Gość: ISRAEL 12.12.03, 00:27 zarchiwizowany
www.fh-augsburg.de/~harsch/germanica/Chronologie/20Jh/Herzl/her_ju00.html
V o r r e d e .
Der Gedanke, den ich in dieser Schrift ausführe, ist ein uralter. Es ist die
Herstellung des Judenstaates.
Die Welt widerhallt vom Geschrei gegen die Juden, und das weckt den
eingeschlummerten Gedanken auf.
Ich erfinde nichts, das wolle man sich vor allem und auf jedem Punkte meiner
Ausführungen deutlich vor Augen halten. Ich erfinde weder die geschichtlich
gewordenen Zustände der Juden noch die Mittel zur Abhilfe. Die materiellen
Bestandteile des Baues, den ich entwerfe, sind in der Wirklichkeit vorhanden,
sind mit Händen zu greifen; jeder kann sich davon überzeugen. Will man also
diesen Versuch einer Lösung der Judenfrage mit einem Worte kennzeichnen, so
darf man ihn nicht «Phantasie», sondern höchstens «Kombination» nennen.
Gegen die Behandlung als Utopie muß ich meinen Entwurf zuerst verteidigen.
Eigentlich bewahre ich damit nur die oberflächlichen Beurteiler vor einer
Albernheit, die sie begehen könnten. Es wäre ja keine Schande, eine
menschenfreundliche Utopie geschrieben zu haben. Ich könnte mir auch einen
leichteren literarischen Erfolg bereiten, wenn ich für Leser, die sich
unterhalten wollen, diesen Plan in den gleichsam unverantwortlichen Vortrag
eines Romans brächte. Aber das ist keine solche liebenswürdige Utopie, wie man
sie vor und nach Thomas Morus so häufig produziert hat. Und ich glaube, die
Lage der Juden in verschiedenen Ländern ist arg genug, um einleitende
Tändeleien überflüssig zu machen.
Um den Unterschied zwischen meiner Konstruktion und einer Utopie erkennbar
zu machen, wähle ich ein interessantes Buch der letzten Jahre: «Freiland» von
Dr. Theodor Hertzka. Das ist eine sinnreiche Phantasterei, von einem durchaus
modernen, national-ökonomisch gebildeten Geist erdacht, und so lebensfern wie
der Äquatorberg, auf dem dieser Traumstaat liegt. «Freiland» ist eine
komplizierte Maschinerie mit vielen Zähnen und Rädern, die sogar ineinander
greifen; aber nichts beweist mir, daß sie in Betrieb gesetzt werden könne. Und
selbst wenn ich Freilandsvereine entstehen sehe, werde ich es für einen Scherz
halten.
V o r r e d e .
Der Gedanke, den ich in dieser Schrift ausführe, ist ein uralter. Es ist die
Herstellung des Judenstaates.
Die Welt widerhallt vom Geschrei gegen die Juden, und das weckt den
eingeschlummerten Gedanken auf.
Ich erfinde nichts, das wolle man sich vor allem und auf jedem Punkte meiner
Ausführungen deutlich vor Augen halten. Ich erfinde weder die geschichtlich
gewordenen Zustände der Juden noch die Mittel zur Abhilfe. Die materiellen
Bestandteile des Baues, den ich entwerfe, sind in der Wirklichkeit vorhanden,
sind mit Händen zu greifen; jeder kann sich davon überzeugen. Will man also
diesen Versuch einer Lösung der Judenfrage mit einem Worte kennzeichnen, so
darf man ihn nicht «Phantasie», sondern höchstens «Kombination» nennen.
Gegen die Behandlung als Utopie muß ich meinen Entwurf zuerst verteidigen.
Eigentlich bewahre ich damit nur die oberflächlichen Beurteiler vor einer
Albernheit, die sie begehen könnten. Es wäre ja keine Schande, eine
menschenfreundliche Utopie geschrieben zu haben. Ich könnte mir auch einen
leichteren literarischen Erfolg bereiten, wenn ich für Leser, die sich
unterhalten wollen, diesen Plan in den gleichsam unverantwortlichen Vortrag
eines Romans brächte. Aber das ist keine solche liebenswürdige Utopie, wie man
sie vor und nach Thomas Morus so häufig produziert hat. Und ich glaube, die
Lage der Juden in verschiedenen Ländern ist arg genug, um einleitende
Tändeleien überflüssig zu machen.
Um den Unterschied zwischen meiner Konstruktion und einer Utopie erkennbar
zu machen, wähle ich ein interessantes Buch der letzten Jahre: «Freiland» von
Dr. Theodor Hertzka. Das ist eine sinnreiche Phantasterei, von einem durchaus
modernen, national-ökonomisch gebildeten Geist erdacht, und so lebensfern wie
der Äquatorberg, auf dem dieser Traumstaat liegt. «Freiland» ist eine
komplizierte Maschinerie mit vielen Zähnen und Rädern, die sogar ineinander
greifen; aber nichts beweist mir, daß sie in Betrieb gesetzt werden könne. Und
selbst wenn ich Freilandsvereine entstehen sehe, werde ich es für einen Scherz
halten.
The Fraud of Zionism
by Wilbur Sensor
Most people have been trained to think of Zionism in positive terms. This is
understandable. Decades of propaganda have misrepresented Zionism as a
progressive, modern force bringing civilization to an arid, uninhabited
wasteland. Such an image is an illusion. This essay will uncover the true
history of Zionism. It will reveal the facts and make clear the real nature of
the movement.
A MOVEMENT WHICH ASSUMES THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF JEW AND GENTILE
Zionism is an apartheid philosophy. Its founder, Theodore Herzl, was dismayed
by the mass anti-semitism in France aroused by the Dreyfuss affair. He became
convinced that the separation of the Jews from the Gentiles by ingathering all
Jews in a separate Jewish nation was the only solution to the age old "Jewish
problem". Herzl spelled out his program in his book Der Judenstaat (The Jewish
State):
"The Jewish question exists. It would be foolish to deny it... The Jewish
problem exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers. Where it does not
exist, it is introduced by Jews who move in... I believe I can understand anti-
semitism, which is in many ways a complicated movement. I look on this
movement from the standpoint of a Jew - but without hatred or fear. I believe
I recognize in anti-semitism what is crude humor, ordinary economic envy,
inherited prejudice, religious intolerance - but also what is deemed to be
self defense."
"Anti-semitism grows daily, hourly, among the peoples, and must continue to
grow since its causes continue to exist, and cannot be alienated."
"The causa remota is the loss, in the Middle Ages, of the ability to
assimilate; the cause proxima is our overproduction of middling intelligences,
that can neither be drained off, nor rise higher-hence, no healthy draining
off, and no healthy rising to a higher level. Downward, we are being
proletarianized into revolutionaries; we are the subalterns of every
revolutionary party, while at the same time our terrible financial might grows
upward."
"Will it not be said that I am putting weapons into the hands of the anti-
semites? Why? Because I acknowledge the truth? Because I do not assert that
there are none but excellent people among us?"
"It is a national question; to resolve it we must, above all, first make it
into a world political question... We are a people, a people..."
"The Jewish State is a world necessity, hence, it will arise..."
Herzl demands:
"We be given sovereignty over a part of the earth's surface sufficient for the
rightful requirements of our people; we shall take care of everything else
ourselves."
"No one is strong enough, or rich enough, to move a people from one dwelling
place to another. Only an idea can do that. The idea of a state may well have
such force."
"No economic disruptions, no crises, nor persecutions will follow after the
departing Jews, but rather a period of prosperity will begin for the lands
left behind. An internal migration of Christian citizens into the positions
surrendered by the Jews takes place. The outlook is gradual, without any jolt,
and its very beginning is the end of anti-semitism."
"The Jews leave as respected friends. If individual Jews then return,
civilized countries will receive and treat them just as they would treat the
citizens of any other foreign country."
"This emigration is no flight, but an orderly withdrawal, under the
observation of public opinion. The movement is not only to be organized by
completely legal means, it can, in any case, be accomplished only with the
friendly collaboration of the participating government, which derives
substantial benefit therefrom."
As these paragraphs make clear, to be a Zionist one must believe there is a
Jewish problem. No Zionist since Herzl has ever repudiated this basic
philosophical premise:
"If we do not admit the rightfulness of anti-semitism, we deny the
rightfulness of our own nationalism. If our people is deserving and willing to
live its own national life, then it is an alien body that insists on its own
distinctive identity, reducing the domain of their life. It is right,
therefore, that they should fight against us for their national integrity....
Instead of establishing societies for defense against the anti-semites who
want to reduce our rights, we should establish societies for defense against
our friends who desire to defend our rights." (Jacob Klatzkin, co-editor of
the Encylopaedia Judaica)
A MOVEMENT WHICH NEVER TOOK ANY CONGNIZANCE OF THE POPULATION OF THE LAND IT
COVETED
The Zionists have long maintained the myth, especially in the United States,
that Palestine was uninhabited before the arrival of the Zionists. This
deception is easily refuted. The British Foreign Secretary, Lord Curzon,
writing on October 26, 1917:
"Now what is the capacity as regards population of Palestine within any
reasonable period of time?...What is to become of the people of this country,
assuming the Turk to be expelled, and the inhabitants not to have been
exterminated by the war? There are over a half a million of these, Syrian
Arabs- a mixed community with Arab, Hebrew, Canaaite, Greek, Egyptian, and
possibly Crusaders' blood. They own the soil, which belongs either to
individual landowners or to village communities. They profess the Mohammedan
faith. They will not be content either to be expropriated for Jewish
immigrants, or to act merely as hewers of wood and drawers of water to the
latter."
Palestine at the beginning of the Zionist movement was part of the Ottoman
Turkish Empire. Herzl, when he decided to champion a Jewish state in
Palestine, necessarily made overtures to the Sultan on behalf of Zionism.
These negotiations establish that the Zionists were well aware of the
existence of the Palestinian Arabs.
"'When Herzl had spoken of a Charter (from the Sultan) he had not, needless to
say, contemplated any eviction of the Arabs of Palestine in favor of the Jews.
He was, to judge from his Congress addresses, hardly aware that Palestine had
settled inhabitants, and he had, in perfect good faith, omitted the Arabs from
his calculations.'"( Zionism, Leonard Stein.)
"Was there ever anything more extraordinary than this? Vast plans are made
engaging the destinies of a multitude of people, yet the man who engenders
these plans never takes the essential first step of surveying the land where
he purposes to carry them out. Nor apparently do any of his associates suggest
it to him. There might be no Arabs in the world for all the difference it
makes to him or to his associates."
"Year by year Zionist congresses are summoned... Was a single day's session of
a single Congress devoted to the discussion of the understanding which must be
reached with the people of Palestine? Not one."
"There were nineteen Jewish colonies established in Palestine before the year
1900... All these trusts and colonies and the people who inhabited them were
in regular continuous communication with Jewish bodies and persons throughout
Europe and America..."
"In a hundred ways the conditions prevailing in Palestine and the existence of
the Arabs and the varying ways in which the Arabs reacted to existing colonies
and to the promise of more colonies must have been known to all active
Zionists."
"The only conclusion then, and it is a conclusion forced upon the observer, is
that if Zionism was unaware of the Arabs it was because most Zionists
perceived an obstacle in the Arabs and did not want to be aware to them.
(Palestine: The Reality, J.M.N. Jeffries, pp. 40-42.)
A MOVEMENT WHICH DISREGARDED PRIOR OBLIGATIONS
Zionism, in addition to coveting someone else's land, has always ignored the
issue of prior obligations. The Arabs fought as Great Britain's ally
by Wilbur Sensor
Most people have been trained to think of Zionism in positive terms. This is
understandable. Decades of propaganda have misrepresented Zionism as a
progressive, modern force bringing civilization to an arid, uninhabited
wasteland. Such an image is an illusion. This essay will uncover the true
history of Zionism. It will reveal the facts and make clear the real nature of
the movement.
A MOVEMENT WHICH ASSUMES THE INCOMPATIBILITY OF JEW AND GENTILE
Zionism is an apartheid philosophy. Its founder, Theodore Herzl, was dismayed
by the mass anti-semitism in France aroused by the Dreyfuss affair. He became
convinced that the separation of the Jews from the Gentiles by ingathering all
Jews in a separate Jewish nation was the only solution to the age old "Jewish
problem". Herzl spelled out his program in his book Der Judenstaat (The Jewish
State):
"The Jewish question exists. It would be foolish to deny it... The Jewish
problem exists wherever Jews live in noticeable numbers. Where it does not
exist, it is introduced by Jews who move in... I believe I can understand anti-
semitism, which is in many ways a complicated movement. I look on this
movement from the standpoint of a Jew - but without hatred or fear. I believe
I recognize in anti-semitism what is crude humor, ordinary economic envy,
inherited prejudice, religious intolerance - but also what is deemed to be
self defense."
"Anti-semitism grows daily, hourly, among the peoples, and must continue to
grow since its causes continue to exist, and cannot be alienated."
"The causa remota is the loss, in the Middle Ages, of the ability to
assimilate; the cause proxima is our overproduction of middling intelligences,
that can neither be drained off, nor rise higher-hence, no healthy draining
off, and no healthy rising to a higher level. Downward, we are being
proletarianized into revolutionaries; we are the subalterns of every
revolutionary party, while at the same time our terrible financial might grows
upward."
"Will it not be said that I am putting weapons into the hands of the anti-
semites? Why? Because I acknowledge the truth? Because I do not assert that
there are none but excellent people among us?"
"It is a national question; to resolve it we must, above all, first make it
into a world political question... We are a people, a people..."
"The Jewish State is a world necessity, hence, it will arise..."
Herzl demands:
"We be given sovereignty over a part of the earth's surface sufficient for the
rightful requirements of our people; we shall take care of everything else
ourselves."
"No one is strong enough, or rich enough, to move a people from one dwelling
place to another. Only an idea can do that. The idea of a state may well have
such force."
"No economic disruptions, no crises, nor persecutions will follow after the
departing Jews, but rather a period of prosperity will begin for the lands
left behind. An internal migration of Christian citizens into the positions
surrendered by the Jews takes place. The outlook is gradual, without any jolt,
and its very beginning is the end of anti-semitism."
"The Jews leave as respected friends. If individual Jews then return,
civilized countries will receive and treat them just as they would treat the
citizens of any other foreign country."
"This emigration is no flight, but an orderly withdrawal, under the
observation of public opinion. The movement is not only to be organized by
completely legal means, it can, in any case, be accomplished only with the
friendly collaboration of the participating government, which derives
substantial benefit therefrom."
As these paragraphs make clear, to be a Zionist one must believe there is a
Jewish problem. No Zionist since Herzl has ever repudiated this basic
philosophical premise:
"If we do not admit the rightfulness of anti-semitism, we deny the
rightfulness of our own nationalism. If our people is deserving and willing to
live its own national life, then it is an alien body that insists on its own
distinctive identity, reducing the domain of their life. It is right,
therefore, that they should fight against us for their national integrity....
Instead of establishing societies for defense against the anti-semites who
want to reduce our rights, we should establish societies for defense against
our friends who desire to defend our rights." (Jacob Klatzkin, co-editor of
the Encylopaedia Judaica)
A MOVEMENT WHICH NEVER TOOK ANY CONGNIZANCE OF THE POPULATION OF THE LAND IT
COVETED
The Zionists have long maintained the myth, especially in the United States,
that Palestine was uninhabited before the arrival of the Zionists. This
deception is easily refuted. The British Foreign Secretary, Lord Curzon,
writing on October 26, 1917:
"Now what is the capacity as regards population of Palestine within any
reasonable period of time?...What is to become of the people of this country,
assuming the Turk to be expelled, and the inhabitants not to have been
exterminated by the war? There are over a half a million of these, Syrian
Arabs- a mixed community with Arab, Hebrew, Canaaite, Greek, Egyptian, and
possibly Crusaders' blood. They own the soil, which belongs either to
individual landowners or to village communities. They profess the Mohammedan
faith. They will not be content either to be expropriated for Jewish
immigrants, or to act merely as hewers of wood and drawers of water to the
latter."
Palestine at the beginning of the Zionist movement was part of the Ottoman
Turkish Empire. Herzl, when he decided to champion a Jewish state in
Palestine, necessarily made overtures to the Sultan on behalf of Zionism.
These negotiations establish that the Zionists were well aware of the
existence of the Palestinian Arabs.
"'When Herzl had spoken of a Charter (from the Sultan) he had not, needless to
say, contemplated any eviction of the Arabs of Palestine in favor of the Jews.
He was, to judge from his Congress addresses, hardly aware that Palestine had
settled inhabitants, and he had, in perfect good faith, omitted the Arabs from
his calculations.'"( Zionism, Leonard Stein.)
"Was there ever anything more extraordinary than this? Vast plans are made
engaging the destinies of a multitude of people, yet the man who engenders
these plans never takes the essential first step of surveying the land where
he purposes to carry them out. Nor apparently do any of his associates suggest
it to him. There might be no Arabs in the world for all the difference it
makes to him or to his associates."
"Year by year Zionist congresses are summoned... Was a single day's session of
a single Congress devoted to the discussion of the understanding which must be
reached with the people of Palestine? Not one."
"There were nineteen Jewish colonies established in Palestine before the year
1900... All these trusts and colonies and the people who inhabited them were
in regular continuous communication with Jewish bodies and persons throughout
Europe and America..."
"In a hundred ways the conditions prevailing in Palestine and the existence of
the Arabs and the varying ways in which the Arabs reacted to existing colonies
and to the promise of more colonies must have been known to all active
Zionists."
"The only conclusion then, and it is a conclusion forced upon the observer, is
that if Zionism was unaware of the Arabs it was because most Zionists
perceived an obstacle in the Arabs and did not want to be aware to them.
(Palestine: The Reality, J.M.N. Jeffries, pp. 40-42.)
A MOVEMENT WHICH DISREGARDED PRIOR OBLIGATIONS
Zionism, in addition to coveting someone else's land, has always ignored the
issue of prior obligations. The Arabs fought as Great Britain's ally
juz niedlugo na internecie !
slonidarnosc4ever !-)
slonidarnosc4ever !-)
"Nie jestesmy Absurdem Narodow"
www.dziennik.com/www/dziennik/kult/archiwum/od07do12-00/pp-09-22-05.html
Jaka jest ta nasza nowa codziennosc? Absurdalna - odpowie kazdy, kto uczyl sie
analizy realnego socjalizmu z pism Mrozka. Ale pisarz - moze wlasnie dlatego,
ze kojarzony z tym pojeciem w sposob automatyczny - zastrzega: "[...] nie ma
zadnego absurdu, bywa tylko nieudolnosc, glupota, zla wola, niedostatki
infrastruktury albo po prostu przypadek. Nie opisze wiec 'polskiego absurdu',
gdyz uwazam, ze nie ma takiego. Nie wierze, ze teraz jestesmy 'Absurdem
Narodow', jak kiedys bylismy 'Chrystusem Narodow', 'Sumieniem Europy'
i 'Przedmurzem Chrzescijanstwa'. Nie badzmy megalomanami, tym razem w
negatywie, jesli w pozytywie sie nie da" (s. 85). Mam wrazenie, ze Mrozek
probuje tutaj - bardzo szlachetnie - zaklinac polska rzeczywistosc, probuje
wepchnac ja w koleiny normalnosci, czyli w rejony, gdzie swiat zalezy od
kompetencji, wiedzy, dobrej woli. Latwo byloby mu przeciez odpowiedziec: z
pomieszania dobrych checi i glupoty, skrzyzowania troski i bezwzglednosci,
splotu poczucia misji i chamstwa rodzi sie czesto w Polsce nienormalnosc i
absurd. Byc moze jednak Mrozkowi chodzi o to samo - o prawo do nazywania rzeczy
po imieniu, bez powolywania sie na wymyslne kategorie estetyczne, ktore zaczna
pelnic role usprawiedliwien.
Stad tez pisarz wybiera za przedmiot swojej felietonowej obserwacji polska
codziennosc. Pisze nie o tym, co nowe, lecz o polskich rzeczach niezmiennych -
tych, ktore przetrwaly i przetrwaja kazda zmiane (nawet tak blaha, jak zmiana
ustroju): o politykach, ktorzy plota bzdury stylem wysokim, o chamstwie
szerzacym sie na ulicach, o zyciu publicznym, ktorym miotaja nasze humory, o
kruchosci i plytkosci polskiej stabilizacji, o rodzimym niedorobstwie i braku
profesjonalizmu, o polskiej niecheci do Polski. Juz po kilku felietonach
Dziennika powrotu czujemy, ze autor jest bardziej stad niz z oddali, bardziej
swoj niz obcy, bardziej nasz niz miedzynarodowy. Juz chloszcze nas jak inni
felietonisci, juz przynudza po naszemu i jak my zamienia szczegolowe w ogolne,
a ogolne w ogolnikowe. Troche smiesznie, troche madrze, troche melancholijnie.
Czyli tak, jak powinno byc w felietonie.
Nie nalezy przeciez oczekiwac od tego gatunku, ze polaczy glebie filozofii,
przekrojowosc socjologii i panoramicznosc historii. Innymi slowy: felietonista
jest tylko felietonista, a nie skrzyzowaniem Kolakowskiego, Baumana i Daviesa.
Kiedy wiec przeczytamy ksiazke Mrozka na prawach przez niego zaproponowanych,
odsloni sie przed nami frapujace oblicze autora. Przede wszystkim widac, ze
tkwi w nim bardzo cenna nadwyzka obywatelskiej troski, dla ktorej znajduje
formy zroznicowane (od monologu i skeczu, poprzez scenke az do eseju), za to
nieagresywne. Przybyl nam zatem felietonista z klasa: ironiczny, ale nie tak
zlosliwy jak Marek Gronski z Polityki, wyrafinowany, ale nie tak literacki jak
Jerzy Pilch, a nade wszystko wyrazisty w swoich sadach o rzeczywistosci. Nie
calej, bo dzieki ostremu wykresleniu tematow, ktorymi nie bedzie sie zajmowal,
Mrozek obsadzil role obserwatora tych zachowan polskiego spoleczenstwa, ktore
zmieniaja sie wolniej niz ustroje i rzadzace partie. Tropi skamieliny rodzimego
charakteru i rodzimej mentalnosci, sprawdzajac, czy nie stoja na drodze do
normalnego zycia. Oczywiscie zalezy mu na normalnosci o podwyzszonym
standardzie, strzezonym przez przyzwoitosc i poczucie humoru. Bo jesli dobrze
rozumiem intencje autora, w takim wlasnie - normalnym - kraju chce zyc. I to
juz ostatni powod, dla ktorego jeszcze do Polski nie powrocil. My tez.
www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=polska+chrystusem+narodow
www.dziennik.com/www/dziennik/kult/archiwum/od07do12-00/pp-09-22-05.html
Jaka jest ta nasza nowa codziennosc? Absurdalna - odpowie kazdy, kto uczyl sie
analizy realnego socjalizmu z pism Mrozka. Ale pisarz - moze wlasnie dlatego,
ze kojarzony z tym pojeciem w sposob automatyczny - zastrzega: "[...] nie ma
zadnego absurdu, bywa tylko nieudolnosc, glupota, zla wola, niedostatki
infrastruktury albo po prostu przypadek. Nie opisze wiec 'polskiego absurdu',
gdyz uwazam, ze nie ma takiego. Nie wierze, ze teraz jestesmy 'Absurdem
Narodow', jak kiedys bylismy 'Chrystusem Narodow', 'Sumieniem Europy'
i 'Przedmurzem Chrzescijanstwa'. Nie badzmy megalomanami, tym razem w
negatywie, jesli w pozytywie sie nie da" (s. 85). Mam wrazenie, ze Mrozek
probuje tutaj - bardzo szlachetnie - zaklinac polska rzeczywistosc, probuje
wepchnac ja w koleiny normalnosci, czyli w rejony, gdzie swiat zalezy od
kompetencji, wiedzy, dobrej woli. Latwo byloby mu przeciez odpowiedziec: z
pomieszania dobrych checi i glupoty, skrzyzowania troski i bezwzglednosci,
splotu poczucia misji i chamstwa rodzi sie czesto w Polsce nienormalnosc i
absurd. Byc moze jednak Mrozkowi chodzi o to samo - o prawo do nazywania rzeczy
po imieniu, bez powolywania sie na wymyslne kategorie estetyczne, ktore zaczna
pelnic role usprawiedliwien.
Stad tez pisarz wybiera za przedmiot swojej felietonowej obserwacji polska
codziennosc. Pisze nie o tym, co nowe, lecz o polskich rzeczach niezmiennych -
tych, ktore przetrwaly i przetrwaja kazda zmiane (nawet tak blaha, jak zmiana
ustroju): o politykach, ktorzy plota bzdury stylem wysokim, o chamstwie
szerzacym sie na ulicach, o zyciu publicznym, ktorym miotaja nasze humory, o
kruchosci i plytkosci polskiej stabilizacji, o rodzimym niedorobstwie i braku
profesjonalizmu, o polskiej niecheci do Polski. Juz po kilku felietonach
Dziennika powrotu czujemy, ze autor jest bardziej stad niz z oddali, bardziej
swoj niz obcy, bardziej nasz niz miedzynarodowy. Juz chloszcze nas jak inni
felietonisci, juz przynudza po naszemu i jak my zamienia szczegolowe w ogolne,
a ogolne w ogolnikowe. Troche smiesznie, troche madrze, troche melancholijnie.
Czyli tak, jak powinno byc w felietonie.
Nie nalezy przeciez oczekiwac od tego gatunku, ze polaczy glebie filozofii,
przekrojowosc socjologii i panoramicznosc historii. Innymi slowy: felietonista
jest tylko felietonista, a nie skrzyzowaniem Kolakowskiego, Baumana i Daviesa.
Kiedy wiec przeczytamy ksiazke Mrozka na prawach przez niego zaproponowanych,
odsloni sie przed nami frapujace oblicze autora. Przede wszystkim widac, ze
tkwi w nim bardzo cenna nadwyzka obywatelskiej troski, dla ktorej znajduje
formy zroznicowane (od monologu i skeczu, poprzez scenke az do eseju), za to
nieagresywne. Przybyl nam zatem felietonista z klasa: ironiczny, ale nie tak
zlosliwy jak Marek Gronski z Polityki, wyrafinowany, ale nie tak literacki jak
Jerzy Pilch, a nade wszystko wyrazisty w swoich sadach o rzeczywistosci. Nie
calej, bo dzieki ostremu wykresleniu tematow, ktorymi nie bedzie sie zajmowal,
Mrozek obsadzil role obserwatora tych zachowan polskiego spoleczenstwa, ktore
zmieniaja sie wolniej niz ustroje i rzadzace partie. Tropi skamieliny rodzimego
charakteru i rodzimej mentalnosci, sprawdzajac, czy nie stoja na drodze do
normalnego zycia. Oczywiscie zalezy mu na normalnosci o podwyzszonym
standardzie, strzezonym przez przyzwoitosc i poczucie humoru. Bo jesli dobrze
rozumiem intencje autora, w takim wlasnie - normalnym - kraju chce zyc. I to
juz ostatni powod, dla ktorego jeszcze do Polski nie powrocil. My tez.
www.google.com/search?num=100&hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&q=polska+chrystusem+narodow
• Link do Listy Morderstw Popelnionych przez zydow IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: E_PALESTYN 11.12.03, 02:45 zarchiwizowany
US denies Gaza inspired new tactics
By Charles Aldinger
Washington
December 10, 2003
The US military has adopted tough new tactics against guerillas in Iraq,
arresting relatives of insurgents and destroying houses used to plan attacks
against American troops.
But US defence officials denied the move was modelled on tactics used by
Israeli forces in Gaza and the West Bank, despite visits by US military
officers to Israel this year to discuss urban combat with the Israel Defence
Forces (IDF).
One US official, who asked not to be identified, said: "In recent weeks, we
have begun using a much-increased tempo of taking the fight to remnants of the
former regime to prevent them from planning and carrying out attacks on our
people."
"This is new in that we are engaging (attacking) buildings for two reasons: if
we find they were used to plan or launch strikes against our forces; or if we
have information that arms were being made or kept there for attacks."
Another confirmed a New York Times report that some family members of guerillas
wanted by the military were being arrested. But he said it was not a pressure
tactic to coerce insurgents to surrender.
"We don't do kidnapping. We are arresting relatives if it becomes known that
they are co-ordinating with those high-value targets that we are seeking, or if
they have information where fugitives are holding out," he said.
The Times reported from Iraq that at least one Iraqi village had been
surrounded by razor wire as part of the crackdown, forcing residents to enter
and leave through a US checkpoint. This was similar to Israeli tactics.
Brigadier General Michael Vane, from US Army's Doctrine and Training Command,
said in a letter to Army magazine in July that American officers had gone to
Israel to discuss urban combat and intelligence with the IDF.
Training command spokesman Harvey Perritt said: "There is a fair amount of
military intellectual discussion that goes on between the US Army and the IDF."
He said General Vane was referring to a visit to Israel last January. Pentagon
officials cautioned against drawing any direct parallel between Israeli tactics
on the West Bank and the new US moves in Iraq.
In one recent incident, the US used a bulldozer to knock down the front wall of
a small compound owned by an elderly couple in the Iraqi village of Hawija,
after troops found explosives in the house.
www.theage.com.au/articles/2003/12/09/1070732210797.html
• a ty komunislamista czy tylko glupi ? grigorij ? IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: TZARON 11.12.03, 01:23 zarchiwizowany
www.democracynow.org/article.pl?sid=03/12/09/162219#transcript
na kolyme by ich poslac...
...teraz dupy dajesz sodomitom z iraku
leczenie nie pomoze
KOMUNISTA CZY FASZYSTA
TY W TYM GOWNIE
JAKO GLISDA
(¯`·.¸¸.·´
;((((((((((((
...laska semtexu i rozrywka!!!
na kolyme by ich poslac...
...teraz dupy dajesz sodomitom z iraku
leczenie nie pomoze
KOMUNISTA CZY FASZYSTA
TY W TYM GOWNIE
JAKO GLISDA
(¯`·.¸¸.·´
;((((((((((((
...laska semtexu i rozrywka!!!
• Precz z faszystowsim rezimem SSharona i Busha IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: JEWHATER 10.12.03, 20:31 zarchiwizowany
Zdrada Jezusa Chrystusa
Książęta żydowscy poznali Chrystusa, a jeśli czegoś o Nim nie wiedzieli, była
to nieświadomość umyślna, więc nie zwalniająca od winy. Grzech ich był przeto
grzechem najcięższym, zarówno ze względu na rodzaj grzesznego czynu, jak i ze
względu na złą wolę. Lud żydowski zgrzeszył bardzo ciężko z uwagi na obiektywny
charakter czynu, wszakże winę jego pomniejsza nieświadomość... Nieświadomość
umyślna nie zwalnia od winy, lecz raczej ją powiększa. Dowodzi bowiem tego, iż
człowiek tak bardzo lgnie do grzechu, że chce trwać w nieświadomości, aby z
grzechem nie zrywać. Żydzi przeto zgrzeszyli nie tylko jako sprawcy
ukrzyżowania Chrystusa-Człowieka, lecz poniekąd także jako sprawcy ukrzyżowania
Boga.
Św. Tomasz z Akwinu,
Suma teologiczna III, 45 a. 5 ad 3; 46 a. 6 corpus
´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
Przypominanie, że ten sam Bóg Żywy mówił do wszystkich zarówno w Starym, jak i
Nowym Testamencie.
Przypominanie, że Jezus narodził się z matki Żydówki, z pokolenia Dawida i ludu
izraelskiego. Jego wieczna miłość i Jego przebaczenie obejmuje własny naród i
cały świat.
Przypominanie, że apostołowie, pierwsi uczniowie i męczennicy byli Żydami.
Przypominanie, że fundamentalne przykazanie chrystianizmu, przykazanie miłości
Boga i bliźniego ogłoszone już w Starym Testamencie potwierdzone zostało przez
Jezusa. Zobowiązuje ono chrześcijan i Żydów we wszystkich relacjach
międzyludzkich, bez żadnego wyjątku.
Unikanie pomniejszania wartości judaizmu pobiblijnego w celach wywyższania
chrystianizmu.
Unikanie słowa «Żydzi» w znaczeniu wyłącznym «nieprzyjaciół Jezusa» lub
wyrażenia «nieprzyjaciele Jezusa» jako określenie całego narodu żydowskiego.
Unikanie przedstawiania Męki Chrystusa w taki sposób, jakoby ohydne skazanie Go
na śmierć ciążyło na wszystkich Żydach. W rzeczywistości to nie wszyscy Żydzi
domagali się śmierci Jezusa i nie oni sami są za nią odpowiedzialni. Krzyż,
który zbawia nas wszystkich, objawia, że również za nasze grzechy umarł
Chrystus. Przypominać należy wszystkim rodzicom i wychowawcom chrześcijańskim o
odpowiedzialności, jaką ponoszą, przedstawiając Ewangelię, a przede wszystkim
opowiadanie o Męce, w sposób nadmiernie uproszczony. Inspirują bowiem przez to,
czy tego chcą, czy też nie, świadomość lub podświadomość swoich dzieci i
słuchaczy. Z punktu widzenia psychologii w duszach prostych, poruszonych gorącą
miłością i żywym współczuciem dla ukrzyżowanego Zbawiciela, nienawiść, jaką
odczuwają ? w sposób zupełnie naturalny ? w stosunku do prześladowców Jezusa,
zmienia się łatwo w niechęć rozszerzaną na Żydów wszystkich czasów, również
tych współczesnych.
Unikanie przekleństwa zawartego w Piśmie świętym i cytowania okrzyku
podburzonego tłumu «Krew Jego na nas i na nasze dzieci», bez przypomnienia, że
ten okrzyk nie może mieć w żadnym wypadku przewagi nad nieskończenie
potężniejszą modlitwą Jezusa: «Ojcze przebacz im, bo nie wiedzą, co czynią».
Unikanie uwierzytelniania niegodziwych opinii, że naród żydowski jest
potępiony, wyklęty i skazany na ciągłe cierpienia.
Unikane mówienia o Żydach tak, jak gdyby by nie byli pierwszymi członkami
Kościoła5.
´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
www.piusx.org.pl/zw/29/29zjc.html
Zapowiedź Antychrysta
W świetle tego, co tu napisaliśmy, można z łatwością zauważyć, że żydzi,
zaangażowani w dialog z katolikami, nie chcą w żadnym wypadku zaakceptować
chrześcijaństwa, a kontynuacja tego dialogu za wszelką cenę prowadzi do
zakwestionowania źródeł Boskiego Objawienia, Depozytu Wiary i Pisma świętego.
?Owoce" tego dialogu widoczne są później w nauczaniu katolickim (katechizmy,
programy duszpasterskie itd.). W ten sposób posoborowy dialog z judaizmem jest
zamachem na sam fundament Kościoła i niszczy Wiarę katolików. Trzeba też
wyraźnie powiedzieć, że jeśli prowadzi się dialog z tymi, który wyraźnie
oczekują mesjasza innego aniżeli Chrystus; mesjasza, który zapewni Żydom
panowanie nad światem i unicestwi Kościół katolicki, to będzie on w
rzeczywistości Antychrystem (z greckiego: antichristos; zob.: J 2,18).
???
=================================================================
;((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
Książęta żydowscy poznali Chrystusa, a jeśli czegoś o Nim nie wiedzieli, była
to nieświadomość umyślna, więc nie zwalniająca od winy. Grzech ich był przeto
grzechem najcięższym, zarówno ze względu na rodzaj grzesznego czynu, jak i ze
względu na złą wolę. Lud żydowski zgrzeszył bardzo ciężko z uwagi na obiektywny
charakter czynu, wszakże winę jego pomniejsza nieświadomość... Nieświadomość
umyślna nie zwalnia od winy, lecz raczej ją powiększa. Dowodzi bowiem tego, iż
człowiek tak bardzo lgnie do grzechu, że chce trwać w nieświadomości, aby z
grzechem nie zrywać. Żydzi przeto zgrzeszyli nie tylko jako sprawcy
ukrzyżowania Chrystusa-Człowieka, lecz poniekąd także jako sprawcy ukrzyżowania
Boga.
Św. Tomasz z Akwinu,
Suma teologiczna III, 45 a. 5 ad 3; 46 a. 6 corpus
´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
Przypominanie, że ten sam Bóg Żywy mówił do wszystkich zarówno w Starym, jak i
Nowym Testamencie.
Przypominanie, że Jezus narodził się z matki Żydówki, z pokolenia Dawida i ludu
izraelskiego. Jego wieczna miłość i Jego przebaczenie obejmuje własny naród i
cały świat.
Przypominanie, że apostołowie, pierwsi uczniowie i męczennicy byli Żydami.
Przypominanie, że fundamentalne przykazanie chrystianizmu, przykazanie miłości
Boga i bliźniego ogłoszone już w Starym Testamencie potwierdzone zostało przez
Jezusa. Zobowiązuje ono chrześcijan i Żydów we wszystkich relacjach
międzyludzkich, bez żadnego wyjątku.
Unikanie pomniejszania wartości judaizmu pobiblijnego w celach wywyższania
chrystianizmu.
Unikanie słowa «Żydzi» w znaczeniu wyłącznym «nieprzyjaciół Jezusa» lub
wyrażenia «nieprzyjaciele Jezusa» jako określenie całego narodu żydowskiego.
Unikanie przedstawiania Męki Chrystusa w taki sposób, jakoby ohydne skazanie Go
na śmierć ciążyło na wszystkich Żydach. W rzeczywistości to nie wszyscy Żydzi
domagali się śmierci Jezusa i nie oni sami są za nią odpowiedzialni. Krzyż,
który zbawia nas wszystkich, objawia, że również za nasze grzechy umarł
Chrystus. Przypominać należy wszystkim rodzicom i wychowawcom chrześcijańskim o
odpowiedzialności, jaką ponoszą, przedstawiając Ewangelię, a przede wszystkim
opowiadanie o Męce, w sposób nadmiernie uproszczony. Inspirują bowiem przez to,
czy tego chcą, czy też nie, świadomość lub podświadomość swoich dzieci i
słuchaczy. Z punktu widzenia psychologii w duszach prostych, poruszonych gorącą
miłością i żywym współczuciem dla ukrzyżowanego Zbawiciela, nienawiść, jaką
odczuwają ? w sposób zupełnie naturalny ? w stosunku do prześladowców Jezusa,
zmienia się łatwo w niechęć rozszerzaną na Żydów wszystkich czasów, również
tych współczesnych.
Unikanie przekleństwa zawartego w Piśmie świętym i cytowania okrzyku
podburzonego tłumu «Krew Jego na nas i na nasze dzieci», bez przypomnienia, że
ten okrzyk nie może mieć w żadnym wypadku przewagi nad nieskończenie
potężniejszą modlitwą Jezusa: «Ojcze przebacz im, bo nie wiedzą, co czynią».
Unikanie uwierzytelniania niegodziwych opinii, że naród żydowski jest
potępiony, wyklęty i skazany na ciągłe cierpienia.
Unikane mówienia o Żydach tak, jak gdyby by nie byli pierwszymi członkami
Kościoła5.
´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´´
www.piusx.org.pl/zw/29/29zjc.html
Zapowiedź Antychrysta
W świetle tego, co tu napisaliśmy, można z łatwością zauważyć, że żydzi,
zaangażowani w dialog z katolikami, nie chcą w żadnym wypadku zaakceptować
chrześcijaństwa, a kontynuacja tego dialogu za wszelką cenę prowadzi do
zakwestionowania źródeł Boskiego Objawienia, Depozytu Wiary i Pisma świętego.
?Owoce" tego dialogu widoczne są później w nauczaniu katolickim (katechizmy,
programy duszpasterskie itd.). W ten sposób posoborowy dialog z judaizmem jest
zamachem na sam fundament Kościoła i niszczy Wiarę katolików. Trzeba też
wyraźnie powiedzieć, że jeśli prowadzi się dialog z tymi, który wyraźnie
oczekują mesjasza innego aniżeli Chrystus; mesjasza, który zapewni Żydom
panowanie nad światem i unicestwi Kościół katolicki, to będzie on w
rzeczywistości Antychrystem (z greckiego: antichristos; zob.: J 2,18).
???
=================================================================
;((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
Polen bäddade för Berlinmurens fall
www.palmecenter.se/article.asp?Article_Id=651
Tadeusz Mazowiecki var först ut på banan under den märkliga hösten 1989. Han
utnämndes till det kommunistiska östblockets första icke-kommunistiska
premiärminister sommaren 1989. Några månader senare fanns inget kommunistiskt
Östeuropa. I ett samtal med Ingvar Carlsson, ingående i Palmecentrets
seminarieserie ”Betraktelser efter murens fall”, blickar han nu tillbaka på de
tio år som gått. Han önskar bland annat att man tagit större sociala hänsyn i
övergången till marknadsekonomi.
Under de senaste åren har kommunistpartierna ökat i popularitet i Central- och
Östeuropa. Men det skrämmer inte Tadeusz Mazowiecki, Polens förste icke-
kommunistiske premiärminister efter kalla kriget, i dag ordförande i
parlamentets EU-integrationsutskott.
– De kommunistpartier som idag är aktiva på den demokratiska arenan kan inte
jämföras med dem som fanns i det gamla systemet, hävdar han.
Ingvar Carlsson och Tadeusz Mazowiecki möttes första gången hösten 1989. Som
förste utländske regeringschef besökte Ingvar Carlsson det nya demokratiska
Polen. Tadeusz Mazowiecki hade nyligen valts till premiärminister. Båda har
starka minnen från mötet, som resulterade i vänskap och som tio år senare har
fört dem samman igen för att tala om den tid som gått. Denna gång äger mötet
rum inom ramen för Palmecentrets seminarieserie ”Betraktelser efter murens
fall”.
Tadeusz Mazowiecki minns särskilt ett råd han fick av Ingvar Carlsson: att
komma ihåg den sociala komponenten i samband med marknadsorienteringen av
ekonomin. I efterhand konstaterar Tadeusz Mazowiecki att han kanske inte
lyssnade tillräckligt noga till detta råd.
– I dag kan man självklart fråga sig om chockterapin som genomfördes inte var
för liberal. Jag förespråkade från början en rätt hård linje, men i dag måste
jag medge att de sociala frågorna blev kraftigt försenade.
Problemet var att man inte hade någon förebild i modern historia, konstaterar
Tadeusz Mazowiecki. Polen var först ut. Aldrig tidigare hade någon försökt att
förvandla en planekonomisk enpartistat till en demokratisk marknadsekonomi.
Kostnaderna blev mycket större än man hade väntat sig.
– Vi hade inte räknat med östmarknadens sammanbrott. Det förde med sig stora
samhällskostnader som i sin tur minskade stödet för reformerna.
För Tadeusz Mazowiecki var det särskilt svårt att tvingas fatta beslut om
nedläggning av industrier som utgjort kärnan i fackföreningsrörelsen
Solidaritet. Han har själv sin bakgrund i Solidaritet och det var på dess
mandat han kom till makten. Men det fanns inget alternativ, det handlade om
industrier som var svårt eftersatta och inte hade en chans att klara sig i en
marknadsekonomi.
Under 80-talet var Solidaritet en massrörelse som samlade hundratusentals
människor till demonstrationer. I dag tycks den polska fackföreningsrörelsen ha
tappat initiativet och har svårt att locka folk. Tadeusz Mazowiecki ser flera
förklaringar till detta. Den främsta orsaken är kanske förvirring vad gäller
identitet inom rörelsen: ska man vara en politisk kraft eller en renodlad
fackföreningsrörelse? Därtill kommer det faktum att arbetsmarknadens parter
fortfarande är svaga.
– Triangeln ”arbetsgivare-arbetstagare-stat” är inte färdig i Polen. Vår
ekonomi befinner sig fortfarande i en övergångsfas, konstaterar Tadeusz
Mazowiecki.
En annan organisation som istället haft oväntade framgångar de senaste åren är
det polska kommunistpartiet. Tadeusz Mazowiecki medger att han är förvånad.
– Vi gjorde misstaget att döma ut kommunistpartiet. Själv trodde jag aldrig att
de skulle kunna komma tillbaka. Idag gör de comeback som kritiker av reformerna.
Trots att dagens kommunister inte reformerat sina åsikter nämnvärt är det fel
att likställa dem med det parti som styrde landet före 1989, anser Mazowiecki.
I dag är utgångspunkten en helt annan: de kommunistiska partierna är aktiva på
den demokratiska arenan.
– Däremot tycker jag att omvärlden allt för lättvindigt accepterat de
kommunister som över en natt förvandlats till socialdemokrater.
Tadeusz Mazowiecki satt med som rådgivare vid runda bordssamtalen våren 1989,
som resulterade i att den polska kommunistiska regeringen slutgiltigt gav upp
makten. Maktöverlämningen skedde fredligt: allmänna fria val kunde hållas redan
samma år.
I efterhand är det Berlinmurens fall som står som den främsta symbolen för
omvandlingen i Central- och Östeuropa. Utvecklingen i Polen har fått mindre
uppmärksamhet, den är inte lika lättgripbar och tydlig, men minst lika viktig.
Redan 1980 tvingades det regerande kommunistpartiet till eftergifter och tillät
massorganisationer. På så sätt kunde Solidaritet och andra organisationer
fortsätta sitt arbete ovan jord, med stöd av den katolska kyrkan.
– Polen står mer för en process än en enstaka spektakulär händelse. Det kanske
viktigaste av allt är att förloppet blev fredligt och banade vägen för det som
sedan hände i Tjeckoslovakien och Tyskland, framhåller Tadeusz Mazowiecki.
Agneta Söderberg
www.palmecenter.se/article.asp?Article_Id=651
Tadeusz Mazowiecki var först ut på banan under den märkliga hösten 1989. Han
utnämndes till det kommunistiska östblockets första icke-kommunistiska
premiärminister sommaren 1989. Några månader senare fanns inget kommunistiskt
Östeuropa. I ett samtal med Ingvar Carlsson, ingående i Palmecentrets
seminarieserie ”Betraktelser efter murens fall”, blickar han nu tillbaka på de
tio år som gått. Han önskar bland annat att man tagit större sociala hänsyn i
övergången till marknadsekonomi.
Under de senaste åren har kommunistpartierna ökat i popularitet i Central- och
Östeuropa. Men det skrämmer inte Tadeusz Mazowiecki, Polens förste icke-
kommunistiske premiärminister efter kalla kriget, i dag ordförande i
parlamentets EU-integrationsutskott.
– De kommunistpartier som idag är aktiva på den demokratiska arenan kan inte
jämföras med dem som fanns i det gamla systemet, hävdar han.
Ingvar Carlsson och Tadeusz Mazowiecki möttes första gången hösten 1989. Som
förste utländske regeringschef besökte Ingvar Carlsson det nya demokratiska
Polen. Tadeusz Mazowiecki hade nyligen valts till premiärminister. Båda har
starka minnen från mötet, som resulterade i vänskap och som tio år senare har
fört dem samman igen för att tala om den tid som gått. Denna gång äger mötet
rum inom ramen för Palmecentrets seminarieserie ”Betraktelser efter murens
fall”.
Tadeusz Mazowiecki minns särskilt ett råd han fick av Ingvar Carlsson: att
komma ihåg den sociala komponenten i samband med marknadsorienteringen av
ekonomin. I efterhand konstaterar Tadeusz Mazowiecki att han kanske inte
lyssnade tillräckligt noga till detta råd.
– I dag kan man självklart fråga sig om chockterapin som genomfördes inte var
för liberal. Jag förespråkade från början en rätt hård linje, men i dag måste
jag medge att de sociala frågorna blev kraftigt försenade.
Problemet var att man inte hade någon förebild i modern historia, konstaterar
Tadeusz Mazowiecki. Polen var först ut. Aldrig tidigare hade någon försökt att
förvandla en planekonomisk enpartistat till en demokratisk marknadsekonomi.
Kostnaderna blev mycket större än man hade väntat sig.
– Vi hade inte räknat med östmarknadens sammanbrott. Det förde med sig stora
samhällskostnader som i sin tur minskade stödet för reformerna.
För Tadeusz Mazowiecki var det särskilt svårt att tvingas fatta beslut om
nedläggning av industrier som utgjort kärnan i fackföreningsrörelsen
Solidaritet. Han har själv sin bakgrund i Solidaritet och det var på dess
mandat han kom till makten. Men det fanns inget alternativ, det handlade om
industrier som var svårt eftersatta och inte hade en chans att klara sig i en
marknadsekonomi.
Under 80-talet var Solidaritet en massrörelse som samlade hundratusentals
människor till demonstrationer. I dag tycks den polska fackföreningsrörelsen ha
tappat initiativet och har svårt att locka folk. Tadeusz Mazowiecki ser flera
förklaringar till detta. Den främsta orsaken är kanske förvirring vad gäller
identitet inom rörelsen: ska man vara en politisk kraft eller en renodlad
fackföreningsrörelse? Därtill kommer det faktum att arbetsmarknadens parter
fortfarande är svaga.
– Triangeln ”arbetsgivare-arbetstagare-stat” är inte färdig i Polen. Vår
ekonomi befinner sig fortfarande i en övergångsfas, konstaterar Tadeusz
Mazowiecki.
En annan organisation som istället haft oväntade framgångar de senaste åren är
det polska kommunistpartiet. Tadeusz Mazowiecki medger att han är förvånad.
– Vi gjorde misstaget att döma ut kommunistpartiet. Själv trodde jag aldrig att
de skulle kunna komma tillbaka. Idag gör de comeback som kritiker av reformerna.
Trots att dagens kommunister inte reformerat sina åsikter nämnvärt är det fel
att likställa dem med det parti som styrde landet före 1989, anser Mazowiecki.
I dag är utgångspunkten en helt annan: de kommunistiska partierna är aktiva på
den demokratiska arenan.
– Däremot tycker jag att omvärlden allt för lättvindigt accepterat de
kommunister som över en natt förvandlats till socialdemokrater.
Tadeusz Mazowiecki satt med som rådgivare vid runda bordssamtalen våren 1989,
som resulterade i att den polska kommunistiska regeringen slutgiltigt gav upp
makten. Maktöverlämningen skedde fredligt: allmänna fria val kunde hållas redan
samma år.
I efterhand är det Berlinmurens fall som står som den främsta symbolen för
omvandlingen i Central- och Östeuropa. Utvecklingen i Polen har fått mindre
uppmärksamhet, den är inte lika lättgripbar och tydlig, men minst lika viktig.
Redan 1980 tvingades det regerande kommunistpartiet till eftergifter och tillät
massorganisationer. På så sätt kunde Solidaritet och andra organisationer
fortsätta sitt arbete ovan jord, med stöd av den katolska kyrkan.
– Polen står mer för en process än en enstaka spektakulär händelse. Det kanske
viktigaste av allt är att förloppet blev fredligt och banade vägen för det som
sedan hände i Tjeckoslovakien och Tyskland, framhåller Tadeusz Mazowiecki.
Agneta Söderberg
Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.
• ReD________________H__:.:__M__.:.__R IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: t;´¯)(¯`·.¸ 10.12.03, 01:18 zarchiwizowany
www.wnyc.org/books/14930
The Untimely Death Of Comrade Zhdano
Moscow, September 6, 1948
You went your glorious way, comrade Zhdanov
Leaving eternal footsteps behind
-Aleksander Zharov, Pravda, Sept.1, 1948
With what biting sarcasm he threatened all the old enemies, all those
who would poison young Soviet literature with their pernicious
poison! With what annihilating scorn and hatred he exposed
the mercenary bourgeois literature of the West today, that
corrupts the minds of readers, that aids reaction, that served
fascism once in no small way and now serves the lackeyism of the
imperialists - the instigators of a new war!
- Mikhail Sholokhov,
Pravda, Sept.2, 1948
The workers of the entire world mourn the untimely death of com.
A. A. Zhdanov
- Izvestia, Sept.3, 1948
On August 31, 1948, at about 4 o'clock in the afternoon, Andrei Aleksandrovich
Zhdanov, a powerful member of Stalin's Politburo, "unexpectedly" died in
Valdai, a health resort for members of the Soviet political elite, about two
and a half hours by car to the north and west of Moscow, on the road to
Leningrad. Zhdanov was fifty-two years old. His death provoked a public
outpouring of grief throughout the Communist world. Condolences were published
over many days. Mao Zedong from China and Georgi Dimitrov, the new president of
Bulgaria, expressed their sorrow, as did the leaders of Communist parties of
Great Britain, France, and Austria, as well as all the Soviet satellites. His
body was borne on a gun carriage through Red Square to the Great Hall that
housed the Politburo, followed by a procession of dignitaries and mourners,
with Stalin in the lead. Eulogies by Molotov and other Politburo leaders were
declaimed in Red Square to a sea of mourners. Poems were dedicated to his
eternal memory. Mikhail Sholokhov and other noted writers, along with members
of the cultural elite, referred to the "great heart" and the "crystal bright
mind" of this "true son of the Motherland and the party." It was said at the
time that no Kremlin leader had been buried with such public attention since
Sergei Kirov, who died in 1934.
A. A. Zhdanov had been the former, brutal boss of the Leningrad party and the
architect of Soviet postwar ideology and cultural policy. It was he who gave
the keynote speech at the 1934 International Writers' Congress, where he had
invoked Stalin's dictum that writers were the "engineers of human souls." In
1946 Zhdanov had issued the infamous "report" on literature and ideology that
included, among other things, harsh criticism of the poetry of A. A. Akhmatova,
and led to her banishment from the Writers' Union. Akhmatova, Zhdanov wrote,
was "A nun or a whore - or rather both a nun and a whore who combines harlotry
with prayer." He described her poetry as "utterly remote from the people ...
What can there be in common between this poetry and the interests of our people
and State? Nothing whatsoever." Another time he had rebuked Shostakovich for
not writing music the average Soviet worker could hum. Zhdanov's report
unleashed what came to be termed the "Zhdanovshchina," which terrorized Soviet
arts and letters for a decade until the Khrushchev "Thaw."
After the Second World War Zhdanov had been represented as a hero of the siege
of Leningrad; he had given his life to the "interests of the State." At the
time of his death he was considered by many to have been the most powerful
member of the Soviet government after Stalin. He had defended Stalin and
Stalinism all his life and had earned the respect of the people as well as
Stalin's confidence. In September 1947 Stalin entrusted Zhdanov, not Molotov,
with delivering the keynote speech at the Szklarska Poreba conference in Poland
that set out the basic terms of Stalin's Cold War vision to leaders of the
satellite countries and foreign Communist parties. Zhdanov depicted the postwar
world as "irrevocably divided into two hostile camps." American expansionism,
he charged, was comparable to that of the fascist states of the 1930s.
More than just professional or political sympathy drew Stalin and Zhdanov
together. Stalin was said to have personally preferred him because Zhdanov was
educated and more literate than most of the other Politburo leaders. Zhdanov
enjoyed playing the piano at Stalin's dacha and discussing literature with
Gorky. In the spring of 1949 his son, Yuri, married Stalin's daughter, vetlana
Alliluyeva, something that was possibly more a sign of political realities than
of personal choice.
But in early July 1948 Zhdanov had fainted on the way to his office in Old
Square near the Kremlin, returning from a Politburo meeting held in
Stalin's "nearby" dacha the Blizhnyaya. Though just over fifty, he had had a
bad heart for some time, the result of years of overwork, drinking, and
hypertension. Earlier that spring Stalin had given him other reasons to be
anxious. In April, only nine months since Zhdanov's historic speech at
Szklarska Poreba, Stalin had reacted very negatively to the role Zhdanov's son,
Yuri, had played in discussing the botanist T.D. Lysenko at a meeting held
under the auspices of the Central Committee, saying that those responsible for
this provocation should be punished in "exemplary "fashion. Although not
formally dismissed from the posts of Secretary of Ideology of the Communist
Party and head of the Leningrad party, Zhdanov knew his position in the party
was now at risk and his life might also be in jeopardy. Stalin's suggestion
that he recover in Valdai had carried with it the same solicitude that had
accompanied the demotion of other Kremlin leaders since the thirties. The head
of the Kremlin Hospital signed the medical certificate authorizing Zhdanov's
leave and he was sent to Valdai on July 13. "Strict bed rest" was ordered for
him to safeguard his health, but its other purpose, as Zhdanov might have
guessed, would have been to keep him out of active political life.
On September 6, 1948, one week after Zhdanov "went his glorious way," an
emergency session of experts was convened in the Kremlin Hospital to
investigate whether the doctors who treated him in Valdai had misdiagnosed
Zhdanov's illness and had provided criminally negligent treatment. The Kremlin
Hospital doctor responsible for the last EKGs of Zhdanov's heart had sent a
secret letter accusing the doctors of this negligence to Lieutenant General
Nikolai Vlasik, the Head of the Kremlin Bodyguards, known as the Okhrana. In
her letter of August 29, 1948 - two days before Zhdanov's death - Lidia
F.Timashuk asserted that the attending doctors had underestimated
the "unquestionably grave condition of comrade Zhdanov." Soon after his death
this evaluation turned into an accusation of outright murder.
For some fifty years this accusation has been viewed as the essential element
in the instigation of the Doctors' Plot, and for fifty years, ever since the
accusation against the doctors was dismissed by the Soviet government after
Stalin's death, it has been widely assumed to have been a false charge,
stemming from a premeditated plan to launch a conspiracy against the
doctors ...
The Untimely Death Of Comrade Zhdano
Moscow, September 6, 1948
You went your glorious way, comrade Zhdanov
Leaving eternal footsteps behind
-Aleksander Zharov, Pravda, Sept.1, 1948
With what biting sarcasm he threatened all the old enemies, all those
who would poison young Soviet literature with their pernicious
poison! With what annihilating scorn and hatred he exposed
the mercenary bourgeois literature of the West today, that
corrupts the minds of readers, that aids reaction, that served
fascism once in no small way and now serves the lackeyism of the
imperialists - the instigators of a new war!
- Mikhail Sholokhov,
Pravda, Sept.2, 1948
The workers of the entire world mourn the untimely death of com.
A. A. Zhdanov
- Izvestia, Sept.3, 1948
On August 31, 1948, at about 4 o'clock in the afternoon, Andrei Aleksandrovich
Zhdanov, a powerful member of Stalin's Politburo, "unexpectedly" died in
Valdai, a health resort for members of the Soviet political elite, about two
and a half hours by car to the north and west of Moscow, on the road to
Leningrad. Zhdanov was fifty-two years old. His death provoked a public
outpouring of grief throughout the Communist world. Condolences were published
over many days. Mao Zedong from China and Georgi Dimitrov, the new president of
Bulgaria, expressed their sorrow, as did the leaders of Communist parties of
Great Britain, France, and Austria, as well as all the Soviet satellites. His
body was borne on a gun carriage through Red Square to the Great Hall that
housed the Politburo, followed by a procession of dignitaries and mourners,
with Stalin in the lead. Eulogies by Molotov and other Politburo leaders were
declaimed in Red Square to a sea of mourners. Poems were dedicated to his
eternal memory. Mikhail Sholokhov and other noted writers, along with members
of the cultural elite, referred to the "great heart" and the "crystal bright
mind" of this "true son of the Motherland and the party." It was said at the
time that no Kremlin leader had been buried with such public attention since
Sergei Kirov, who died in 1934.
A. A. Zhdanov had been the former, brutal boss of the Leningrad party and the
architect of Soviet postwar ideology and cultural policy. It was he who gave
the keynote speech at the 1934 International Writers' Congress, where he had
invoked Stalin's dictum that writers were the "engineers of human souls." In
1946 Zhdanov had issued the infamous "report" on literature and ideology that
included, among other things, harsh criticism of the poetry of A. A. Akhmatova,
and led to her banishment from the Writers' Union. Akhmatova, Zhdanov wrote,
was "A nun or a whore - or rather both a nun and a whore who combines harlotry
with prayer." He described her poetry as "utterly remote from the people ...
What can there be in common between this poetry and the interests of our people
and State? Nothing whatsoever." Another time he had rebuked Shostakovich for
not writing music the average Soviet worker could hum. Zhdanov's report
unleashed what came to be termed the "Zhdanovshchina," which terrorized Soviet
arts and letters for a decade until the Khrushchev "Thaw."
After the Second World War Zhdanov had been represented as a hero of the siege
of Leningrad; he had given his life to the "interests of the State." At the
time of his death he was considered by many to have been the most powerful
member of the Soviet government after Stalin. He had defended Stalin and
Stalinism all his life and had earned the respect of the people as well as
Stalin's confidence. In September 1947 Stalin entrusted Zhdanov, not Molotov,
with delivering the keynote speech at the Szklarska Poreba conference in Poland
that set out the basic terms of Stalin's Cold War vision to leaders of the
satellite countries and foreign Communist parties. Zhdanov depicted the postwar
world as "irrevocably divided into two hostile camps." American expansionism,
he charged, was comparable to that of the fascist states of the 1930s.
More than just professional or political sympathy drew Stalin and Zhdanov
together. Stalin was said to have personally preferred him because Zhdanov was
educated and more literate than most of the other Politburo leaders. Zhdanov
enjoyed playing the piano at Stalin's dacha and discussing literature with
Gorky. In the spring of 1949 his son, Yuri, married Stalin's daughter, vetlana
Alliluyeva, something that was possibly more a sign of political realities than
of personal choice.
But in early July 1948 Zhdanov had fainted on the way to his office in Old
Square near the Kremlin, returning from a Politburo meeting held in
Stalin's "nearby" dacha the Blizhnyaya. Though just over fifty, he had had a
bad heart for some time, the result of years of overwork, drinking, and
hypertension. Earlier that spring Stalin had given him other reasons to be
anxious. In April, only nine months since Zhdanov's historic speech at
Szklarska Poreba, Stalin had reacted very negatively to the role Zhdanov's son,
Yuri, had played in discussing the botanist T.D. Lysenko at a meeting held
under the auspices of the Central Committee, saying that those responsible for
this provocation should be punished in "exemplary "fashion. Although not
formally dismissed from the posts of Secretary of Ideology of the Communist
Party and head of the Leningrad party, Zhdanov knew his position in the party
was now at risk and his life might also be in jeopardy. Stalin's suggestion
that he recover in Valdai had carried with it the same solicitude that had
accompanied the demotion of other Kremlin leaders since the thirties. The head
of the Kremlin Hospital signed the medical certificate authorizing Zhdanov's
leave and he was sent to Valdai on July 13. "Strict bed rest" was ordered for
him to safeguard his health, but its other purpose, as Zhdanov might have
guessed, would have been to keep him out of active political life.
On September 6, 1948, one week after Zhdanov "went his glorious way," an
emergency session of experts was convened in the Kremlin Hospital to
investigate whether the doctors who treated him in Valdai had misdiagnosed
Zhdanov's illness and had provided criminally negligent treatment. The Kremlin
Hospital doctor responsible for the last EKGs of Zhdanov's heart had sent a
secret letter accusing the doctors of this negligence to Lieutenant General
Nikolai Vlasik, the Head of the Kremlin Bodyguards, known as the Okhrana. In
her letter of August 29, 1948 - two days before Zhdanov's death - Lidia
F.Timashuk asserted that the attending doctors had underestimated
the "unquestionably grave condition of comrade Zhdanov." Soon after his death
this evaluation turned into an accusation of outright murder.
For some fifty years this accusation has been viewed as the essential element
in the instigation of the Doctors' Plot, and for fifty years, ever since the
accusation against the doctors was dismissed by the Soviet government after
Stalin's death, it has been widely assumed to have been a false charge,
stemming from a premeditated plan to launch a conspiracy against the
doctors ...
• _R__:-___D________H__:.:__M__.:.__R IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: .¸¸.·´¯) 10.12.03, 01:15 zarchiwizowany
Education is a weapon, whose effect depends on who holds it in his hands and at
whom it is aimed.A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.
Stalin, Joseph Vissarionovich (1879 - 1953) Georgian Politician
========================================================================
The Untimely Death Of Comrade Zhdano
Moscow, September 6, 1948
You went your glorious way, comrade Zhdanov
Leaving eternal footsteps behind
-Aleksander Zharov, Pravda, Sept.1, 1948
With what biting sarcasm he threatened all the old enemies, all those
who would poison young Soviet literature with their pernicious
poison! With what annihilating scorn and hatred he exposed
the mercenary bourgeois literature of the West today, that
corrupts the minds of readers, that aids reaction, that served
fascism once in no small way and now serves the lackeyism of the
imperialists - the instigators of a new war!
- Mikhail Sholokhov,
Pravda, Sept.2, 1948
The workers of the entire world mourn the untimely death of com.
A. A. Zhdanov
- Izvestia, Sept.3, 1948
On August 31, 1948, at about 4 o'clock in the afternoon, Andrei Aleksandrovich
Zhdanov, a powerful member of Stalin's Politburo, "unexpectedly" died in
Valdai, a health resort for members of the Soviet political elite, about two
and a half hours by car to the north and west of Moscow, on the road to
Leningrad. Zhdanov was fifty-two years old. His death provoked a public
outpouring of grief throughout the Communist world. Condolences were published
over many days. Mao Zedong from China and Georgi Dimitrov, the new president of
Bulgaria, expressed their sorrow, as did the leaders of Communist parties of
Great Britain, France, and Austria, as well as all the Soviet satellites. His
body was borne on a gun carriage through Red Square to the Great Hall that
housed the Politburo, followed by a procession of dignitaries and mourners,
with Stalin in the lead. Eulogies by Molotov and other Politburo leaders were
declaimed in Red Square to a sea of mourners. Poems were dedicated to his
eternal memory. Mikhail Sholokhov and other noted writers, along with members
of the cultural elite, referred to the "great heart" and the "crystal bright
mind" of this "true son of the Motherland and the party." It was said at the
time that no Kremlin leader had been buried with such public attention since
Sergei Kirov, who died in 1934.
A. A. Zhdanov had been the former, brutal boss of the Leningrad party and the
architect of Soviet postwar ideology and cultural policy. It was he who gave
the keynote speech at the 1934 International Writers' Congress, where he had
invoked Stalin's dictum that writers were the "engineers of human souls." In
1946 Zhdanov had issued the infamous "report" on literature and ideology that
included, among other things, harsh criticism of the poetry of A. A. Akhmatova,
and led to her banishment from the Writers' Union. Akhmatova, Zhdanov wrote,
was "A nun or a whore - or rather both a nun and a whore who combines harlotry
with prayer." He described her poetry as "utterly remote from the people ...
What can there be in common between this poetry and the interests of our people
and State? Nothing whatsoever." Another time he had rebuked Shostakovich for
not writing music the average Soviet worker could hum. Zhdanov's report
unleashed what came to be termed the "Zhdanovshchina," which terrorized Soviet
arts and letters for a decade until the Khrushchev "Thaw."
After the Second World War Zhdanov had been represented as a hero of the siege
of Leningrad; he had given his life to the "interests of the State." At the
time of his death he was considered by many to have been the most powerful
member of the Soviet government after Stalin. He had defended Stalin and
Stalinism all his life and had earned the respect of the people as well as
Stalin's confidence. In September 1947 Stalin entrusted Zhdanov, not Molotov,
with delivering the keynote speech at the Szklarska Poreba conference in Poland
that set out the basic terms of Stalin's Cold War vision to leaders of the
satellite countries and foreign Communist parties. Zhdanov depicted the postwar
world as "irrevocably divided into two hostile camps." American expansionism,
he charged, was comparable to that of the fascist states of the 1930s.
More than just professional or political sympathy drew Stalin and Zhdanov
together. Stalin was said to have personally preferred him because Zhdanov was
educated and more literate than most of the other Politburo leaders. Zhdanov
enjoyed playing the piano at Stalin's dacha and discussing literature with
Gorky. In the spring of 1949 his son, Yuri, married Stalin's daughter, vetlana
Alliluyeva, something that was possibly more a sign of political realities than
of personal choice.
But in early July 1948 Zhdanov had fainted on the way to his office in Old
Square near the Kremlin, returning from a Politburo meeting held in
Stalin's "nearby" dacha the Blizhnyaya. Though just over fifty, he had had a
bad heart for some time, the result of years of overwork, drinking, and
hypertension. Earlier that spring Stalin had given him other reasons to be
anxious. In April, only nine months since Zhdanov's historic speech at
Szklarska Poreba, Stalin had reacted very negatively to the role Zhdanov's son,
Yuri, had played in discussing the botanist T.D. Lysenko at a meeting held
under the auspices of the Central Committee, saying that those responsible for
this provocation should be punished in "exemplary "fashion. Although not
formally dismissed from the posts of Secretary of Ideology of the Communist
Party and head of the Leningrad party, Zhdanov knew his position in the party
was now at risk and his life might also be in jeopardy. Stalin's suggestion
that he recover in Valdai had carried with it the same solicitude that had
accompanied the demotion of other Kremlin leaders since the thirties. The head
of the Kremlin Hospital signed the medical certificate authorizing Zhdanov's
leave and he was sent to Valdai on July 13. "Strict bed rest" was ordered for
him to safeguard his health, but its other purpose, as Zhdanov might have
guessed, would have been to keep him out of active political life.
On September 6, 1948, one week after Zhdanov "went his glorious way," an
emergency session of experts was convened in the Kremlin Hospital to
investigate whether the doctors who treated him in Valdai had misdiagnosed
Zhdanov's illness and had provided criminally negligent treatment. The Kremlin
Hospital doctor responsible for the last EKGs of Zhdanov's heart had sent a
secret letter accusing the doctors of this negligence to Lieutenant General
Nikolai Vlasik, the Head of the Kremlin Bodyguards, known as the Okhrana. In
her letter of August 29, 1948 - two days before Zhdanov's death - Lidia
F.Timashuk asserted that the attending doctors had underestimated
the "unquestionably grave condition of comrade Zhdanov." Soon after his death
this evaluation turned into an accusation of outright murder.
For some fifty years this accusation has been viewed as the essential element
in the instigation of the Doctors' Plot, and for fifty years, ever since the
accusation against the doctors was dismissed by the Soviet government after
Stalin's death, it has been widely assumed to have been a false charge,
stemming from a premeditated plan to launch a conspiracy against the
doctors ...
www.wnyc.org/books/14930
whom it is aimed.A single death is a tragedy; a million deaths is a statistic.
Stalin, Joseph Vissarionovich (1879 - 1953) Georgian Politician
========================================================================
The Untimely Death Of Comrade Zhdano
Moscow, September 6, 1948
You went your glorious way, comrade Zhdanov
Leaving eternal footsteps behind
-Aleksander Zharov, Pravda, Sept.1, 1948
With what biting sarcasm he threatened all the old enemies, all those
who would poison young Soviet literature with their pernicious
poison! With what annihilating scorn and hatred he exposed
the mercenary bourgeois literature of the West today, that
corrupts the minds of readers, that aids reaction, that served
fascism once in no small way and now serves the lackeyism of the
imperialists - the instigators of a new war!
- Mikhail Sholokhov,
Pravda, Sept.2, 1948
The workers of the entire world mourn the untimely death of com.
A. A. Zhdanov
- Izvestia, Sept.3, 1948
On August 31, 1948, at about 4 o'clock in the afternoon, Andrei Aleksandrovich
Zhdanov, a powerful member of Stalin's Politburo, "unexpectedly" died in
Valdai, a health resort for members of the Soviet political elite, about two
and a half hours by car to the north and west of Moscow, on the road to
Leningrad. Zhdanov was fifty-two years old. His death provoked a public
outpouring of grief throughout the Communist world. Condolences were published
over many days. Mao Zedong from China and Georgi Dimitrov, the new president of
Bulgaria, expressed their sorrow, as did the leaders of Communist parties of
Great Britain, France, and Austria, as well as all the Soviet satellites. His
body was borne on a gun carriage through Red Square to the Great Hall that
housed the Politburo, followed by a procession of dignitaries and mourners,
with Stalin in the lead. Eulogies by Molotov and other Politburo leaders were
declaimed in Red Square to a sea of mourners. Poems were dedicated to his
eternal memory. Mikhail Sholokhov and other noted writers, along with members
of the cultural elite, referred to the "great heart" and the "crystal bright
mind" of this "true son of the Motherland and the party." It was said at the
time that no Kremlin leader had been buried with such public attention since
Sergei Kirov, who died in 1934.
A. A. Zhdanov had been the former, brutal boss of the Leningrad party and the
architect of Soviet postwar ideology and cultural policy. It was he who gave
the keynote speech at the 1934 International Writers' Congress, where he had
invoked Stalin's dictum that writers were the "engineers of human souls." In
1946 Zhdanov had issued the infamous "report" on literature and ideology that
included, among other things, harsh criticism of the poetry of A. A. Akhmatova,
and led to her banishment from the Writers' Union. Akhmatova, Zhdanov wrote,
was "A nun or a whore - or rather both a nun and a whore who combines harlotry
with prayer." He described her poetry as "utterly remote from the people ...
What can there be in common between this poetry and the interests of our people
and State? Nothing whatsoever." Another time he had rebuked Shostakovich for
not writing music the average Soviet worker could hum. Zhdanov's report
unleashed what came to be termed the "Zhdanovshchina," which terrorized Soviet
arts and letters for a decade until the Khrushchev "Thaw."
After the Second World War Zhdanov had been represented as a hero of the siege
of Leningrad; he had given his life to the "interests of the State." At the
time of his death he was considered by many to have been the most powerful
member of the Soviet government after Stalin. He had defended Stalin and
Stalinism all his life and had earned the respect of the people as well as
Stalin's confidence. In September 1947 Stalin entrusted Zhdanov, not Molotov,
with delivering the keynote speech at the Szklarska Poreba conference in Poland
that set out the basic terms of Stalin's Cold War vision to leaders of the
satellite countries and foreign Communist parties. Zhdanov depicted the postwar
world as "irrevocably divided into two hostile camps." American expansionism,
he charged, was comparable to that of the fascist states of the 1930s.
More than just professional or political sympathy drew Stalin and Zhdanov
together. Stalin was said to have personally preferred him because Zhdanov was
educated and more literate than most of the other Politburo leaders. Zhdanov
enjoyed playing the piano at Stalin's dacha and discussing literature with
Gorky. In the spring of 1949 his son, Yuri, married Stalin's daughter, vetlana
Alliluyeva, something that was possibly more a sign of political realities than
of personal choice.
But in early July 1948 Zhdanov had fainted on the way to his office in Old
Square near the Kremlin, returning from a Politburo meeting held in
Stalin's "nearby" dacha the Blizhnyaya. Though just over fifty, he had had a
bad heart for some time, the result of years of overwork, drinking, and
hypertension. Earlier that spring Stalin had given him other reasons to be
anxious. In April, only nine months since Zhdanov's historic speech at
Szklarska Poreba, Stalin had reacted very negatively to the role Zhdanov's son,
Yuri, had played in discussing the botanist T.D. Lysenko at a meeting held
under the auspices of the Central Committee, saying that those responsible for
this provocation should be punished in "exemplary "fashion. Although not
formally dismissed from the posts of Secretary of Ideology of the Communist
Party and head of the Leningrad party, Zhdanov knew his position in the party
was now at risk and his life might also be in jeopardy. Stalin's suggestion
that he recover in Valdai had carried with it the same solicitude that had
accompanied the demotion of other Kremlin leaders since the thirties. The head
of the Kremlin Hospital signed the medical certificate authorizing Zhdanov's
leave and he was sent to Valdai on July 13. "Strict bed rest" was ordered for
him to safeguard his health, but its other purpose, as Zhdanov might have
guessed, would have been to keep him out of active political life.
On September 6, 1948, one week after Zhdanov "went his glorious way," an
emergency session of experts was convened in the Kremlin Hospital to
investigate whether the doctors who treated him in Valdai had misdiagnosed
Zhdanov's illness and had provided criminally negligent treatment. The Kremlin
Hospital doctor responsible for the last EKGs of Zhdanov's heart had sent a
secret letter accusing the doctors of this negligence to Lieutenant General
Nikolai Vlasik, the Head of the Kremlin Bodyguards, known as the Okhrana. In
her letter of August 29, 1948 - two days before Zhdanov's death - Lidia
F.Timashuk asserted that the attending doctors had underestimated
the "unquestionably grave condition of comrade Zhdanov." Soon after his death
this evaluation turned into an accusation of outright murder.
For some fifty years this accusation has been viewed as the essential element
in the instigation of the Doctors' Plot, and for fifty years, ever since the
accusation against the doctors was dismissed by the Soviet government after
Stalin's death, it has been widely assumed to have been a false charge,
stemming from a premeditated plan to launch a conspiracy against the
doctors ...
www.wnyc.org/books/14930
slonidarnosc z wlazenzom to podstawa rozwoju naszej slonistycznej demokracji
wlazen
--
©
wlazen
--
©
www.changethatsrightnow.com/phobia_list_of_all_phobias.asp?PhobiaID=1944&SDID=6540
The human nervous system is capable of developing irrational fears of anything
at all. Some fears, such as flying or public speaking are clearly more
widespread, but there are now formally named phobias.
A phobia is defined as an unwwarranted and irrational fear, and at The Phobia
Clinic we assist individuals in overcoming fears and phobias of all kinds.
The Phobia List includes unwarranted and irrational phobias of a number of
nationalities:
Anglophobia
Dutchphobia
Francophobia
Germanophobia
Japanophobia
Judeophobia
Sinophobia
In reality irrational fears exist towards all races and nationalities, it is
simply that these are the ones which have been formally named and listed.
The Phobia Clinic is dedicated to helping all individuals overcome all
inappropriate fears and phobias
www.changethatsrightnow.com/problem_detail_nationals.asp
--
©
The human nervous system is capable of developing irrational fears of anything
at all. Some fears, such as flying or public speaking are clearly more
widespread, but there are now formally named phobias.
A phobia is defined as an unwwarranted and irrational fear, and at The Phobia
Clinic we assist individuals in overcoming fears and phobias of all kinds.
The Phobia List includes unwarranted and irrational phobias of a number of
nationalities:
Anglophobia
Dutchphobia
Francophobia
Germanophobia
Japanophobia
Judeophobia
Sinophobia
In reality irrational fears exist towards all races and nationalities, it is
simply that these are the ones which have been formally named and listed.
The Phobia Clinic is dedicated to helping all individuals overcome all
inappropriate fears and phobias
www.changethatsrightnow.com/problem_detail_nationals.asp
--
©
• Cos do przeczytania na odprezenie IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: michal 09.12.03, 21:48 zarchiwizowany
• !!!!!!!!!!!!!____Jewphobia___!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: _! 09.12.03, 20:19 zarchiwizowany
www.damianpenny.com/archives/001366.html
Hoaxes > Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
Intellectual cornerstone of the white power movement, The Protocols of the
Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion serves a crucial role in the personal
growth of any heartfelt anti-semite. The book is a long diatribe, exposing the
nefarious tactics and goals of a clandestine multinational Jewish cabal that
secretly rules the world (in partnership with the Freemasons). It's a must-read
for any self-respecting opponent of Zionism.
The document purports to be the collected notes from an 1897 conference in
Switzerland, surreptitiously convened by this shadowy Hebrew organization. So a
better translation of the title would be Minutes from the Meetings of the
Zionist Chieftains. The book outlines an insidious Jewish plot for global
conquest, which involves subverting whole cultures, manipulating world economic
markets, instigating wars... pretty much your run-of-the-mill supervillainy.
Precisely why we should believe that a group unable to control the distribution
of their own meeting minutes would be capable of controlling international
affairs, simply defies reason.
But who cares? It isn't like The Protocols is going to convert anyone. Its
function is to provide a plausible excuse for a bigot to trade in his existing
Jewphobia for overt racism. Most screwballs only tackle this monster after
they've already plodded their way through The Turner Diaries and a few dozen
photocopied hate tracts. For this reason, it doesn't matter that The Protocols
was and is a pathetic hoax. Once a nutjob decides to believe the book is
genuine, nothing you can say will ever change his mind. He wants to believe.
For the record, The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion was
proven to be a fake as far back as 1921. That year, a newspaper article in the
London Times traced the meat of the book back to a plagiarization of a
plagiarization of a work whose original target was Napoleon Bonaparte. The
ultimate source, published in 1864, was titled Dialogue aux enfers entre
Machiavelli et Montesquieu ("Discussions Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu in
Hell"). The book was a satirical commentary on Napoleon's insatiable lust for
world domination. No Jews whatsoever appear in the story.
That work was just plain ripped off in 1868 by German novelist Hermann
Goedsche, who took out all of the Napoleon references and replaced him with the
Jews. His book, To Sedan, contains a chapter called "The Jewish Cemetery in
Prague and the Council of Representatives of the Twelve Tribes of Israel." It
describes a centennial meeting between the Devil and the upper echelons of
world Jewry. This section was extracted in 1891 and repackaged as a nonfiction
essay titled "The Rabbi's Speech," which became the primary source for The
Protocols.
The end product was cobbled together in 1895 by an officer of the Russian
secret police, Pytor Ivanovich Rachovsky. The book was conceived as propaganda,
calculated to rally the Russian citizenry behind the Czar as he took whatever
steps would be necessary to fend off the ubiquitous Jewish-Masonic threat.
Which is why, even when amongst only each other, the Zionists cannot help but
compare themselves disfavorably to their enemy:
The people under our guidance have annihilated the aristocracy, who were their
one and only defence and foster-mother for the sake of their own advantage,
which is inseparably bound up with the well-being of the people.
Or how about:
The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labour of the workers, was interested
in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy and strong. We are interested
in just the opposite -- in the diminution, the killing off of the goyim.
Printed copies did not surface publicly until 1905, courtesy of freaky
publisher Sergei Nilus. Once the book hit the public, it became a sensation.
American industrialist Henry Ford adapted an English translation and
distributed thousands of copies nationwide. And needless to say, it was a big
hit in Nazi Germany. Adolf Hitler was a true believer, and vouched for the
book's authenticity in his best-selling autobiography Mein Kampf:
To what extent the whole existence of this people is based on a continuous lie
is shown incomparably by The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, so infinitely
hated by the Jews. . . . Anyone who examines the historical development of the
last hundred years from the standpoint of this book will at once understand the
screaming of the Jewish press. For once this book has become the common
property of a people, the Jewish menace may be considered as broken.
But despite its age, its thoroughly-debunked origins, and most of all its
completely preposterous tale, this lousy fake is still popular the world over.
Recently, the book has become a sensation in the Arab world. In 2002, Egyptian
television broadcasted a 41-episode miniseries called "Horseman without a
Horse." This late-19th-century period piece follows the courageous Arabs who
discover The Protocols and, despite Zionist opposition, translate and circulate
the book to the rest of the world. Egyptian TV broadcasted the episodes daily
throughout the month of Ramadan, thereby capitalizing on a huge captive
audience.
www.rotten.com/library/hoaxes/zion-protocols/
Hoaxes > Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion
Intellectual cornerstone of the white power movement, The Protocols of the
Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion serves a crucial role in the personal
growth of any heartfelt anti-semite. The book is a long diatribe, exposing the
nefarious tactics and goals of a clandestine multinational Jewish cabal that
secretly rules the world (in partnership with the Freemasons). It's a must-read
for any self-respecting opponent of Zionism.
The document purports to be the collected notes from an 1897 conference in
Switzerland, surreptitiously convened by this shadowy Hebrew organization. So a
better translation of the title would be Minutes from the Meetings of the
Zionist Chieftains. The book outlines an insidious Jewish plot for global
conquest, which involves subverting whole cultures, manipulating world economic
markets, instigating wars... pretty much your run-of-the-mill supervillainy.
Precisely why we should believe that a group unable to control the distribution
of their own meeting minutes would be capable of controlling international
affairs, simply defies reason.
But who cares? It isn't like The Protocols is going to convert anyone. Its
function is to provide a plausible excuse for a bigot to trade in his existing
Jewphobia for overt racism. Most screwballs only tackle this monster after
they've already plodded their way through The Turner Diaries and a few dozen
photocopied hate tracts. For this reason, it doesn't matter that The Protocols
was and is a pathetic hoax. Once a nutjob decides to believe the book is
genuine, nothing you can say will ever change his mind. He wants to believe.
For the record, The Protocols of the Meetings of the Learned Elders of Zion was
proven to be a fake as far back as 1921. That year, a newspaper article in the
London Times traced the meat of the book back to a plagiarization of a
plagiarization of a work whose original target was Napoleon Bonaparte. The
ultimate source, published in 1864, was titled Dialogue aux enfers entre
Machiavelli et Montesquieu ("Discussions Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu in
Hell"). The book was a satirical commentary on Napoleon's insatiable lust for
world domination. No Jews whatsoever appear in the story.
That work was just plain ripped off in 1868 by German novelist Hermann
Goedsche, who took out all of the Napoleon references and replaced him with the
Jews. His book, To Sedan, contains a chapter called "The Jewish Cemetery in
Prague and the Council of Representatives of the Twelve Tribes of Israel." It
describes a centennial meeting between the Devil and the upper echelons of
world Jewry. This section was extracted in 1891 and repackaged as a nonfiction
essay titled "The Rabbi's Speech," which became the primary source for The
Protocols.
The end product was cobbled together in 1895 by an officer of the Russian
secret police, Pytor Ivanovich Rachovsky. The book was conceived as propaganda,
calculated to rally the Russian citizenry behind the Czar as he took whatever
steps would be necessary to fend off the ubiquitous Jewish-Masonic threat.
Which is why, even when amongst only each other, the Zionists cannot help but
compare themselves disfavorably to their enemy:
The people under our guidance have annihilated the aristocracy, who were their
one and only defence and foster-mother for the sake of their own advantage,
which is inseparably bound up with the well-being of the people.
Or how about:
The aristocracy, which enjoyed by law the labour of the workers, was interested
in seeing that the workers were well fed, healthy and strong. We are interested
in just the opposite -- in the diminution, the killing off of the goyim.
Printed copies did not surface publicly until 1905, courtesy of freaky
publisher Sergei Nilus. Once the book hit the public, it became a sensation.
American industrialist Henry Ford adapted an English translation and
distributed thousands of copies nationwide. And needless to say, it was a big
hit in Nazi Germany. Adolf Hitler was a true believer, and vouched for the
book's authenticity in his best-selling autobiography Mein Kampf:
To what extent the whole existence of this people is based on a continuous lie
is shown incomparably by The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, so infinitely
hated by the Jews. . . . Anyone who examines the historical development of the
last hundred years from the standpoint of this book will at once understand the
screaming of the Jewish press. For once this book has become the common
property of a people, the Jewish menace may be considered as broken.
But despite its age, its thoroughly-debunked origins, and most of all its
completely preposterous tale, this lousy fake is still popular the world over.
Recently, the book has become a sensation in the Arab world. In 2002, Egyptian
television broadcasted a 41-episode miniseries called "Horseman without a
Horse." This late-19th-century period piece follows the courageous Arabs who
discover The Protocols and, despite Zionist opposition, translate and circulate
the book to the rest of the world. Egyptian TV broadcasted the episodes daily
throughout the month of Ramadan, thereby capitalizing on a huge captive
audience.
www.rotten.com/library/hoaxes/zion-protocols/
WLADZOmana
pedofila
zlodzieja
dobr swego narodu
sowieckiego agenta
mordercy
tego co najdrozsze
POKOJU
pedofila
zlodzieja
dobr swego narodu
sowieckiego agenta
mordercy
tego co najdrozsze
POKOJU
Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.
• ¸.& middot;´& macr;)(& macr;`& middot;.¸:ZionCentral¸.&
zupagrzybowa 08.12.03, 19:58 zarchiwizowany
www.zioncentre.org.uk/services.html
Zion Community Resource was set up by local people in 1991 and has been working
since that time with and for the people in this area, offering support &
resources, encouraging self-help and helping to develop new services wherever
they are needed.
zion.radio365.net/
"For the sake of Zion I will not be silent..."
www.artfromzion.com/
¯`·.¸¸.)·´¯)·´¯)·_.¯(¯`·.¸((¯`·¸¸.¸¸.·´.¸.·´¯)(¯`
Zion Community Resource was set up by local people in 1991 and has been working
since that time with and for the people in this area, offering support &
resources, encouraging self-help and helping to develop new services wherever
they are needed.
zion.radio365.net/
"For the sake of Zion I will not be silent..."
www.artfromzion.com/
¯`·.¸¸.)·´¯)·´¯)·_.¯(¯`·.¸((¯`·¸¸.¸¸.·´.¸.·´¯)(¯`
AUS TEHERAN ?
duBist ajn SMOCK !-)
duBist ajn SMOCK !-)
The Leader of Muslims: Iraqi Muslims Should Not Cooperate with Foreign Rule
The Leader of Muslims, His Eminence Ayatullah al-Uzma Hajj Seyed Ali Khamene'i
(d.) has asked Iraqi Muslims not to cooperate with foreign rule and
said: "Today, if anyone assists foreign forces to consolidate their rule in
Iraq, this will be recorded in the history of Iraq as a shameful stain for any
individual or any group that does it.” Addressing Iraqi Muslims in Arabic in
the second khutbah of Friday-prayers on 11 April, Ayatollah Khamene'i
said: "The American and British claim that they are giving freedom to the Iraqi
people is a travesty. In reality, they are acting to secure control of Iraq,
its oil and the Middle East and they are trying to suppress the Palestinian
intifada. They are also trying to bury the Islamic revival. The appointment of
a foreign ruler in Iraq is a humiliation for freedom and popular sovereignty in
Iraq. They are scheming to obliterate Iraq's Islamic identity and nationalism
and to turn it into a springboard for American domination of all the Middle
East and its valuable human and material resources."
Ayatollah Khamene'i delineated Islamic Republic's policy as follows: "As far
as the war between Saddam on the one hand, and America and Britain on the
other, is concerned, we believed that both sides were wrong.
We have not given any help to any of them, and we declared our neutrality
towards both of them. However, we will not be neutral in the confrontation
between the occupiers and the Iraqi people."
www.wilayah.org/Eng/Default.htm
The Leader of Muslims, His Eminence Ayatullah al-Uzma Hajj Seyed Ali Khamene'i
(d.) has asked Iraqi Muslims not to cooperate with foreign rule and
said: "Today, if anyone assists foreign forces to consolidate their rule in
Iraq, this will be recorded in the history of Iraq as a shameful stain for any
individual or any group that does it.” Addressing Iraqi Muslims in Arabic in
the second khutbah of Friday-prayers on 11 April, Ayatollah Khamene'i
said: "The American and British claim that they are giving freedom to the Iraqi
people is a travesty. In reality, they are acting to secure control of Iraq,
its oil and the Middle East and they are trying to suppress the Palestinian
intifada. They are also trying to bury the Islamic revival. The appointment of
a foreign ruler in Iraq is a humiliation for freedom and popular sovereignty in
Iraq. They are scheming to obliterate Iraq's Islamic identity and nationalism
and to turn it into a springboard for American domination of all the Middle
East and its valuable human and material resources."
Ayatollah Khamene'i delineated Islamic Republic's policy as follows: "As far
as the war between Saddam on the one hand, and America and Britain on the
other, is concerned, we believed that both sides were wrong.
We have not given any help to any of them, and we declared our neutrality
towards both of them. However, we will not be neutral in the confrontation
between the occupiers and the Iraqi people."
www.wilayah.org/Eng/Default.htm
Drexler and Smalley debate feasibility of molecular nanotechnology in Chemical
& Engineering News cover story.
Foresight issues press release. "[Smalley] offers vehement opinions and
colorful metaphors but no relevant, defensible scientific arguments..."
Kurzweil analyzes the issues. "Smalley's position, which denies both the
promise and the peril of molecular assembly, will ultimately backfire"
http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0604.html
Howard Lovey's nano blog covers Clash of the nanotech titans. "...I've covered
local and national government enough to confidently question the motives of
those who side with the Smalley camp."
The Center for Responsible Nanotechnology (CRN) issued a press release. "If
Smalley's goal is to demonstrate that machine-phase chemistry is fundamentally
flawed, he has not been effective..."
Major nanotechnology initiative planned at Georgia Tech
Christine Peterson, President, Foresight Institute, testified before the House
Committee on Science about societal implications of advanced nanotechnology.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The next few paragraphs provide a brief introduction to the core concepts of
molecular nanotechnology, followed by links to further reading.
Manufactured products are made from atoms. The properties of those products
depend on how those atoms are arranged. If we rearrange the atoms in coal we
can make diamond. If we rearrange the atoms in sand (and add a few other trace
elements) we can make computer chips. If we rearrange the atoms in dirt, water
and air we can make potatoes.
Todays manufacturing methods are very crude at the molecular level. Casting,
grinding, milling and even lithography move atoms in great thundering
statistical herds. It's like trying to make things out of LEGO blocks with
boxing gloves on your hands. Yes, you can push the LEGO blocks into great heaps
and pile them up, but you can't really snap them together the way you'd like.
http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/selfRep.html
In the future, nanotechnology will let us take off the boxing gloves. We'll be
able to snap together the fundamental building blocks of nature easily,
inexpensively and in most of the ways permitted by the laws of physics. This
will be essential if we are to continue the revolution in computer hardware
beyond about the next decade, and will also let us fabricate an entire new
generation of products that are cleaner, stronger, lighter, and more precise.
It's worth pointing out that the word "nanotechnology" has become very popular
and is used to describe many types of research where the characteristic
dimensions are less than about 1,000 nanometers. For example, continued
improvements in lithography have resulted in line widths that are less than one
micron: this work is often called "nanotechnology." Sub-micron lithography is
clearly very valuable (ask anyone who uses a computer!) but it is equally clear
that conventional lithography will not let us build semiconductor devices in
which individual dopant atoms are located at specific lattice sites. Many of
the exponentially improving trends in computer hardware capability have
remained steady for the last 50 years. There is fairly widespread belief that
these trends are likely to continue for at least another several years, but
then conventional lithography starts to reach its limits.
If we are to continue these trends we will have to develop a new manufacturing
technology which will let us inexpensively build computer systems with mole
quantities of logic elements that are molecular in both size and precision and
are interconnected in complex and highly idiosyncratic patterns. Nanotechnology
will let us do this.
When it's unclear from the context whether we're using the specific definition
of "nanotechnology" (given here) or the broader and more inclusive definition
(often used in the literature), we'll use the terms "molecular nanotechnology"
or "molecular manufacturing."
Whatever we call it, it should let us
Get essentially every atom in the right place.
Make almost any structure consistent with the laws of physics that we can
specify in molecular detail.
Have manufacturing costs not greatly exceeding the cost of the required raw
materials and energy.
There are two more concepts commonly associated with nanotechnology:
Positional assembly.
Self replication.
Clearly, we would be happy with any method that simultaneously achieved the
first three objectives. However, this seems difficult without using some form
of positional assembly (to get the right molecular parts in the right places)
and some form of self replication (to keep the costs down).
The need for positional assembly implies an interest in molecular robotics,
e.g., robotic devices that are molecular both in their size and precision.
These molecular scale positional devices are likely to resemble very small
versions of their everyday macroscopic counterparts. Positional assembly is
frequently used in normal macroscopic manufacturing today, and provides
tremendous advantages. Imagine trying to build a bicycle with both hands tied
behind your back! The idea of manipulating and positioning individual atoms and
molecules is still new and takes some getting used to. However, as Feynman said
in a classic talk in 1959: "The principles of physics, as far as I can see, do
not speak against the possibility of maneuvering things atom by atom." We need
to apply at the molecular scale the concept that has demonstrated its
effectiveness at the macroscopic scale: making parts go where we want by
putting them where we want!
The requirement for low cost creates an interest in self replicating
manufacturing systems, studied by von Neumann in the 1940's. These systems are
able both to make copies of themselves and to manufacture useful products. If
we can design and build one such system the manufacturing costs for more such
systems and the products they make (assuming they can make copies of themselves
in some reasonably inexpensive environment) will be very low.
There is a brief and accessible video introduction to the basic idea of
nanotechnology (Windows Media Player 56 kilobits/second or 165 kilobits/second)
from Big Thinkers "Ralph Merkle: Nanotechnology"
More Information
Foresight's nanotechnology resource page
News and topical discussions
Nanodot
Books
The following books can be ordered directly from The Foresight Institute or
through Foresight's affiliation with Amazon.
The best technical introduction to this area is:
Nanosystems: molecular machinery, manufacturing, and computation by K. Eric
Drexler (Wiley 1992).
A technical introduction to medical applications of nanotechnology:
Nanomedicine, currently being written by Robert A. Freitas, is a technical
introduction to medical applications of nanotechnology. Volume I is available.
A web page on Nanomedicine has an overview. The full text is also available.
Further reading::
Engines of Creation(full text in html) by K. Eric Drexler (Anchor 1986)
discusses both the technology and its possible applications and consequences.
Unbounding the Future, by K. Eric Drexler, Chris Peterson and Gayle Pergamit
(Quill 1991) provides a non-technical discussion of what nanotechnology should
let us do, using technically feasible scenarios to clearly illustrate the
possibilities. Now available on the web!
Nano! by Ed Regis (Little, Brown 1995) is an engaging and entertaining book
that describes the researchers involved in this area, particularly Drexler, and
the reactions of different members of the scientific community to the concept.
Foresight's suggestions for further reading.
Journals, publications and newsgroups
The Foresight Update is a
& Engineering News cover story.
Foresight issues press release. "[Smalley] offers vehement opinions and
colorful metaphors but no relevant, defensible scientific arguments..."
Kurzweil analyzes the issues. "Smalley's position, which denies both the
promise and the peril of molecular assembly, will ultimately backfire"
http://www.kurzweilai.net/meme/frame.html?main=/articles/art0604.html
Howard Lovey's nano blog covers Clash of the nanotech titans. "...I've covered
local and national government enough to confidently question the motives of
those who side with the Smalley camp."
The Center for Responsible Nanotechnology (CRN) issued a press release. "If
Smalley's goal is to demonstrate that machine-phase chemistry is fundamentally
flawed, he has not been effective..."
Major nanotechnology initiative planned at Georgia Tech
Christine Peterson, President, Foresight Institute, testified before the House
Committee on Science about societal implications of advanced nanotechnology.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The next few paragraphs provide a brief introduction to the core concepts of
molecular nanotechnology, followed by links to further reading.
Manufactured products are made from atoms. The properties of those products
depend on how those atoms are arranged. If we rearrange the atoms in coal we
can make diamond. If we rearrange the atoms in sand (and add a few other trace
elements) we can make computer chips. If we rearrange the atoms in dirt, water
and air we can make potatoes.
Todays manufacturing methods are very crude at the molecular level. Casting,
grinding, milling and even lithography move atoms in great thundering
statistical herds. It's like trying to make things out of LEGO blocks with
boxing gloves on your hands. Yes, you can push the LEGO blocks into great heaps
and pile them up, but you can't really snap them together the way you'd like.
http://www.zyvex.com/nanotech/selfRep.html
In the future, nanotechnology will let us take off the boxing gloves. We'll be
able to snap together the fundamental building blocks of nature easily,
inexpensively and in most of the ways permitted by the laws of physics. This
will be essential if we are to continue the revolution in computer hardware
beyond about the next decade, and will also let us fabricate an entire new
generation of products that are cleaner, stronger, lighter, and more precise.
It's worth pointing out that the word "nanotechnology" has become very popular
and is used to describe many types of research where the characteristic
dimensions are less than about 1,000 nanometers. For example, continued
improvements in lithography have resulted in line widths that are less than one
micron: this work is often called "nanotechnology." Sub-micron lithography is
clearly very valuable (ask anyone who uses a computer!) but it is equally clear
that conventional lithography will not let us build semiconductor devices in
which individual dopant atoms are located at specific lattice sites. Many of
the exponentially improving trends in computer hardware capability have
remained steady for the last 50 years. There is fairly widespread belief that
these trends are likely to continue for at least another several years, but
then conventional lithography starts to reach its limits.
If we are to continue these trends we will have to develop a new manufacturing
technology which will let us inexpensively build computer systems with mole
quantities of logic elements that are molecular in both size and precision and
are interconnected in complex and highly idiosyncratic patterns. Nanotechnology
will let us do this.
When it's unclear from the context whether we're using the specific definition
of "nanotechnology" (given here) or the broader and more inclusive definition
(often used in the literature), we'll use the terms "molecular nanotechnology"
or "molecular manufacturing."
Whatever we call it, it should let us
Get essentially every atom in the right place.
Make almost any structure consistent with the laws of physics that we can
specify in molecular detail.
Have manufacturing costs not greatly exceeding the cost of the required raw
materials and energy.
There are two more concepts commonly associated with nanotechnology:
Positional assembly.
Self replication.
Clearly, we would be happy with any method that simultaneously achieved the
first three objectives. However, this seems difficult without using some form
of positional assembly (to get the right molecular parts in the right places)
and some form of self replication (to keep the costs down).
The need for positional assembly implies an interest in molecular robotics,
e.g., robotic devices that are molecular both in their size and precision.
These molecular scale positional devices are likely to resemble very small
versions of their everyday macroscopic counterparts. Positional assembly is
frequently used in normal macroscopic manufacturing today, and provides
tremendous advantages. Imagine trying to build a bicycle with both hands tied
behind your back! The idea of manipulating and positioning individual atoms and
molecules is still new and takes some getting used to. However, as Feynman said
in a classic talk in 1959: "The principles of physics, as far as I can see, do
not speak against the possibility of maneuvering things atom by atom." We need
to apply at the molecular scale the concept that has demonstrated its
effectiveness at the macroscopic scale: making parts go where we want by
putting them where we want!
The requirement for low cost creates an interest in self replicating
manufacturing systems, studied by von Neumann in the 1940's. These systems are
able both to make copies of themselves and to manufacture useful products. If
we can design and build one such system the manufacturing costs for more such
systems and the products they make (assuming they can make copies of themselves
in some reasonably inexpensive environment) will be very low.
There is a brief and accessible video introduction to the basic idea of
nanotechnology (Windows Media Player 56 kilobits/second or 165 kilobits/second)
from Big Thinkers "Ralph Merkle: Nanotechnology"
More Information
Foresight's nanotechnology resource page
News and topical discussions
Nanodot
Books
The following books can be ordered directly from The Foresight Institute or
through Foresight's affiliation with Amazon.
The best technical introduction to this area is:
Nanosystems: molecular machinery, manufacturing, and computation by K. Eric
Drexler (Wiley 1992).
A technical introduction to medical applications of nanotechnology:
Nanomedicine, currently being written by Robert A. Freitas, is a technical
introduction to medical applications of nanotechnology. Volume I is available.
A web page on Nanomedicine has an overview. The full text is also available.
Further reading::
Engines of Creation(full text in html) by K. Eric Drexler (Anchor 1986)
discusses both the technology and its possible applications and consequences.
Unbounding the Future, by K. Eric Drexler, Chris Peterson and Gayle Pergamit
(Quill 1991) provides a non-technical discussion of what nanotechnology should
let us do, using technically feasible scenarios to clearly illustrate the
possibilities. Now available on the web!
Nano! by Ed Regis (Little, Brown 1995) is an engaging and entertaining book
that describes the researchers involved in this area, particularly Drexler, and
the reactions of different members of the scientific community to the concept.
Foresight's suggestions for further reading.
Journals, publications and newsgroups
The Foresight Update is a
• Lista Morderstw Popelnionych przez Zydow-LINK IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: drf 07.12.03, 20:16 zarchiwizowany
MUUUUUUUUUUDLLLLLLLLLLLLL
SIE ZA NAMI
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSYNNNNNNNNNNNNAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMI !!!!!!!!!!
LLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU !!!!!
SIE ZA NAMI
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSYNNNNNNNNNNNNAAAAAAAAAAAAMMMMMMMMMMI !!!!!!!!!!
LLLLLLLLLEEEEEEEEEEEEHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUU !!!!!
SŁO NIE NA HA SŁO SŁO WA SŁO NECZ NIK
NO BI LI TUJą SIę ...
IZ RA EL RULEZ !
©iddish
NO BI LI TUJą SIę ...
IZ RA EL RULEZ !
©iddish
GDANSK W CENTRUM EUROAZJI !!!
LECHICI MIRIAMSCY NOBILITOWANI !!!
www.sIonidarnosc.©
---------------------------------
©oR
spise©
©oncpt
LECHICI MIRIAMSCY NOBILITOWANI !!!
www.sIonidarnosc.©
---------------------------------
©oR
spise©
©oncpt
} ? NIEtzsCHE ? {
members.aol.com/lrdetrigan/index4.html
SYFILIZM FOOLOZOFICZNY
====================================================================
NobleMaleInstincts;(((((((((((((
members.aol.com/lrdetrigan/index4.html
SYFILIZM FOOLOZOFICZNY
====================================================================
NobleMaleInstincts;(((((((((((((
• PoLLs- IRrATIONal and TRAN5CENdENTAL IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: MT.PR9M 06.12.03, 17:57 zarchiwizowany
TEZA 1 HUMOR=ZYCIE
ANTYTEZA 1 nieZYCIE=nieHUMOR?
DEFINICJA 1 ZYCIE=ORGANICZNOCZNAsymbiozaNieOGRANICZNOSCi6^6^6
SYNTEZA 1.1.1 ><
AMNEZJA 2 PUSTA PAMIEC
EGZEKUCJA 2.1 ^
REMINISCENCJE 2.3.6 CENZURA 4.4.4.4
ZMARTWYCHSTANIA 3.1.4 IL PAP*PA MUN*DI*PI *7*7*7
URBANIZACJA 4.4 SYNTEZA 1.1.1
__________________________________________________________________________
SUMMA POLLs 9.9.9.1 ZOV66SZ LEHVLV69SL 9VLSLL6O9V
> EEOS7Z7OE6 S7S9S9L9SE O9ZLH6LL7E HL9EZ6LL79 ELOSLLHSVH
> O7VV6ZE799 6Z7V9S67ES LHHS7SZ7ZV H9LZZ79EHL HEOLL9V9LZ
> 9HEE67EE6Z VVO6S66VEO H6OZLE9V9V 6E9SZZV7E7 L9O7OZL79H
> 6O9VE7OZ77 OSE9ZL7L76 Z9EL767SZE HV67VHLHV6 7669VOSLEZ
> OOOS6HLZ7L VSZ6ES6OHZ 77HS77LEVZ 7S77H96O9L 7E6E7L7H7Z
> LV6HVVO9OL ZZV9SEVEOL V6SV9SHSE7 LOSO79ZZ79 6H9ZSH9ZES
> VZOL99S6LL ZLZ9OZL96O H6VOEVVLHL S9HLE6Z977 V77LEO996O
> SLH7O7ZLLE V999999HE7 Z97HOV99SL OS97EL7EZH L6O96ELHS9
> SOZVVS9VSS EV69OHEOZ6 VZSZZEOHZS EEVV6HSOES Z6L9ELLHHL
ANTYTEZA 1 nieZYCIE=nieHUMOR?
DEFINICJA 1 ZYCIE=ORGANICZNOCZNAsymbiozaNieOGRANICZNOSCi6^6^6
SYNTEZA 1.1.1 ><
AMNEZJA 2 PUSTA PAMIEC
EGZEKUCJA 2.1 ^
REMINISCENCJE 2.3.6 CENZURA 4.4.4.4
ZMARTWYCHSTANIA 3.1.4 IL PAP*PA MUN*DI*PI *7*7*7
URBANIZACJA 4.4 SYNTEZA 1.1.1
__________________________________________________________________________
SUMMA POLLs 9.9.9.1 ZOV66SZ LEHVLV69SL 9VLSLL6O9V
> EEOS7Z7OE6 S7S9S9L9SE O9ZLH6LL7E HL9EZ6LL79 ELOSLLHSVH
> O7VV6ZE799 6Z7V9S67ES LHHS7SZ7ZV H9LZZ79EHL HEOLL9V9LZ
> 9HEE67EE6Z VVO6S66VEO H6OZLE9V9V 6E9SZZV7E7 L9O7OZL79H
> 6O9VE7OZ77 OSE9ZL7L76 Z9EL767SZE HV67VHLHV6 7669VOSLEZ
> OOOS6HLZ7L VSZ6ES6OHZ 77HS77LEVZ 7S77H96O9L 7E6E7L7H7Z
> LV6HVVO9OL ZZV9SEVEOL V6SV9SHSE7 LOSO79ZZ79 6H9ZSH9ZES
> VZOL99S6LL ZLZ9OZL96O H6VOEVVLHL S9HLE6Z977 V77LEO996O
> SLH7O7ZLLE V999999HE7 Z97HOV99SL OS97EL7EZH L6O96ELHS9
> SOZVVS9VSS EV69OHEOZ6 VZSZZEOHZS EEVV6HSOES Z6L9ELLHHL
The Prince
Machiavelli opens The Prince describing the two principal types of governments:
monarchies and republics. His focus in The Prince is on monarchies. The most
controversial aspects of Machiavelli's analysis emerge in the middle chapters
of his work. In Chapter 15 he proposes to describe the truth about surviving as
a monarch, rather than recommending lofty moral ideals. He describes those
virtues which, on face value, we think a prince should possess. He concludes
that some "virtues" will lead to a prince's destruction, whereas some "vices"
allow him to survive. Indeed, the virtues which we commonly praise in people
might lead to his downfall. In chapter 16 he notes that we commonly think that
it is best for a prince to have a reputation of being generous. However, if his
generosity is done in secret, no one will know about it and he will be thought
to be greedy. If it is done openly, then he risks going broke to maintain his
reputation. He will then extort more money from his subjects and thus be hated.
For Machiavelli, it is best for a prince to have a reputation for being stingy.
Machiavelli anticipates examples one might give of generous monarchs who have
been successful. He concludes that generosity should only be shown to soldiers
with goods taken from a pillaged enemy city. In Chapter 17 he argues that it is
better for a prince to be severe when punishing people rather than merciful.
Severity through death sentences affects only a few, but it deters crimes which
affects many. Further, he argues, it is better to be feared than to be loved.
However, the prince should avoid being hated, which he can easily accomplish by
not confiscating the property of his subjects: "people more quickly forget the
death of their father than the loss of their inheritance." In Chapter 18,
perhaps the most controversial section of The Prince, Machiavelli argues that
the prince should know how to be deceitful when it suits his purpose. When the
prince needs to be deceitful, though, he must not appear that way. Indeed he
must always exhibit five virtues in particular: mercy, honesty, humaneness,
uprightness, and religiousness. In Chapter 19 Machiavelli argues that the
prince must avoid doing things which will cause him to be hated. This is
accomplished by not confiscating property, and not appearing greedy or wishy-
washy. In fact, the best way to avoid being overthrown is to avoid being hated.
................................................................
Tutti li stati, tutti e' dominii che hanno avuto et hanno imperio sopra li
uomini, sono stati e sono o repubbliche o principati. E' principati sono o
ereditarii, de' quali el sangue del loro signore ne sia suto lungo tempo
principe, o e' sono nuovi. E' nuovi, o sono nuovi tutti, come fu Milano a
Francesco Sforza, o sono come membri aggiunti allo stato ereditario del
principe che li acquista, come è el regno di Napoli al re di Spagna. Sono
questi dominii cosí acquistati, o consueti a vivere sotto uno principe,o usi ad
essere liberi; et acquistonsi, o con le armi d'altri o con le proprie, o per
fortuna o per virtù.
www.utm.edu/research/iep/m/machiave.htm
ftp://sailor.gutenberg.org/pub/gutenberg/etext97/nmchv10.txt
Those who can make you believe absurdities
can make you commit atrocities.
www.lucidcafe.com/library/95nov/voltaire.html
Machiavelli opens The Prince describing the two principal types of governments:
monarchies and republics. His focus in The Prince is on monarchies. The most
controversial aspects of Machiavelli's analysis emerge in the middle chapters
of his work. In Chapter 15 he proposes to describe the truth about surviving as
a monarch, rather than recommending lofty moral ideals. He describes those
virtues which, on face value, we think a prince should possess. He concludes
that some "virtues" will lead to a prince's destruction, whereas some "vices"
allow him to survive. Indeed, the virtues which we commonly praise in people
might lead to his downfall. In chapter 16 he notes that we commonly think that
it is best for a prince to have a reputation of being generous. However, if his
generosity is done in secret, no one will know about it and he will be thought
to be greedy. If it is done openly, then he risks going broke to maintain his
reputation. He will then extort more money from his subjects and thus be hated.
For Machiavelli, it is best for a prince to have a reputation for being stingy.
Machiavelli anticipates examples one might give of generous monarchs who have
been successful. He concludes that generosity should only be shown to soldiers
with goods taken from a pillaged enemy city. In Chapter 17 he argues that it is
better for a prince to be severe when punishing people rather than merciful.
Severity through death sentences affects only a few, but it deters crimes which
affects many. Further, he argues, it is better to be feared than to be loved.
However, the prince should avoid being hated, which he can easily accomplish by
not confiscating the property of his subjects: "people more quickly forget the
death of their father than the loss of their inheritance." In Chapter 18,
perhaps the most controversial section of The Prince, Machiavelli argues that
the prince should know how to be deceitful when it suits his purpose. When the
prince needs to be deceitful, though, he must not appear that way. Indeed he
must always exhibit five virtues in particular: mercy, honesty, humaneness,
uprightness, and religiousness. In Chapter 19 Machiavelli argues that the
prince must avoid doing things which will cause him to be hated. This is
accomplished by not confiscating property, and not appearing greedy or wishy-
washy. In fact, the best way to avoid being overthrown is to avoid being hated.
................................................................
Tutti li stati, tutti e' dominii che hanno avuto et hanno imperio sopra li
uomini, sono stati e sono o repubbliche o principati. E' principati sono o
ereditarii, de' quali el sangue del loro signore ne sia suto lungo tempo
principe, o e' sono nuovi. E' nuovi, o sono nuovi tutti, come fu Milano a
Francesco Sforza, o sono come membri aggiunti allo stato ereditario del
principe che li acquista, come è el regno di Napoli al re di Spagna. Sono
questi dominii cosí acquistati, o consueti a vivere sotto uno principe,o usi ad
essere liberi; et acquistonsi, o con le armi d'altri o con le proprie, o per
fortuna o per virtù.
www.utm.edu/research/iep/m/machiave.htm
ftp://sailor.gutenberg.org/pub/gutenberg/etext97/nmchv10.txt
Those who can make you believe absurdities
can make you commit atrocities.
www.lucidcafe.com/library/95nov/voltaire.html
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/4898
Michael Ignatieff's review of William McGrath's Freud's Discovery of
Psychoanalysis: The Politics of Hysteria and Marianne Krull's Freud and His
Father [NYR, June 12, 1986] has some of his usual felicities and suggestive
speculations. But unfortunately, it is vitiated by a series of errors that
deserve to be noted. These are not simply careless mistakes about minor
biographical detail, but they lie at the heart of Ignatieff's argument and, I
believe, have incapacitated him from getting to the heart of the two books he
has reviewed.
First: "…his very last work, the posthumous Moses and Monotheism." The fact is
that Freud had been at work on this study at least since 1934, and published
the first two of its three parts, "Moses an Egyptian," and "If Moses was an
Egyptian," in Imago in 1937. He completed the last, longest and most subversive
part during the early days of his English exile in 1938, and lived to see not
only the original German in print, but even a complete English translation.
Second: this first mistake acquires its importance from the second one: "What
dark energies drove Freud to make this disavowal of Moses [that Moses was not a
Jew after all, but an Egyptian] at the very moment in 1938 when his daughter
Anna was forced to spend hours with the Gestapo?" It is an intriguing question,
but it is unanswerable because the puzzle is imaginary. As I have noted, Freud
published his "disavowal" of Moses the year before, that is to say, a year
before the Nazis marched into Austria. This matters, because Freud's insistence
on his theory that Moses must have been an Egyptian got him into a good deal of
trouble in his own last years, and has occasioned much head-shaking since. If
it could be shown that Freud came upon this radical notion (which in any case
he did not invent) just as his beloved daughter, partner, and successor was
being interrogated by the Gestapo, one would have to make some interesting
amendments to Freud's biography. But, for the reasons I have indicated, it
cannot be shown.
Third: "In the same weeks that Freud returned from his first visit to Rome, at
last free of the hold of the Hannibal fantasy, he wrote to Fliess announcing
his renunciation of the seduction theory." With deep regret (for the scene
would make a terrific television drama), I must point out that Freud repudiated
the seduction theory in a letter to Fliess in September 1897, but could not
bring himself to go to Rome until four years later, September 1901. What he did
do in 1897 was to recognize, as he told Fliess, that his longing for Rome was
very neurotic. This too matters, because Freud suffered from an inhibition
about Rome, which stood for more things in his mind than I have time to
enumerate in a single letter. The four years that intervened between his giving
up the seduction theory and his final conquest of Rome were occupied with the
most strenuous years of Freud's self-analysis, and it was this analysis that
made it possible for Freud to conquer his neurotic inability to visit the
Mother of Cities.
Fourth: Freud "only dared broach the issue of female sexuality on his mother's
death in 1930…." Here Ignatieff is paraphrasing Krull, but since he does not
object to this statement, one must assume that he is making it his own. Again,
what drama reality denies us! Freud no doubt had his psychological problems
with his mother, and never analyzed them. But they did not keep him from
writing about female sexuality. He broached the subject in the mid-1890s in the
Studies on Hysteria he did with Josef Breuer; he referred to it in the several
editions of his Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, which he first
published in 1905. None of these treatments may be considered systematic; that
had to wait until he had developed the structural theory of mind in 1920. But
after that, there was no holding him. I refer only to important papers
like "The Infantile Genital Organization" (1923), "The Dissolution of the
Oedipus Complex" (1924), and most important, "Some Psychical Consequences of
the Anatomical Distinction Between the Sexes" (1925). Precisely because Freud's
theories of female sexual development are enveloped, rightly, in controversy,
it is important to note that whatever his difficulties with his mother may have
been, this did not inhibit him from studying the female psychology even while
she lived.
Fifth: "In 1897 after attending The New Ghetto, a play written by the future
Zionist leader Theodor Herzl, Freud wrote Fliess that he had been
worrying 'about the future of one's children to whom one cannot give a country
of their own.' Here the forlorn image of the wandering Jew reveals itself
beneath the cosmopolitan mask." There is no such letter. The passage belongs to
Freud's Interpretation of Dreams. There one may read of the worry of which
Ignatieff speaks, but that book was not published until the end of 1899 (dated
1900). Freud tells Fliess in January 1898 that he is going to see Herzl's play,
but does not comment on it later to Fliess at all. Rather, he dreamt about it
and then used the dream as one of the many specimens in his "dream book." The
year 1897 is important for those, like McGrath, who insist on interpreting
Freud's psychoanalysis as a kind of "counter-politics." It was in 1897 that the
populist and anti-Semitic Karl Lueger was finally installed as Mayor of Vienna,
after Emperor Francis Josef had prevented his accession before. Again this
matters for our reading of Freud, because what is striking about Freud's
intimate correspondence with Fliess, the most intimate correspondence he ever
carried on except with his fiancée in the early 1880s, is the absence of
political comment. When, in 1895, the Emperor refuses to confirm Lueger's
election, Freud triumphantly celebrates with some forbidden cigars and tells
Fliess about it. Otherwise, virtually nothing.
And this is why I am writing. It would be one thing if a busy scholar like
Michael Ignatieff, pressed for time and drafting this review, as I imagine him
doing, on a trans-Atlantic plane ride, simply got a few things wrong because he
has failed to look them up later and misremembers them. But the errors I have
cited make it impossible for him to see that the question of Freud's character,
especially the matter of his Jewishness which is in question in the books under
review, and in the review itself, has not been resolved by those two books. He
quotes McGrath to the effect that "the political events he lived through
stirred his own phantasies so powerfully and directly that Freud suddenly came
to realize that phantasy could foster driving emotional forces as powerful as,
or even more powerful than those generated by real events." This of course
means that, according to McGrath, Freud rejected the seduction theory of
neuroses because Lueger's access to power convinced him that fantasy has a
profound impact over the human mind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The trouble with his political reading of Freud's inner history (first
developed in an influential, elegant, but to me wholly unconvincing article by
Carl Schorske, "Politics and Patricide in Freud's Interpretation of Dreams," of
1973), is that there is virtually no evidence for, and much evidence against
it. Freud, as I have written elsewhere, had many very different ambitions, and
his dreams and correspondence testify to the variety and their power. He
identified himself with great figures of the past and present, not all of whom
were politicians. The idea that he invented or discovered psychoanalysis
because he could not, as he had hoped, become Prime Minister, must fail simply
as we consider the chronology of his life and
Michael Ignatieff's review of William McGrath's Freud's Discovery of
Psychoanalysis: The Politics of Hysteria and Marianne Krull's Freud and His
Father [NYR, June 12, 1986] has some of his usual felicities and suggestive
speculations. But unfortunately, it is vitiated by a series of errors that
deserve to be noted. These are not simply careless mistakes about minor
biographical detail, but they lie at the heart of Ignatieff's argument and, I
believe, have incapacitated him from getting to the heart of the two books he
has reviewed.
First: "…his very last work, the posthumous Moses and Monotheism." The fact is
that Freud had been at work on this study at least since 1934, and published
the first two of its three parts, "Moses an Egyptian," and "If Moses was an
Egyptian," in Imago in 1937. He completed the last, longest and most subversive
part during the early days of his English exile in 1938, and lived to see not
only the original German in print, but even a complete English translation.
Second: this first mistake acquires its importance from the second one: "What
dark energies drove Freud to make this disavowal of Moses [that Moses was not a
Jew after all, but an Egyptian] at the very moment in 1938 when his daughter
Anna was forced to spend hours with the Gestapo?" It is an intriguing question,
but it is unanswerable because the puzzle is imaginary. As I have noted, Freud
published his "disavowal" of Moses the year before, that is to say, a year
before the Nazis marched into Austria. This matters, because Freud's insistence
on his theory that Moses must have been an Egyptian got him into a good deal of
trouble in his own last years, and has occasioned much head-shaking since. If
it could be shown that Freud came upon this radical notion (which in any case
he did not invent) just as his beloved daughter, partner, and successor was
being interrogated by the Gestapo, one would have to make some interesting
amendments to Freud's biography. But, for the reasons I have indicated, it
cannot be shown.
Third: "In the same weeks that Freud returned from his first visit to Rome, at
last free of the hold of the Hannibal fantasy, he wrote to Fliess announcing
his renunciation of the seduction theory." With deep regret (for the scene
would make a terrific television drama), I must point out that Freud repudiated
the seduction theory in a letter to Fliess in September 1897, but could not
bring himself to go to Rome until four years later, September 1901. What he did
do in 1897 was to recognize, as he told Fliess, that his longing for Rome was
very neurotic. This too matters, because Freud suffered from an inhibition
about Rome, which stood for more things in his mind than I have time to
enumerate in a single letter. The four years that intervened between his giving
up the seduction theory and his final conquest of Rome were occupied with the
most strenuous years of Freud's self-analysis, and it was this analysis that
made it possible for Freud to conquer his neurotic inability to visit the
Mother of Cities.
Fourth: Freud "only dared broach the issue of female sexuality on his mother's
death in 1930…." Here Ignatieff is paraphrasing Krull, but since he does not
object to this statement, one must assume that he is making it his own. Again,
what drama reality denies us! Freud no doubt had his psychological problems
with his mother, and never analyzed them. But they did not keep him from
writing about female sexuality. He broached the subject in the mid-1890s in the
Studies on Hysteria he did with Josef Breuer; he referred to it in the several
editions of his Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, which he first
published in 1905. None of these treatments may be considered systematic; that
had to wait until he had developed the structural theory of mind in 1920. But
after that, there was no holding him. I refer only to important papers
like "The Infantile Genital Organization" (1923), "The Dissolution of the
Oedipus Complex" (1924), and most important, "Some Psychical Consequences of
the Anatomical Distinction Between the Sexes" (1925). Precisely because Freud's
theories of female sexual development are enveloped, rightly, in controversy,
it is important to note that whatever his difficulties with his mother may have
been, this did not inhibit him from studying the female psychology even while
she lived.
Fifth: "In 1897 after attending The New Ghetto, a play written by the future
Zionist leader Theodor Herzl, Freud wrote Fliess that he had been
worrying 'about the future of one's children to whom one cannot give a country
of their own.' Here the forlorn image of the wandering Jew reveals itself
beneath the cosmopolitan mask." There is no such letter. The passage belongs to
Freud's Interpretation of Dreams. There one may read of the worry of which
Ignatieff speaks, but that book was not published until the end of 1899 (dated
1900). Freud tells Fliess in January 1898 that he is going to see Herzl's play,
but does not comment on it later to Fliess at all. Rather, he dreamt about it
and then used the dream as one of the many specimens in his "dream book." The
year 1897 is important for those, like McGrath, who insist on interpreting
Freud's psychoanalysis as a kind of "counter-politics." It was in 1897 that the
populist and anti-Semitic Karl Lueger was finally installed as Mayor of Vienna,
after Emperor Francis Josef had prevented his accession before. Again this
matters for our reading of Freud, because what is striking about Freud's
intimate correspondence with Fliess, the most intimate correspondence he ever
carried on except with his fiancée in the early 1880s, is the absence of
political comment. When, in 1895, the Emperor refuses to confirm Lueger's
election, Freud triumphantly celebrates with some forbidden cigars and tells
Fliess about it. Otherwise, virtually nothing.
And this is why I am writing. It would be one thing if a busy scholar like
Michael Ignatieff, pressed for time and drafting this review, as I imagine him
doing, on a trans-Atlantic plane ride, simply got a few things wrong because he
has failed to look them up later and misremembers them. But the errors I have
cited make it impossible for him to see that the question of Freud's character,
especially the matter of his Jewishness which is in question in the books under
review, and in the review itself, has not been resolved by those two books. He
quotes McGrath to the effect that "the political events he lived through
stirred his own phantasies so powerfully and directly that Freud suddenly came
to realize that phantasy could foster driving emotional forces as powerful as,
or even more powerful than those generated by real events." This of course
means that, according to McGrath, Freud rejected the seduction theory of
neuroses because Lueger's access to power convinced him that fantasy has a
profound impact over the human mind.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The trouble with his political reading of Freud's inner history (first
developed in an influential, elegant, but to me wholly unconvincing article by
Carl Schorske, "Politics and Patricide in Freud's Interpretation of Dreams," of
1973), is that there is virtually no evidence for, and much evidence against
it. Freud, as I have written elsewhere, had many very different ambitions, and
his dreams and correspondence testify to the variety and their power. He
identified himself with great figures of the past and present, not all of whom
were politicians. The idea that he invented or discovered psychoanalysis
because he could not, as he had hoped, become Prime Minister, must fail simply
as we consider the chronology of his life and
wiem.onet.pl/wiem/006f06.html
4. EYES WIDE SHUT (Stanley Kubrick; 1999) 4 stars
The great filmmaker's last feature, based on Artur Schnitzler's "Dream Novel,"
was greeted in America with derision. A pity. This modern sexual odyssey --
with Tom Cruise and Kidman as a yuppie couple driven apart during a night of
erotic adventure and a day of reckoning -- is one of the few 1999 movies
certain to be around at next century's end. (DVD/video
w1.317.telia.com/~u31706948/diverse.htm
Under rubriken opinion fanns följande att läsa 21 januari 2001
Teater som samhällsdiagnos GÄSTREFLEKTION
För att tala med filosofen Kant: Människan får aldrig bli ett medel utan är ett
mål i sig. Det är därför man skall se Love is all You need (sex is all You get)
på Stadsteatern. Inte för att få se lite sång, lite dans, lite naket… Wien
1903. Läkaren och författaren Artur Schnitzler publicerar sin pjäs Regien
(Ringlek). Den antisemitiske (!) juden Otto Weininger ger ut sin
kvinnofientliga bok Kön och karaktär. Senare samma år kommer han att ta sitt
liv. Sigmund Freud har mottagning på Berggaße och skriver på sin sexualteori,
som kommer att publiceras två år senare. Karl Kraus är på sitt fjärde
utgivningsår med den alltmer berömda satiriska tidskriften Die Fackel. De
sammanstrålar alla på caféerna, kanske främst Café Griensteidl. Konstnären
Gustav Klimt målar kvinnor som framstår som blandningar av madonnor och
vampyrer.
Den blivande filosofen Ludwig Wittgenstein är bara 14 år, men uppvisar en
enastående förmåga att vissla klassiska verk, särskilt Schubert. Borås 2001. På
Stadsteatern går pjäsen Love is all You need (sex is all You get). Med stor
skicklighet har Göran Parkrud omarbetat (eller EU-anpassat..) och iscensatt
Schnitzlers Ringlek. Låt mig med en gång säga att det är en idémässigt viktig
pjäs, dessutom stor teater såväl scenografiskt som i skådespelarprestationerna
(pjäsen recenserades i BT 15 januari). Kanske är det orätt att lyfta fram
några, men särskilt starkt intryck på mig gjorde Viktoria Folkesson, David
Mjönes samt Tuvalisa Rangström. Pjäsen innehåller mycket naket och sex. Kanske
kan det i sig provocera någon med hämningar. Men viktigare är de djupa frågor
som smyger sig på under pjäsens gång och som ligger i öppen dager när pjäsen är
slut. Är det skillnad på kärlek och sexualitet? Hur kan vi förena dem? Vad är
det som gör människan till människa?
Det är som om pjäsens personer säger: Sanningen, det äkta och det verkligt
vackra finns, men inte här och vi kan inte nå det. Artur Schnitzler (1862-1931)
beskrev i sina många texter just en kylig, opersonlig värld med inbyggd
oförmåga till djupare gemenskap mellan människorna. Litteraturvetaren Gunnar
Brandell har pekat på den roll som Arthur Schnitzler, läkare, hypnosspecialist
och författare i den psykologiska naturalismens tradition spelade för Freuds
tänkande. I Schnitzlers drama "Paracelsus" (1898) beskrevs drömmarna som
verktyget för att nå kontakt med det omedvetna.
Två år senare utkom Freuds arbete om drömtydning. Schnitzler är ett lysande
exempel på läkare som författare. Som psykiater med hypnos som specialitet hade
han ett rikt stoff att utgå från i sitt författarskap. Skillnaden mellan
sexualitet och kärlek handlar delvis om skillnaden mellan natur och kultur. Sex
utan kärlek är rå promiskuitet. Kärlek är fördjupad gemensamhetskänsla och
förädling - det är kultur. Människan måste i alla sammanhang försöka hitta den
harmoniska blandningen mellan natur och kultur. Samtidigt kan man med Freud
konstatera att kulturen kan bli trång och hämmande som i sekelskiftets Wien.
Det märkliga är att Schnitzlers texter, dvs hans samhällsdiagnos, lika gärna
kan tillämpas då som nu. Han ställer diagnos på en hel kultur präglad av
förytligande, rädsla, flykt och förnekande. Kanske har vår tid ett inte så
litet mått av allt detta samt en narcissistisk självbespegling - där man
använder andra som verktyg. Men för att tala med filosofen Kant: Människan får
aldrig bli ett medel utan är ett mål i sig. Det är därför man skall se Love is
all You need (sex is all You get) på Stadsteatern. Inte för att få se lite
sång, lite dans, lite naket? (även om Viktorias sång var fantastisk). Nej, man
skall gå dit för att fundera över vad som gör människan till människa: längtan
efter gemenskap, samhörighet och att en stund få dela allas vår ensamhet. Men i
ett samhälle där kärleksbristen är stor riskerar vi istället att ägna oss åt
kontaktlös, ensidig sexualitet och kanske är denna brist också orsaken till
otrygghetens främlingsfientlighet. Samtidigt utgör bristen på kärlek
förutsättningen för den ohämmade marknadens bristande solidaritet och
hänsynslösa egoism.
Av Carl-Magnus Stolt professor
www.teatry.art.pl/!recenzje/samotnad_hus/korozja.htm
Poeci mówia metaforami o tresciach swojej nieswiadomosci, totez Freud
utrzymywal, ze i oni, i inni wielcy artysci wiedzieli juz wszystko to, co sam
odkrywac musial w tak wielkim trudzie. W wielu swoich pracach odwolywal sie do
utworów literackich i dziel sztuki, aby pobudzic nasze odczucia intuicyjne,
przemówic zarówno do naszych swiadomych wladz poznawczych, jak do wladz
nieswiadomych. Przytaczal czesto Goethego i Szekspira oraz innych poetów, a
takze takich pisarzy jak Dostojewski, Nietzsche i Artur Schnitzler, utrzymujac,
ze wiedzieli oni o nieswiadomosci wszystko, co nalezy wiedziec. Uwazaf, ze sam
jedynie uporzadkowal te wiedze i udostepnil ja w takiej postaci, ze umozliwia
nie tylko intuicyjne rozumienie nieswiadomosci, ale takze rozumienie jej w
sposób jasny i wyrazny. Freud rzadko cytowaf przyrodników, nie mówiac juz o
lekarzach; wyjatek czynil jedynie dla tych swoich kolegów psychoanalityków,
którzy zostali jego pierwszymi uczniami, a byli zarazem lekarzami.
www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/5921/books/bettel/Bet07.html
4. EYES WIDE SHUT (Stanley Kubrick; 1999) 4 stars
The great filmmaker's last feature, based on Artur Schnitzler's "Dream Novel,"
was greeted in America with derision. A pity. This modern sexual odyssey --
with Tom Cruise and Kidman as a yuppie couple driven apart during a night of
erotic adventure and a day of reckoning -- is one of the few 1999 movies
certain to be around at next century's end. (DVD/video
w1.317.telia.com/~u31706948/diverse.htm
Under rubriken opinion fanns följande att läsa 21 januari 2001
Teater som samhällsdiagnos GÄSTREFLEKTION
För att tala med filosofen Kant: Människan får aldrig bli ett medel utan är ett
mål i sig. Det är därför man skall se Love is all You need (sex is all You get)
på Stadsteatern. Inte för att få se lite sång, lite dans, lite naket… Wien
1903. Läkaren och författaren Artur Schnitzler publicerar sin pjäs Regien
(Ringlek). Den antisemitiske (!) juden Otto Weininger ger ut sin
kvinnofientliga bok Kön och karaktär. Senare samma år kommer han att ta sitt
liv. Sigmund Freud har mottagning på Berggaße och skriver på sin sexualteori,
som kommer att publiceras två år senare. Karl Kraus är på sitt fjärde
utgivningsår med den alltmer berömda satiriska tidskriften Die Fackel. De
sammanstrålar alla på caféerna, kanske främst Café Griensteidl. Konstnären
Gustav Klimt målar kvinnor som framstår som blandningar av madonnor och
vampyrer.
Den blivande filosofen Ludwig Wittgenstein är bara 14 år, men uppvisar en
enastående förmåga att vissla klassiska verk, särskilt Schubert. Borås 2001. På
Stadsteatern går pjäsen Love is all You need (sex is all You get). Med stor
skicklighet har Göran Parkrud omarbetat (eller EU-anpassat..) och iscensatt
Schnitzlers Ringlek. Låt mig med en gång säga att det är en idémässigt viktig
pjäs, dessutom stor teater såväl scenografiskt som i skådespelarprestationerna
(pjäsen recenserades i BT 15 januari). Kanske är det orätt att lyfta fram
några, men särskilt starkt intryck på mig gjorde Viktoria Folkesson, David
Mjönes samt Tuvalisa Rangström. Pjäsen innehåller mycket naket och sex. Kanske
kan det i sig provocera någon med hämningar. Men viktigare är de djupa frågor
som smyger sig på under pjäsens gång och som ligger i öppen dager när pjäsen är
slut. Är det skillnad på kärlek och sexualitet? Hur kan vi förena dem? Vad är
det som gör människan till människa?
Det är som om pjäsens personer säger: Sanningen, det äkta och det verkligt
vackra finns, men inte här och vi kan inte nå det. Artur Schnitzler (1862-1931)
beskrev i sina många texter just en kylig, opersonlig värld med inbyggd
oförmåga till djupare gemenskap mellan människorna. Litteraturvetaren Gunnar
Brandell har pekat på den roll som Arthur Schnitzler, läkare, hypnosspecialist
och författare i den psykologiska naturalismens tradition spelade för Freuds
tänkande. I Schnitzlers drama "Paracelsus" (1898) beskrevs drömmarna som
verktyget för att nå kontakt med det omedvetna.
Två år senare utkom Freuds arbete om drömtydning. Schnitzler är ett lysande
exempel på läkare som författare. Som psykiater med hypnos som specialitet hade
han ett rikt stoff att utgå från i sitt författarskap. Skillnaden mellan
sexualitet och kärlek handlar delvis om skillnaden mellan natur och kultur. Sex
utan kärlek är rå promiskuitet. Kärlek är fördjupad gemensamhetskänsla och
förädling - det är kultur. Människan måste i alla sammanhang försöka hitta den
harmoniska blandningen mellan natur och kultur. Samtidigt kan man med Freud
konstatera att kulturen kan bli trång och hämmande som i sekelskiftets Wien.
Det märkliga är att Schnitzlers texter, dvs hans samhällsdiagnos, lika gärna
kan tillämpas då som nu. Han ställer diagnos på en hel kultur präglad av
förytligande, rädsla, flykt och förnekande. Kanske har vår tid ett inte så
litet mått av allt detta samt en narcissistisk självbespegling - där man
använder andra som verktyg. Men för att tala med filosofen Kant: Människan får
aldrig bli ett medel utan är ett mål i sig. Det är därför man skall se Love is
all You need (sex is all You get) på Stadsteatern. Inte för att få se lite
sång, lite dans, lite naket? (även om Viktorias sång var fantastisk). Nej, man
skall gå dit för att fundera över vad som gör människan till människa: längtan
efter gemenskap, samhörighet och att en stund få dela allas vår ensamhet. Men i
ett samhälle där kärleksbristen är stor riskerar vi istället att ägna oss åt
kontaktlös, ensidig sexualitet och kanske är denna brist också orsaken till
otrygghetens främlingsfientlighet. Samtidigt utgör bristen på kärlek
förutsättningen för den ohämmade marknadens bristande solidaritet och
hänsynslösa egoism.
Av Carl-Magnus Stolt professor
www.teatry.art.pl/!recenzje/samotnad_hus/korozja.htm
Poeci mówia metaforami o tresciach swojej nieswiadomosci, totez Freud
utrzymywal, ze i oni, i inni wielcy artysci wiedzieli juz wszystko to, co sam
odkrywac musial w tak wielkim trudzie. W wielu swoich pracach odwolywal sie do
utworów literackich i dziel sztuki, aby pobudzic nasze odczucia intuicyjne,
przemówic zarówno do naszych swiadomych wladz poznawczych, jak do wladz
nieswiadomych. Przytaczal czesto Goethego i Szekspira oraz innych poetów, a
takze takich pisarzy jak Dostojewski, Nietzsche i Artur Schnitzler, utrzymujac,
ze wiedzieli oni o nieswiadomosci wszystko, co nalezy wiedziec. Uwazaf, ze sam
jedynie uporzadkowal te wiedze i udostepnil ja w takiej postaci, ze umozliwia
nie tylko intuicyjne rozumienie nieswiadomosci, ale takze rozumienie jej w
sposób jasny i wyrazny. Freud rzadko cytowaf przyrodników, nie mówiac juz o
lekarzach; wyjatek czynil jedynie dla tych swoich kolegów psychoanalityków,
którzy zostali jego pierwszymi uczniami, a byli zarazem lekarzami.
www.geocities.com/Athens/Forum/5921/books/bettel/Bet07.html
• Re: __________________TYLKO DLA KATOLICKICH GEYOW IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: 60©> 01.12.03, 02:11 zarchiwizowany
He blends in well these days, living most of his quiet life in an apartment
building on the outskirts of Washington, D.C., his accent piquing no curiosity
among neighbors of all the nationalities one encounters in the capital. In the
midst of these mostly retired educators, civil servants, diplomats, soldiers
and business people, he cuts a dignified but unexceptional figure.
Many of them know about him now, but most have never seen the compact study in
his modest widower's apartment, its walls and table space full of talismans of
honor: honorary degrees from universities; awards from organizations such as
the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith,
United States Holocaust Memorial Council and the Archdiocese of Washington; the
Polish military equivalent of the U.S. Congressional Medal of Honor; and a
certificate commemorating the highest honor the State of Israel can bestow,
honorary citizenship.
Jan Karski, now 81 years old, a Polish-born Roman Catholic, an American citizen
since 1954, retired after many years as a professor of political science at
Georgetown University, has received all these and other accolades for an effort
he made a half-century ago as a young, clandestine operative from Nazi-occupied
Poland-- an effort that failed.
He tried to stop the Holocaust.
remember.org/ideas/weare.html
www.remember.org/harold/map.html
remember.org/karski/karski.html
remember.org/karski/kaudio.html
building on the outskirts of Washington, D.C., his accent piquing no curiosity
among neighbors of all the nationalities one encounters in the capital. In the
midst of these mostly retired educators, civil servants, diplomats, soldiers
and business people, he cuts a dignified but unexceptional figure.
Many of them know about him now, but most have never seen the compact study in
his modest widower's apartment, its walls and table space full of talismans of
honor: honorary degrees from universities; awards from organizations such as
the American Jewish Committee, the Anti-Defamation League of B'nai B'rith,
United States Holocaust Memorial Council and the Archdiocese of Washington; the
Polish military equivalent of the U.S. Congressional Medal of Honor; and a
certificate commemorating the highest honor the State of Israel can bestow,
honorary citizenship.
Jan Karski, now 81 years old, a Polish-born Roman Catholic, an American citizen
since 1954, retired after many years as a professor of political science at
Georgetown University, has received all these and other accolades for an effort
he made a half-century ago as a young, clandestine operative from Nazi-occupied
Poland-- an effort that failed.
He tried to stop the Holocaust.
remember.org/ideas/weare.html
www.remember.org/harold/map.html
remember.org/karski/karski.html
remember.org/karski/kaudio.html
"Do you think there's a single Christian in the world, even taking the noblest,
straightest and truest one you like, one single Christian who has not in some
moment or other of spite, temper or rage, made at any rate mentally some
contemptuous allusion to the Jewishness of even his best friend, his mistress
or his wife, if they were Jews or of Jewish descent?" And without waiting for
George's answer: "There isn't one. I assure you. You can try another test also
if you life. Read for instance the letters of any celebrated and otherwise
perfectly shrewd and excellent man and observe the passages which contain
hostile and ironic expressions about his contemporaries. Ninety-nine times out
of a hundred it simply deals with an individual without taking any account of
his descent or creed. In the hundredth case, where the miserable victim has the
misfortune to be a Jew, the writer will certainly not forget to mention that
fact. That's just how the thing is, I can't help it. What you choose to call
persecution-mania, my dear George, is in reality simply an extremely intense
consciousness that has been kept continuously awake of a condition in which we
Jews happen to find ourselves. And as for talking about persecution-mania, why
it would be much more logical to talk about a mania for being hidden, a mania
for being left alone, a mania for being safe; which though perhaps a less
sensational form of the disease is certainly a much more dangerous one for its
victims. My father suffers from it, like many others of his generation. He at
any rate made such a radical cure that he went mad in the process."
By Arthur Schnizler.
Translated by Horace Samuel from the orinal Germen DER WEG INS FREIE, 1908.
412 pages
New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1923.
www.webster.edu/~corbetre/personal/reading/schnitzler-road.html
It is to Heinrich that this fundamental revelation is given, and the root of
the English title. While discussing the battles within the Jewish community
over Hertzl's Palestinian dreams, George asks Heinrich how the question should
be settled. Heinrich's reply is more than just to that question, it is a
fundamental orientation toward life:
"Who knows," said George reflectively, "if you won't be regarded as right -- in
a thousand years? But till then?"
"Why, my dear George, there won't be anything in the way of a solution of the
question before then. In our time there won't be any solution, that's
absolutely positive. No universal solution at any rate. It will rather be a
case of a million different solutions. For it's just a question which for the
time being everyone has got to settle for himself as best he can. Every one
must manage to find an escape for himself and out of his vexation or out of his
despair or out of his loathing, to some place or other where he can breathe
again in freedom. Perhaps there are really people who would like to go as far
as Jerusalem to find it… I only fear that many of them, once they arrive at
their official goal, would then begin to realize that they had made an utter
mistake. I don't think for a minute that migrations like that into the open
should be gone in for in parties… For the roads there do not run through the
country outside but through our own selves. Every one's life simply depends on
whether or not he finds his mental way out. To do that of course it is
necessary to see as clearly as possible into one's most hidden crannies, to
have the courage to be what one naturally is -- not to be led into a mistake.
Yes, that should be the daily prayer of every decent man: to make no mistake."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Takich madrych ksiazek juz sie nie pisze...;(
straightest and truest one you like, one single Christian who has not in some
moment or other of spite, temper or rage, made at any rate mentally some
contemptuous allusion to the Jewishness of even his best friend, his mistress
or his wife, if they were Jews or of Jewish descent?" And without waiting for
George's answer: "There isn't one. I assure you. You can try another test also
if you life. Read for instance the letters of any celebrated and otherwise
perfectly shrewd and excellent man and observe the passages which contain
hostile and ironic expressions about his contemporaries. Ninety-nine times out
of a hundred it simply deals with an individual without taking any account of
his descent or creed. In the hundredth case, where the miserable victim has the
misfortune to be a Jew, the writer will certainly not forget to mention that
fact. That's just how the thing is, I can't help it. What you choose to call
persecution-mania, my dear George, is in reality simply an extremely intense
consciousness that has been kept continuously awake of a condition in which we
Jews happen to find ourselves. And as for talking about persecution-mania, why
it would be much more logical to talk about a mania for being hidden, a mania
for being left alone, a mania for being safe; which though perhaps a less
sensational form of the disease is certainly a much more dangerous one for its
victims. My father suffers from it, like many others of his generation. He at
any rate made such a radical cure that he went mad in the process."
By Arthur Schnizler.
Translated by Horace Samuel from the orinal Germen DER WEG INS FREIE, 1908.
412 pages
New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1923.
www.webster.edu/~corbetre/personal/reading/schnitzler-road.html
It is to Heinrich that this fundamental revelation is given, and the root of
the English title. While discussing the battles within the Jewish community
over Hertzl's Palestinian dreams, George asks Heinrich how the question should
be settled. Heinrich's reply is more than just to that question, it is a
fundamental orientation toward life:
"Who knows," said George reflectively, "if you won't be regarded as right -- in
a thousand years? But till then?"
"Why, my dear George, there won't be anything in the way of a solution of the
question before then. In our time there won't be any solution, that's
absolutely positive. No universal solution at any rate. It will rather be a
case of a million different solutions. For it's just a question which for the
time being everyone has got to settle for himself as best he can. Every one
must manage to find an escape for himself and out of his vexation or out of his
despair or out of his loathing, to some place or other where he can breathe
again in freedom. Perhaps there are really people who would like to go as far
as Jerusalem to find it… I only fear that many of them, once they arrive at
their official goal, would then begin to realize that they had made an utter
mistake. I don't think for a minute that migrations like that into the open
should be gone in for in parties… For the roads there do not run through the
country outside but through our own selves. Every one's life simply depends on
whether or not he finds his mental way out. To do that of course it is
necessary to see as clearly as possible into one's most hidden crannies, to
have the courage to be what one naturally is -- not to be led into a mistake.
Yes, that should be the daily prayer of every decent man: to make no mistake."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Takich madrych ksiazek juz sie nie pisze...;(
In his novel 'Der Weg ins Freie' and in his drama 'Professor Bernhardi', Arthur
Schnitzler dealt, among other things, with the problematic relations between
Jews and non-Jews in fin-de-siecle Vienna. This is widely known. So far,
however, whenever the author's Jewish identity has been discussed, it has
nearly always been just his autobiography, 'Jugend in Wien', and quotations of
his fictional characters which have been considered. The focus of this
dissertation is a careful approach to Schnitzler's self-image as a Jew, based
primarily on his non-fiction writing. His early diaries refer to this topic in
only a few isolated entries. This changes in later years: more than a thousand,
mostly very short passages referring in one way or another to Jews and Judaism
('Judentum') or antisemitism help to piece together Schnitzler´s very complex
relationship with his Jewish identity. On the basis of relevant examples from a
period of more than fifty years between 1879 and 1931, this dissertation
attempts to reconstruct the complex formative process of his changing Jewish
identity. Schnitzler's diaries provide the starting point and main source of
this analysis. In addition, his letters, aphorisms and notes - to a large
extent published after his death - as well as his autobiography covering his
early years up to 1889, are taken into account. Moreover, a number of
heretofore unknown Schnitzler interviews on Jews, Judaism and antisemitism
offer a wealth of new source material. This large collection of mostly
fragmentary notes presents a kaleidoscope of observations, from everyday
antisemitic utterances of neigbour children or Jewish jokes in their
typical 'jargon' to his own reflections on how his being Jewish influenced his
voting record in elections or was responsible for his supposed lack of talent
as a dramatist. Schnitzler´s ambivalece to Judaism and being a Jew, but also to
Austria and to German culture constantly forced him to manoeuvre between
various positions of self-definition. He pressured to defend his right of
decision to regard himself as a Jew, a German or an Austrian, since 'the
Germans' or 'the Austrians' often denied this right. At the same time, he saw
himself often in a position to defend one community against the other. He
strongly opposed being characterized by the simple label of Jewish author,
pointing at his close links to German culture. On the other hand, if his roots
in German culture were overrated, he referred to his Jewish background,
stressing how much German culture has benefited from Judaism. Schnitzler was
well aware of his problematic situation but insisted until the end on his right
to decide his identity. This specific reaction to his personal dilemma of
a 'multiple identity in times of nationalistic simplicity' distinguished him,
e.g. from Sigmund Freud, who, in the light of growing antisemitic attacks,
stopped terming himself as being German and defined himself as a Jew only.
Schnitzler's relentless insistance on his right of self-determination regarding
his identity is one of the most important reasons for the absence over a period
of decades of any radical breaks in his position vis a vis Jews, Judaism and
antisemitism. Compared with his contemporaries, who were also constantly forced
to deal with the so-called 'Jewish question', Schnitzler's statements show a
remarkable degree of continuity. Table of Contents: Part I: Antisemitism;
Public and political antisemitism; Part II: Jews and Judaism; Remarks on Jewish
movements and Jewish politics; Schnitzler and Theodor Herzl; Jewish aspects in
Schnitzler's everyday-life; Schnitzler and the Jewish theatre; traces of
Jiddish and 'Juedischdeutsch' Part III: Works and Reception; Models for
characters in 'Der Weg ins Freie'; Schnitzler's comments on 'Der Weg ins
Freie'; Prelude: protests in Wiener Neustadt; A public excitation: 'Der
Reigen'; Painful aftermath: two disrupted Schnitzler-readings [Graz and
Teplitz]; Part IV: Facets of a Jewish-Austrian-German Identity; Schnitzler as a
Jew in his political decisions; being characterized as a Jew or non-Jew;
Schnitzler's remarks on the Jewish identity of his contemporaries; Jewish
cultural production and Jewish interpretation of culture ('Kulturverständnis');
Schnitzler's self-image as a Jew and German writer; influences of Judaism
on 'the physiology of creativity'; interviews and reflections; affiliation and
separations; between philosemitism and being stigmatized: a methodological
tight-rope walk; Echo: dreams.
www.arcs.ac.at/DissDB/diss/UI/GW/trn100075
Schnitzler dealt, among other things, with the problematic relations between
Jews and non-Jews in fin-de-siecle Vienna. This is widely known. So far,
however, whenever the author's Jewish identity has been discussed, it has
nearly always been just his autobiography, 'Jugend in Wien', and quotations of
his fictional characters which have been considered. The focus of this
dissertation is a careful approach to Schnitzler's self-image as a Jew, based
primarily on his non-fiction writing. His early diaries refer to this topic in
only a few isolated entries. This changes in later years: more than a thousand,
mostly very short passages referring in one way or another to Jews and Judaism
('Judentum') or antisemitism help to piece together Schnitzler´s very complex
relationship with his Jewish identity. On the basis of relevant examples from a
period of more than fifty years between 1879 and 1931, this dissertation
attempts to reconstruct the complex formative process of his changing Jewish
identity. Schnitzler's diaries provide the starting point and main source of
this analysis. In addition, his letters, aphorisms and notes - to a large
extent published after his death - as well as his autobiography covering his
early years up to 1889, are taken into account. Moreover, a number of
heretofore unknown Schnitzler interviews on Jews, Judaism and antisemitism
offer a wealth of new source material. This large collection of mostly
fragmentary notes presents a kaleidoscope of observations, from everyday
antisemitic utterances of neigbour children or Jewish jokes in their
typical 'jargon' to his own reflections on how his being Jewish influenced his
voting record in elections or was responsible for his supposed lack of talent
as a dramatist. Schnitzler´s ambivalece to Judaism and being a Jew, but also to
Austria and to German culture constantly forced him to manoeuvre between
various positions of self-definition. He pressured to defend his right of
decision to regard himself as a Jew, a German or an Austrian, since 'the
Germans' or 'the Austrians' often denied this right. At the same time, he saw
himself often in a position to defend one community against the other. He
strongly opposed being characterized by the simple label of Jewish author,
pointing at his close links to German culture. On the other hand, if his roots
in German culture were overrated, he referred to his Jewish background,
stressing how much German culture has benefited from Judaism. Schnitzler was
well aware of his problematic situation but insisted until the end on his right
to decide his identity. This specific reaction to his personal dilemma of
a 'multiple identity in times of nationalistic simplicity' distinguished him,
e.g. from Sigmund Freud, who, in the light of growing antisemitic attacks,
stopped terming himself as being German and defined himself as a Jew only.
Schnitzler's relentless insistance on his right of self-determination regarding
his identity is one of the most important reasons for the absence over a period
of decades of any radical breaks in his position vis a vis Jews, Judaism and
antisemitism. Compared with his contemporaries, who were also constantly forced
to deal with the so-called 'Jewish question', Schnitzler's statements show a
remarkable degree of continuity. Table of Contents: Part I: Antisemitism;
Public and political antisemitism; Part II: Jews and Judaism; Remarks on Jewish
movements and Jewish politics; Schnitzler and Theodor Herzl; Jewish aspects in
Schnitzler's everyday-life; Schnitzler and the Jewish theatre; traces of
Jiddish and 'Juedischdeutsch' Part III: Works and Reception; Models for
characters in 'Der Weg ins Freie'; Schnitzler's comments on 'Der Weg ins
Freie'; Prelude: protests in Wiener Neustadt; A public excitation: 'Der
Reigen'; Painful aftermath: two disrupted Schnitzler-readings [Graz and
Teplitz]; Part IV: Facets of a Jewish-Austrian-German Identity; Schnitzler as a
Jew in his political decisions; being characterized as a Jew or non-Jew;
Schnitzler's remarks on the Jewish identity of his contemporaries; Jewish
cultural production and Jewish interpretation of culture ('Kulturverständnis');
Schnitzler's self-image as a Jew and German writer; influences of Judaism
on 'the physiology of creativity'; interviews and reflections; affiliation and
separations; between philosemitism and being stigmatized: a methodological
tight-rope walk; Echo: dreams.
www.arcs.ac.at/DissDB/diss/UI/GW/trn100075
• Re: ==============Free Patterns IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: Kartofel 28.11.03, 21:34 zarchiwizowany
Szpinak? A co ta stonka? W koncu zywe i do tego yankee connection. Cos mojej
stonki towarzyszu nie lubicie!
stonki towarzyszu nie lubicie!
• Re: --------------------AQUANET------------------ IP: *.espol.com.pl
Gość: jk 28.11.03, 02:53 zarchiwizowany
k
www.al-sunnah.com/convert/can_a_non.htm
And whoever seeks a religion other than Islaam, it will never be accepted of
him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers...
WYJSCIE : nie wybierac zadnej religi...
And whoever seeks a religion other than Islaam, it will never be accepted of
him, and in the Hereafter he will be one of the losers...
WYJSCIE : nie wybierac zadnej religi...
"A Muslim imam, calling on Allah to 'annihilate the Jews and their supporters,'
envisioned a day when all the lands of the earth will be 'owned by the Muslim
nation,' in his Friday sermon last week, broadcast live on Palestinian
Authority television" (Worldnetdaily.com).
-----------------------------------------------
www.polamjournal.com/Library/APHistory/coffee/body_coffee.html
envisioned a day when all the lands of the earth will be 'owned by the Muslim
nation,' in his Friday sermon last week, broadcast live on Palestinian
Authority television" (Worldnetdaily.com).
-----------------------------------------------
www.polamjournal.com/Library/APHistory/coffee/body_coffee.html
• sp...daaaalaaaaaaaaaaaajjjjMUSTAFA ! IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: <©> 27.11.03, 19:09 zarchiwizowany
Wiadomość została usunięta ze względu na złamanie prawa lub regulaminu.
A moze to virusMACowy ? Kuracje proponuje Klasowo :
Przykłady
W tym przykładzie najpierw zdefiniujemy bazową klasę i jej rozszerzenie. Klasa
bazowa opisuje normalne warzywo, czy jest jadalne czy nie oraz jego kolor.
Podklasa Szpinak dodaje metodę pozwalającą go zagotować i drugą, która pozwala
dowiedzieć się, czy jest zagotowany.
Przykład 1. classes.inc
// klasa bazowa wraz z jej właściwościami i metodami
class Warzywo {
var $jadalne;
var $kolor;
function Warzywo( $jadalne, $kolor="zielony" ) {
$this->jadalne = $jadalne;
$this->kolor = $kolor;
}
function jest_jadalne() {
return $this->jadalne;
}
function jaki_kolor() {
return $this->kolor;
}
} // koniec klasy Warzywo
// rozrzesza klasę bazową
class Szpinak extends Warzywo {
var $ugotowane = false;
function Szpinak() {
$this->Warzywo( true, "zielone" );
}
function ugotuj() {
$this->ugotowane = true;
}
function jest_ugotowane() {
return $this->ugotowane;
}
} // koniec klasy Szpinak
?>
przeprogramuj sie
pzdr z wzgorzaSzoku
zGrzyb
Przykłady
W tym przykładzie najpierw zdefiniujemy bazową klasę i jej rozszerzenie. Klasa
bazowa opisuje normalne warzywo, czy jest jadalne czy nie oraz jego kolor.
Podklasa Szpinak dodaje metodę pozwalającą go zagotować i drugą, która pozwala
dowiedzieć się, czy jest zagotowany.
Przykład 1. classes.inc
// klasa bazowa wraz z jej właściwościami i metodami
class Warzywo {
var $jadalne;
var $kolor;
function Warzywo( $jadalne, $kolor="zielony" ) {
$this->jadalne = $jadalne;
$this->kolor = $kolor;
}
function jest_jadalne() {
return $this->jadalne;
}
function jaki_kolor() {
return $this->kolor;
}
} // koniec klasy Warzywo
// rozrzesza klasę bazową
class Szpinak extends Warzywo {
var $ugotowane = false;
function Szpinak() {
$this->Warzywo( true, "zielone" );
}
function ugotuj() {
$this->ugotowane = true;
}
function jest_ugotowane() {
return $this->ugotowane;
}
} // koniec klasy Szpinak
?>
przeprogramuj sie
pzdr z wzgorzaSzoku
zGrzyb
• Kiedw spi NOS budza sie de MONY IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: Matolek 26.11.03, 20:33 zarchiwizowany
Zlapalem bakcyla i nie odpowiadam za skutki.Kiedw spi NOS budza sie de MONY.
Koziolek Matolek
Koziolek Matolek
archives.neohapsis.com/archives/sf/secprog/2001-q3/0097.html
www.bhamjcc.org/singles/july13/pages/alef2.htm
www.alephfrance.com/aleph
www.kolumbus.fi/gematria/orthodox.htm
xray.sai.msu.ru/~lipunov/images/como/alef1a.jpg
bbs.inway.cz/bbs2www/CZphilosophy/0210
www.generalsemantics.org/about/ISGS_DIR.HTM
www.hofesh.org.il/letters/talks/alef1.html
www.aleph1.co.uk
www.aleph1.co.uk/bio/index.html
www.aleph1.co.uk/bio/resource.html
archives.neohapsis.com/archives/sf/secprog/2001-q3/0097.html
mathworld.wolfram.com/Aleph-1.html
mathworld.wolfram.com/SetTheory.html
www.mrob.com/pub/muency/aleph1.html
www.ii.com/math/ch/confusion
CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS
CONFUSION
An example of confusion is in George Gamow's One Two Three...Infinity. On page
34 he says:
The sequence of numbers (including the infinite ones!) now runs:
1 2 3 4 5 ... aleph1 aleph2 aleph3 ...
and we say "there are aleph1 points on a line" or "there are aleph2 different
curves" ...
First note that Gamow's sequence of finite and transfinite numbers is not
correct. It should be:
1 2 3 4 5 ... aleph0 aleph1 aleph2 aleph3 ...
Also note that he is assuming CH when he says "there are aleph1 points on a
line" and GCH when he says "there are aleph2 different curves."
Another example of confusion is on page 46 of Michael Guillen's Bridges to
Infinity:
an aleph0 set ... has precisely 2aleph0 conceivable subsets ... It is the first
stepping stone beyond infinity, the first transfinite number, which Cantor
named aleph1 ... A set with aleph1 elements in turn, has precisely 2aleph1
conceivable subsets. This is the second stepping stone, the second transfinite
number aleph2, and so forth.
Note that Cantor did not give 2aleph0 the name aleph1. Cantor's Continuum
Hypothesis is exactly the question about whether 2aleph0 equals aleph1. Also
note that aleph1 is not the first transfinite number, aleph0 is.
Guillen continues his confusion on page 50:
To this day we still don't know exactly how many irrationals there are,
although it has been established that the total number cannot be more than
aleph1. Cantor himself guessed that the total number of irrationals is exactly
aleph1, mainly since aleph1 is the next largest infinity after aleph0 defined
by set theory. His guess came to be known as the Continuum Hypothesis. But
there is still the uneliminated possibility that the number of irrationals
actually lies between aleph0 and aleph1.
This quote includes three confusions:
" it has been established that the total number [of irrationals] cannot be more
than aleph1. "
Wrong. It has been established that the number of irrationals is the same as
the number of reals, which is 2aleph0, which is >= aleph1. What we don't know
about the irrationals (and the reals, which have the same cardinality as the
irrationals) is where their cardinality lies in the sequence of transfinite
numbers:
aleph0 aleph1 aleph2 aleph3 ...
"Cantor himself guessed that the total number of irrationals is exactly aleph1"
This is a correct statement of CH but since Guillen is assuming 2aleph0 =
aleph1, Guillen can restate this as:
Cantor himself guessed that the total number of irrationals is exactly 2aleph0
Cantor did not guess this, he proved it.
"But there is still the uneliminated possibility that the number of irrationals
actually lies between aleph0 and aleph1."
Since aleph1 is defined to be the "second transfinite number," as Guillen
himself said in the first quote above, it doesn't make sense to say there's a
cardinal that lies between aleph0 and aleph1.
www.bhamjcc.org/singles/july13/pages/alef2.htm
www.alephfrance.com/aleph
www.kolumbus.fi/gematria/orthodox.htm
xray.sai.msu.ru/~lipunov/images/como/alef1a.jpg
bbs.inway.cz/bbs2www/CZphilosophy/0210
www.generalsemantics.org/about/ISGS_DIR.HTM
www.hofesh.org.il/letters/talks/alef1.html
www.aleph1.co.uk
www.aleph1.co.uk/bio/index.html
www.aleph1.co.uk/bio/resource.html
archives.neohapsis.com/archives/sf/secprog/2001-q3/0097.html
mathworld.wolfram.com/Aleph-1.html
mathworld.wolfram.com/SetTheory.html
www.mrob.com/pub/muency/aleph1.html
www.ii.com/math/ch/confusion
CONTINUUM HYPOTHESIS
CONFUSION
An example of confusion is in George Gamow's One Two Three...Infinity. On page
34 he says:
The sequence of numbers (including the infinite ones!) now runs:
1 2 3 4 5 ... aleph1 aleph2 aleph3 ...
and we say "there are aleph1 points on a line" or "there are aleph2 different
curves" ...
First note that Gamow's sequence of finite and transfinite numbers is not
correct. It should be:
1 2 3 4 5 ... aleph0 aleph1 aleph2 aleph3 ...
Also note that he is assuming CH when he says "there are aleph1 points on a
line" and GCH when he says "there are aleph2 different curves."
Another example of confusion is on page 46 of Michael Guillen's Bridges to
Infinity:
an aleph0 set ... has precisely 2aleph0 conceivable subsets ... It is the first
stepping stone beyond infinity, the first transfinite number, which Cantor
named aleph1 ... A set with aleph1 elements in turn, has precisely 2aleph1
conceivable subsets. This is the second stepping stone, the second transfinite
number aleph2, and so forth.
Note that Cantor did not give 2aleph0 the name aleph1. Cantor's Continuum
Hypothesis is exactly the question about whether 2aleph0 equals aleph1. Also
note that aleph1 is not the first transfinite number, aleph0 is.
Guillen continues his confusion on page 50:
To this day we still don't know exactly how many irrationals there are,
although it has been established that the total number cannot be more than
aleph1. Cantor himself guessed that the total number of irrationals is exactly
aleph1, mainly since aleph1 is the next largest infinity after aleph0 defined
by set theory. His guess came to be known as the Continuum Hypothesis. But
there is still the uneliminated possibility that the number of irrationals
actually lies between aleph0 and aleph1.
This quote includes three confusions:
" it has been established that the total number [of irrationals] cannot be more
than aleph1. "
Wrong. It has been established that the number of irrationals is the same as
the number of reals, which is 2aleph0, which is >= aleph1. What we don't know
about the irrationals (and the reals, which have the same cardinality as the
irrationals) is where their cardinality lies in the sequence of transfinite
numbers:
aleph0 aleph1 aleph2 aleph3 ...
"Cantor himself guessed that the total number of irrationals is exactly aleph1"
This is a correct statement of CH but since Guillen is assuming 2aleph0 =
aleph1, Guillen can restate this as:
Cantor himself guessed that the total number of irrationals is exactly 2aleph0
Cantor did not guess this, he proved it.
"But there is still the uneliminated possibility that the number of irrationals
actually lies between aleph0 and aleph1."
Since aleph1 is defined to be the "second transfinite number," as Guillen
himself said in the first quote above, it doesn't make sense to say there's a
cardinal that lies between aleph0 and aleph1.
1.ALEF1 Research Studies
THE EXEMPELS OF THE GEMATRIA
http://www.alephfrance.com/aleph/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
777:
ORTHODOX MESSIAH (hei5 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 + chet8 + dalet4 + tav400 +
yud10) = 777
YHWH IN YESHUA MESSIAH (yud10 + hei5 + vav6 + hei5 + beit2 + yud10 + shin300 +
vav6 + ayin70 + hei5 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 + chet8) = 777
YESHUA SAVE (yud10 + shin300 + vav6 + ayin70 + hei5 + vav6 + shin300 + yud10 +
ayin70) = 777
The Acts 4:10-12: "Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel,
that by the name of Yeshua Messiah of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God
raised from the dead... This is the stone which was set at nought of you
builders, which is become the head of the corner*. Neither is there salvation
in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men,
whereby we must be saved".
*) Psalms 118:22; Isaiah 28:16
Philippians 2:6-11: "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to
be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the
form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in
fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the
death of the cross. Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a
name which is above every name: That at the name of Yeshua every knee should
bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth*; And
that every tongue should confess that Yeshua Messiah is Lord, to the glory of
God the Father".
*) Isaiah 45:23
386:
YESHUA (yud10 + shin300 + vav6 + ayin70) = 386
HE IS MESSIAH (hei5 + vav6 + alef1 + hei5 + vav6 + hei5 + mem40 + shin300 +
yud10 + chet8) = 386
MY GOD'S NAME (shin300 + mem40 + alef1 + lamed30 + hei5 + yud10) = 386
YHWH IN MESSIAH (yud10 + hei5 + vav6 + hei5 + beit2 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 +
chet8) = 386
Numbers 3, 8 and 6:
3 three (shin300 + lamed30 + shin300 + hei5) = 635; SPIRIT OF GOD (reish200 +
vav6 + chet8 + shin300 + lamed30 + hei5 + alef1 + lamed30 + hei5 + yud10 +
mem40) = 635
8 eight (shin300 + mem40 + vav6 + nun50 + hei5) = 401; YHWH IS MESSIAH (yud10 +
hei5 + vav6 + hei5 + hei5 + vav6 + alef1 + hei5 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 +
chet8) = 401
6 six (shin300 + shin300 + hei5) = 605; MAN (alef1 + dalet4 + mem600) = 605
II Corinthians 5:19-21: "To wit, that God was in Messiah, reconciling the world
unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto
us the word of reconciliation. Now then we are ambassadors for Messiah, as
though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Messiah's stead, be ye
reconciled to God. For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that
we might be made the righteousness of God in him".
I AM THAT I AM
Exodus 3:14: I AM THAT I AM (alef1 + hei5 + yud10 + hei5 + alef1 + shin300 +
reis200 + alef1 + hei5 + yud10 + hei5) = 543
Matthew 1:23: HIS NAME EMMANUEL (shin300 + mem40 + vav6 + ayin70 + mem40 +
nun50 + vav6 + alef1 + lamed30) = 543
IN ISRAEL (beit2 + yud10 + shin300 + reis200 + alef1 + lamed30) = 543
IN CONGREGATIONS (beit2 + kuf100 + hei5 + lamed30 + vav6 + tav400) = 543
MY FATHER (alef111 + beit412 + yud20) = 543
COME TO, ARRIVE (yud20 + beit412 + alef111) = 543
[ALEF (alef1 + lamed30 + pei80) = 111]
[BEIT (beit2 + yud10 + tav400) = 412]
[YUD (yud10 + vav6 + dalet4) = 20]
EMMANUEL
Matthew 1:23: EMMANUEL (ayin70 + mem40 + nun50 + vav6 + alef1 + lamed30) = 197
HE IS YHWH (hei6 + vav12 + alef111 + hei6 + vav12 + hei6 + yud20 + hey6 + vav12
+ hei6) = 197
SEED OF WOMAN
Genesis 3:15: HE IS SEED OF WOMAN (zayin7 + reis200 + ayin70 + hei5 + hei5 +
alef1 + shin300 + hei5 + hei5 + vav6 + alef1) = 605
Genesis 49:11: SeREKA, Messiah (shin300 + reis200 + kuf100 + hei5) = 605
Figures 6, 0, 5 SIX, ZERO, FIVE (shin300 + shin300 + hei5 + alef1 + pei80 +
samech60 + chet8 + mem40 + shin300 + hei5) = 1099
Isaiah 41:27: FIRST, Messiah (reis510 + alef111 + shin360 + vav12 + nun106) =
1099
Number 605 SIXHUNDRED FIVE (shin300 + shin300 + mem40 + alef1 + vav6 + tav400 +
vav6 + chet8 + mem40 + shin300 + hei5) = 1406
YESHUA MESSIAH (yud20 + shin360 + vav12 + ayin130 + hei6 + mem80 + shin360 +
yud20 + chet418) = 1406
BAPTISM
Ephesians 4:5: ONE BAPTISM (tet9 + beit2 + yud10 + lamed30 + hei5 + alef1 +
chet8 + tav400) = 465
LIKE IN THE BEGINNING (kaf20 + beit2 + tav400 + chet8 + lamed30 + hei5) = 465
Figures 4, 6, 5 FOUR, SIX, FIVE (alef1 + reis200 + beit2 + ayin70 + hei5 +
shin300 + shin300 + hei5 + chet8 + mem40 + shin300 + hei5 = 1236
BAPTISM IN THE NAME OF LORD YESHUA MESSIAH (hei5 + tet9 + beit2 + lamed30 +
hei5 + lamed30 + shin300 + mem40 + hei5 + alef1 + dalet4 + vav6 + nun50 + yud10
+ shin300 + vav6 + ayin70 + hei5 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 + chet8) = 1236
666:
John Paul II is 666 if write his name in hebrew: yud10 + vav6 + chet8 + nun50 +
nun50 + pei80 + vav6 + lamed30 + vav6 + samech60 + shin300 + nun50 + yud10 = 666
Moshe Zew
http://www.kolumbus.fi/gematria/orthodox.htm
http://www.quarrior.it/contributi/marcoS2/imagepages/image14.htm
Алеф
Первородный грех
Владимир Воблин в
своих "Ночных
заметках" написал:
Арабы действительно
живут тут 700-800 лет, и за
всё это время у них,
хоть с
оккупантами, хоть
без, ничего путного
не выходило. Ни в
одной арабской
стране.
А евреи пришли всего
каких-то 100 лет назад и
обштопали их по всем
статьям со
страшной силой.
Действия людей, как и
их болезни,
редко происходят от
одной причины.
У каждого действия
много корней.
Гиппократ с острова
Кос
Я думаю, названная
THE EXEMPELS OF THE GEMATRIA
http://www.alephfrance.com/aleph/
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
777:
ORTHODOX MESSIAH (hei5 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 + chet8 + dalet4 + tav400 +
yud10) = 777
YHWH IN YESHUA MESSIAH (yud10 + hei5 + vav6 + hei5 + beit2 + yud10 + shin300 +
vav6 + ayin70 + hei5 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 + chet8) = 777
YESHUA SAVE (yud10 + shin300 + vav6 + ayin70 + hei5 + vav6 + shin300 + yud10 +
ayin70) = 777
The Acts 4:10-12: "Be it known unto you all, and to all the people of Israel,
that by the name of Yeshua Messiah of Nazareth, whom ye crucified, whom God
raised from the dead... This is the stone which was set at nought of you
builders, which is become the head of the corner*. Neither is there salvation
in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men,
whereby we must be saved".
*) Psalms 118:22; Isaiah 28:16
Philippians 2:6-11: "Who, being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to
be equal with God: But made himself of no reputation, and took upon him the
form of a servant, and was made in the likeness of men: And being found in
fashion as a man, he humbled himself, and became obedient unto death, even the
death of the cross. Wherefore God also hath highly exalted him, and given him a
name which is above every name: That at the name of Yeshua every knee should
bow, of things in heaven, and things in earth, and things under the earth*; And
that every tongue should confess that Yeshua Messiah is Lord, to the glory of
God the Father".
*) Isaiah 45:23
386:
YESHUA (yud10 + shin300 + vav6 + ayin70) = 386
HE IS MESSIAH (hei5 + vav6 + alef1 + hei5 + vav6 + hei5 + mem40 + shin300 +
yud10 + chet8) = 386
MY GOD'S NAME (shin300 + mem40 + alef1 + lamed30 + hei5 + yud10) = 386
YHWH IN MESSIAH (yud10 + hei5 + vav6 + hei5 + beit2 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 +
chet8) = 386
Numbers 3, 8 and 6:
3 three (shin300 + lamed30 + shin300 + hei5) = 635; SPIRIT OF GOD (reish200 +
vav6 + chet8 + shin300 + lamed30 + hei5 + alef1 + lamed30 + hei5 + yud10 +
mem40) = 635
8 eight (shin300 + mem40 + vav6 + nun50 + hei5) = 401; YHWH IS MESSIAH (yud10 +
hei5 + vav6 + hei5 + hei5 + vav6 + alef1 + hei5 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 +
chet8) = 401
6 six (shin300 + shin300 + hei5) = 605; MAN (alef1 + dalet4 + mem600) = 605
II Corinthians 5:19-21: "To wit, that God was in Messiah, reconciling the world
unto himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them; and hath committed unto
us the word of reconciliation. Now then we are ambassadors for Messiah, as
though God did beseech you by us: we pray you in Messiah's stead, be ye
reconciled to God. For he hath made him to be sin for us, who knew no sin; that
we might be made the righteousness of God in him".
I AM THAT I AM
Exodus 3:14: I AM THAT I AM (alef1 + hei5 + yud10 + hei5 + alef1 + shin300 +
reis200 + alef1 + hei5 + yud10 + hei5) = 543
Matthew 1:23: HIS NAME EMMANUEL (shin300 + mem40 + vav6 + ayin70 + mem40 +
nun50 + vav6 + alef1 + lamed30) = 543
IN ISRAEL (beit2 + yud10 + shin300 + reis200 + alef1 + lamed30) = 543
IN CONGREGATIONS (beit2 + kuf100 + hei5 + lamed30 + vav6 + tav400) = 543
MY FATHER (alef111 + beit412 + yud20) = 543
COME TO, ARRIVE (yud20 + beit412 + alef111) = 543
[ALEF (alef1 + lamed30 + pei80) = 111]
[BEIT (beit2 + yud10 + tav400) = 412]
[YUD (yud10 + vav6 + dalet4) = 20]
EMMANUEL
Matthew 1:23: EMMANUEL (ayin70 + mem40 + nun50 + vav6 + alef1 + lamed30) = 197
HE IS YHWH (hei6 + vav12 + alef111 + hei6 + vav12 + hei6 + yud20 + hey6 + vav12
+ hei6) = 197
SEED OF WOMAN
Genesis 3:15: HE IS SEED OF WOMAN (zayin7 + reis200 + ayin70 + hei5 + hei5 +
alef1 + shin300 + hei5 + hei5 + vav6 + alef1) = 605
Genesis 49:11: SeREKA, Messiah (shin300 + reis200 + kuf100 + hei5) = 605
Figures 6, 0, 5 SIX, ZERO, FIVE (shin300 + shin300 + hei5 + alef1 + pei80 +
samech60 + chet8 + mem40 + shin300 + hei5) = 1099
Isaiah 41:27: FIRST, Messiah (reis510 + alef111 + shin360 + vav12 + nun106) =
1099
Number 605 SIXHUNDRED FIVE (shin300 + shin300 + mem40 + alef1 + vav6 + tav400 +
vav6 + chet8 + mem40 + shin300 + hei5) = 1406
YESHUA MESSIAH (yud20 + shin360 + vav12 + ayin130 + hei6 + mem80 + shin360 +
yud20 + chet418) = 1406
BAPTISM
Ephesians 4:5: ONE BAPTISM (tet9 + beit2 + yud10 + lamed30 + hei5 + alef1 +
chet8 + tav400) = 465
LIKE IN THE BEGINNING (kaf20 + beit2 + tav400 + chet8 + lamed30 + hei5) = 465
Figures 4, 6, 5 FOUR, SIX, FIVE (alef1 + reis200 + beit2 + ayin70 + hei5 +
shin300 + shin300 + hei5 + chet8 + mem40 + shin300 + hei5 = 1236
BAPTISM IN THE NAME OF LORD YESHUA MESSIAH (hei5 + tet9 + beit2 + lamed30 +
hei5 + lamed30 + shin300 + mem40 + hei5 + alef1 + dalet4 + vav6 + nun50 + yud10
+ shin300 + vav6 + ayin70 + hei5 + mem40 + shin300 + yud10 + chet8) = 1236
666:
John Paul II is 666 if write his name in hebrew: yud10 + vav6 + chet8 + nun50 +
nun50 + pei80 + vav6 + lamed30 + vav6 + samech60 + shin300 + nun50 + yud10 = 666
Moshe Zew
http://www.kolumbus.fi/gematria/orthodox.htm
http://www.quarrior.it/contributi/marcoS2/imagepages/image14.htm
Алеф
Первородный грех
Владимир Воблин в
своих "Ночных
заметках" написал:
Арабы действительно
живут тут 700-800 лет, и за
всё это время у них,
хоть с
оккупантами, хоть
без, ничего путного
не выходило. Ни в
одной арабской
стране.
А евреи пришли всего
каких-то 100 лет назад и
обштопали их по всем
статьям со
страшной силой.
Действия людей, как и
их болезни,
редко происходят от
одной причины.
У каждого действия
много корней.
Гиппократ с острова
Кос
Я думаю, названная
According to the Holy Quran:
One may eat and drink* at any time during the night "until you can plainly
distinguish a white thread from a black thread by the daylight: then keep the
fast until night"
*czysta swiencona wyborowa
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The good that is acquired through the fast can be destroyed by five things -
the telling of a lie**
slander**
denouncing** someone behind his back
a false** oath
greed** or covetousness**
**
do uzgodnienia z kalifem
-----------------------------------------
During Ramadan, it is common for Muslims to go to the Masjid (Mosque) and spend
several hours praying and studying the Quran. In addition to the five daily
prayers, during Ramadan Muslims recite a special prayer called the Taraweeh
prayer (Night Prayer). The length of this prayer is usually 2-3 times as long
as the daily prayers. Some Muslims spend the entire night in prayer
............................................;)
One may eat and drink* at any time during the night "until you can plainly
distinguish a white thread from a black thread by the daylight: then keep the
fast until night"
*czysta swiencona wyborowa
------------------------------------------------------------------------
The good that is acquired through the fast can be destroyed by five things -
the telling of a lie**
slander**
denouncing** someone behind his back
a false** oath
greed** or covetousness**
**
do uzgodnienia z kalifem
-----------------------------------------
During Ramadan, it is common for Muslims to go to the Masjid (Mosque) and spend
several hours praying and studying the Quran. In addition to the five daily
prayers, during Ramadan Muslims recite a special prayer called the Taraweeh
prayer (Night Prayer). The length of this prayer is usually 2-3 times as long
as the daily prayers. Some Muslims spend the entire night in prayer
............................................;)
a mNie jeDen kaRaluch zadziwil znajomOscia Kafki....inSektIntelektuaLista ?
Ta stonka to jego.. Rodzaj.. a ze Ziemniaki lubi to oznaka inteRnaCjoNaliZmu
nie ?
================================================
SpinOZ:doWe
• ,.,.,.wierz tylko w stonke ziemniaczana,.,.,. IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: QED 25.11.03, 19:38 zarchiwizowany
Snil mi sie spinoza i powiedzial:wierz tylko w stonke ziemniaczana. QED.
home.hetnet.nl/~turing/d3_lattice_20.html
Now we will discuss group theory as we find it in infinite two-dimensional
periodic patterns. Evidently this will throw some light on infinite three-
dimensional patterns, which are much harder to understand, but which are one of
our objectives enabling us to better understand and discuss the internal
structure of real crystals. Crystals consist of an internal pattern of
microscopic chemical units that are repeated periodically in three different
directions. This structure can be seen as a three-dimensional periodic point
grid or point lattice in which the points are occupied by certain chemical
motifs. Because a crystal consists of a huge number of such chemical motifs it
can be considered as to possess an infinite periodic pattern.
Generally a pattern can be conceived as a basic motif that is regularly
repeated. This can occur in two basic ways. In the first way the basic motif is
repeated radially about some axis of rotation, or it is repeated by way of
reflection about a point, line or plane. It can be proved that those plane
patterns (and the same will be the case with three-dimensional patterns) in
which the motif appears only a finite number of times must have a fixed point,
i.e. that each symmetry operation leaves at least one point in place, and that
their groups are either cyclic (such as, for example, C6 , C7 , etc.) or
dihedral (such as D3 , D6 , etc.) (BUDDEN, p. 505). Such groups, i.e. groups
involving a fixed point, are called point groups in crystallography. As we know
from the first part of this website -- accessible via back to homepage -- in
(three-dimensional) crystals there are precisely 32 such point groups,
representing the 32 crystal classes of crystallography. In the two-dimensional
realm such a point group can be realized, for example, by the Square ( D4 )
(and all other images having the same symmetry), the Equilateral Triangle (
D3 ), etc., while in three dimensions it can be represented by, for example,
the Cube (Oi ) (and all other images having the same symmetry), the Tetrahedron
(S4 ), and also the Regular Tetragonal Pyramid ( D4 ) and the Regular Trigonal
Pyramid ( D3 ), etc.
However, as soon as symmetry operations, containing translations, are included
in a pattern, not a single point is fixed anymore, because a translation, or
translational component, shifts the whole pattern. Patterns that have such
symmetry operations included, resulting in periodic patterns, are based upon,
what we could call translational groups, as such contrasting with point groups.
In the present document we will be concerned with such translational groups,
limiting ourselves, however, to two-dimensional translational groups,
underlying infinite two-dimensional periodic patterns (As has been said, they
will support the understanding of three-dimensional periodic patterns as they
occur in real crystals). The groups that describe such patterns are called
plane groups (groups describing three-dimensional periodic infinite patterns
are called space groups).
home.hetnet.nl/~turing/frieze_5.gif
home.hetnet.nl/~turing/d3_lattice_13.html#table132
symmetry, biological
similarity or balance between parts of an organism so that when a straight cut
is made through a point or along a line, equal, mirror-image halves are formed.
Symmetry in body shapes is related to the lifestyles of organisms. Asymmetry,
or the absence of symmetry, most often occurs in sessile organisms or in slow-
moving forms such as amebas. Most other organisms can generally be classified
in three groups with respect to symmetry type. 1
In spherical, or point, symmetry, any straight cut through the central point of
a sphere divides it into mirror-image halves. Point symmetry, often called
universal symmetry by biologists, is seen in some floating animals with
radiating parts, such as the single-celled protozoans of the order
Radiolaria. 2
Radial, or line, symmetry, as exemplified by a cone or a disk that is
symmetrical about a central axis, is especially suitable for sessile or
floating animals. Most radially symmetrical animals are symmetrical about an
axis extending from the center of the oral surface, which contains the mouth,
to the center of the opposite, or aboral, end. Radial symmetry is seen in
sessile organisms such as the sea anemone, floating organisms such as
jellyfish, and slow-moving organisms such as sea stars, or starfish. Many
jellyfish have four radial canals and are said to have tetramerous radial
symmetry; sea stars, with five arms, have pentamerous radial symmetry. Many
flowers, such as dandelions and daffodils, are radially symmetrical. Nonradial
parts, such as the slit-shaped gullets of sea anemones, are often present in
otherwise radial animals. 3
In plane, or bilateral, symmetry, one particular plane, termed the sagittal
plane, divides the body into two equal halves, usually right and left halves
that are mirror images of each other. Flowers such as orchids and sweet peas
are bilaterally symmetrical. Bilateral symmetry is most suitable for actively
moving organisms, as it permits streamlining, and is the most common symmetry
among animals. In animals this symmetry type also favors the formation of main
nerve centers and special sense organs and contributes to cephalization, or the
evolutionary development of a head. 4
......................................
to na bol glowy..;(
;)
Now we will discuss group theory as we find it in infinite two-dimensional
periodic patterns. Evidently this will throw some light on infinite three-
dimensional patterns, which are much harder to understand, but which are one of
our objectives enabling us to better understand and discuss the internal
structure of real crystals. Crystals consist of an internal pattern of
microscopic chemical units that are repeated periodically in three different
directions. This structure can be seen as a three-dimensional periodic point
grid or point lattice in which the points are occupied by certain chemical
motifs. Because a crystal consists of a huge number of such chemical motifs it
can be considered as to possess an infinite periodic pattern.
Generally a pattern can be conceived as a basic motif that is regularly
repeated. This can occur in two basic ways. In the first way the basic motif is
repeated radially about some axis of rotation, or it is repeated by way of
reflection about a point, line or plane. It can be proved that those plane
patterns (and the same will be the case with three-dimensional patterns) in
which the motif appears only a finite number of times must have a fixed point,
i.e. that each symmetry operation leaves at least one point in place, and that
their groups are either cyclic (such as, for example, C6 , C7 , etc.) or
dihedral (such as D3 , D6 , etc.) (BUDDEN, p. 505). Such groups, i.e. groups
involving a fixed point, are called point groups in crystallography. As we know
from the first part of this website -- accessible via back to homepage -- in
(three-dimensional) crystals there are precisely 32 such point groups,
representing the 32 crystal classes of crystallography. In the two-dimensional
realm such a point group can be realized, for example, by the Square ( D4 )
(and all other images having the same symmetry), the Equilateral Triangle (
D3 ), etc., while in three dimensions it can be represented by, for example,
the Cube (Oi ) (and all other images having the same symmetry), the Tetrahedron
(S4 ), and also the Regular Tetragonal Pyramid ( D4 ) and the Regular Trigonal
Pyramid ( D3 ), etc.
However, as soon as symmetry operations, containing translations, are included
in a pattern, not a single point is fixed anymore, because a translation, or
translational component, shifts the whole pattern. Patterns that have such
symmetry operations included, resulting in periodic patterns, are based upon,
what we could call translational groups, as such contrasting with point groups.
In the present document we will be concerned with such translational groups,
limiting ourselves, however, to two-dimensional translational groups,
underlying infinite two-dimensional periodic patterns (As has been said, they
will support the understanding of three-dimensional periodic patterns as they
occur in real crystals). The groups that describe such patterns are called
plane groups (groups describing three-dimensional periodic infinite patterns
are called space groups).
home.hetnet.nl/~turing/frieze_5.gif
home.hetnet.nl/~turing/d3_lattice_13.html#table132
symmetry, biological
similarity or balance between parts of an organism so that when a straight cut
is made through a point or along a line, equal, mirror-image halves are formed.
Symmetry in body shapes is related to the lifestyles of organisms. Asymmetry,
or the absence of symmetry, most often occurs in sessile organisms or in slow-
moving forms such as amebas. Most other organisms can generally be classified
in three groups with respect to symmetry type. 1
In spherical, or point, symmetry, any straight cut through the central point of
a sphere divides it into mirror-image halves. Point symmetry, often called
universal symmetry by biologists, is seen in some floating animals with
radiating parts, such as the single-celled protozoans of the order
Radiolaria. 2
Radial, or line, symmetry, as exemplified by a cone or a disk that is
symmetrical about a central axis, is especially suitable for sessile or
floating animals. Most radially symmetrical animals are symmetrical about an
axis extending from the center of the oral surface, which contains the mouth,
to the center of the opposite, or aboral, end. Radial symmetry is seen in
sessile organisms such as the sea anemone, floating organisms such as
jellyfish, and slow-moving organisms such as sea stars, or starfish. Many
jellyfish have four radial canals and are said to have tetramerous radial
symmetry; sea stars, with five arms, have pentamerous radial symmetry. Many
flowers, such as dandelions and daffodils, are radially symmetrical. Nonradial
parts, such as the slit-shaped gullets of sea anemones, are often present in
otherwise radial animals. 3
In plane, or bilateral, symmetry, one particular plane, termed the sagittal
plane, divides the body into two equal halves, usually right and left halves
that are mirror images of each other. Flowers such as orchids and sweet peas
are bilaterally symmetrical. Bilateral symmetry is most suitable for actively
moving organisms, as it permits streamlining, and is the most common symmetry
among animals. In animals this symmetry type also favors the formation of main
nerve centers and special sense organs and contributes to cephalization, or the
evolutionary development of a head. 4
......................................
to na bol glowy..;(
;)
• -1699--------1799-------1899------1999------ IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: NaTI 24.11.03, 16:00 zarchiwizowany
"Der konservative Sinn der Universitäten kann auf die technische Wissenschaft
nicht übertragen werden", so der damalige Rektor der TH Charlottenburg, Alois
Riedler. Das Pathos, mit dem die eigene Position beschrieben wurde, ist heute
nicht mehr nachvollziehbar. "Es war, als spräche der Zeitgeist selbst", solche
und ähnliche zeitgenössische Kommentare begleiteten den Eintritt der
Technischen Hochschule in das 20. Jahrhundert.
www.tu-berlin.de/alumni/parTU/99okt/jubila.htm
nicht übertragen werden", so der damalige Rektor der TH Charlottenburg, Alois
Riedler. Das Pathos, mit dem die eigene Position beschrieben wurde, ist heute
nicht mehr nachvollziehbar. "Es war, als spräche der Zeitgeist selbst", solche
und ähnliche zeitgenössische Kommentare begleiteten den Eintritt der
Technischen Hochschule in das 20. Jahrhundert.
www.tu-berlin.de/alumni/parTU/99okt/jubila.htm
Spinoza tylko dla mondrali. Prosty lud czyta nicza.na razie leb mi penka i
czytam nic.Naba rykad.
czytam nic.Naba rykad.
See also:
The Cognitive and Neurosciences
What Makes us Human?
Are we Free?
Genetics
Evolution
Philosophy
Theology
Books on Neuroscience and Theology
www.meta-library.net/stanford/damasio1-body.html
The Cognitive and Neurosciences
What Makes us Human?
Are we Free?
Genetics
Evolution
Philosophy
Theology
Books on Neuroscience and Theology
www.meta-library.net/stanford/damasio1-body.html
Gość portalu: 666 napisał(a):
> m 7pm padlem i ocknalem o 5am. bylem w ziemi swietej i poklomilem ob.
> kwasniakowi spiacemu w grobie sary.byl caly rozowy.666
....................................................................
poczytaj szpinozy zostan PANtaoIStoTom deRYBOM czym chcesz
ale wodom swieconom siem nie upijesz ;(
www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0151005575/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-9860867-8227031#reader-page
> m 7pm padlem i ocknalem o 5am. bylem w ziemi swietej i poklomilem ob.
> kwasniakowi spiacemu w grobie sary.byl caly rozowy.666
....................................................................
poczytaj szpinozy zostan PANtaoIStoTom deRYBOM czym chcesz
ale wodom swieconom siem nie upijesz ;(
www.amazon.com/gp/reader/0151005575/ref=sib_dp_pt/103-9860867-8227031#reader-page
Gość portalu: jeremiasz napisał(a):
> Gość portalu: *©*©* napisał(a):
>
> > Solomon
> > SievertsSurface
> > SphericalTriangle
> >
> > SphericalCube
>
>
> Wom z ziemniakiem! Marchewka z groszkiem i fibertärta na deser a umieramy
> zdrowi.jeremiasz
ja was towarzyszu na internecie lansuje a wy tu te technikum rolnicze
po lini wicie WYKOPKI trza a wroga prac gdzie popadnie i PARTIA
was za czlonka trzyma aby AKCJE WYKOPEK nie sabotowc szczegolnie
w Sza!BeS ???
TOW.LE55ERwszyZpeeRelu
> Gość portalu: *©*©* napisał(a):
>
> > Solomon
> > SievertsSurface
> > SphericalTriangle
> >
> > SphericalCube
>
>
> Wom z ziemniakiem! Marchewka z groszkiem i fibertärta na deser a umieramy
> zdrowi.jeremiasz
ja was towarzyszu na internecie lansuje a wy tu te technikum rolnicze
po lini wicie WYKOPKI trza a wroga prac gdzie popadnie i PARTIA
was za czlonka trzyma aby AKCJE WYKOPEK nie sabotowc szczegolnie
w Sza!BeS ???
TOW.LE55ERwszyZpeeRelu
Gość portalu: *©*©* napisał(a):
> Solomon
> SievertsSurface
> SphericalTriangle
>
> SphericalCube
Wom z ziemniakiem! Marchewka z groszkiem i fibertärta na deser a umieramy
zdrowi.jeremiasz
> Solomon
> SievertsSurface
> SphericalTriangle
>
> SphericalCube
Wom z ziemniakiem! Marchewka z groszkiem i fibertärta na deser a umieramy
zdrowi.jeremiasz
3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286208
9986280348253421170679
B.l Kl PGN bPB PSG Z GBNB SKbNbK BBS BNZG
PONSSKl GZlb GBG GBZ PlOPS NOG ZK GKKPG NBOZ SlbKO
bNSb NOS
GG SbN SOB KSNP BKNllZ ObZG
datsh.freeservers.com/photo2.html
9986280348253421170679
B.l Kl PGN bPB PSG Z GBNB SKbNbK BBS BNZG
PONSSKl GZlb GBG GBZ PlOPS NOG ZK GKKPG NBOZ SlbKO
bNSb NOS
GG SbN SOB KSNP BKNllZ ObZG
datsh.freeservers.com/photo2.html
Pi to one MILLION decimal places
3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286208
9986280348253421170679
82148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128481117450284102701938521105559
64462294895493038196
44288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104543266482
13393607260249141273
72458700660631558817488152092096282925409171536436789259036001133053054882046652
13841469519415116094
33057270365759591953092186117381932611793105118548074462379962749567351885752724
89122793818301194912
98336733624406566430860213949463952247371907021798609437027705392171762931767523
84674818467669405132
00056812714526356082778577134275778960917363717872146844090122495343014654958537
10507922796892589235
42019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960518707211349999998372978049951
05973173281609631859
50244594553469083026425223082533446850352619311881710100031378387528865875332083
81420617177669147303
59825349042875546873115956286388235378759375195778185778053217122680661300192787
66111959092164201989
38095257201065485863278865936153381827968230301952035301852968995773622599413891
24972177528347913151
55748572424541506959508295331168617278558890750983817546374649393192550604009277
01671139009848824012
85836160356370766010471018194295559619894676783744944825537977472684710404753464
62080466842590694912
93313677028989152104752162056966024058038150193511253382430035587640247496473263
91419927260426992279
67823547816360093417216412199245863150302861829745557067498385054945885869269956
90927210797509302955
32116534498720275596023648066549911988183479775356636980742654252786255181841757
46728909777727938000
81647060016145249192173217214772350141441973568548161361157352552133475741849468
43852332390739414333
45477624168625189835694855620992192221842725502542568876717904946016534668049886
27232791786085784383
82796797668145410095388378636095068006422512520511739298489608412848862694560424
19652850222106611863
06744278622039194945047123713786960956364371917287467764657573962413890865832645
99581339047802759009
94657640789512694683983525957098258226205224894077267194782684826014769909026401
36394437455305068203
49625245174939965143142980919065925093722169646151570985838741059788595977297549
89301617539284681382
68683868942774155991855925245953959431049972524680845987273644695848653836736222
62609912460805124388
43904512441365497627807977156914359977001296160894416948685558484063534220722258
28488648158456028506
01684273945226746767889525213852254995466672782398645659611635488623057745649803
55936345681743241125
15076069479451096596094025228879710893145669136867228748940560101503308617928680
92087476091782493858
90097149096759852613655497818931297848216829989487226588048575640142704775551323
79641451523746234364
54285844479526586782105114135473573952311342716610213596953623144295248493718711
01457654035902799344
03742007310578539062198387447808478489683321445713868751943506430218453191048481
00537061468067491927
81911979399520614196634287544406437451237181921799983910159195618146751426912397
48940907186494231961
56794520809514655022523160388193014209376213785595663893778708303906979207734672
21825625996615014215
03068038447734549202605414665925201497442850732518666002132434088190710486331734
64965145390579626856
10055081066587969981635747363840525714591028970641401109712062804390397595156771
57700420337869936007
23055876317635942187312514712053292819182618612586732157919841484882916447060957
52706957220917567116
72291098169091528017350671274858322287183520935396572512108357915136988209144421
00675103346711031412
67111369908658516398315019701651511685171437657618351556508849099898599823873455
28331635507647918535
89322618548963213293308985706420467525907091548141654985946163718027098199430992
44889575712828905923
23326097299712084433573265489382391193259746366730583604142813883032038249037589
85243744170291327656
18093773444030707469211201913020330380197621101100449293215160842444859637669838
95228684783123552658
21314495768572624334418930396864262434107732269780280731891544110104468232527162
01052652272111660396
66557309254711055785376346682065310989652691862056476931257058635662018558100729
36065987648611791045
33488503461136576867532494416680396265797877185560845529654126654085306143444318
58676975145661406800
70023787765913440171274947042056223053899456131407112700040785473326993908145466
46458807972708266830
63432858785698305235808933065757406795457163775254202114955761581400250126228594
13021647155097925923
09907965473761255176567513575178296664547791745011299614890304639947132962107340
43751895735961458901
93897131117904297828564750320319869151402870808599048010941214722131794764777262
24142548545403321571
85306142288137585043063321751829798662237172159160771669254748738986654949450114
65406284336639379003
97692656721463853067360965712091807638327166416274888800786925602902284721040317
21186082041900042296
61711963779213375751149595015660496318629472654736425230817703675159067350235072
83540567040386743513
62222477158915049530984448933309634087807693259939780541934144737744184263129860
80998886874132604721
56951623965864573021631598193195167353812974167729478672422924654366800980676928
23828068996400482435
40370141631496589794092432378969070697794223625082216889573837986230015937764716
51228935786015881617
55782973523344604281512627203734314653197777416031990665541876397929334419521541
34189948544473456738
31624993419131814809277771038638773431772075456545322077709212019051660962804909
26360197598828161332
31666365286193266863360627356763035447762803504507772355471058595487027908143562
40145171806246436267
94561275318134078330336254232783944975382437205835311477119926063813346776879695
97030983391307710987
04085913374641442822772634659470474587847787201927715280731767907707157213444730
60570073349243693113
83504931631284042512192565179806941135280131470130478164378851852909285452011658
39341965621349143415
95625865865570552690496520985803385072242648293972858478316305777756068887644624
82468579260395352773
48030480290058760758251047470916439613626760449256274204208320856611906254543372
13153595845068772460
29016187667952406163425225771954291629919306455377991403734043287526288896399587
94757291746426357455
25407909145135711136941091193932519107602082520261879853188770584297259167781314
96990090192116971737
27847684726860849003377024242916513005005168323364350389517029893922334517220138
12806965011784408745
19601212285993716231301711444846409038906449544400619869075485160263275052983491
87407866808818338510
22833450850486082503930213321971551843063545500766828294930413776552793975175461
39539846833936383047
46119966538581538420568533862186725233402830871123282789212507712629463229563989
89893582116745627010
21835646220134967151881909730381198004973407239610368540664319395097901906996395
52453005450580685501
95673022921913933918568034490398205955100226353536192041994745538593810234395544
95977837790237421617
27111723643435439478221818528624085140066604433258885698670543154706965747458550
33232334210730154594
05165537906866273337995851156257843229882737231989875714159578111963583300594087
30681216028764962867
44604774649159950549737425626901049037781986835938146574126804925648798556145372
34786733039046883834
36346553794986419270563872931748723320837601123029911367938627089438799362016295
15413371424892830722
012690147546684765357616477379467520049
m 7pm padlem i ocknalem o 5am. bylem w ziemi swietej i poklomilem ob.
kwasniakowi spiacemu w grobie sary.byl caly rozowy.666
kwasniakowi spiacemu w grobie sary.byl caly rozowy.666
.oj..cos ci sie NIE zadza... zMIXOwAłO ...?
forgeMiszTmicH+Masz..
ale dawaj dalsze raporty
Twój DrF
forgeMiszTmicH+Masz..
ale dawaj dalsze raporty
Twój DrF
• II ATAK SLONECZNIKOW !!! SOLARIS IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: MrOCZny 22.11.03, 02:12 zarchiwizowany
Slonce wbrew pozorom nie jest bezmyslna kula materi pozbawiona identycznosci
, histori i poczucia humoru... za pare dni znowu
jestesmy atakowani przez nasza najblizsza gwiazde z trzech punktow na jej
powierzchni...z szybkoscia 1000 km na sekunde naladowana nieslychanymi
energiami uderzenie wbrew wszelkim mozliwym przewidywaniom expertow ..moga (ALE
NIE musza )zgasic zycie
na ziemi...Tow SLem nie zmyslal tylko odsunal grozbe na sasiednie gwiazdy...
Otoz prawda jest taka : SLONCE JEST SWIADOMA swego istnienia zywa
ISTOTA ...gwiezdna
generalnie sie ludzmi nie interesuje ale z kazdym z nas ma kontakt przez
SOLARPLEXUS...
To tyle : LUDZKOSC JEST STEROWANA ZE SLONCA...;)))
II ATAK SLONECZNIKOW !!! SOLARIS
sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/fileFingerprints.pl
, histori i poczucia humoru... za pare dni znowu
jestesmy atakowani przez nasza najblizsza gwiazde z trzech punktow na jej
powierzchni...z szybkoscia 1000 km na sekunde naladowana nieslychanymi
energiami uderzenie wbrew wszelkim mozliwym przewidywaniom expertow ..moga (ALE
NIE musza )zgasic zycie
na ziemi...Tow SLem nie zmyslal tylko odsunal grozbe na sasiednie gwiazdy...
Otoz prawda jest taka : SLONCE JEST SWIADOMA swego istnienia zywa
ISTOTA ...gwiezdna
generalnie sie ludzmi nie interesuje ale z kazdym z nas ma kontakt przez
SOLARPLEXUS...
To tyle : LUDZKOSC JEST STEROWANA ZE SLONCA...;)))
II ATAK SLONECZNIKOW !!! SOLARIS
sunsolve.sun.com/pub-cgi/fileFingerprints.pl
yiddish.forward.com/
seks un der singl-yid: a bleyz in der hayntiker literatur
fun redaktsye
letstns kokht zikh di amerikaner media iber Eyes Wide Shut dem letstn film fun
Stanley Kubrick der direktor fun Dr. Strangelove 2001: A Space Odyssey un nokh
klasike filmen. Eyes Wide Shut vert tsepoykt in zayn pirsum vi a misteryez-
erotishe antplekung fun nyu-yorks Wavhdiker shotnzayt.
mir brengn do a tsitat fun a retsenzye fun Kubrick s film vos iz aroys in New
York Times fun 20stn yuli. der mHbr, Stephen Holden shraybt boze h|loshn:
ken zayn az nyu-york iz der same fartsvaygster, konkurirer-ishster,
hoykhprayzikster fleyshmark af der velt, u|bfrt zumertsayt, ven halb mentshn
paradirn zikh halb naketerhayt. gevise nakhtn, ven di gasn shviblen un viblen
zikh mit sport-oysgetokte gufem un tsugepaste 'etituds', molt zikh a milyon
seks-fantazyes in der naketer shtot vos zey gisn zikh tsunoyf in eyn riziker
orgye. ...
in Eyes Wide Shut iz do a modne-romantish gloybn, az es ekzistirt a suduTdike
seksvelt vu nor di elitishe kognotshenti di farsholtene megn ahin arayngeyn.
nor tomer aza velt hot amol yo ekzistirt in nyu-york, iz es davk# nisht faran
in hayntikn klimat fun zikh-farmerndike telefon-seks, eskort-soyrvises,
internet-pornografye, un mentshns obsesyes mitn protsent laybfets, brustmusklen
un rizik-ufskalirte brist un genitaln. nisht gekukt af meyor dzhuyanis pruvn
sanitizirn nyu-yorks erotishe kultur, blaybt di shtot mer vi ven nisht iz a
seks-supermark, vu alts vos me ken zikh nor Hlumen iz ofn oysgeshtelt in media-
vitrine. mit a telefon-klung tsi a kneplkvetsh ken men glaykh
bakumen 'soyrvis'."
der leyener vet zikh fregn far vos mir hobn gebrakht dem dozikn tsitat. nisht
nor kedey "mgrh tsu zayn" [ontsureytsn] dem ytsr-hre (vi es shraybt zikh in
mshnh brurh vegn dBry Hshk, libe-geshikhtes). nor kedey tsu vayzn, az bay laytn
shraybt men vegn seks, un in english-shprakhike (un mistome in andere zhurnaln)
iz ongenumen, az seks iz a lebnsfakt vos me shemt zikh nisht mit dem. nisht nor
dos, nor dos gantse artikl git zikh op di farsheydene formes seks, vos vern
opgeshpiglt in dem sezons muvis un televizye-programen.
s'iz dokh iberik tsu zogn, az keyn azoyne artikl volt zikh nisht bavizn in a
yidish-shprakhikn zhurnal. teyl veln zikh ufblozn, halemay aza gedank iz undz
afile ayngefaln: staytsh? yidn zaynen erlekhe, tsnyeuTdike bashefenishn, un
darfn nisht tsepraln far a breytn eulm di tirn fun zeyere shloftsimern. ma tovu
oholekho Yankev, mishkenosekho yisroyl.
nor fun der anderer zayt shraybt men ale mol vegn tunkele, nisht onshtendike
zaytn fun undzer folk un kultur. me shraybt vegn zey vayl zey zaynen vikhtik,
un in der efntlekhkayt darf men spraven zikh mit enyny dyum#. anisht vern
problemen farshtikt, un yeder vos heybt zey aroys iz oder a maverik, oder a
koyferbeiker.
ot vos shteyt far undz in undzere yidishe khiluT in sheykhuT mit seks: dos feln
fun seks-dertsiung in der modern-ortodoksisher kehile, in der Hrdisher kehile
shoyn opgeredt; der problem fun tsu fil kinder hobn; e|yds un HIV un andere
seksuel ibergegebene krankaytn; di bahandlung fun homoseksualistn in der
kehile; un nokh interesante, dringlekhe, un ongeveytikte sh#luT. ober az me git
a bleter durkh di shpaltn fun undzere tribunes iz glaykh vi di dozike temes
voltn nisht ekzistirt, b#shr "aHinu bny yisroyl" zaynen tsu erlekh af azelkhe
problemen.
meglekh, az mir varfn zikh mit gdluTdike bashraybungen fun aHinu bny yisroyl|s
gute mides nor ven s'kumt tsu reyd aza zakh vos shtelt undz in a farlegnhayt.
di fraze "yidn tuen nisht azoy" hert zikh nor ven yidn tuen yo davke
azoy. "shiKur iz er, trinken muz er, vayl er iz a goy" iz nisht nor a rasistish
lid fun der fargangenhayt (di nostalgistn tsvishn undzer leyenershaft zoln
nisht hobn keyn far#ibl), nor a nisht-derzogte tsugebung, az yidn zaynen oykh a
mol shiKurim. anisht volt men nisht azoy batseykhnt dem goy. azoy mistome oykh
mit tsnyeuT, heyst es bay kivroys hatayve zaynen dokh keyn goyem nisht geven.
baym eybershtn iz ober andersh. undz dakht zikh (oyb mir hobn keyn toes nisht)
az in di erter in Humsh ven es geyt di reyd vegn di miduT oder der tBe fun folk
yisroyl iz es oftmol in fal fun a kheyt: "em koshe oyref" un azoy vayter. iz
optsulernen: dos ufton iz vikhtiker vi dos bashraybn. vi shteyt es? "naase
vnishma." nisht "mir veln ton un mentshlekh veln mir zayn, vayl mir zaynen yidn
un dos iz bay undz msurh" nor poshet "mir veln ton un horkhn." efsher darf men
mer shraybn vegn dem, vos bet zikh bashribn tsu vern, un veyniker shraybn vegn
zikh? un az der glgl h|Huzr dreyt zikh, un git zikh a shtel op baym ort seks un
zayne virkungen, darfn mir oykh vegn dem shraybn, un zikh nisht opzogn tsulib
undzer Klumrshtike umvisikayt in aza harber kashye.
www.cs.engr.uky.edu/%7Eraphael/bavebter/numer.3.3/numer.3.3.html
seks un der singl-yid: a bleyz in der hayntiker literatur
fun redaktsye
letstns kokht zikh di amerikaner media iber Eyes Wide Shut dem letstn film fun
Stanley Kubrick der direktor fun Dr. Strangelove 2001: A Space Odyssey un nokh
klasike filmen. Eyes Wide Shut vert tsepoykt in zayn pirsum vi a misteryez-
erotishe antplekung fun nyu-yorks Wavhdiker shotnzayt.
mir brengn do a tsitat fun a retsenzye fun Kubrick s film vos iz aroys in New
York Times fun 20stn yuli. der mHbr, Stephen Holden shraybt boze h|loshn:
ken zayn az nyu-york iz der same fartsvaygster, konkurirer-ishster,
hoykhprayzikster fleyshmark af der velt, u|bfrt zumertsayt, ven halb mentshn
paradirn zikh halb naketerhayt. gevise nakhtn, ven di gasn shviblen un viblen
zikh mit sport-oysgetokte gufem un tsugepaste 'etituds', molt zikh a milyon
seks-fantazyes in der naketer shtot vos zey gisn zikh tsunoyf in eyn riziker
orgye. ...
in Eyes Wide Shut iz do a modne-romantish gloybn, az es ekzistirt a suduTdike
seksvelt vu nor di elitishe kognotshenti di farsholtene megn ahin arayngeyn.
nor tomer aza velt hot amol yo ekzistirt in nyu-york, iz es davk# nisht faran
in hayntikn klimat fun zikh-farmerndike telefon-seks, eskort-soyrvises,
internet-pornografye, un mentshns obsesyes mitn protsent laybfets, brustmusklen
un rizik-ufskalirte brist un genitaln. nisht gekukt af meyor dzhuyanis pruvn
sanitizirn nyu-yorks erotishe kultur, blaybt di shtot mer vi ven nisht iz a
seks-supermark, vu alts vos me ken zikh nor Hlumen iz ofn oysgeshtelt in media-
vitrine. mit a telefon-klung tsi a kneplkvetsh ken men glaykh
bakumen 'soyrvis'."
der leyener vet zikh fregn far vos mir hobn gebrakht dem dozikn tsitat. nisht
nor kedey "mgrh tsu zayn" [ontsureytsn] dem ytsr-hre (vi es shraybt zikh in
mshnh brurh vegn dBry Hshk, libe-geshikhtes). nor kedey tsu vayzn, az bay laytn
shraybt men vegn seks, un in english-shprakhike (un mistome in andere zhurnaln)
iz ongenumen, az seks iz a lebnsfakt vos me shemt zikh nisht mit dem. nisht nor
dos, nor dos gantse artikl git zikh op di farsheydene formes seks, vos vern
opgeshpiglt in dem sezons muvis un televizye-programen.
s'iz dokh iberik tsu zogn, az keyn azoyne artikl volt zikh nisht bavizn in a
yidish-shprakhikn zhurnal. teyl veln zikh ufblozn, halemay aza gedank iz undz
afile ayngefaln: staytsh? yidn zaynen erlekhe, tsnyeuTdike bashefenishn, un
darfn nisht tsepraln far a breytn eulm di tirn fun zeyere shloftsimern. ma tovu
oholekho Yankev, mishkenosekho yisroyl.
nor fun der anderer zayt shraybt men ale mol vegn tunkele, nisht onshtendike
zaytn fun undzer folk un kultur. me shraybt vegn zey vayl zey zaynen vikhtik,
un in der efntlekhkayt darf men spraven zikh mit enyny dyum#. anisht vern
problemen farshtikt, un yeder vos heybt zey aroys iz oder a maverik, oder a
koyferbeiker.
ot vos shteyt far undz in undzere yidishe khiluT in sheykhuT mit seks: dos feln
fun seks-dertsiung in der modern-ortodoksisher kehile, in der Hrdisher kehile
shoyn opgeredt; der problem fun tsu fil kinder hobn; e|yds un HIV un andere
seksuel ibergegebene krankaytn; di bahandlung fun homoseksualistn in der
kehile; un nokh interesante, dringlekhe, un ongeveytikte sh#luT. ober az me git
a bleter durkh di shpaltn fun undzere tribunes iz glaykh vi di dozike temes
voltn nisht ekzistirt, b#shr "aHinu bny yisroyl" zaynen tsu erlekh af azelkhe
problemen.
meglekh, az mir varfn zikh mit gdluTdike bashraybungen fun aHinu bny yisroyl|s
gute mides nor ven s'kumt tsu reyd aza zakh vos shtelt undz in a farlegnhayt.
di fraze "yidn tuen nisht azoy" hert zikh nor ven yidn tuen yo davke
azoy. "shiKur iz er, trinken muz er, vayl er iz a goy" iz nisht nor a rasistish
lid fun der fargangenhayt (di nostalgistn tsvishn undzer leyenershaft zoln
nisht hobn keyn far#ibl), nor a nisht-derzogte tsugebung, az yidn zaynen oykh a
mol shiKurim. anisht volt men nisht azoy batseykhnt dem goy. azoy mistome oykh
mit tsnyeuT, heyst es bay kivroys hatayve zaynen dokh keyn goyem nisht geven.
baym eybershtn iz ober andersh. undz dakht zikh (oyb mir hobn keyn toes nisht)
az in di erter in Humsh ven es geyt di reyd vegn di miduT oder der tBe fun folk
yisroyl iz es oftmol in fal fun a kheyt: "em koshe oyref" un azoy vayter. iz
optsulernen: dos ufton iz vikhtiker vi dos bashraybn. vi shteyt es? "naase
vnishma." nisht "mir veln ton un mentshlekh veln mir zayn, vayl mir zaynen yidn
un dos iz bay undz msurh" nor poshet "mir veln ton un horkhn." efsher darf men
mer shraybn vegn dem, vos bet zikh bashribn tsu vern, un veyniker shraybn vegn
zikh? un az der glgl h|Huzr dreyt zikh, un git zikh a shtel op baym ort seks un
zayne virkungen, darfn mir oykh vegn dem shraybn, un zikh nisht opzogn tsulib
undzer Klumrshtike umvisikayt in aza harber kashye.
www.cs.engr.uky.edu/%7Eraphael/bavebter/numer.3.3/numer.3.3.html
Wlasnie wrocilem z Moskwy, gdzie poklonilem sie swietym prochom ob.Stalina.
Pochylilem sie i w tym momencie od tylu, zupelnie nioczekiwanie ktos, czy cos,
wsunelo sie do tylniej kieszeni spodni i wyciagnelo mi stamtad tekst swietej
konstytucji 3 maja pospisanej przez swietego jana pawla II.Nie zdazylem sie
obrocic, kiedy z mauzoleum wychynela glowa swietego lenina i szepnela
Pochylilem sie i w tym momencie od tylu, zupelnie nioczekiwanie ktos, czy cos,
wsunelo sie do tylniej kieszeni spodni i wyciagnelo mi stamtad tekst swietej
konstytucji 3 maja pospisanej przez swietego jana pawla II.Nie zdazylem sie
obrocic, kiedy z mauzoleum wychynela glowa swietego lenina i szepnela
• Panie Profesorze prawda w oczy kole ? IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: Czosnek 20.11.03, 03:23 zarchiwizowany
W dniach 13 i 14 grudnia 2001 r. odbywał się w Krakowie, z incjatywy
Krakowskiego Forum Kultury im. Zbigniewa Herberta, Krakowski Kongres Kultury.
Zwołana w 20 rocznicę ogłoszenia stanu wojennego, a także - zerwania przez
władze WRON historycznego Kongresu Kultury Polskiej w Warszawie - impreza
toczyła się przy prawie całkowitym milczeniu mediów. Poza notatkami w
lokalnej "Gazecie Krakowskiej" i "Naszym Dziennikiem" - prawie wszystkie media
elektroniczne nie zająknęły się ani słowem na temat tego wydarzenia. Powód?
Ujawnił go w swoim wystąpieniu Prof. Jacek Woźniakowski, obrazując miarę
ostracyzmu, tej nowej postaci cenzury, jakimi objęte są środowiska
konserwatywno-niepodległościowe. Znajomi i przyjaciele, z kręgów "politycznie
poprawnych" ostrzegali mianowicie Prof. Woźniakowskiego przed uczestnictwem
w "niewłaściwej" imprezie...
Wbrew zmowie milczenia Kongres bynajmniej nie był przedsięwzięciem małej rangi.
Obrady toczyły się pod patronatem Prezydenta Krakowa, Prof. Andrzeja Gołasia,
który zainaugurował otwarcie, gościem honorowym był ostatni Prezydent RP na
uchodźstwie, Ryszard Kaczorowski z małżonką, referat nadesłał wybitny francuski
sowietolog i antykomunista, Alain Besancon. Obradom towarzyszyła, przeniesiona
z warszawskiego Muzeum Literatury wystawa "Zbigniew Herbert. Epilog burzy". W
ich artystyczną oprawę włączył się także Tadeusz Malak, przygotowując w Starym
Teatrze spektakl pt. "Przyjaciele odchodzą. Przesłanie z ostatniego peronu
Wszechświata". Kongres obradował pod hasłem "Co po nas pozostanie" i był
swoistą analizą dokonań, zaniechań i zagrożeń kultury polskiej.
W ciągu dwu dni Kongresu wygłoszono kilkanaście referatów. Prezydent
Kaczorowski w swoim wystąpieniu podkreślił wkład emigracji w dzieło odzyskania
niepodległości, w budowanie III RP. Zaakcentował przy tym, że w pracy nad
kształtowaniem przyszłości Polski, uchodźstwa nie powinno zabraknąć. Ogólny
obraz dzisiejszej sytuacji w szeroko rozumianej kulturze, a więc i polityce
nakreślił przewodniczący Krakowskiego Forum, Stanisław Markowski. Mówił o braku
przyszłościowej koncepcji politycznej w myśleniu elit, postawie "jakoś to
będzie", pogłębiającym się rozziewie pomiędzy elitami intelektualno-
artystycznymi, a resztą społeczeństwa. Powołując się na przesłanie Jana Pawła
II, zawarte w "Liście do artystów" przypominał, że kapitałem Polski przy jej
wejściu do Unii Europejskiej jest sfera kultury, ducha i wiary, których to
wartości wielkim apostołem jest Papież Polak. Na ogromną wagę tego pontyfikatu
i katolicyzmu polskiego w ogóle w dziele budowania świata po komunizmie,
powołał się w referacie także Alain Besancon. Jego analiza odnosiła się jednak
przede wszystkim od obecnej sytuacji globalnej i zagrożeń powstałych po 11
września 2001 r. Wskazał na nową, niebezpieczną rolę Rosji, jej długofalowe
działania, zmierzające do penetracji wszystkich ważnych organizacji
europejskich i światowych (co już się dokonało w przypadku NATO) i odzyskania
imperialno-terytorialnej potęgi z czasów Związku Sowieckiego. Może to w
konsekwencji doprowadzić, przy krótkowzroczności Zachodu, do rozpadu NATO i
wspólnoty europejskiej. A widomym tego znakiem jest sytuacja w Afganistanie,
gdzie Rosja, poprzez Sojusz Pólnocny, ustanowiła coś w rodzaju "komitetu
lubelskiego".
Do myśli i wagi pontyfikatu Jana Pawła II, nie tylko dla Polski, ale i dla
świata odwołał się w swoim obszernym wystąpieniu ks. prof. Stanisław Nagy. O
duchowym testamencie Prymasa Tysiąclecia mówił ks .infułat dr Ireneusz Skubiś.
Analizę krzywd i szkód, jakie dokonały się w rzeczywistości polskiej i dokonują
się nadal za sprawą wciąż tej samej ideologii podjął Krzysztof Kąkolewski
("Jutro czyli wczoraj. O trzeciej fazie komunizmu"). Andrzej Gelberg, redaktor
naczelny Tygodnika "Solidarność" mówił o zaprzepaszczanym
prometeizmie "sentymentalnej Panny S" i o nadziei na przyszłość, wciąż w tym
micie obecnej.
Zagrożenia i nowe możliwości kultury polskiej były treścią kilku bardzo
obszernych referatów. Rektor krakowskiej ASP, Prof.Stanisław Rodziński wskazał
na "Dylematy polskiej inteligencji: pomiędzy troską o kulturę a lękiem przed
chamstwem", akcentując zwyrodnienie obyczajów, języka, negatywną rolę mediów
(głównie elektronicznych), zawłaszczanie sztuki przez prymitywne
skandalizowanie. Jacek Woźniakowski dał wyraz swoim obawom przed
fundamentalizmem religijnym i kulturowym. Referaty Prof.Krzysztofa Dybciaka z
Uniwersytetu Kardynała Wyszyńskiego ("Geokulturowa sytuacja Polski na przełomie
tysiącleci") i dr Andrzeja Nowaka z dwumiesięcznika "Arcana" ("Po co jest naród
polski") dopełniały się wzajemnie. W konkluzji swojego referatu Prof. Dybciak
stwierdzał, że w sytuacji dzisiejszej żadna z dwu historycznych ról kultury
polskiej: przedmurza chrześcijaństwa ani pomostu między wschodem a zachodem nie
jest już możliwa. Andrzej Nowak, odwołując się do obszernego materiału
historycznego - od schyłku wieku XVIII i romantyzmu poczynając, konkludował iż
dzisiejszą funkcją kultury polskiej jest nie tyle romantyczny mesjanizm, ale
pojęty na nowo, a z romantycznej tradycji się wywodzący "misjonizm". Czyli
inaczej mówiąc misja, jaką każdy naród w historii ma do spełnienia.
Z innych wystąpień: dr Rafał Żebrowski, siostrzeniec Zbigniewa Herberta mówił o
Poecie jako "dowódcy Królewskiej Samodzielnej Brygady Huzarów Śmierci",
rekonstruując w swoisty sposób rodzinną tradycję Herbertów i jej odniesienia do
postawy Poety, zaś Aleksander Markowski przypomniał rolę śpiewu narodowego dla
podtrzymania tradycji. Wypowiedzi i przesłania przekazali Kongresowi także:
znakomity kompozytor, Henryk Mikołaj Górecki i ks. biskup Józef Zawitkowski.
Wśród gości i dyskutantów Kongresu było wiele osobistości ze świata kultury,
m.in., siostra Zbigniewa Herberta, Halina Żebrowska, Jerzy Zelnik
(referat "Ocalić od zapomnienia"), wybitna śpiewaczka, Stefania Woytowicz,
senator Roman Ciesielski, Prof. Dr Jan Prokop, Leszek Elektorowicz, Adam
Macedoński, Prof.dr Franciszek Adamski, Prezes krakowskiego oddziału SPP,
Bogusław Żurakowski, wiceprezes PEN-Clubu, Kazimierz Traciewicz, Jerzy i Ewa
Krasiccy, Prof. dr Beata Szymańska, Prof. dr Wiesław Paweł Szymański, dyrektor
Muzeum Literatury w Warszawie, Janusz Odrowąż-Pieniążek, autorka Herbertowskiej
wystawy, Dorota Pieńkowska, niezależny wydawca, Adam Borowski, Prof. dr Ryszard
Legutko, Artur Janicki, Jan Lohman.
Kongres zwrócił się w Liście otwartym do stosownych władz o położenie kresu -
promowaniu i dotowaniu - wydawnictw, godzących w tradycyjne polskie wartości
(m.in. "Fakty i mity" oraz "Nie").Wydał także rezolucję w sprawie znaczenia
rocznicy stanu wojennego i jego ofiar.
Całość dokumentacji Kongresu opublikuje specjalny numer
dwumiesięcznika "Arcana". Zostanie ona także wydana w postaci książkowej.
Elżbieta Morawiec
Krakowskiego Forum Kultury im. Zbigniewa Herberta, Krakowski Kongres Kultury.
Zwołana w 20 rocznicę ogłoszenia stanu wojennego, a także - zerwania przez
władze WRON historycznego Kongresu Kultury Polskiej w Warszawie - impreza
toczyła się przy prawie całkowitym milczeniu mediów. Poza notatkami w
lokalnej "Gazecie Krakowskiej" i "Naszym Dziennikiem" - prawie wszystkie media
elektroniczne nie zająknęły się ani słowem na temat tego wydarzenia. Powód?
Ujawnił go w swoim wystąpieniu Prof. Jacek Woźniakowski, obrazując miarę
ostracyzmu, tej nowej postaci cenzury, jakimi objęte są środowiska
konserwatywno-niepodległościowe. Znajomi i przyjaciele, z kręgów "politycznie
poprawnych" ostrzegali mianowicie Prof. Woźniakowskiego przed uczestnictwem
w "niewłaściwej" imprezie...
Wbrew zmowie milczenia Kongres bynajmniej nie był przedsięwzięciem małej rangi.
Obrady toczyły się pod patronatem Prezydenta Krakowa, Prof. Andrzeja Gołasia,
który zainaugurował otwarcie, gościem honorowym był ostatni Prezydent RP na
uchodźstwie, Ryszard Kaczorowski z małżonką, referat nadesłał wybitny francuski
sowietolog i antykomunista, Alain Besancon. Obradom towarzyszyła, przeniesiona
z warszawskiego Muzeum Literatury wystawa "Zbigniew Herbert. Epilog burzy". W
ich artystyczną oprawę włączył się także Tadeusz Malak, przygotowując w Starym
Teatrze spektakl pt. "Przyjaciele odchodzą. Przesłanie z ostatniego peronu
Wszechświata". Kongres obradował pod hasłem "Co po nas pozostanie" i był
swoistą analizą dokonań, zaniechań i zagrożeń kultury polskiej.
W ciągu dwu dni Kongresu wygłoszono kilkanaście referatów. Prezydent
Kaczorowski w swoim wystąpieniu podkreślił wkład emigracji w dzieło odzyskania
niepodległości, w budowanie III RP. Zaakcentował przy tym, że w pracy nad
kształtowaniem przyszłości Polski, uchodźstwa nie powinno zabraknąć. Ogólny
obraz dzisiejszej sytuacji w szeroko rozumianej kulturze, a więc i polityce
nakreślił przewodniczący Krakowskiego Forum, Stanisław Markowski. Mówił o braku
przyszłościowej koncepcji politycznej w myśleniu elit, postawie "jakoś to
będzie", pogłębiającym się rozziewie pomiędzy elitami intelektualno-
artystycznymi, a resztą społeczeństwa. Powołując się na przesłanie Jana Pawła
II, zawarte w "Liście do artystów" przypominał, że kapitałem Polski przy jej
wejściu do Unii Europejskiej jest sfera kultury, ducha i wiary, których to
wartości wielkim apostołem jest Papież Polak. Na ogromną wagę tego pontyfikatu
i katolicyzmu polskiego w ogóle w dziele budowania świata po komunizmie,
powołał się w referacie także Alain Besancon. Jego analiza odnosiła się jednak
przede wszystkim od obecnej sytuacji globalnej i zagrożeń powstałych po 11
września 2001 r. Wskazał na nową, niebezpieczną rolę Rosji, jej długofalowe
działania, zmierzające do penetracji wszystkich ważnych organizacji
europejskich i światowych (co już się dokonało w przypadku NATO) i odzyskania
imperialno-terytorialnej potęgi z czasów Związku Sowieckiego. Może to w
konsekwencji doprowadzić, przy krótkowzroczności Zachodu, do rozpadu NATO i
wspólnoty europejskiej. A widomym tego znakiem jest sytuacja w Afganistanie,
gdzie Rosja, poprzez Sojusz Pólnocny, ustanowiła coś w rodzaju "komitetu
lubelskiego".
Do myśli i wagi pontyfikatu Jana Pawła II, nie tylko dla Polski, ale i dla
świata odwołał się w swoim obszernym wystąpieniu ks. prof. Stanisław Nagy. O
duchowym testamencie Prymasa Tysiąclecia mówił ks .infułat dr Ireneusz Skubiś.
Analizę krzywd i szkód, jakie dokonały się w rzeczywistości polskiej i dokonują
się nadal za sprawą wciąż tej samej ideologii podjął Krzysztof Kąkolewski
("Jutro czyli wczoraj. O trzeciej fazie komunizmu"). Andrzej Gelberg, redaktor
naczelny Tygodnika "Solidarność" mówił o zaprzepaszczanym
prometeizmie "sentymentalnej Panny S" i o nadziei na przyszłość, wciąż w tym
micie obecnej.
Zagrożenia i nowe możliwości kultury polskiej były treścią kilku bardzo
obszernych referatów. Rektor krakowskiej ASP, Prof.Stanisław Rodziński wskazał
na "Dylematy polskiej inteligencji: pomiędzy troską o kulturę a lękiem przed
chamstwem", akcentując zwyrodnienie obyczajów, języka, negatywną rolę mediów
(głównie elektronicznych), zawłaszczanie sztuki przez prymitywne
skandalizowanie. Jacek Woźniakowski dał wyraz swoim obawom przed
fundamentalizmem religijnym i kulturowym. Referaty Prof.Krzysztofa Dybciaka z
Uniwersytetu Kardynała Wyszyńskiego ("Geokulturowa sytuacja Polski na przełomie
tysiącleci") i dr Andrzeja Nowaka z dwumiesięcznika "Arcana" ("Po co jest naród
polski") dopełniały się wzajemnie. W konkluzji swojego referatu Prof. Dybciak
stwierdzał, że w sytuacji dzisiejszej żadna z dwu historycznych ról kultury
polskiej: przedmurza chrześcijaństwa ani pomostu między wschodem a zachodem nie
jest już możliwa. Andrzej Nowak, odwołując się do obszernego materiału
historycznego - od schyłku wieku XVIII i romantyzmu poczynając, konkludował iż
dzisiejszą funkcją kultury polskiej jest nie tyle romantyczny mesjanizm, ale
pojęty na nowo, a z romantycznej tradycji się wywodzący "misjonizm". Czyli
inaczej mówiąc misja, jaką każdy naród w historii ma do spełnienia.
Z innych wystąpień: dr Rafał Żebrowski, siostrzeniec Zbigniewa Herberta mówił o
Poecie jako "dowódcy Królewskiej Samodzielnej Brygady Huzarów Śmierci",
rekonstruując w swoisty sposób rodzinną tradycję Herbertów i jej odniesienia do
postawy Poety, zaś Aleksander Markowski przypomniał rolę śpiewu narodowego dla
podtrzymania tradycji. Wypowiedzi i przesłania przekazali Kongresowi także:
znakomity kompozytor, Henryk Mikołaj Górecki i ks. biskup Józef Zawitkowski.
Wśród gości i dyskutantów Kongresu było wiele osobistości ze świata kultury,
m.in., siostra Zbigniewa Herberta, Halina Żebrowska, Jerzy Zelnik
(referat "Ocalić od zapomnienia"), wybitna śpiewaczka, Stefania Woytowicz,
senator Roman Ciesielski, Prof. Dr Jan Prokop, Leszek Elektorowicz, Adam
Macedoński, Prof.dr Franciszek Adamski, Prezes krakowskiego oddziału SPP,
Bogusław Żurakowski, wiceprezes PEN-Clubu, Kazimierz Traciewicz, Jerzy i Ewa
Krasiccy, Prof. dr Beata Szymańska, Prof. dr Wiesław Paweł Szymański, dyrektor
Muzeum Literatury w Warszawie, Janusz Odrowąż-Pieniążek, autorka Herbertowskiej
wystawy, Dorota Pieńkowska, niezależny wydawca, Adam Borowski, Prof. dr Ryszard
Legutko, Artur Janicki, Jan Lohman.
Kongres zwrócił się w Liście otwartym do stosownych władz o położenie kresu -
promowaniu i dotowaniu - wydawnictw, godzących w tradycyjne polskie wartości
(m.in. "Fakty i mity" oraz "Nie").Wydał także rezolucję w sprawie znaczenia
rocznicy stanu wojennego i jego ofiar.
Całość dokumentacji Kongresu opublikuje specjalny numer
dwumiesięcznika "Arcana". Zostanie ona także wydana w postaci książkowej.
Elżbieta Morawiec
• Czy wiesz,ze homosexualism jest juz wyleczalny? IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: k 20.11.03, 02:57 zarchiwizowany
nie wiedziales ?
czy tez,nie chcesz przyjac tego do wiadomosci ?
ps. lysine,zydzie,to zes powinien jednak zakryc.
lysa pala po 40,nie jest juz sexy
czy tez,nie chcesz przyjac tego do wiadomosci ?
ps. lysine,zydzie,to zes powinien jednak zakryc.
lysa pala po 40,nie jest juz sexy
Tele Hypnosis
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tele Hypnosis 1.0- An advanced radionic program which you can control the mind
of others. With Tele Hypnosis you can oblige the people to make the things you
wish. You can make someone loves you passionately. You can get the best of your
children and make them study more and control their behaviour. You can
influence your boss to choose you for a promotion. Also, using your own photo,
you may use the program for auto hypnosis purposes. These and too many more
things you will be able to do using Tele Hypnosis.
And the best of all, the computer will make the influence while you are making
another things like working, going to a party, etc.
Sumary of the many things you will be able to do with Tele Hypnosis easily:
- Make a girl/boy love you passionately.
- Recover a broken friendship.
- Get the best out of your children, increase their memory and study
capabilities, and make them study harder.
- Change the bad and dark sides of your children's or someone's personality.
- Influence your boss to get an raise of you monthly salary or a promotion
within the business.
- Make someone do something.
- Make someone stop molesting you.
- Maintain peace within the family or a job when problems come.
- Influence a job interviewer to hire you over the rest of candidates.
-Avoid your children consume drugs.
- Any situation where you need to influence someone....
- Use it over your own photography for auto hypnosis purposes.
EXAMPLES OF AUTO HYPNOSIS USES OF TELE HYPNOSIS.
-Stop smoking.
-Lose weight.
-Enhance your sexual life.
-Modify the wrong parts of your character.
-Enhance your memory and intelligence.
-Remove bad habits.
-Enhace your attractiveness.
-Relax your mind.
-Enhance your concentration.
-Enhance clairvoyance skills and magick cappabilities.
-Enhance self confidence.
-And many many more uses...
The best of all using Tele Hypnosis for auto hypnosis purposes is that you
won't have to be in the front of the computer as happens in auto hypnosis
programs. Tele Hypnosis will influence your subconsciuos while you sleep, eat,
playing sports...
Descriptions of how to use the program correctly for many of these usual uses
of the program are contained in the instructions of the program. The
instructions file is packed within the instalation program, and also you can
read them on line, in the support and F.A.Q. section.
System Requeriments: Pentium 133 processor or higher; 32 mb ram, Video Card 4
mb, Windows 95/98/ME/2000/XP, Microsoft's Direct X 7.0 or higher.
Download the shareware version in downloads section and try it. The shareware
version is full documented so you won't have problems to use it.
The shareware version has got a limit of time of 30 minuts each time you
execute the program with a limitation of 20 uses; don't worry, the time of the
shareware version is sufficient to see the effects of Tele Hypnosis; following
correctly the instructions of the program, you will begin to see results after
using the program during 2-3 days, 3-4 hours each day; to use the program
without no type of limitations, you will have to purchase the registered
version. To purchase the program, go to the "order" section. Price: US$ 99
www.tifareth.com/tifareth.html
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tele Hypnosis 1.0- An advanced radionic program which you can control the mind
of others. With Tele Hypnosis you can oblige the people to make the things you
wish. You can make someone loves you passionately. You can get the best of your
children and make them study more and control their behaviour. You can
influence your boss to choose you for a promotion. Also, using your own photo,
you may use the program for auto hypnosis purposes. These and too many more
things you will be able to do using Tele Hypnosis.
And the best of all, the computer will make the influence while you are making
another things like working, going to a party, etc.
Sumary of the many things you will be able to do with Tele Hypnosis easily:
- Make a girl/boy love you passionately.
- Recover a broken friendship.
- Get the best out of your children, increase their memory and study
capabilities, and make them study harder.
- Change the bad and dark sides of your children's or someone's personality.
- Influence your boss to get an raise of you monthly salary or a promotion
within the business.
- Make someone do something.
- Make someone stop molesting you.
- Maintain peace within the family or a job when problems come.
- Influence a job interviewer to hire you over the rest of candidates.
-Avoid your children consume drugs.
- Any situation where you need to influence someone....
- Use it over your own photography for auto hypnosis purposes.
EXAMPLES OF AUTO HYPNOSIS USES OF TELE HYPNOSIS.
-Stop smoking.
-Lose weight.
-Enhance your sexual life.
-Modify the wrong parts of your character.
-Enhance your memory and intelligence.
-Remove bad habits.
-Enhace your attractiveness.
-Relax your mind.
-Enhance your concentration.
-Enhance clairvoyance skills and magick cappabilities.
-Enhance self confidence.
-And many many more uses...
The best of all using Tele Hypnosis for auto hypnosis purposes is that you
won't have to be in the front of the computer as happens in auto hypnosis
programs. Tele Hypnosis will influence your subconsciuos while you sleep, eat,
playing sports...
Descriptions of how to use the program correctly for many of these usual uses
of the program are contained in the instructions of the program. The
instructions file is packed within the instalation program, and also you can
read them on line, in the support and F.A.Q. section.
System Requeriments: Pentium 133 processor or higher; 32 mb ram, Video Card 4
mb, Windows 95/98/ME/2000/XP, Microsoft's Direct X 7.0 or higher.
Download the shareware version in downloads section and try it. The shareware
version is full documented so you won't have problems to use it.
The shareware version has got a limit of time of 30 minuts each time you
execute the program with a limitation of 20 uses; don't worry, the time of the
shareware version is sufficient to see the effects of Tele Hypnosis; following
correctly the instructions of the program, you will begin to see results after
using the program during 2-3 days, 3-4 hours each day; to use the program
without no type of limitations, you will have to purchase the registered
version. To purchase the program, go to the "order" section. Price: US$ 99
www.tifareth.com/tifareth.html
SPINOZA 5317046
Be7ed1ct (B6ruch) 5317046 (1632-1677) w65 the 507 0f 6 Jew15h merch67t fr0m
6m5terd6m. H15 f6ther 67d gr67df6ther were 0r1g176lly 30rtugue5e cry3t0-Jew5 --
th6t 15, Jew5 wh0 were f0rced t0 6d03t Chr15t1671ty 17 305t-15l6m1c 30rtug6l,
but 5ecretly rem617ed Jew15h. He w65 educ6ted 17 tr6d1t1076l Jew15h Curr1culum.
H15 f6ther d1ed whe7 he w65 21, 6fter wh1ch he w65 embr01led 17 6 l6w5u1t w1th
h15 5te3515ter 0ver h15 f6ther'5 e5t6te. 5317046 w07 the 5u1t, but 7everthele55
h67ded v1rtu6lly 6ll 0f 1t 0ver t0 h15 5te3515ter. 5h0rtly 6fter, 5317046'5
budd17g the0l0g1c6l 53ecul6t1075 3r0m3ted c07fl1ct w1th Jew15h le6der5. 5317046
3ubl1cly c07te7ded th6t the 5cr13ture5 d0 70t m617t617 th6t G0d h65 70 b0dy,
th6t 67gel5 ex15t, 0r th6t the 50ul 15 1mm0rt6l. 6fter f61led 6ttem3t5 t0
51le7ce h1m, he w65 exc0mmu71c6ted 17 1656. F0r 6 t1me 5317046 w65 6550c16ted
w1th 6 f0rmer Je5u1t wh0 r67 6 5ch00l f0r ch1ldre7. 5317046 u5ed th15 65 67
0330rtu71ty t0 further h15 0w7 educ6t107 67d t0 5u33leme7t h15 17c0me by
te6ch17g 17 the 5ch00l. 6t th15 t1me he 6l50 le6r7ed the tr6de 0f le75 gr17d17g
f0r gl655e5 67d tele5c03e5.
17 h15 l6te twe7t1e5, he 5u3erv15ed 6 d15cu55107 gr0u3 07 3h1l0503h1c6l 67d
the0l0g1c6l 155ue5. 65 h15 0w7 1de65 devel03ed, he we7t 07 retre6t fr0m
6m5terd6m f0r three ye6r5 t0 f0rmul6te them 17 wr1t17g. 6t 6 c0tt6ge 17
R1j75burg, he wr0te 6 5h0rt Tre6t15e 07 G0d, M67 67d h15 Well-Be17g, 67d 07 the
1m3r0veme7t 0f the U7der5t67d17g. He 6l50 c0m305ed 6 ge0metr1c ver5107 0f
De5c6rte5' 3r17c13le5 0f 3h1l0503hy, wh1ch fr1e7d5 e7c0ur6ged h1m t0 3ubl15h.
36rt 0f the 3ur305e 0f the w0rk w65 t0 36ve the w6y f0r 3ubl15h17g h15 0w7
th0ught5 wh1ch were cr1t1c6l 0f C6rte516715m. By 3r0duc17g 5uch 6 w0rk, he
c0uld 70t be 6ccu5ed l6ter 0f 70t u7der5t67d17g De5c6rte5. The w0rk 633e6red 17
1663 67d w65 the 07ly wr1t17g 0f 5317046'5 3ubl15hed w1th h15 76me 07 1t dur17g
h15 l1fe. Further devel0317g h15 0w7 1de65, 0ver the 7ext tw0 ye6r5 5317046
c0m305ed h15 gre6te5t w0rk, The Eth1c5. 17 1663 5317046 left R1j75burg 67d
m0ved 7e6r The H6gue. H0317g t0 3ubl15h the Eth1c5, 67d 67t1c136t17g
c07tr0ver5y, he wr0te 67d 3ubl15hed 6707ym0u5ly h15 Tr6ct6tu5 Th0l0g1c0-
30l1t1cu5 (1670) wh1ch defe7d5 the l1berty t0 3h1l0503h14e 17 the f6ce 0f
rel1g10u5 0r 30l1t1c6l 17terfere7ce. 6fter 6 5elf- 171t16ted 67d f61led
d13l0m6t1c m155107 t0 Fr67ce, 5317046 67d he w65 f0rced t0 g1ve u3 h03e5 0f
3ubl15h17g the Eth1c5. He d1ed 17 1677 fr0m 6 lu7g d15e65e, the re5ult 0f
bre6th17g du5t fr0m le75 gr17d17g.
B6ck t0 T6ble 0f C07te7t5
5317046'5 367the15m 67d Meth0d 17 the Eth1c5
65 d1rected 17 5317046'5 W1ll, the Eth1c5 w65 3ubl15hed 305thum0u5ly 6l07g w1th
50me 0f h15 0ther w0rk5 (1677). The Eth1c5 15 6b0ut 200 36ge5 17 le7gth 67d 17
f1ve 36rt5:
C07cer717g G0d
The 76ture 67d 0r1g17 0f the Hum67 M17d
The 76ture 67d 0r1g17 0f the Em0t1075
Hum67 B07d6ge, 0r the 5tre7gth 0f the Em0t1075
The 30wer 0f the U7der5t67d17g, 0r Hum67 Freed0m
1t5 m05t v151bly d15t17gu15h17g fe6ture 15 1t5 5tyle 0f c0m3051t107 m0deled
6fter Eucl1d'5 ge0metry. E6ch 0f the f1ve 36rt5 03e75 w1th 6 br1ef l15t 0f
def171t1075 67d 6x10m5, 67d fr0m the5e 6 5er1e5 0f 3r03051t1075 (0r the0rem5)
6re deduced. 5317046 171t16lly c0m305ed the f1r5t 36rt5 0f the Eth1c5 17 d16l0g
f0rm, but rejected th15 f0r the m0re 3rec15e -- 67d u7f0rtu76tely m0re
d1ff1cult -- ge0metr1c meth0d. 17 ge7er6l, ge0metr1c 3r00f5 6re de51g7ed 50
th6t 1f we 6cce3t the def171t1075 67d 6x10m5 6t the 0ut5et, 67d deduct1075 fr0m
the5e 6re 3r03erly m6de, the7 we mu5t 6cce3t the c07cluded 3r03051t1075.
H0wever, 65 Le1b714 0b5erved, eve7 th0ugh 5317046'5 5y5tem f0ll0w5 th15 5tyle,
1t 7everthele55 l6ck5 m6them6t1c6l r1g0r. C075eque7tly, we mu5t l00k 6t the
c07te7t 0f 5317046'5 c0m3lete 5y5tem 67d 6cce3t 0r reject 1t 07 1t5 0w7 mer1t5,
r6ther th67 fr0m the 5ucce55 0f the v6r10u5 deduct1075.
17 36rt 07e 0f the Eth1c5, "C07cer717g G0d," 6fter 3re5e7t17g 6 5h0rt l15t 0f
def171t1075 67d 6x10m5, 5317046 deduce5 36 3r03051t1075 wh1ch ex3l617 the
76ture 0f G0d. The m05t 1m30rt67t 0f the5e 15 3r03051t107 14, wh1ch ex3re55e5
5317046'5 367the15m: "Be51de5 G0d, 70 5ub5t67ce c67 be gr67ted 0r c07ce1ved."
The term "367the15m" (l1ter6lly 6ll-G0d) me675 th6t G0d 15 1de7t1c6l t0 the
u71ver5e 65 6 wh0le. F0r ex6m3le my c6r, my h0u5e, 67d eve7 1 my5elf 6re 6ll
36rt5 0f G0d. 0ther We5ter7 3h1l0503her5 bef0re 5317046 6dv0c6ted 367the15m,
17clud17g Xe703h67e5, 36rme71de5, 3l0t17u5, 67d Me15ter Eckh6rdt. H0wever, the
v65t m6j0r1ty 0f We5ter7 3h1l0503her5 67d the0l0g1675 5tr07gly rejected th15
v1ew 17 f6v0r 0f 6 tr675ce7de7t c07ce3t 0f G0d wh1ch h0ld5 th6t G0d 15 d15t17ct
fr0m h15 cre6t107. 17deed, 50me the0l0g1675 m617t617ed th6t G0d h65 the
6ttr1bute 0f 5e36r6te7e55 thu5 be17g c0m3letely 5e36r6te fr0m the re5t 0f the
u71ver5e, 17clud17g the 3hy51c6l w0rld 67d hum675. 5317046'5 6rgume7t f0r
367the15m 17 3r03051t107 14 15 65 f0ll0w5:
3r03051t107 5. There c6770t ex15t 17 the u71ver5e tw0 0r m0re 5ub5t67ce5 h6v17g
the 56me 76ture 0r 6ttr1bute.
3r03051t107 11: G0d (def17ed 65 6 5ub5t67ce c07515t17g 0f 17f171te 6ttr1bute5,
0f wh1ch e6ch ex3re55e5 eter76l 67d 17f171te e55e7t16l1ty) 7ece556r1ly ex15t5.
Theref0re, 3r03051t107 14: Be51de5 G0d, 70 5ub5t67ce c67 be gr67ted 0r
c07ce1ved.
The 17tu1t107 beh17d 5317046'5 6rgume7t 6b0ve c67 be ex3re55ed 51m3ly. Tw0
5e36r6te 5ub5t67ce5 c6770t 5h6re the 56me 6ttr1bute5 (3 5). G0d h65 every
6ctu6l 67d 30551ble 6ttr1bute (3 11). Thu5, 70 0ther 5ub5t67ce c67 ex15t. T0
1llu5tr6te 5317046'5 3017t, 1m6g17e 67 17f171tely l07g l15t 0f qu6l1t1e5 5uch
65 "c07510u57e55" 67d "three-d1me751076l1ty." F0r 5317046, e6ch 6ttr1bute 07
th15 l15t c67 be 6551g7ed t0 07ly 07e 5ub5t67ce 0r th17g. 50, 5ub5t67ce 1 m1ght
exclu51vely h6ve the 6ttr1bute 0f "c075c10u57e55," 67d 5ub5t67ce 2 m1ght
exclu51vely h6ve the 6ttr1bute 0f "three- d1me751076l1ty." H0wever, G0d h65
6lre6dy bee7 6551g7ed 6ll 6ttr1bute5 07 the l15t, 67d 70 6ttr1bute5 6re left t0
6551g7 t0 0ther 5ub5t67ce5. 517ce 6 5ub5t67ce c67't ex15t 1f 1t d0e57't h6ve
67y 6ttr1bute5, the7 G0d 15 the 07ly 5ub5t67ce wh1ch ex15t5.
65 70ted, 5317046 03e75 36rt 07e 0f the Eth1c5 w1th 6 l15t 0f def171t1075 67d
6x10m5. H15 l15t 0f def171t1075 6re 65 f0ll0w5:
By th6t wh1ch 15 5elf-c6u5ed, 1 me67 th6t 0f wh1ch the e55e7ce 17v0lve5
ex15te7ce, 0r th6t 0f wh1ch the 76ture 15 07ly c07ce1v6ble 65 ex15te7t.
6 th17g 15 c6lled f171te 6fter 1t5 k17d, whe7 1t c67 be l1m1ted by 670ther
th17g 0f the 56me 76ture; f0r 175t67ce, 6 b0dy 15 c6lled f171te bec6u5e we
6lw6y5 c07ce1ve 670ther gre6ter b0dy. 50, 6l50, 6 th0ught 15 l1m1ted by 670ther
th0ught, but 6 b0dy 15 70t l1m1ted by th0ught, 70r 6 th0ught by b0dy.
By 5ub5t67ce, 1 me67 th6t wh1ch 15 17 1t5elf, 67d 15 c07ce1ved thr0ugh 1t5elf:
17 0ther w0rd5, th6t 0f wh1ch 6 c07ce3t107 c67 be f0rmed 17de3e7de7tly 0f 67y
0ther c07ce3t107.
By 6ttr1bute, 1 me67 th6t wh1ch the 17tellect 3erce1ve5 65 c075t1tut17g the
e55e7ce 0f 5ub5t67ce.
By m0de, 1 me67 the m0d1f1c6t1075 0f 5ub5t67ce, 0r th6t wh1ch ex15t5 17, 67d 15
c07ce1ved thr0ugh, 50meth17g 0ther th67 1t5elf.
By G0d, 1 me67 6 be17g 6b50lutely 17f171te -- th6t 15, 6 5ub5t67ce c07515t17g
17 17f171te 6ttr1bute5, 0f wh1ch e6ch ex3re55e5 eter76l 67d 17f171te
e55e7t16l1ty. ...
Th6t th17g 15 c6lled free, wh1ch ex15t5 50lely by the 7ece551ty 0f 1t5 0w7
76ture, 67d 0f wh1ch the 6ct107 15 determ17ed by 1t5elf 6l07e. 07 the 0ther
h67d, th6t th17g 15 7ece556ry, 0r r6ther c075tr617ed, wh1ch 15 determ17ed by
50meth17g exter76l t0 1t5elf t0 6 f1xed 67d def171te meth0d 0f ex15te7ce 0r
6ct107.
By eter71ty, 1 me67 ex15te7ce 1t5elf, 17 50 f6r 65 1t 15 c07ce1ved 7ece556r1ly
t0 f0ll0w 50lely fr0m the def171t107 0f th6t wh1ch 15 eter76l.
171t16lly, the m05t 1m30rt67t 0f the def171t1075 bel0w 6re th05e 0f 5ub5t67ce,
6ttr1bute, 67d m0de. 5ub
Be7ed1ct (B6ruch) 5317046 (1632-1677) w65 the 507 0f 6 Jew15h merch67t fr0m
6m5terd6m. H15 f6ther 67d gr67df6ther were 0r1g176lly 30rtugue5e cry3t0-Jew5 --
th6t 15, Jew5 wh0 were f0rced t0 6d03t Chr15t1671ty 17 305t-15l6m1c 30rtug6l,
but 5ecretly rem617ed Jew15h. He w65 educ6ted 17 tr6d1t1076l Jew15h Curr1culum.
H15 f6ther d1ed whe7 he w65 21, 6fter wh1ch he w65 embr01led 17 6 l6w5u1t w1th
h15 5te3515ter 0ver h15 f6ther'5 e5t6te. 5317046 w07 the 5u1t, but 7everthele55
h67ded v1rtu6lly 6ll 0f 1t 0ver t0 h15 5te3515ter. 5h0rtly 6fter, 5317046'5
budd17g the0l0g1c6l 53ecul6t1075 3r0m3ted c07fl1ct w1th Jew15h le6der5. 5317046
3ubl1cly c07te7ded th6t the 5cr13ture5 d0 70t m617t617 th6t G0d h65 70 b0dy,
th6t 67gel5 ex15t, 0r th6t the 50ul 15 1mm0rt6l. 6fter f61led 6ttem3t5 t0
51le7ce h1m, he w65 exc0mmu71c6ted 17 1656. F0r 6 t1me 5317046 w65 6550c16ted
w1th 6 f0rmer Je5u1t wh0 r67 6 5ch00l f0r ch1ldre7. 5317046 u5ed th15 65 67
0330rtu71ty t0 further h15 0w7 educ6t107 67d t0 5u33leme7t h15 17c0me by
te6ch17g 17 the 5ch00l. 6t th15 t1me he 6l50 le6r7ed the tr6de 0f le75 gr17d17g
f0r gl655e5 67d tele5c03e5.
17 h15 l6te twe7t1e5, he 5u3erv15ed 6 d15cu55107 gr0u3 07 3h1l0503h1c6l 67d
the0l0g1c6l 155ue5. 65 h15 0w7 1de65 devel03ed, he we7t 07 retre6t fr0m
6m5terd6m f0r three ye6r5 t0 f0rmul6te them 17 wr1t17g. 6t 6 c0tt6ge 17
R1j75burg, he wr0te 6 5h0rt Tre6t15e 07 G0d, M67 67d h15 Well-Be17g, 67d 07 the
1m3r0veme7t 0f the U7der5t67d17g. He 6l50 c0m305ed 6 ge0metr1c ver5107 0f
De5c6rte5' 3r17c13le5 0f 3h1l0503hy, wh1ch fr1e7d5 e7c0ur6ged h1m t0 3ubl15h.
36rt 0f the 3ur305e 0f the w0rk w65 t0 36ve the w6y f0r 3ubl15h17g h15 0w7
th0ught5 wh1ch were cr1t1c6l 0f C6rte516715m. By 3r0duc17g 5uch 6 w0rk, he
c0uld 70t be 6ccu5ed l6ter 0f 70t u7der5t67d17g De5c6rte5. The w0rk 633e6red 17
1663 67d w65 the 07ly wr1t17g 0f 5317046'5 3ubl15hed w1th h15 76me 07 1t dur17g
h15 l1fe. Further devel0317g h15 0w7 1de65, 0ver the 7ext tw0 ye6r5 5317046
c0m305ed h15 gre6te5t w0rk, The Eth1c5. 17 1663 5317046 left R1j75burg 67d
m0ved 7e6r The H6gue. H0317g t0 3ubl15h the Eth1c5, 67d 67t1c136t17g
c07tr0ver5y, he wr0te 67d 3ubl15hed 6707ym0u5ly h15 Tr6ct6tu5 Th0l0g1c0-
30l1t1cu5 (1670) wh1ch defe7d5 the l1berty t0 3h1l0503h14e 17 the f6ce 0f
rel1g10u5 0r 30l1t1c6l 17terfere7ce. 6fter 6 5elf- 171t16ted 67d f61led
d13l0m6t1c m155107 t0 Fr67ce, 5317046 67d he w65 f0rced t0 g1ve u3 h03e5 0f
3ubl15h17g the Eth1c5. He d1ed 17 1677 fr0m 6 lu7g d15e65e, the re5ult 0f
bre6th17g du5t fr0m le75 gr17d17g.
B6ck t0 T6ble 0f C07te7t5
5317046'5 367the15m 67d Meth0d 17 the Eth1c5
65 d1rected 17 5317046'5 W1ll, the Eth1c5 w65 3ubl15hed 305thum0u5ly 6l07g w1th
50me 0f h15 0ther w0rk5 (1677). The Eth1c5 15 6b0ut 200 36ge5 17 le7gth 67d 17
f1ve 36rt5:
C07cer717g G0d
The 76ture 67d 0r1g17 0f the Hum67 M17d
The 76ture 67d 0r1g17 0f the Em0t1075
Hum67 B07d6ge, 0r the 5tre7gth 0f the Em0t1075
The 30wer 0f the U7der5t67d17g, 0r Hum67 Freed0m
1t5 m05t v151bly d15t17gu15h17g fe6ture 15 1t5 5tyle 0f c0m3051t107 m0deled
6fter Eucl1d'5 ge0metry. E6ch 0f the f1ve 36rt5 03e75 w1th 6 br1ef l15t 0f
def171t1075 67d 6x10m5, 67d fr0m the5e 6 5er1e5 0f 3r03051t1075 (0r the0rem5)
6re deduced. 5317046 171t16lly c0m305ed the f1r5t 36rt5 0f the Eth1c5 17 d16l0g
f0rm, but rejected th15 f0r the m0re 3rec15e -- 67d u7f0rtu76tely m0re
d1ff1cult -- ge0metr1c meth0d. 17 ge7er6l, ge0metr1c 3r00f5 6re de51g7ed 50
th6t 1f we 6cce3t the def171t1075 67d 6x10m5 6t the 0ut5et, 67d deduct1075 fr0m
the5e 6re 3r03erly m6de, the7 we mu5t 6cce3t the c07cluded 3r03051t1075.
H0wever, 65 Le1b714 0b5erved, eve7 th0ugh 5317046'5 5y5tem f0ll0w5 th15 5tyle,
1t 7everthele55 l6ck5 m6them6t1c6l r1g0r. C075eque7tly, we mu5t l00k 6t the
c07te7t 0f 5317046'5 c0m3lete 5y5tem 67d 6cce3t 0r reject 1t 07 1t5 0w7 mer1t5,
r6ther th67 fr0m the 5ucce55 0f the v6r10u5 deduct1075.
17 36rt 07e 0f the Eth1c5, "C07cer717g G0d," 6fter 3re5e7t17g 6 5h0rt l15t 0f
def171t1075 67d 6x10m5, 5317046 deduce5 36 3r03051t1075 wh1ch ex3l617 the
76ture 0f G0d. The m05t 1m30rt67t 0f the5e 15 3r03051t107 14, wh1ch ex3re55e5
5317046'5 367the15m: "Be51de5 G0d, 70 5ub5t67ce c67 be gr67ted 0r c07ce1ved."
The term "367the15m" (l1ter6lly 6ll-G0d) me675 th6t G0d 15 1de7t1c6l t0 the
u71ver5e 65 6 wh0le. F0r ex6m3le my c6r, my h0u5e, 67d eve7 1 my5elf 6re 6ll
36rt5 0f G0d. 0ther We5ter7 3h1l0503her5 bef0re 5317046 6dv0c6ted 367the15m,
17clud17g Xe703h67e5, 36rme71de5, 3l0t17u5, 67d Me15ter Eckh6rdt. H0wever, the
v65t m6j0r1ty 0f We5ter7 3h1l0503her5 67d the0l0g1675 5tr07gly rejected th15
v1ew 17 f6v0r 0f 6 tr675ce7de7t c07ce3t 0f G0d wh1ch h0ld5 th6t G0d 15 d15t17ct
fr0m h15 cre6t107. 17deed, 50me the0l0g1675 m617t617ed th6t G0d h65 the
6ttr1bute 0f 5e36r6te7e55 thu5 be17g c0m3letely 5e36r6te fr0m the re5t 0f the
u71ver5e, 17clud17g the 3hy51c6l w0rld 67d hum675. 5317046'5 6rgume7t f0r
367the15m 17 3r03051t107 14 15 65 f0ll0w5:
3r03051t107 5. There c6770t ex15t 17 the u71ver5e tw0 0r m0re 5ub5t67ce5 h6v17g
the 56me 76ture 0r 6ttr1bute.
3r03051t107 11: G0d (def17ed 65 6 5ub5t67ce c07515t17g 0f 17f171te 6ttr1bute5,
0f wh1ch e6ch ex3re55e5 eter76l 67d 17f171te e55e7t16l1ty) 7ece556r1ly ex15t5.
Theref0re, 3r03051t107 14: Be51de5 G0d, 70 5ub5t67ce c67 be gr67ted 0r
c07ce1ved.
The 17tu1t107 beh17d 5317046'5 6rgume7t 6b0ve c67 be ex3re55ed 51m3ly. Tw0
5e36r6te 5ub5t67ce5 c6770t 5h6re the 56me 6ttr1bute5 (3 5). G0d h65 every
6ctu6l 67d 30551ble 6ttr1bute (3 11). Thu5, 70 0ther 5ub5t67ce c67 ex15t. T0
1llu5tr6te 5317046'5 3017t, 1m6g17e 67 17f171tely l07g l15t 0f qu6l1t1e5 5uch
65 "c07510u57e55" 67d "three-d1me751076l1ty." F0r 5317046, e6ch 6ttr1bute 07
th15 l15t c67 be 6551g7ed t0 07ly 07e 5ub5t67ce 0r th17g. 50, 5ub5t67ce 1 m1ght
exclu51vely h6ve the 6ttr1bute 0f "c075c10u57e55," 67d 5ub5t67ce 2 m1ght
exclu51vely h6ve the 6ttr1bute 0f "three- d1me751076l1ty." H0wever, G0d h65
6lre6dy bee7 6551g7ed 6ll 6ttr1bute5 07 the l15t, 67d 70 6ttr1bute5 6re left t0
6551g7 t0 0ther 5ub5t67ce5. 517ce 6 5ub5t67ce c67't ex15t 1f 1t d0e57't h6ve
67y 6ttr1bute5, the7 G0d 15 the 07ly 5ub5t67ce wh1ch ex15t5.
65 70ted, 5317046 03e75 36rt 07e 0f the Eth1c5 w1th 6 l15t 0f def171t1075 67d
6x10m5. H15 l15t 0f def171t1075 6re 65 f0ll0w5:
By th6t wh1ch 15 5elf-c6u5ed, 1 me67 th6t 0f wh1ch the e55e7ce 17v0lve5
ex15te7ce, 0r th6t 0f wh1ch the 76ture 15 07ly c07ce1v6ble 65 ex15te7t.
6 th17g 15 c6lled f171te 6fter 1t5 k17d, whe7 1t c67 be l1m1ted by 670ther
th17g 0f the 56me 76ture; f0r 175t67ce, 6 b0dy 15 c6lled f171te bec6u5e we
6lw6y5 c07ce1ve 670ther gre6ter b0dy. 50, 6l50, 6 th0ught 15 l1m1ted by 670ther
th0ught, but 6 b0dy 15 70t l1m1ted by th0ught, 70r 6 th0ught by b0dy.
By 5ub5t67ce, 1 me67 th6t wh1ch 15 17 1t5elf, 67d 15 c07ce1ved thr0ugh 1t5elf:
17 0ther w0rd5, th6t 0f wh1ch 6 c07ce3t107 c67 be f0rmed 17de3e7de7tly 0f 67y
0ther c07ce3t107.
By 6ttr1bute, 1 me67 th6t wh1ch the 17tellect 3erce1ve5 65 c075t1tut17g the
e55e7ce 0f 5ub5t67ce.
By m0de, 1 me67 the m0d1f1c6t1075 0f 5ub5t67ce, 0r th6t wh1ch ex15t5 17, 67d 15
c07ce1ved thr0ugh, 50meth17g 0ther th67 1t5elf.
By G0d, 1 me67 6 be17g 6b50lutely 17f171te -- th6t 15, 6 5ub5t67ce c07515t17g
17 17f171te 6ttr1bute5, 0f wh1ch e6ch ex3re55e5 eter76l 67d 17f171te
e55e7t16l1ty. ...
Th6t th17g 15 c6lled free, wh1ch ex15t5 50lely by the 7ece551ty 0f 1t5 0w7
76ture, 67d 0f wh1ch the 6ct107 15 determ17ed by 1t5elf 6l07e. 07 the 0ther
h67d, th6t th17g 15 7ece556ry, 0r r6ther c075tr617ed, wh1ch 15 determ17ed by
50meth17g exter76l t0 1t5elf t0 6 f1xed 67d def171te meth0d 0f ex15te7ce 0r
6ct107.
By eter71ty, 1 me67 ex15te7ce 1t5elf, 17 50 f6r 65 1t 15 c07ce1ved 7ece556r1ly
t0 f0ll0w 50lely fr0m the def171t107 0f th6t wh1ch 15 eter76l.
171t16lly, the m05t 1m30rt67t 0f the def171t1075 bel0w 6re th05e 0f 5ub5t67ce,
6ttr1bute, 67d m0de. 5ub
BIJE W GLOWE HEGLA
I STAWIA BRACI MARX
NA USZACH !!!
PS: WYGLADA NA TO IZ PAN JERZY URBAN NIGDY NIE
PRZESTAL BYC RZECZNIKIEM RZADOWYM ;)
forum.nie.com.pl/viewtopic.php?t=179
I STAWIA BRACI MARX
NA USZACH !!!
PS: WYGLADA NA TO IZ PAN JERZY URBAN NIGDY NIE
PRZESTAL BYC RZECZNIKIEM RZADOWYM ;)
forum.nie.com.pl/viewtopic.php?t=179
• 1946 :kardynał Hlond:O tragedii żydowskiej IP: *.cm-upc.chello.se
Gość: "|" 18.11.03, 01:59 zarchiwizowany
www.wsdsc.poznan.pl/ahlond/druki/admortem/s1948.htm
O tragedii żydowskiej.
Przed kilku dniami J. Em Ks. kardynał Hlond, przyjął na dłuższej audiencji
bawiącego w Poznaniu przedstawiciela żyd. Zrzeszeń Religijnych ob. prof.
Michała Zylberberga. Rozmowa toczyła się w wyjątkowo serdecznej atmosferze. Ks.
Kardynał niesłychanie żywo interesował się losem ocalałych Żydów; była to
rozmowa daleko odbiegająca od zwykłej urzędowości. Widać było, że niesłychana
tragedia narodu żydowskiego do głębi przejmuje głowę kościoła katolickiego w
Polsce.
- Wydaje mi się, że nieśmiertelne prawdy zawarte w Starym Testamencie, zaczyna
Ksiądz Kardynał, zasady dziesięciorga przykazań, natchnione słowa proroków
musiały niepokoić tego prawdziwego szatana jakim był Hