poniedziałek, 28 maja 2007

SAVEtheMALES.....cenzura GW....

zupagrzybowa 17.02.04, 20:25 zarchiwizowany

Author Can we think about nothing?


Posts: 3
Jul 08, 2003 - 05:36 PM
Try this:

Close your eyes and imagine that there are three bubbles in front of you. Now
pop the one on the left. Now pop the one on the right. Now pop the one in the
middle. And for that moment when all the bubbles have been popped... what were
you thinking of? A black space? A colour? For that second, are we thinking
about nothing?



Posts: 65
Jul 09, 2003 - 02:55 AM
I think, but I'm not sure that meditation has as an objective to slow the mind
down and ultimately, (among other things) to stop thinking.

I guess it's possible



Posts: 193
Jul 09, 2003 - 10:02 AM
What a curious thread. I have no idea how to approach it.

I wonder if to think about nothing at all is to lose consciousness?



Posts: 193
Jul 09, 2003 - 10:03 AM
I think


Posts: 513
Jul 09, 2003 - 10:22 AM
Hmmm, I think losing consciousness would qualify more as NOT thinking.
Thinking about nothing implies thinking.

I'm getting the same feeling with this concept as the thread where we discussed
if consciousness could exists without memory - where I proposed the idea that
without any history to build on, you can only have the spark, but not the flame
of consciousness. Thinking about nothing, without any implications of what
nothing means, without any comparison to thinking about something, and even
without the realization that you are thinking about nothing, is the ultimate
pursuit of Zen. (satori) and may be almost like the spark of thinking without
actually following through.

People who claim to have achieved that state say the very awareness that you
have achieved it takes you out of it - which makes sense because you are now
thinking about what you are doing, and that is thinking about something. It is
best characterised by cute expressions like:

"I'm there, wasn't I!"



Posts: 23
Jul 11, 2003 - 10:19 PM
Nope unless you want to die. You are always thinking if only subconciously.
Your mind makes your heart beat and makes you breathe.

edited by: okokenough, Jul 11, 2003 - 10:22 PM
Many will read. None will reply.



Posts: 79
Jul 12, 2003 - 03:04 PM
My God! What a hell are you talking about?!?

You are always thinking if only subconsciously.


OK, if sending electrical impulses through nerves is considered thinking, then
yes! But I doubt that is what we understand under this concept!

About topic... we can try to thing about nothing.... Not sure it will ever
happen! For thinking requires doing its job from some (one) object! Therefore
we cannot get anymore further then thinking about something, for example,
One will say, "That was the main point!"... Well, if the topic was "Can we
think about something called nothing?", I would agree, but it seems to be

My experience:
One I tried to think in Russian... I'm not very good at it, so it was a bit
hard, and at one moment I couldn't think anymore... and at that moment I
stopped thinking and was aware of that!

Can you feel my cold breath. Yes? Good...



Posts: 23
Jul 12, 2003 - 08:06 PM



Posts: 23
Jul 13, 2003 - 01:03 AM
I am wrong again I see
Many will read. None will reply.



Posts: 45
Jul 16, 2003 - 08:11 PM
When you pop the three bubbles, you are merely thinking about the space where
a minute before the bubbles had been. What you are thinking of is equivalent to
thinking about a totally black (or any other color, depending on the
previous "locations" of your bubbles) room that has nothing in it that you can

Another small point... A better choice of words might have been prudent...

Of course we can "think about nothing." I think what Sir Paco was asking was
whether we can stop the thinking process altogether. I believe we can slow this
process down to an infinitely small fraction of its original function, but,
because imagination is a definintive human quality, we can't "shut it down"
completely, lest we cease to become human... (the italicized clause of that
statement was simply for emphasis...)
Sartre said, "Hell is other people..." Could this be the reason so many of us
flock to these forums that involve no visual contact whatsoever?



Posts: 1
Aug 02, 2003 - 09:07 PM
Assume for a moment, that the point is to prove that we never think about
nothing, or better phrased perhaps, we never for a moment cease to think. Then
if you never cease to think, you would always have to have a thought in your
mind constantly. Yet our thoughts are always changing, so I wonder, in the time
between thinking about thought x and thought y, have we ceased to think for a
fraction of a second? Before the mind conceives another thought?

Also, what are we thinking about when we are staring off into space, "in the
moon" so to speak?



Posts: 203
Aug 02, 2003 - 10:31 PM
There are two ways to approach this, both interrelated:

Thinking is not required for consciousness, but consciousness is needed for
thought. 'Inner sense' or Introspection, is needed for what some called higher-
order consciousness, or namely the sort of consciousness that only we humans
posses (or so we like to think!) In order to introspect, it would be required
of you to actually think. This entails language use, which is what has led many
to assume language-use is necessary for consciousness. Maybe introspective
consciousness, but certainly not all forms of consciousness.

First, David Armstrong in his paper What Is Consciousness? laid out 3
categories of consciousness, Minimal Conciousness, Perceptual Conciousness, and
Introspcetive Conciousness. Many others have done the same thing. Introspective
consciousness might be called Intentional consciousness, i.e. we as higher-
conscious beings are always thinking about an object, whatever it may be. Our
(internal/introspective) consciousness is always focused on a thing, or
conversely something is always the focus of our consciousness.

Secondly, we can liken Perceptual consciousness to the phenomena one sometime
experiences while driving long distances. Armstrong uses the truck driver
example and it will suffice. When a truck driver is driving a long distance for
many at night on a lonely stretches of road, he may suddenly 'come to' and
realize he has just driven several hundred miles at top speed without being
fully aware!

This phenomena is not rare, and more than likely happens to us all in a variety
of cases. My point being that, he was not at anytime 'thinking' in the sense we
would use the word. One might argue "of course he was, but he cannot remember
it" but that still does not lend any evidence to the premise that he must not
have been conscious (if you feel it does then explain how the truck stayed its
course and his foot applied the same amount of force to the gas pedal the
entire time).

So on some level, he is still conscious. He still perceives, but the previous
conversion of the external to the internal is not going on (and unless you are
a rabid follower of Freud, most will agree), and instead he expe

SAVEtheMALES.& ParaNO-YES & 'GUY-uh'
zupagrzybowa 17.02.04, 20:01 zarchiwizowany

"But I was inspired when I learned about British scientist James Lovelock's
Gaia Hypothesis (pronounced 'GUY-uh'), a bunch of scientific theories about the
earth's biosphere (the plant and animal world) & upper atmosphere and how they
work together to sustain our lives. The term 'Gaia' comes from the Greeks. Gaia
was the name for the goddess of the Earth and it was one of James Lovelock's
friends, Lynn Margolis, who suggested that he give this name to his theories.
But then I learned that people were turning Gaia principles into a freakin'
religion. That upset me at first because I'm not very fond of organized
religions. But then later I thought maybe Gaia principles as part of a belief
system might not be such a bad idea. We need a belief system that cares more
deeply for the earth rather than assuming it has infinite resources. We're
taxing it faster than it can renew itself. Many, like Dr. Ralph Metzner, have
speculated that new emerging mythologies (the underpinnings of how we think)
need to include a healthier appreciation for the earth. The current mythology
seems to be that science can solve all our problems, and that the pollution
created by all these solutions will also be solved by science. Philosopher Sam
Keen calls this our myth of progress, the notion that we can continue
progressing towords increasing states of bliss through technology. As much as I
like science, this just isn't adding up. It seems that we can, however,
progress out of poverty, and that is important. But beyond that the mind and
body do not seem to be designed for increased states of comfort. For example,
note the recent talk about exercise and diet.

The true way to gain much, is never to desire to gain too much. He is not rich
that possesses much, but he that covets no more; and he is not poor that enjoys
little, but he that wants too much.
Francis Beaumont (1584-1616) "

The Oral Defense. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .262
The Internet Connection . . . . . . . . . . . . .265
The Global Network Academy. . . . . . . . . . . .270
The Architectural Plan of UU-GNA. . . . . . . . .275
The Suppressive Regime of UU-GNA. . . . . . . . .277
An Alternative: Neutopian Transversity . . . . .279
Student-Teacher Relationship. . . . . . . . . . .281
The Mission of Neutopian Transversity . . . . . .282
The Neutopian Administration. . . . . . . . . . .286
Architectural Plan of the Neutopian Transversity.287
The Neutopian Rituals . . . . . . . . . . . . . .290
"My own approach has been to try and seize various "net kooks" and
their ideologies for myself, to take certain terms, push their
ideology to absurdity and also try to mix in some serious thought
in the mess. The "neu neu topian" movement has been flaring
sparodically in alt.cyberspace for a couple months now and though
it is in a low point (we are trying to integrate after success),
fragments of interest to this group to remain. Check Paul Wolf,
Glass, Paul Murphy, James McGowan, Earl Dombrowski and myself
for relevant articles (though not all are relevant). Also look
for threads containing "neu" and "buttons". Mythical organizations
such as the "knight templar" and "Illuminati" along with various
theories are all attempts to create pseudo idea systems which
battle across the net.

In regards to conventional "neutonians", you must divide into several
subsets. The only "classical Neutopian" appears to be Libby Hubbard
herself. If taken as a satirist (which I strongly suspect), she is
at points brilliant and she does have a capacity to press certain
"buttons". There are a number of unassociated people with an obsession
about Libby who have been given a purpose in life by her ramblinga
and finally there are the "monster truck neutopians." The quality of
these people vary, though some are educated. A few weeks back, I
attempted to engage them in a pseudo religious war with little response
and finally silence. I'm afraid alt.society.neutopia has been disrupted
by the event and a new force known as "Mother Foundress" has moved in
to fill the vacuum. We are still evaluating the results of this
experiment and the process is in a lull.

Those in this alt.memetics who are interested in acting out actual
events of idea conflict might create pseudo neutopian ideologies
or anti neutopian ideologies and move them to alt.society.neutopia.
We can then act out aspects of Minskys "society of minds". The
cross posting of such threads is quite welcome in alt.cyberspace
because a number of our readers don't get alt.society.neutopia.
The goal is satire and absurdity with a serious edge.

- Doctress Chen -"


Re: SAVEtheMALES.ca & ParaNO-YES
patience 17.02.04, 09:27 zarchiwizowany

Ronson: "Because at Ruby Ridge, you know, the federal government acted just
like the extremists expected them to. Ruby Ridge is where all conspiracy
theories come true. ... But what I have put in is stuff about the weird
symbiotic relationship between us and them. "

Very smart guy:) But in some ways this last sentence could be false. "This
stuff" is not about "us and them." It is about 'the werid relationship':)
between linear and non-linear thinking of humans (causal reasoning vs.
probability calculus). Ruby Ridge represents a jumping point from linear
concluding (cause and the reason) to un-ordered probability of events:)

Mmmm. Linear prediction is a operation where future value is estimated as a
linear function of previous samples. Now, take 'imaginary numbers.' In
mathematics, an 'imaginary number' is a number whose square is negative. A
complex number is the sum of a real number and an imaginary number. A complex
number is that what people 'have on mind'. 'Imaginary numbers' - you may
describe tham as 'potentialities' - they do not exist, in fact, but have a
power to influence and interfere. And this is the most werid - that humans have
the ability to get there:)))))))))

Sample Ruby Ridge in math:
If you gather 23 persons in the room, the correct answer to the question
concerning probability of 2 of them having the same date of birth is - higher
than 0,5.:-)

"Liczby urojone są cudownym wzlotem Ducha Bożego; są one pomostem łączącym byt
z niebytem." (nie pamiętam autora)


Re: SAVEtheMALES.ca & ParaNO-YES
patience 17.02.04, 07:39 zarchiwizowany

Werid Nazi Green Utopia Builders


This Is Just to Say
by William Carlos Williams

I have eaten
the plums
that were in
the icebox

and which
you were probably
for breakfast

Forgive me
they were delicious
so sweet
and so cold

Thank you:)))


Re: SAVEtheMALES.ca & ParaNO-YES IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: py;> 17.02.04, 01:15 zarchiwizowany


See this image around you day and night, feel it flow, feel the power and know
that you are One. Around your dwelling, around your body, around your office,
etc. see a field of swirling energy. Breath deeply and it grows stronger,
brighter as it circles around you. Maybe you picture a wall of holy fire, maybe
pure energy of a certain color, let your feelings guide you. See it grow and
rise rapidly, forming a column of energy that reaches high into the sky.

You are a Universal Being, One with the Total Mind and Total Energy of the
Universe, your power in this Oneness is truly unlimited! You and your column of
powerful energy are now intimately connected to the ionosphere; energy flows
back and forth between the earth's energy field and you, just like a free
energy device. You have plugged in to global consciousness and the planetary

Now, at the top of your column, the energy spreads out in all directions,
racing through the ionosphere around the globe. See, imagine, feel your energy
encompassing the globe until it is joined on the other side.

Your field of conscious free energy surrounding the world, pulsing with life,
now begins to rain energy droplets around the entire planet. You are now
influencing everything in the earth's system with your energy shower.

The rain of your free energy grows stronger as it brings all life, including
the planet itself, to a higher vibration of freedom, collective freedom, which
benefits all life.

Your energy rain penetrates all life forms and matter. You are helping,
changing, healing, loving, and freeing everything and everyone. Picture
different areas around the world that you feel drawn to focus on, knowing at
the same time you are also assisting the rest of the planet.

Your universal free energy dissolves energy patterns that limit our freedom.
Your mighty free energy is helping to free us from fear, hatred, violence,
oppression, pollution, and mental, spiritual, and physical limitations. Know
that you are magnificent, feel good because you are truly helping.

Now imagine looking across the globe and seeing thousands of columns of human
free energy rising into the sky from people just like you. These energy columns
naturally form as people meditate, pray, and visualize world peace and freedom.
Thousands, even millions of people are healing this planet and together our
energy is so POWERFUL that we can celebrate in the evolution, knowing we are
truly guided.

Let's complete the circuit. Below the surface of the earth, a mighty free
energy field pulsates in harmony with the ionosphere. This inner earth
energy grid is below land surfaces and beneath bodies of water. Visualize this
powerful grounding energy growing stronger, larger and seeping it's way to all
surfaces. Even in the depths of the oceans this energy rises to heal the
amazing life forms dwelling there. Maybe you picture "energy grass" or "energy
vines" growing, maybe you see energy droplets raining upward. However you see
it, imagine the energy penetrating all life forms and matter from below.

As this energy flows into people, it grounds them, drawing all negative energy
away from them. This steady, persistent grounding energy cleanses people,
animals, plants, matter, technology, etc. Any negative energy, any fear, any
hatred is drawn into the earth's fiery depths where it can be transmuted into
neutral energy. As the grounding energy penetrates everything, it rises and
unites with the energy rain from above.

A sacred union occurs; the energies intermingle and coalesce to form a
circulating energy path. As the ionosphere energy rains down, it cleanses
everything in it’s path, and as the energy stream reaches the inner earth
energy grid, all the negative energy is released into the interior earth for
transmutation. The energy then rises again, pure in it’s state, back to the
ionosphere where it mends and strengthens the planet’s energy field. The cycle
repeats over and over, and our thoughts can amplify the intensity. The system
is balancing, negative energy is being transmuted into positive free energy and
the overall vibration of the planet is steadily increasing. The energy rims
above and below are now balancing each other in perfect harmony. The flow
increases and the planet grows brighter and more vibrant. With the system
naturally flowing in this balance you may simply sit back and enjoy the
perfection of the system. See the mightiness of the earth, the perfection of
the flow. Observe the earth from outer space and see the magnificence of the
Creator Force at work.

Remember this, all the geophysical events that take place on the planet are the
result of the earth and the larger system seeking balance and expanding

With your every breath, the energy grids magnify freedom and unconditional
acceptance in every mind. When people think a thought of freedom or oneness or
love on this planet, it is greatly magnified by our mighty energy grids. Feel
the freedom! Feel the power! Feel the love! Feeling the HEALING!

Thank you for helping, you are blessed!"


zaczyna sie era wodnika ....

patience 16.02.04, 05:28 zarchiwizowany


We are not taught history for a good reason. Feminism today is Communism.
Communism was never a Russian-based revolt of the working class. It was always
an elite mechanism to control the common man and establish world dictatorship.
Leon Trotsky played chess with Baron Rothschild at Cafe Central in Vienna
before going on to lead the Bolshevik Revolution. (Joseph Nedava, Trotsky and
the Jews, 1972, p.36) Like Trotsky, most politicians are elite agents.

The Tavistock Institute in London directs the elite's psychological warfare and
social engineering. They cooked up second-wave feminism to destabilize society.

According to Byron Weeks MD:

"All Tavistock and American foundation techniques have a single goal, to break
down the psychological strength of the individual and render him helpless to
oppose the dictators of the World Order. Any technique which helps to break
down the family unit, and the family inculcated principles of religion, honour,
patriotism and sexual behaviour, is used by the Tavistock as weapons of crowd


I don't enjoy being the bearer of bad tidings, but things have gone terribly
wrong. Satanic forces have hijacked this planet. Of course, they are not going
to tell you about it.

The super-rich have more in common with each other than with you and me. We
are "squatters" on their planet. United in secret societies, they have
infiltrated and subverted our political, economic, cultural and religious

They are waging a secret war on humanity and are responsible for the political
and economic upheavals of the past 200 years including the slaughter of

The ultimate goal is to organize a weakened and reduced world population in an
Orwellian police state. The attack on the World Trade Centre, the "War on
Terror" and "Patriot Act" is really about this.

So is feminism. The correct male reaction to feminist social subversion is to
uphold rather than eschew the traditional vision of masculinity, marriage and


RUROCIAG NIENAWISCI ... IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: copy;id 16.02.04, 00:50 zarchiwizowany

Gość: ©> 16.02.04, 00:31 zarchiwizowany

PARA NO I A = A i ON ARAB ! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: ;}: 16.02.04, 00:07 zarchiwizowany


zupagrzybowa 15.02.04, 23:08 zarchiwizowany


Plato: For the greater good.

Karl Marx: It was a historical inevitability.

Machiavelli: So that its subjects will view it with admiration,
as a chicken which has the daring and courage to
boldly cross the road, but also with fear, for whom
among them has the strength to contend with such a
paragon of avian virtue? In such a manner is the
princely chicken's dominion maintained.

Hippocrates: Because of an excess of light pink gooey stuff in its

Jacques Derrida: Any number of contending discourses may be discovered
within the act of the chicken crossing the road, and
each interpretation is equally valid as the authorial
intent can never be discerned, because structuralism

Thomas de Torquemada: Give me ten minutes with the chicken and I'll find out.

Timothy Leary: Because that's the only kind of trip the Establishment
would let it take.

Douglas Adams: Forty-two.

Nietzsche: Because if you gaze too long across the Road, the Road
gazes also across you.

Oliver North: National Security was at stake.

B.F. Skinner: Because the external influences which had pervaded its
sensorium from birth had caused it to develop in such a
fashion that it would tend to cross roads, even while
believing these actions to be of its own free will.

Carl Jung: The confluence of events in the cultural gestalt
necessitated that individual chickens cross roads at
this historical juncture, and therefore
synchronicitously brought such occurrences into being.

Jean-Paul Sartre: In order to act in good faith and be true to itself,
the chicken found it necessary to cross the road.

Ludwig Wittgenstein: The possibility of "crossing" was encoded into the
objects "chicken" and "road", and circumstances came
into being which caused the actualization of this
potential occurrence.

Albert Einstein: Whether the chicken crossed the road or the road crossed
the chicken depends upon your frame of reference.

Aristotle: To actualize its potential.

Buddha: If you ask this question, you deny your own chicken-

Howard Cosell: It may very well have been one of the most astonishing
events to grace the annals of history. An historic,
unprecedented avian biped with the temerity to attempt
such an herculean achievement formerly relegated to
homo sapien pedestrians is truly a remarkable occurence.

Salvador Dali: The Fish.

Darwin: It was the logical next step after coming down from
the trees.

Emily Dickinson: Because it could not stop for death.

Epicurus: For fun.

Ralph Waldo Emerson: It didn't cross the road; it transcended it.

Johann von Goethe: The eternal hen-principle made it do it.

Ernest Hemingway: To die. In the rain.

Werner Heisenberg: We are not sure which side of the road the chicken
was on, but it was moving very fast.

David Hume: Out of custom and habit.

Jack Nicholson: 'Cause it (censored) wanted to. That's the (censored)

Pyrrho the Skeptic: What road?

Ronald Reagan: I forget.

John Sununu: The Air Force was only too happy to provide the
transportation, so quite understandably the chicken
availed himself of the opportunity.

The Sphinx: You tell me.

Mr. T: If you saw me coming you'd cross the road too!

Henry David Thoreau: To live deliberately ... and suck all the marrow
out of life.

Mark Twain: The news of its crossing has been greatly exaggerated.

Molly Yard: It was a hen!

Zeno of Elea: To prove it could never reach the other side.

Chaucer: So priketh hem nature in hir corages.

Wordsworth: To wander lonely as a cloud.

The Godfather: I didn't want its mother to see it like that.

Keats: Philosophy will clip a chicken's wings.

Blake: To see heaven in a wild fowl.

Othello: Jealousy.

Dr Johnson: Sir, had you known the Chicken for as long as I have,
you would not so readily enquire, but feel rather the
Need to resist such a public Display of your own
lamentable and incorrigible Ignorance.

Mrs Thatcher: This chicken's not for turning.

Supreme Soviet: There has never been a chicken in this photograph.

Oscar Wilde: Why, indeed? One's social engagements whilst in
town ought never expose one to such barbarous
inconvenience - although, perhaps, if one must cross a
road, one may do far worse than to cross it as the
chicken in question.

Kafka: Hardly the most urgent enquiry to make of a low-grade
insurance clerk who woke up that morning as a hen.

Swift: It is, of course, inevitable that such a loathsome,
filth-ridden and degraded creature as Man should assume
to question the actions of one in all respects his

Macbeth: To have turned back were as tedious as to go o'er.

Whitehead: Clearly, having fallen victim to the fallacy of
misplaced concreteness.

Freud: An die andere Seite zu kommen. (Much laughter)

Hamlet: That is not the question.

Donne: It crosseth for thee.

Pope: It was mimicking my Lord Hervey.

Constable: To get a better view.


Re: Mojżesz Winnetou? ...
patience 15.02.04, 23:02 zarchiwizowany

First. The Library exists ab aeterno. This truth, whose immediate corollary is
the future eternity of the world, cannot be placed in doubt by any reasonable
mind. Man, the imperfect librarian, may be the product of chance or of
malevolent demurgi; the universe, with its elegant endowment of shelves, of
enigmatical volumes, of inexhaustible stairways for the traveller and latrines
for the seated librarian, can only be the work of god. To perceive the distance
between the divine and the human, it is enough to compare these crude wavering
symbols with my fallible hand scrawls on the cover of a book with the organic
symbols inside: punctual, delicate, perfectly black, inimitably symmetrical.

Second. The orthographical symbols are twenty fiwe in numbers. This finding
made it possible, three hundred years ago, to formulate a general theory of the
Library and solve satisfactorily the problem which no conjecture had
deciphereed: the formless and chaotic nature of almost all the books.

Jorge Luis Borges: Labirynths.


Man working and fabricating and building a world inhabited only by himself
would still be a fabricator, though not homo faber: he would have lost his
specifically human quality and, rather, be a god - not, to be sure, the
Creator, but a divine - demiurge as Plato described him in one of his myths.
Action alone is the exclusive prerogative of man; neither a beast nor a god is
capable of it and only action is entirely dependent upon the constant presence
of others.

This special relationship between action and being together seems fully to
justify the early translation of Aristotle's zoon politikon by animal socialis,
already found in Seneca. which then became the standard translation through
Thomas Aquinas: homo est naturaliter politicus, id est,, socialis (man is by
nature political, that is, social).

H. Arendt, The Public and the Private Realm, in: The Portable Hannah Arendt


masz całusa, Indianinie:)


tylko jeden ja! IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: wadzki 15.02.04, 22:25 zarchiwizowany

ha ha ha IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: wadzki 15.02.04, 22:25 zarchiwizowany

hi hi hi IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: wadzki 15.02.04, 22:24 zarchiwizowany

tylko jeden ja IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: wadzki 15.02.04, 22:24 zarchiwizowany

umyslowo niewydolnej zreszta IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: wadzki 15.02.04, 22:23 zarchiwizowany

nikt z calej diaspory IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: wadzki 15.02.04, 22:22 zarchiwizowany

nikt takiego nie ma IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: wadzki 15.02.04, 22:22 zarchiwizowany

a ja mam wysoko sklepione czolko IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: wadzki 15.02.04, 22:21 zarchiwizowany

Re: Mojżesz Winnetou? ...
zupagrzybowa 15.02.04, 22:10 zarchiwizowany

Seen on a restroom wall: "God is dead: Nietzsche. Nietzsche is
dead: God."

* * * * * * *
Overheard in 18th century England: "Did you hear that George
Berkeley died? His girlfriend stopped seeing him."

* * * * * * *

The First Law of Philosophy: For every philosopher, there exists an equal and
opposite philosopher.

The Second Law of Philosophy: They're both wrong.


Re: Mojżesz Winnetou? ...
patience 15.02.04, 20:21 zarchiwizowany

Zupo grzybowa. Czekam i czekam żeby sie dowiedzieć nie na temat, czy oprócz
Tory masz też tomahawk?

Mojżesz Winnetou? ...
patience 15.02.04, 01:59 zarchiwizowany

..... nie na temat IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: * 15.02.04, 01:09 zarchiwizowany

i www.o2.pl

[...] IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: ISRAEL 13.02.04, 05:39 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

drf 13.02.04, 00:27 zarchiwizowany

We are a non-profit orginization in the making. Our purpose is to rescue,
rehab, and adopt out reptiles to suitable homes.
Due to missinformation and ineducation many reptiles are abused or neglected.
We intend to rescue as many of these as possible.
We are not accepting monetary donations at this time, but any contributions of
cages, UVB lights, heat lamps, heat pads, and the like would be gratefully
Stay tuned to this page for rescue updates in the following months...


__________________________________________________ IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: ======== 11.02.04, 00:39 zarchiwizowany



Selection of inmates at Auschwitz. Mengele is in foreground at far right with
cigarette in hand

The freight train rumbled to an agonizing stop on the rails inside of the
Auschwitz compound. The human cargo that was packed tightly into its bevy of
cattle cars continued to groan and clamor, suffering as they were from a four-
day journey without food, water, bathroom facilities, or even fresh air. The
Jewish prisoners were the latest victims of the Nazi campaign to liquidate the
Jewish population of Hungary, the last Jewish community to remain intact during
the war. Their final destination was the violent, Dantesque nightmare of
Auschwitz, the premier Nazi death factory in southwestern Poland, the most
efficient cog in the wheel of the Nazi’s Endlosung, Final Solution, to the so-
called Jewish question.

The doors of each cattle car were violently thrown open by Nazi SS soldiers
carrying machine guns. "Raus, raus!" ("Out, out!") they screamed at the
frightened and bewildered Jews, who hurried out the doors under a rain of
cudgel blows and past the snapping, barking jaws of the camp’s German
Shepherds. The air was thick with the deafening and confusing sound of orders
being screamed, dogs barking, and the stench of burning flesh and hair that
spewed from the smokestacks of the camp’s 5 crematoria 24 hours a day. Families
were separated immediately, with the males forming one line and the females
forming another. Most victims were unaware that this was the last time that
they would see their loved ones alive, unaware of their lost opportunity to say
last good-byes.

Josef Mengele at Auschwitz in 1943
The SS troops marched the doomed prisoners to the head of the ramp onto which
they had exited. They were led before an SS officer who, in the midst of all
the madness, agony and death, seemed very out of place. His handsome face was
set with a kind smile, his uniform impeccably tailored, cleaned and pressed. He
was cheerfully whistling an opera tune, one of his favorites by Wagner. His
eyes betrayed nothing but a cursory interest in the drama that was unfolding
before him, the drama of which he alone was the chief architect. He carried a
riding crop, but rather than using it to strike the prisoners as they passed
before him, he merely used it to indicate which direction he selected them to
go in, links oder rechts, left or right. Unbeknownst to the prisoners, this
charming and handsome officer with the innocuous demeanor was engaging in his
favorite activity at Auschwitz, selecting which new arrivals were fit to work
and which ones should be sent immediately to the gas chambers and crematorium.
Those sent to the left, roughly 10 to 30 percent of all new arrivals, had their
lives spared, at least for the moment. Those sent to the right, usually 70 to
90 percent of all new arrivals, had been condemned to die without even a
passing glance from their judge and jury at Auschwitz. The handsome officer who
held omnipotent sway over the fate of all the camp’s prisoners was Dr. Josef
Mengele, the Angel of Death.

DR.MENGELE: SERIAL KILLERS and GERMANS ! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: [...] 11.02.04, 00:34 zarchiwizowany

Gość: 00;       11.02.04, 00:29 zarchiwizowany

Gość: ':':':' 11.02.04, 00:16 zarchiwizowany

Now that the first public accusation of anti-Muslim bigotry has been leveled
at "Allah," I'm going to let the mask drop for a moment and respond to the e-
mail that was sent to Charles Johnson this morning.

In the first place, neither Charles nor anyone else on my blogroll has anything
to do with this site. Please don't bother them because you're angry at me. Go
here instead and start your own blog where you can rave to your heart's
content. Better yet, start a blog that goofs on the Christian god. Lord knows,
there's no shortage of material. If it's funny, "Allah" will even link to it.

That said, I want to make clear that I have nothing against Muslims--or the
adherents of any other faith, for that matter--who practice their religion
peacefully. This site is intended as a parody of the radical Islamist mindset
with which Americans have become only too familiar in the past two years. I
tried alluding in my last post to the distinction between radical and moderate
Islam by having "Allah" remark that most of his disciples pray only for
innocuous, beneficent things like food and good health. To those moderate
Muslims who read this site, then, I'd ask you to bear in mind that there's no
malice directed here at you or your beliefs, and I apologize if any offense is
given. To any radical Muslims who should read this site, I'd ask you to bear in
mind that I hope you die soon, and painfully.

The simple truth is that a million blogs like this one, updated constantly for
a million years, wouldn't do one-one millionth as much damage to Islam's
reputation as this did. So if you're really serious about confronting Islam's
enemies, my advice is not to worry so much about "Allah." Worry about this guy

And no, I don't mean Bert.

A LLAH B LLAH C LLAH IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: o 11.02.04, 00:12 zarchiwizowany

you can buy (or sell) ANYTHING on eBay. !!! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: py;©P 11.02.04, 00:04 zarchiwizowany

Relic of Relics
For centuries, many churches have had actual portions of the cross which Christ
was crucified upon. It would be interesting to try and assemble them back
together. It seems you might be able to construct many crosses from all the
pieces. If you have some spare cash, you can even get your own piece of history
on eBay here and here.
Other key relics include parts of the saints. As in actual parts. Actual body
parts. So much for honoring the dead. Many of these poor chaps bones are
scattered in churches all across Europe. They traveled more in death than in
life. And some shocking truth has been revealed which seems to have been
ommitted from the history books - some of these men had three hands while
others had two heads! I'm not entirely sure how such vivid physical
characteristics were missed, but we do have the physical evidence to prove it.
(And if you might need human relics for some reason, eBay once again proves its
worth here.)

However, all of these antiquities pale when compared to a certain item
currently in the posession of the Chicago Historical Society:

Hiding on a shelf deep in the archives of the Chicago Historical Society among
some 20 million other antiquities and documents of historical significance is
the oddest of treasures.
"Skin of Serpent."

That's what the plain white label on the outside of the plain gray box says. It
doesn't begin to tell the story.

Inside Archive Box #1920.1714 is a piece of the hide of the snake that tempted
Eve in the Garden of Eden.

I'm not making this up.

This, folks, is a true story.

At least, that's what the yellowing French label that's stuck to the front of
the framed glass behind which rests an 8-by-4-inch piece of something red and
scaly inside the gray archival box claims.

Specifically, the label says, "Peau du serpent qui a seduit la premiere femme"--
which, if you're Francais isn't as superb as mine, means "Skin of the serpent
who seduced the first woman."

The label goes on to say, in French, "It was killed by Adam the day after its
treachery. Adam used a stake, the traces of which can be seen. This skin was
part of the legacy of Adam, and it was preserved by his family in Asia."

It's signed with the assurance, "Seals of guarantee of doctors and

This is truly amazing for two reasons. First, we have a real piece of history -
snakeskin over 6 millenium old. Second, we now know that the French language
actually came before all other human tongues ever spoken. These important
issues aside, the real question is what did the original serpent, the very one
who tempted Eve, look like:
What lies behind the gilt-framed glass, affixed to what appears to be a
document written on velum or some other kind of hide in some sort of Asian
characters, is rusty-red, scaly, old and leathery.
It looks like someone killed a pair of Bishop Don "Magic" Juan's cowboy boots,
tore off a piece and stuck it to an ancient takeout menu with a couple of big,
wax seals.

Or like a tiny piece of dragon skin, or a fabric sample from the costume
designer for Marilyn Manson, or a red armadillo pelt, if there were such a

What it doesn't look like is a piece of, arguably, millions- or at least
thousands-of-years-old snake skin.

Apparently that's because it's not.

What? It isn't real? How do they know for sure?
"It a fraud," Olivia Mahoney, chief curator at the historical society, was
telling me the other day.

"It's probably leather. People have speculated it might be alligator. But it's
highly doubtful that that is a serpent's skin," Mahoney said.

Not that the society's curators know for sure. See, they've never tested it to
see what it is, or how old it might be.

"We don't want to take it apart to analyze it because you could risk damaging
this piece," she said. "We've never had anyone in to really do hard research on
this because we know it's a fake."

It seems to me that the moral of this story is when creating a relic, be sure
it is not possible to get to the 'old' parts without destroying the whole
thing. That way, no one will ever attempt to prove its authenticity.
Ok, that was pretty weak. The real moral is that you can buy (or sell) ANYTHING
on eBay.


ALLAH Is In THE House IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: "|||" 11.02.04, 00:00 zarchiwizowany

Exposing Imperialist Lackeys IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: tOw.Oda 10.02.04, 23:45 zarchiwizowany

Exposing Imperialist Lackeys, Capitalist Reactionaries, and Zionist Running


Hamas Leader Yassin 'Marked for Death' IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: py;> 10.02.04, 23:07 zarchiwizowany

Israel Says Hamas Leader Yassin 'Marked for Death'

Jan 16, 8:07 AM (ET)

By Jeffrey Heller and Nidal al-Mughrabi
JERUSALEM/GAZA (Reuters) - Israel has "marked for death" Hamas spiritual leader
Ahmed Yassin, following a suicide bombing that killed four Israeli security
personnel in Gaza, Israel's deputy defense chief said on Friday.

The wheelchair-bound Muslim cleric attended Friday prayers as usual at a mosque
near his Gaza City home and told reporters he would embrace "martyrdom." A
Palestinian cabinet minister said Israel was playing with fire by making the

Hamas, an Islamic group dedicated to Israel's destruction, claimed
responsibility for Wednesday's bombing by a Palestinian mother of two at a
border industrial zone. It killed three soldiers and a security officer,
further undermining chances of reviving a U.S.-backed peace plan.

"He is marked for death and he had better dig deep underground, where he won't
be able to tell the difference between day and night," Deputy Defense Minister
Zeev Boim said of Yassin.

"We will find him in his tunnels and liquidate him," he told Army Radio.

Palestinian cabinet minister Saeb Erekat told Reuters: "Escalating the Israeli
policy of assassinations will... lead to more escalation and a widening of the
cycle of violence, bloodshed and chaos."

Yassin survived with only a slight hand injury an Israeli assassination attempt
in September, when a warplane bombed a Gaza building just as he and other Hamas
leaders were leaving.

On Thursday, Prime Minister Ariel Sharon's deputy, Ehud Olmert, threatened
renewed military strikes on Palestinian militants "planning or setting in
motion acts of murder."

Along with a steep drop in suicide bombings in Israel, the army has scaled back
its attacks on Hamas leaders after a series of largely failed attempts to kill
them in the summer.

Israeli officials say army raids and a controversial barrier in the West Bank
are responsible for the relative lull in attacks inside Israel. But there has
been much speculation about a de facto cease-fire with Hamas, which both sides


"I repeat that there is no room to speak about a truce," Yassin, surrounded by
bodyguards, said outside the Gaza mosque. "Resistance must continue, until the
removal of the occupation."

Asked if he feared for his life, he replied: "They have tried to kill Sheikh
Ahmed Yassin before... I would like to say to them: We do not fear death
threats. We are seekers of martyrdom."

He said Israel knew he had "nothing to do with military activity" carried out
by Hamas's armed wing.

In Wednesday's bombing, Reem al-Reyashi, 22, detonated her explosives belt
during a security check inside the Erez crossing terminal on the Gaza-Israel
border. Reyashi, from a prominent merchant family, left behind a three-year-old
son and a daughter aged one.

It was the first time Hamas, behind dozens of suicide attacks in Israel, has
used a woman bomber. The group said it did so because of toughened Israeli
security obstacles facing its male bombers.

"She started asking (to carry out a bombing) before she was married and then
pursued her request after she gave birth to her first and second babies," a
Hamas source said.

Reyashi's brother said her family had been unaware of her intentions. "We were
shocked," Ayman al-Reyashi said, calling the bombing "an act of honor."


Protesters Call for Death to Israel, America IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: ©> 10.02.04, 22:59 zarchiwizowany

Israel: Hamas Leader 'Marked for Death' IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: drFox 10.02.04, 22:55 zarchiwizowany

HAMAS Leader Marked For DEATH, Israel Says IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: AbuMucha 10.02.04, 22:51 zarchiwizowany

@@@@@@@PEACE TO BRUNEI !@@@@@@@@@@@@@@ IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: ar 10.02.04, 22:39 zarchiwizowany

[...] IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: ISRAEL 10.02.04, 15:33 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

Załaduj widłami rozum do glowy.
patience 10.02.04, 09:32 zarchiwizowany

Różnica między tobą a autorem tego wątku jest taka, że on sie nigdy nie
powtarza, a ty zawsze się powtarzasz. Powtarzalność wskazuje na IQ nogi
stołowej oraz nerwicę natręctw. Na takie też dziewczyny możesz liczyć, inne sie
znudzą po 5 minutach, męska niedoróbko:)

zupagrzybowa 10.02.04, 02:55 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

zupagrzybowa 10.02.04, 02:44 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

zupagrzybowa 10.02.04, 02:37 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

zupagrzybowa 10.02.04, 00:33 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

zupagrzybowa 09.02.04, 22:51 zarchiwizowany

Alpha release notes:
This alpha release is stable code; its status as 'alpha' is because the library
interface (Paranoia III) is soon to be replaced (by Paranoia IV) and as such,
will not be supported after Paranoia IV's release.

UZI IDDISH IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: UsIDDISH 09.02.04, 21:49 zarchiwizowany


JOYofIDDIsh______________________________________! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: MenTsH 09.02.04, 21:43 zarchiwizowany

A bisl mehr vegen mine erfahrungen mit iddish. Min bobe-zayde zinen geven di
"principals" fun di iddische veltliche schulen in Rige, dos heist di grundshul
und der gymnasium. Beide min eltern zeinen geven talmidin in jene schulen. In
di dreisike yoren di fashisten (der haupt iz geven Ullmanis) hoben farmahkt di
shulen; mine eltern zeinen geven tatik in die Bund und in die bewegung gegen
die fashisten und zeinen entlufen kayn Prague. Far zay iddish iz zayer
vichtik, avadeh.

Vie ikh hob shayn gezogt mit a voch zurik, mine iddish iz nit flisik; ober
mir hoben do in Yale a leyn kreiz, und mine sprach vert a bisl besser. Ikh hob
eych a gelegenheit zu reden mit mine eltern kemat yeden tog (telefonish), ober
zay zeinen zu tolerant zu meine felern.

Es geht on zogn, az min meshprokeh ret a litvische iddish. Die andere
mitglider in unzer leyn kreiz reden a prachtige iddish (fiel besser vi ikh!),
ober far zay unzer dialekt iz a bisl komish. Fun destwegen, zog ikh zayer oft,
ven zay lakhn, "In Rige flekt mir zogen ..." (Emes gezogt, ikh bin born in
Amerike und hob keyn mol nit gezen Rige).

Nu, genug.

Zit mir gezunt!

UZA GOD YDYZ !!! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: YDYZ 09.02.04, 20:25 zarchiwizowany


Stripéd yellow and electric blue
Mouth stupidly pursed
Fins undulating nonchalant
Silent as life or death.

Fish are ridiculous but sane.
Fish are easily tempted but rarely give in.
Eating fish is sacrilege. Kissing fish is good.
Fish are better than you unless you are one.

Elegant purveyours of common wisdom
Often denying their true identity
Unlikely to affect your life significantly
They swim on, on.


Translator's comments:

Like the neighboring Muladz and Endzy tribes, and despite their current
reputation as fierce landholders, the earliest Iddish were a coastal people;
there is no reason to doubt that this poem, and the importance (if not
centrality) of fish in the Iddish mythos, dates back to ancient times. Unlike
Neptune of Western folklore, sea creatures to the Iddish are hardly
anthropomorphized or granted undue intelligence; they are instead seen as not
too bright, stubborn, but possessed of a certain mystery that the Iddish find
inexplicably alluring. Indeed, who among us has not stared for long hours into
a fishtank and wondered: if a fish does not think, what does it not think about?

There is some controversy among the current generation of Iddish scholars about
the best way to translate the third line of the second stanza, rendered above
as "Eating fish is sacrilege. Kissing fish is good." This may sound strange to
Western ears, and indeed, the original, "Ergroszo sobleytzso iydatn, diglaszo
sobleytzsi erdatn", while undeniably mellifluous, sounds grammatically (and
conceptually) strange to the modern Iddish ear, especially in the context of
the rest of the poem--why should eating them be sacrilegious? We may perhaps
assume that the line was originally constructed by some clever Old Iddish poet
(a primitive William Shakespeare?) more intent on creating an amusing-sounding
line than on communicating any deep meaning. Or perhaps the poem was altered in
the Early Middle Iddish period through the sometimes farcical retellings of
boisterous travelling storytellers as they tried to liven up those dark times.
Nevertheless, by the Middle Middle Iddish period, this line was already being
taken very seriously by conservative Iddish hardliners; eating fish was
punishable by death during the reign of Szylny II.


[...] IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: IZM 09.02.04, 20:08 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

[...] IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: wadzki 09.02.04, 18:00 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

[...] IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: JiDEO 09.02.04, 16:55 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

IMMnieJTYMLEpsZaJaKosc}F-LO-ZOO-FIA IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: miniMizm 09.02.04, 16:41 zarchiwizowany


RED _RUM_DNA_LAETS SWEJG _NIK CU F___ IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: 09.02.04, 14:33 zarchiwizowany


patience 09.02.04, 06:16 zarchiwizowany

patience 09.02.04, 03:05 zarchiwizowany

"In my utopia, human solidarity would be seen not as a fact to be recognized by
clearing away "prejudice" or burrowing down to previously hidden depths but,
rather, as a goal to be achieved. Is it to be achieved not by inquiry but by
imagination, the imaginative ability to see strange people as fellow sufferers.
Solidarity is not discovered by reflection but created. It is created by
increasing our sensitivity to the particular details of the pain and
humiliation of other, unfamiliar sorts of people" --Richard
Rorty, "Contingency, Irony and Solidarity"

Richard Rorty


[...] IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: snajper8 09.02.04, 02:58 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

[...] IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: Wisla 09.02.04, 02:47 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

Die Berliner Mauer werde "notfalls noch hundert Jahre stehen" verkündete Erich
Honecker im Januar 1989 selbstbewußt, doch nur wenige Monate später wurde ihr
Fall zum Symbol der gewaltlosen Wiedervereinigung Deutschlands.



"In its proper meaning," Lenin says, "dialectics is the study of the
contradiction within the very essence of things." (Lenin, Philosophical
Notebooks, p. 265.)

And further:

"Development is the 'struggle' of opposites." (Lenin, Vol. XIII, p. 301.)

Such, in brief, are the principal features of the Marxist dialectical method.

It is easy to understand how immensely important is the extension of the
principles of the dialectical method to the study of social life and the
history of society, and how immensely important is the application of these
principles to the history of society and to the practical activities of the
party of the proletariat.

If there are no isolated phenomena in the world, if all phenomena are
interconnected and interdependent, then it is clear that every social system
and every social movement in history must be evaluated not from the standpoint
of "eternal justice" or some other preconceived idea, as is not infrequently
done by historians, but from the standpoint of the conditions which gave rise
to that system or that social movement and with which they are connected.

The slave system would be senseless, stupid and unnatural under modern
conditions. But under the conditions of a disintegrating primitive communal
system, the slave system is a quite understandable and natural phenomenon,
since it represents an advance on the primitive communal system

The demand for a bourgeois-democratic republic when tsardom and bourgeois
society existed, as, let us say, in Russia in 1905, was a quite understandable,
proper and revolutionary demand; for at that time a bourgeois republic would
have meant a step forward. But now, under the conditions of the U.S.S.R., the
demand for a bourgeois-democratic republic would be a senseless and
counterrevolutionary demand; for a bourgeois republic would be a retrograde
step compared with the Soviet republic.

Everything depends on the conditions, time and place.

It is clear that without such a historical approach to social phenomena, the
existence and development of the science of history is impossible; for only
such an approach saves the science of history from becoming a jumble of
accidents and an agglomeration of most absurd mistakes.

Further, if the world is in a state of constant movement and development, if
the dying away of the old and the upgrowth of the new is a law of development,
then it is clear that there can be no "immutable" social systems, no "eternal
principles" of private property and exploitation, no "eternal ideas" of the
subjugation of the peasant to the landlord, of the worker to the capitalist.

Hence, the capitalist system can be replaced by the socialist system, just as
at one time the feudal system was replaced by the capitalist system.

Hence, we must not base our orientation on the strata of society which are no
longer developing, even though they at present constitute the predominant
force, but on those strata which are developing and have a future before them,
even though they at present do not constitute the predominant force.

In the eighties of the past century, in the period of the struggle between the
Marxists and the Narodniks, the proletariat in Russia constituted an
insignificant minority of the population, whereas the individual peasants
constituted the vast majority of the population. But the proletariat was
developing as a class, whereas the peasantry as a class was disintegrating. And
just because the proletariat was developing as a class the Marxists based their
orientation on the proletariat. And they were not mistaken; for, as we know,
the proletariat subsequently grew from an insignificant force into a first-rate
historical and political force.

Hence, in order not to err in policy, one must look forward, not backward.

Further, if the passing of slow quantitative changes into rapid and abrupt
qualitative changes is a law of development, then it is clear that revolutions
made by oppressed classes are a quite natural and inevitable phenomenon.

Hence, the transition from capitalism to socialism and the liberation of the
working class from the yoke of capitalism cannot be effected by slow changes,
by reforms, but only by a qualitative change of the capitalist system, by

Hence, in order not to err in policy, one must be a revolutionary, not a

Further, if development proceeds by way of the disclosure of internal
contradictions, by way of collisions between opposite forces on the basis of
these contradictions and so as to overcome these contradictions, then it is
clear that the class struggle of the proletariat is a quite natural and
inevitable phenomenon.

Hence, we must not cover up the contradictions of the capitalist system, but
disclose and unravel them; we must not try to check the class struggle but
carry it to its conclusion.

Hence, in order not to err in policy, one must pursue an uncompromising
proletarian class policy, not a reformist policy of harmony of the interests of
the proletariat and the bourgeoisie, not a compromisers' policy of
the "growing" of capitalism into socialism.

Such is the Marxist dialectical method when applied to social life, to the
history of society.

As to Marxist philosophical materialism, it is fundamentally the direct
opposite of philosophical idealism.

2) Marxist Philosophical Materialism
The principal features of Marxist philosophical materialism are as follows:

a) Materialist

Contrary to idealism, which regards the world as the embodiment of an "absolute
idea," a "universal spirit," "consciousness," Marx's philosophical materialism
holds that the world is by its very nature material, that the multifold
phenomena of the world constitute different forms of matter in motion, that
interconnection and interdependence of phenomena as established by the
dialectical method, are a law of the development of moving matter, and that the
world develops in accordance with the laws of movement of matter and stands in
no need of a "universal spirit."

"The materialistic outlook on nature," says Engels, "means no more than simply
conceiving nature just as it exists, without any foreign admixture." (Marx and
Engels, Vol. XIV, p. 651.)

Speaking of the materialist views of the ancient philosopher Heraclitus, who
held that "the world, the all in one, was not created by any god or any man,
but was, is and ever will be a living flame, systematically flaring up and
systematically dying down"' Lenin comments: "A very good exposition of the
rudiments of dialectical materialism." (Lenin, Philosophical Notebooks, p. 318.)

b) Objective Reality

Contrary to idealism, which asserts that only our consciousness really exists,
and that the material world, being, nature, exists only in our consciousness'
in our sensations, ideas and perceptions, the Marxist philosophical materialism
holds that matter, nature, being, is an objective reality existing outside and
independent of our consciousness; that matter is primary, since it is the
source of sensations, ideas, consciousness, and that consciousness is
secondary, derivative, since it is a reflection of matter, a reflection of
being; that thought is a product of matter which in its development has reached
a high degree of perfection, namely, of the brain, and the brain is the organ
of thought; and that therefore one cannot separate thought from matter without
committing a grave error. Engels says:

"The question of the relation of thinking to being, the relation of spirit to
nature is the paramount question of the whole of philosophy.... The answers
which the philosophers gave to this question split them into two great camps.
Those who asserted the primacy of spirit to nature ... compr

J. V. Stalin

September 1938

Transcribed for the Internet by M.

Dialectical materialism is the world outlook of the Marxist-Leninist party. It
is called dialectical materialism because its approach to the phenomena of
nature, its method of studying and apprehending them, is dialectical, while its
interpretation of the phenomena of nature, its conception of these phenomena,
its theory, is materialistic.

Historical materialism is the extension of the principles of dialectical
materialism to the study of social life, an application of the principles of
dialectical materialism to the phenomena of the life of society, to the study
of society and of its history.

When describing their dialectical method, Marx and Engels usually refer to
Hegel as the philosopher who formulated the main features of dialectics. This,
however, does not mean that the dialectics of Marx and Engels is identical with
the dialectics of Hegel. As a matter of fact, Marx and Engels took from the
Hegelian dialectics only its "rational kernel," casting aside its Hegelian
idealistic shell, and developed dialectics further so as to lend it a modern
scientific form.

"My dialectic method," says Marx, "is not only different from the Hegelian, but
is its direct opposite. To Hegel, ... the process of thinking which, under the
name of 'the Idea,' he even transforms into an independent subject, is the
demiurgos (creator) of the real world, and the real world is only the external,
phenomenal form of 'the Idea.' With me, on the contrary, the ideal is nothing
else than the material world reflected by the human mind and translated into
forms of thought." (Marx, Afterword to the Second German Edition of Volume I of

When describing their materialism, Marx and Engels usually refer to Feuerbach
as the philosopher who restored materialism to its rights. This, however, does
not mean that the materialism of Marx and Engels is identical with Feuerbach's
materialism. As a matter of fact, Marx and Engels took from Feuerbach's
materialism its "inner kernel," developed it into a scientific-philosophical
theory of materialism and cast aside its idealistic and religious-ethical
encumbrances. We know that Feuerbach, although he was fundamentally a
materialist, objected to the name materialism. Engels more than once declared
that "in spite of" the materialist "foundation," Feuerbach "remained... bound
by the traditional idealist fetters," and that "the real idealism of Feuerbach
becomes evident as soon as we come to his philosophy of religion and ethics."
(Marx and Engels, Vol. XIV, pp. 652-54.)

Dialectics comes from the Greek dialego, to discourse, to debate. In ancient
times dialectics was the art of arriving at the truth by disclosing the
contradictions in the argument of an opponent and overcoming these
contradictions. There were philosophers in ancient times who believed that the
disclosure of contradictions in thought and the clash of opposite opinions was
the best method of arriving at the truth. This dialectical method of thought,
later extended to the phenomena of nature, developed into the dialectical
method of apprehending nature, which regards the phenomena of nature as being
in constant movement and undergoing constant change, and the development of
nature as the result of the development of the contradictions in nature, as the
result of the interaction of opposed forces in nature.

In its essence, dialectics is the direct opposite of metaphysics.

1) Marxist Dialectical Method
The principal features of the Marxist dialectical method are as follows:

a) Nature Connected and Determined

Contrary to metaphysics, dialectics does not regard nature as an accidental
agglomeration of things, of phenomena, unconnected with, isolated from, and
independent of, each other, but as a connected and integral whole, in which
things, phenomena are organically connected with, dependent on, and determined
by, each other.

The dialectical method therefore holds that no phenomenon in nature can be
understood if taken by itself, isolated from surrounding phenomena, inasmuch as
any phenomenon in any realm of nature may become meaningless to us if it is not
considered in connection with the surrounding conditions, but divorced from
them; and that, vice versa, any phenomenon can be understood and explained if
considered in its inseparable connection with surrounding phenomena, as one
conditioned by surrounding phenomena.

b) Nature is a State of Continuous Motion and Change

Contrary to metaphysics, dialectics holds that nature is not a state of rest
and immobility, stagnation and immutability, but a state of continuous movement
and change, of continuous renewal and development, where something is always
arising and developing, and something always disintegrating and dying away.

The dialectical method therefore requires that phenomena should be considered
not only from the standpoint of their interconnection and interdependence, but
also from the standpoint of their movement, their change, their development,
their coming into being and going out of being.

The dialectical method regards as important primarily not that which at the
given moment seems to be durable and yet is already beginning to die away, but
that which is arising and developing, even though at the given moment it may
appear to be not durable, for the dialectical method considers invincible only
that which is arising and developing.

"All nature," says Engels, "from the smallest thing to the biggest. from grains
of sand to suns, from protista (the primary living cells -- J. St.) to man, has
its existence in eternal coming into being and going out of being, in a
ceaseless flux, in unresting motion and change (Ibid., p. 484.)

Therefore, dialectics, Engels says, "takes things and their perceptual images
essentially in their interconnection, in their concatenation, in their
movement, in their rise and disappearance." (Marx and Engels, Vol. XIV,' p. 23.)

c) Natural Quantitative Change Leads to Qualitative Change

Contrary to metaphysics, dialectics does not regard the process of development
as a simple process of growth, where quantitative changes do not lead to
qualitative changes, but as a development which passes from insignificant and
imperceptible quantitative changes to open' fundamental changes' to qualitative
changes; a development in which the qualitative changes occur not gradually,
but rapidly and abruptly, taking the form of a leap from one state to another;
they occur not accidentally but as the natural result of an accumulation of
imperceptible and gradual quantitative changes.

The dialectical method therefore holds that the process of development should
be understood not as movement in a circle, not as a simple repetition of what
has already occurred, but as an onward and upward movement, as a transition
from an old qualitative state to a new qualitative state, as a development from
the simple to the complex, from the lower to the higher:

"Nature," says Engels, "is the test of dialectics. and it must be said for
modern natural science that it has furnished extremely rich and daily
increasing materials for this test, and has thus proved that in the last
analysis nature's process is dialectical and not metaphysical, that it does not
move in an eternally uniform and constantly repeated circle. but passes through
a real history. Here prime mention should be made of Darwin, who dealt a severe
blow to the metaphysical conception of nature by proving that the organic world
of today, plants and animals, and consequently man too, is all a product of a
process of development that has been in progress for millions of yea

Sensation and Perception
sanatorium_psychiatryczne 09.02.04, 01:43 zarchiwizowany

-- Take a shiny spoon and check out your reflection. Reflected from the back
convex surface you will see a large right-side-up image of yourself, but when
you look inside the concave surface, the image will be smaller and up-side-
down. Can you figure out why?

(Hint: draw a diagram

Sensation and Perception: Psych 115s

This assessment was based on the material covered in the Light & Eyes lecture.

Assessment 1
1. The job of focusing the light that enters your eye is mostly accomplished by

a. the fovea
b. the lens
c. the sclera
d. the cornea
e. the iris
Answer: D - the cornea does about 2/3 of the focusing

2. On its way to the retina, light has to pass through a network of blood
vessels inside the vitreous humour, but we never see these blood vessels. Why
not? (10 words or less)

Answer: because blood vessels don't move relative to the retina and stabilized
images fade

3. [TRUE or FALSE] At night, your vision is best not in the center of your
vision, but a little off to the side.

Answer: TRUE

4. [TRUE or FALSE] Your color vision is best in the fovea.

Answer: TRUE

5. [TRUE or FALSE] If the focal length of your lens is too short, this can be
remedied by adding a concave lens in front of your eye.

Answer: TRUE

6. [TRUE or FALSE] Humans can reliably detect even a single photon of light.

Answer: TRUE

7. [TRUE or FALSE] Tomatoes look red because they absorb red light.

Answer: FALSE - Tomatoes look red because they reflect red light.

8. Visual transduction is the most important job of the retina. In transduction

a. electrical energy is converted into chemical energy
b. chemical energy is converted into light energy
c. light energy is converted into neural signals
d. electrical light energy is conducted by the brain
e. all of the above
Answer: C

9. (2 points) Why do you get "red-eye" when you take photos with a flash? (25
words or less)

Answer: The back of the retina is actually reddish. Light from the flash
travels inside the pupil, and red light is reflected back to the camera.

GDZIE ? IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: KPP 09.02.04, 00:14 zarchiwizowany

The Communist Party of Poland 2


The R.C.P.(B.) fought opportunism by the tried and tested method of resolutely
isolating the opportunist leaders. And the result it achieved was that
revolutionary Marxism triumphed and the Party acquired exceptional unity.

I think that the experience of the R.C.P.(B.) should serve as a lesson for us.
The method of fighting recommended by Kostrzewa is a hang-over from Social-
Democratic opportunism. It is fraught with the danger of a split in the Party.

Lastly, the question of leadership of the Party. What is the characteristic
feature of the development of the Communist Parties in the West at the present
time? It is that the parties have come right up against the question of
reorganising their practical activities on new, revolutionary lines. It is not
a matter of adopting a communist programme or of proclaiming revolutionary
slogans. It is a matter of reorganising the parties' everyday work, their
practical activities, along such a line that every step and every action they
take should naturally lead to the revolutionary education of the masses, to
preparation for revolution. That is now the essence of the matter and not the
adoption of revolutionary directives.

Yesterday, Pruchniak read here a whole string of revolutionary resolutions
adopted by the leaders of the Polish Central Committee. He read those
resolutions with a triumphant air, believing that leadership of the Party
consists solely in drafting resolutions. He has no inkling that drafting
resolutions is only the first step, the beginning of leadership of the Party.
He does not realise that, at bottom, leadership consists not in drafting
resolutions, but in the implementation of them, in putting them into effect. As
a consequence, in his long speech he forgot to tell us what became of those
resolutions; he did not deem it necessary to tell us whether the Communist
Party of Poland has carried out those resolutions, and to what extent. And yet,
the essence of Party leadership consists precisely in the implementation of
resolutions and directives. Looking at him, I was reminded of the typical
Soviet bureaucrat called to "report" to an inspection commission. "Has such and
such a directive been carried out?" the inspection commission asks. "Measures
have been taken," answers the bureaucrat. "What measures?" the inspection
commission asks. "Orders have been issued," the bureaucrat answers. The
inspection commission calls for the document. With a triumphant air the
bureaucrat presents a copy of the orders. The inspection commission asks: "What
has become of these orders? Were they carried out and if so, when?" The
bureaucrat looks blank, and says "We have received no information." Of course,
the inspection commission calls such a bureaucrat to account. It was precisely
such a Soviet bureaucrat that Pruchniak reminded me of when he, with a
triumphant air, read the revolutionary resolutions, concerning the
implementation of which he has "no information." That is not leadership of the
Party; it is a mockery of all leadership.

What are the conclusions? The conclusions can be summed up as follows.

Firstly. In the forthcoming Party discussion in Poland, I am emphatically
opposed to any dividing line being drawn between the former Polish Socialist
Party and the former Social-Democracy. That would be dangerous for the Party.
The former P.S.P. and P.S.D. have long been merged in a single party and are
jointly fighting the Polish landlords and bourgeoisie. To divide them now
retrospectively into two parts would be a profound error. The fight must not be
waged along the old line as between the P.S.P. and P.S.D., but along the new
line of isolating the opportunist wing of the Communist Party of Poland.
Complete victory over the opportunist wing — that is the guarantee against a
split and the guarantee of the Party's unity.

Secondly. I am emphatically opposed to the so-called amputation method, i.e.,
to the removal of certain members of the Central Committee from that body. In
general, I am opposed to the reorganisation of the Central Committee from
above. It must be borne in mind that surgical operations carried out when there
is no imperative need for them leave a bad aftermath in the Party. Let the
Communist Party of Poland itself reorganise its Central Committee at the
forthcoming congress or conference. It is inconceivable that a growing party
should not promote new leaders.

Thirdly. I think that the practical proposals put forward by Unszlicht are
quite correct. It would be quite rational to set up in place of the present
Organising Bureau and Political Bureau, which have become divorced from each
other, a single political and practical centre consisting of members of the
present Polish Central Committee.

Doubts have been expressed here about the theoretical knowledge and party
experience of the new leaders who have come to the fore in the revolutionary
struggle in Poland. I think that this circumstance is not of decisive
importance. There have been cases in the life of the R.C.P.(B.) when workers
with inadequate theoretical and political knowledge became the heads of huge
regional organisations. But those workers proved to be better leaders than many
intellectuals who lack the necessary revolutionary intuition. It is quite
possible that at first things will not run quite smoothly with the new leaders,
but there will be no harm in that. They will stumble once or twice, but
eventually they will learn to lead the revolutionary movement. Trained leaders
never fall from the skies. They grow up only in the course of the struggle.


Gość: PPK 09.02.04, 00:03 zarchiwizowany

The Communist Party of Poland


Speech: Delivered at a Meeting of the Polish Commission of the Comintern, July
3, 1924;
First Published: Bolshevik, No. 11, September 20, 1924;
Source: J. V. Stalin, Works, Vol. 6, pp. 276-84, Foreign Languages Publishing
House, Moscow 1953.


Comrades, I have not sufficient material at my disposal to enable me to speak
as emphatically as some of those who have spoken here. Nevertheless, on the
basis of the material that I did, after all, manage to obtain, and on the basis
of the debate that has taken place here, I have formed a definite opinion,
which I would like to share with you.

Undoubtedly, the Polish Communist Party is in an abnormal state. That there is
a crisis in the Polish Party is a fact. It was admitted by Walecki; you have
all admitted it, and it was clearly revealed here, for it was noted that there
is discord in the Central Committee of the Polish Party between practical
workers who are members of the C.C. and the leaders of the C.C. Moreover, the
Central Committee of the Polish Party itself, at its plenums of December last
year and March this year, admitted in its resolutions that a number of its
actions had been of an opportunist character and it condemned them without
mincing words. That seems to be proof enough. I repeat, all this goes to show
that there is undoubtedly a crisis in the Communist Party of Poland.

What is the cause of this crisis?

The cause lies in certain opportunist transgressions committed in their
practical work by the official leaders of the Communist Party of Poland.

Permit me to quote a few examples confirming this statement.

The "Russian" question. Some Polish comrades say that this is a question of
external policy and, as such, is of no great importance for the Polish Party.
That is wrong. The "Russian" question is of decisive importance for the entire
revolutionary movement, in the West as well as in the East. Why? Because Soviet
power in Russia is the base, the bulwark, the haven of the revolutionary
movement all over the world. If in this base, i.e., in Russia, the Party and
the government begin to waver, it must cause very grave harm to the entire
revolutionary movement throughout the world.

During the discussion in our R.C.P.(B.) wavering began in the Party. By its
struggle against the Party, the opposition, which is essentially opportunist,
tended to shake, to weaken the Party, and hence, to weaken the Soviet power
itself; for our Party is the ruling party and the chief guiding factor in the
state. It is natural that wavering within the R.C.P.(B.) could eventually lead
to the wavering, the weakening of the Soviet power itself; and the wavering of
the Soviet power would mean harm to the revolutionary movement all over the
world. Precisely for this reason, disagreements within the R.C.P.(B.), and the
fate of the R.C.P.(B.) in general, cannot but directly affect the fate of the
revolutionary movement in other countries. That is why the "Russian" question,
although an external question for Poland, is one of prime importance for all
the Communist Parties, including the Polish Communist Party.

Well, what was the attitude of the leaders of the Polish Party towards
the "Russian" question? Whom did they support: the opportunist opposition or
the revolutionary majority in the R.C.P.(B.)? It is clear to me that in the
first period of the struggle within the R.C.P.(B.), the struggle against the
opportunist opposition, the leaders of the Polish Party unambiguously supported
that opposition. I shall not delve into the minds of Warski or Walecki; what
Warski was thinking when he wrote the well-known resolution of the Central
Committee of the Communist Party of Poland in support of the opposition in the
R.C.P.(B.) is of no importance for me. It is not people's intentions, but the
objective results of that resolution that are of primary importance for me. And
the objective results of that resolution are that it brings grist to the
opposition's mill. That resolution supported the opportunist wing of the R.C.P.
(B.). That is the whole point. At the time when the Central Committee of the
Polish Party adopted that resolution and sent it to the Central Committee of
the R.C.P.(B.) it represented the Polish branch of the opportunist opposition
within the R.C.P.(B.). If we regard the opposition within the R.C.P.(B.) as a
sort of business firm having branches in different countries, we can say that
at that time the Communist Party of Poland was the Polish branch of that firm.
That is the essence of the opportunist transgressions on the "Russian" question
committed by the leaders of the Polish Party. It is sad, but, unfortunately, it
is a fact.

The German question. Next to the "Russian" question, this one is of the
greatest importance, firstly, because Germany is more pregnant with revolution
than any other country in Europe; and secondly, because a revolutionary victory
in Germany would be victory in the whole of Europe. If a revolutionary upheaval
commences anywhere in Europe it will be in Germany. Only Germany can take the
initiative in this matter, and the victory of the revolution in Germany will
ensure the victory of the international revolution.

You know that last year a struggle flared up within the Communist Party of
Germany between its revolutionary majority and opportunist minority. You know
how greatly a victory of the Left or of the Right wing of the German Communist
Party would affect the whole course of the international revolution. Well, whom
did the leaders of the Central Committee of the Polish Communist Party support
in that struggle? They supported the Brandler group against the revolutionary
majority of the German Communist Party. That is now admitted by all, both
friends and foes. The same thing happened as on the "Russian" question. If we
assume that there is in Germany a sort of business firm in the shape of the
opportunist opposition in the Communist Party, then the Polish leaders were the
Polish branch of that firm. This, too, is sad, but you cannot go against facts;
facts must be admitted.

The method of fighting the opportunist opposition. Kostrzewa said that they,
i.e., the leaders of the Polish Central Committee, in essence support the
Russian Central Committee and, perhaps, the present German Central Committee,
but disagree with those bodies on the methods of fighting the Opposition. They,
you see, demand mild methods of fighting the opposition. They are in favour of
war against the opposition, but they want a war that will involve no
casualties. Walecki even went so far as to shout out: But we are in favour of
the "three"! I must say that nobody demands that Walecki should say ditto to
the Russian Central Committee in everything. Besides, I don't know who
these "three" are about whom Walecki is so enthusiastic. He has forgotten that
nobody is obliged to say ditto to the Russian Central Committee in everything
(Walecki, from his seat: "I am not obliged to, but I can.") Of course, you can,
but one ought to realise that such conduct places both Walecki and the Russian
Central Committee in an awkward position. It is not at all a matter of saying
ditto. The point is that in Russia, under the conditions of the NEP, a new
bourgeoisie has arisen which, being unable to come into the political arena
openly, is trying to breach the communist front from within and is looking for
champions among the leaders of the R.C.P.(B.). Well, this circumstance is
giving rise to oppositionist sentiments within the R.C.P.(B.) and is creating
the ground for an opportunist deviation. Hence, the point is that

A ILE STALIN WYTLUKL NIEMCOW ? IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: y;P 08.02.04, 23:57 zarchiwizowany

GerMan Flying Saucer ? IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: ©> 08.02.04, 23:09 zarchiwizowany

Cook concludes that by 1947 the U.S. must already have had a key component of
UFO technology -- anti-gravity. That's why they weren't interested in Brown's
technology years later. He suspects the technology came from Nazi Germany, and
recounts allegations of German flying saucer programs from a few dubious books,
as well as information he admits seems to have "magically appeared out of thin
air ... passed down from one researcher to the next, without attribution."

He gets off of the Internet and starts searching through military archives for
clues. He finds a few hints in old Army Air Force records on Luftwaffe
technology, but nothing substantial. Then he reads that the SS was in charge of
the most secret German technology. "I felt a constriction in my throat. I was
so keyed, my breath was coming in short, sharp gasps." Don't worry, he's not
having a heart attack. He just realizes he's been looking in the wrong place.
He starts reading about the SS.

Soon we're off to Poland. A "researcher" named Igor Witkowski shows Cook an old
mine, where he claims SS scientists worked on a machine called the Bell, a
glowing, rotating contraption that used up a lot of electricity. "Word had it
that the tests sought to investigate some kind of antigravitational effect,
Witkowski said." Somebody else thinks it might have been a time machine. Then
Cook finds yet another SS anti-gravity program, a flying saucer called
the "Repulsine."

Cook concludes that an SS official named Hans Kammler had all of this
technology boxed up and flown to a safe place, later trading it to the U.S.
military for his freedom.

The U.S. government kept it all under wraps for years, but probably implemented
some of it in the B2 bomber. Why didn't the U.S. make more widespread use of
this technology? Partly because it would have disrupted the existing aerospace
industry, with its expertise in winged aircraft. Partly because anti-gravity
might tap into energies just too destructive to tamper with. And "... in the
1940s and 1950s, it wasn't as if the world really needed it."

It's a story that strains credulity. But unless we're after cheap laughs, our
hope when we pick up a book like this is that the author will, against the
odds, build a careful, reasonable and convincing case. Cook isn't that author.

The first problem is that Cook is no help sorting out the physics he's writing
about. His explanation of "zero point energy" (a quantum effect caused by
virtual particles winking in and out of existence) is acceptable. But he's also
capable of explaining that the Repulsine made air molecules "pack so tightly
together that their molecular and nuclear binding energies were affected in a
way that triggered the anti-gravity effect." Both explanations sound equally
weird to the layman. But the first is recognized science, the second pseudo-

OK, so physics is hard, and Cook is a journalist. But we should at least expect
him to bring a journalist's care to the sources he uses and the conclusions he
draws. Instead, we're bombarded with a hodgepodge of information trawled up
from the Internet, other books and UFO and anti-gravity enthusiasts, along with
some firsthand reporting. Although he makes a show of weighing this information
with the critical eye of a trained aerospace expert, he doesn't prove worthy of
much confidence.

A perfect example is his reliance on Witkowski, the Polish researcher, whose
information is key to Cook's conclusions. Where did the information come from?
Witkowski says a Polish government official (whom he refuses to name) allowed
him to see some documents, but not make copies of them. Why does Cook believe

"Witkowski had been recommended to me by Polish sources through my work at
Jane's as someone who was both highly knowledgeable and reliable ... Had
Witkowski been in any way a lightweight, I would have turned around and got on
the first plane home. But when I saw him, I knew he was OK."

A ticket to the La Habra fascist fiesta IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: py;> 08.02.04, 22:38 zarchiwizowany

Nazis Invade La Habra!

A ticket to the La Habra fascist fiesta


Another gathering of Nazi nuts, white-supremacist cretins, and the racist rock
bands that love them is set to go off this Saturday night. But for a change,
this fascist fest will not be taking place at dingy Anaheim club the Shack,
site of several such rallies over the past few years. Instead, the 6 p.m. show,
ostensibly to celebrate Adolf Hitler’s April 20 birthday, will happen in
heavily Latino La Habra, in a Moose Lodge on the second floor of a once-
bustling-now-crumbling strip mall at 2065 W. La Habra Blvd. For a $15 ticket,
the co-promoters—Orange-based website Radio White (known for taking song lyrics
out of context, claiming that tunes from such avowed anti-racist bands as X,
the Blasters, Steve Earle and the Reverend Horton Heat are somehow aligned with
their screwed worldview) and a Long Beach Aryan Nations chapter—are promising
guest speakers, a full bar, dinner, and a set by OC white-power band
Youngland. "All National Socialist customs and traditions will be observed,"
says the show link on Radio White’s creepy site. "Please dress appropriately"—
we assume this means no drag queens, unless they’re wearing black jackboots,
swastika armbands and leather chaps, which would be kinda kinky. There will
also be "a receiving line welcoming arriving guests and party members, followed
by an arch of arms [Hitler salute] in which party leaders and colors will pass
under," and a raffle, with prizes including Hitler Youth knives, belts, buckles
and an SS lady’s ring, the proceeds from which will "go directly towards the
education and training of our youth," which sounds weirdly like child
molestation—and, in a way, it is. We aren’t sure why this oppression orgy is
happening at a Moose Lodge—of all ironic places—since the fraternal
organization’s membership ballooned with Nazi-killing veterans right after
World War II. Our guess is that the Nazis lied about their true motives, a
tactic they’ve used in the past to book white power shows at rock clubs. As we
went to press, we were still trying to find the answer. (Rich Kane)

Funny Like That IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: TTr 08.02.04, 22:33 zarchiwizowany

Funny Like That
Episode 8, Part 3
The Last Resort
Interior - A hotel room. Night following Scene H.
The phone rings. Tippy enters and answers it.

Bon jour! (Not sure why French? Read Episode 8, Part 1, Scene C)

I can’t believe he outed me.

I think he outed both of us.

Yes, but everyone knew we were of the closet. They didn’t know I was out of my

Stop saying things like that. He’s just a little man. Don’t let him get to you.
Oh, I have to go. Our houseboy Greico is drawing my bath.


All right, it’s some old woman named Celia who has a wart the size of a nickel
on her forehead. We’re calling her Celia, the Cyclopes.... Greco is actually my
masseur. Au revoir!

He hangs up the phone.
Exterior - Arians’ Resort. Around noon.
Clark and Richard are walking along a street.

Thanks for meeting with me today. Do you mind if I use my tape recorder?

Of course not. I'm not ashamed of what I'm thinkin’. But you will make me
sound intelligent, right?

(Knowing he can't change quotes.) Well….

(Smiling.) I’m only kiddin’. . Hey, let's stop in here at the David Duke Double
Dip Ice Cream Shop.

Interior - ice cream shop.

Let’s see, what are the specials today? Nazi Nuts and Caramel or Mein Kampf
Chip, which one do you want? My treat.

Well, do they have vanilla?

They have Caucasian Creme. That's always been one of my favorites. Of course,
can’t have none of that darky hot fudge! No siree!! (Clark looks at his
aghast.) I’m only kiddin’.

An ice cream parlor employee, wearing all white including a hood with the name
of the ice cream parlor on it, walks up to the counter.

(Aghast.) Yeah, I'll take the.... Caucasian Creme.

And I’ll have a Red Skin Praline.

The worker exits to prepare the ice cream cones.

So what kinda questions ya got for me?

Well, shouldn't we wait until we sit down?

Oh, we ain't sittin’ down. I'm showin' you around. (Opens his arms.) This is my
home. I'm invitin’ you in. I want to show you every blade of grass here.

Well, I don’t know if we'll have time for that.

You don’t seem like you’re comfortable in your own skin, son?


(Pulling back.) Nothin’.

The worker hands them their cones. Richard pays him. They exit.

Exterior - Arians’ Resort.Continuous.
Clark and Richard are walking down a sidewalk in the resort.

(Licking on his ice cream cone.) Well, fire away at me.

What are your views on hatred in America today?

Oh, I think hatred’s wrong.

OK, let’s call it bigotry. Some people think that bigotry is alive and well in
our country. In fact, it’s worse today than it was a few decades ago.

Now see, sometimes the history books paint things wrong. They don’t show the
world in contacts.

You mean, context?

Yeah. You see, slavery was about economics. That’s all it was. Companies have
sweat shops today.

And sweat shops are wrong.

But they’re here and we ain't startin' no war over 'em.. People hire folks for
as cheap as they can get them. Well, back then, they were just roundin' up
workers real cheap - for free! And slavery would still be around today if those
pesky courts hadn’t gotten involved. But the history books don’t tell you about
that. No siree! They don’t tell how some men in history get a bad name just
cause they’re standing up for their own people. Don’t you make tough decisions
at your job?

Well, yes I have.

That’s all I’m talking about, too. Tough choices. Some men get a bad rap cause
they make tough decisions for the good of their people and for tryin’ to
preserve what is right in their heritage.

Are you talking about Adolph Hitler?

I'm talkin' about everybody, son! You, me and everybody! That’s all I’m sayin’.
Oh! Look around! Look around! (He begins skipping.) Oh, I love this place!
Isn't it beautiful? The birds are singin’! The sun is out! This is where I am.
This is where I belong! (He stops skipping.) This is where I belong. This is

Yes, but the birds on sitting on the roof of the Triple K Bed and Breakfast.

Oh, that is a wonderful place! They play bingo on Thursday nights.

Don't you think it's wrong to discriminate?

Now, ya see, I’ve got a New Age philosophy. I'm progressive. I don't have a
problem with all men who have dark skin. I just have a problem with the
niggers. People who are Jewish are OK, as long as they don't act like a Jew. If
you're gonna act like that, don't be ashamed to be called what you are. It's
like your little friend! He comes prancin’ in here with his Judy jam.

It was Minnelli jelly.

Whatever you call it, he’s spreadin’ it on with his pinky in the air. You know
it’s true… (More emphatically.) You know it's true.

He does have a pinky problem, yes.

But then he gets upset when I calls him like I sees him. People shouldn't get
upset about that. If it walks like a duck, walks like a duck, it's gonna fly
south for the winter!

What about me, then?

(Uncertain.) What about you?

I have a mental illness. You said so.

Did I?

Yes, you did. So why don't you call me nuts?

Richard stares at him.

Cause, you know, it's not that bad. People live with it every day. It's not the
end of the world.

Richard stares at him.

Why don't you call me something? (Pause.) How about a loon? A crackpot? A nut
case. What about crazy as a shithouse rat? Why don't you call me that?

I can't.

Why not? It would make me feel at home around here.

Long pause.

It’s too foreign to me. It bothers me more than words can say. It makes my
insides squirm.

Clark stares at him.

(Smiles.) What's your next question?

Interior - A small radio studio set up in a gift shop at the resort. An hour
Brad is checking some equipment. Richard enters.

Hey, Richard.

Hey, Buddy! How are on this glorious afternoon?

Great, how about you?


You’re cuttin’ it kinda close. We’re about to go on the air.

Well, I was just talkin’ to your newspaper friend. I don't know if he knows how
to take me.

Well, Clark’s middle name is peculiar.

Well, he's living up to his name. But, I know you and I share a bond.

(Uncertain.) You think so?

Oh, I know we do, son.


That’s nice….. Here's your mike.


Are you ready? Here we go.

Intro music for the radio show 'Spill Your Guts.'

Good afternoon, all your numbskulls out there! Welcome to "Spill Your Guts!"
We're here live from the Arians Resort with Richard Roof. Thanks for bein’ here
today, Richard.

Thank you for having me. And welcome to our little piece of paradise.

Well, some people might call it your little corner of a swastika.

Haven’t you had a wonderful time down here, Brad? Isn’t the weather beautiful?
They say the ocean air is good for what ails you. What’s ailin’ you today, son.

Well I do have corn on my left

ReaCtionAryChic IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: ReActioN 08.02.04, 22:27 zarchiwizowany

... CitizensOfTheGalaxy ... IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: .:. 08.02.04, 21:10 zarchiwizowany

EARTH (Sol III): Also known as "Terra." The planet Earth is divided up into
approximately 200 independent nation-states (though this number is subject to
change for one political reason or another). While some races consider this
lack of unity to be a sign of disorder and intraplanetary conflict, many
consider the structure a source of local pride, patriotism and even competition
leading to scientific and technological advances. A loose confederation of
representatives known as the "United Nations" functions as an international
legislature, and is located in New York City.

NAZIA (New Erde II): During Earth's second World War, a number of colonists
from the nation of Germany were transported by the Chromes to the planet Nazia,
where they continued to thrive until well into the twenty-first century.
During this time, a subspace barrier was placed around the system by operatives
from Trell Station One, in order to prevent a Nazi invasion of neighboring star
systems. Eventually, however, the barrier collapsed, wiping out the resident
By the twenty-third century, the planet was re-colonized by the Zhelians.
(Trellian Sector)

[...] IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: © > 08.02.04, 19:46 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

[...] IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: ch 08.02.04, 19:40 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

U RUN !!!
zupagrzybowa 08.02.04, 04:38 zarchiwizowany


NOW Khodzhent

Dzherkamar uranium deposit, Karamazar Mts, Adrasman, Khodzhent (Leninabad)
District, Tajikistan

Leninabad (40°13'N 69°43'E)

LENINABAD IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: 1944 08.02.04, 04:17 zarchiwizowany

Powyżej pomyliłam się w pisaniu! Miało być tak:


2B & 2b3 & :-)& 6&3R & ;}


I think that Kim Jong Il has reached a tipping point of sorts now. A definitive
move right now to release ALL of the prisoners from the camps and offer
compensation to them would go a long way towards changing the view of the rest
of the world on North Korea. Nothing else will do. On the other hand,
continuance of the current policies of mass imprisonment, murder, slave labor,
torture and deliberate starvation will soon reach the point where the world
will no longer tolerate it without taking action. And this action may not take
the form of war, it may not unfold predictably for the North Korean regime and
its leaders.

2B & 2b3 & :-)& 6&3R

zupagrzybowa 07.02.04, 23:30 zarchiwizowany


Gość portalu: MeTaFiZyK napisał(a):

> EkoLoGia OdBYTu
> saCrum=proFanum
> roZklad Idei ID+DEA
> deko Mpozycja,muTacje;
> ukLady jElitarne;
> sySStem TraWienny
> mowaTrawa;
> CywiLiZacjEJelitaGrubEgo
> FloRAbaKteRyjnA;
> ===========================================
> 2B or NOT 2B ....?
> 2B !!!-)

2B & 2b3 :-)

6000letnie Drzewa ...
zupagrzybowa 06.02.04, 20:16 zarchiwizowany

"Walk in the sequoia woods at any time of year and you will say they are the
most beautiful and majestic on earth. Beautiful and impressive contrasts meet
you everywhere, the colors of tree and flower, rock and sky, light and shade,
strength and frailty, endurance and evanescence"
(John Muir)
Generally accepted as the largest single living organism on earth, the General
Sherman tree is 30 feet thick at shoulder height, and 17 feet thick at a height
of 120 feet. The first branch of the tree is more than seven feet in diameter,
and the tree itself towers to a height of 275 feet. While not all giant
sequoias are as famous as the General Sherman, a walk through any of the
bigtree groves will make all other trees, as well as yourself, seem miniature
by comparison.




zupagrzybowa 06.02.04, 02:29 zarchiwizowany


Jestem Józef Zawadzki.Mam imię.Mam nazwisko.Mam... IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: wadzki 06.02.04, 01:45 zarchiwizowany

Gość portalu: Józek Zawadzki napisał(a): życiorys.Mam Tropienie Zbrodniczej
Działalności Antypolskiej.Piszę i Znaczę.


9633453 IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: 535325 06.02.04, 01:40 zarchiwizowany

W32/Randex-G is a network worm with backdoor capabilities that allows a remote
intruder to access and control a computer via IRC channels.
W32/Randex-G spreads over a network by copying itself to the Windows system32
folder of C$ and Admin$ shares with weak passwords.

Each time the worm is run it tries to connect to a remote IRC server and join a
specific channel. The worm then runs in the background as a server process,
listening for commands to execute.

When first run the worm copies itself to Windows system folder as ntd32.exe and
creates the following registry entries so that the worm is run when Windows
starts up:

Microsoft Network Daemon for Win32 = ntd32.exe

Microsoft Network Daemon for Win32 = ntd32.exe

W32/Randex-G obtains and sends out the CD key for the following games:
Battlefield 1942
Battlefield 1942 The Road to Rome
Unreal Tournament 2003

Please follow the instructions for removing worms.

Check your administrator passwords and review network security.

You will also need to edit the following registry entries, if they are present.
Please read the warning about editing the registry.

At the taskbar, click Start|Run. Type 'Regedit' and press Return. The registry
editor opens.

Before you edit the registry, you should make a backup. On the 'Registry' menu,
click 'Export Registry File'. In the 'Export range' panel, click 'All', then
save your registry as Backup.

Locate the HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE entries:

Microsoft Network Daemon for Win32 = ntd32.exe

Microsoft Network Daemon for Win32 = ntd32.exe

and delete them if they exist.

Close the registry editor.


[...] IP: *.219.63.*
Gość: ki 05.02.04, 05:19 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

Is it holy war to shed Muslim blood?
zupagrzybowa 05.02.04, 02:29 zarchiwizowany


244 people trampled to death during Saudi pilgrimage

ARAFAT, Saudi Arabia: In a sermon that was remarkable not only for its strong
language but also its timing, Saudi Arabia's top cleric called on Muslims
around the world on Saturday to forsake terrorism, saying those who claim to be
holy warriors were an affront to the faith.

At the climax of the annual haj, Sheik Abdul Aziz al-Sheik told 2 million
pilgrims that terrorists were giving their enemies an excuse to criticise
Muslim nations.


Mr Al-Sheik who is widely respected in the Arab world as the foremost cleric in
Saudi Arabia spoke at Namira Mosque, a televised sermon watched by millions of
Muslims in Saudi Arabia and other Gulf states.

The mosque is close to Mount Arafat, where the pilgrims converged on Saturday
for the climax of their annual trek. This year's haj has been carried out amid
heightened security after a year of terror attacks in the kingdom.

"Is it holy war to shed Muslim blood? Is it holy war to shed the blood of non-
Muslims given sanctuary in Muslim lands? Is it holy war to destroy the
possession of Muslims?" he said.

A large number of the victims of suicide attacks in Saudi Arabia, Turkey, Iraq
and elsewhere have been Muslims.

In speaking of terrorists who killed fellow Muslims, Mr al-Sheik was clearly
referring to the Prophet Muhammad's final sermon, delivered on Mount Arafat 14
centuries ago.

It must be the end of Hamas too.

JewsForAllah JFA

[...] IP: *.internetdsl.tpnet.pl
Gość: AS 04.02.04, 22:22 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

deutshland 04.02.04, 19:56 zarchiwizowany

deutshland 04.02.04, 19:40 zarchiwizowany



H-Net ist eine internationaler und interdisziplinärer Verbund von
Wissenschaftlerinnen und Wissenschafltlern, der das Ziel hat, das Potential des
Internets für Forschung und Lehre nutzbar zu machen. Die Fachredaktionen
betreuen über 100 Mailinglisten und Websites und veröffentlichen regelmäßig
Artikel, Rezensionen, multimediale Materialien und Diskussionsbeiträge für die
interessierte Öffentlichkeit. Das Rechenzentrum von H-Net ist ein Teil von
MATRIX, dem Online-Center für die Geistes- und Sozialwissenschaften an der
Michigan State Universität (MSU). Allerdings kommen die H-Net-
Mitarbeiter/innen, Fachredaktionen und Teilnehmer/innen von überall auf der
Welt. Weitere Informationen...


deutshland 04.02.04, 19:03 zarchiwizowany



deutshland 04.02.04, 18:32 zarchiwizowany

kody: 3100chowa,777P,9PLeNUM,TLMX
operacje: 1leviPrawi,2OswieceNieOswiecImia 3teRRRoTeRRRaPia ,3TemPLe
"?iCH BiN AjN BeRLiNaRe? /in iDDish"

CoNiCu ZnGaGe AsSeBr KrRbSrYZr NbMoTcRuRhPdAg CdInSnSb
TeIXeCs BaLaCePr NdPmSmEuGdTb DyHoEr TmYbLuHfTa WReOsIr
PtAuHg TlPbBiPoAtRnFrRaAc ThPaNpPuUAm CmBkCfEsFmMd
NoLrRfDb SgBhHsMtUunUuu

sanatorium_psychiatryczne 04.02.04, 16:56 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

sanatorium_psychiatryczne 04.02.04, 13:08 zarchiwizowany

Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.

Brak komentarzy: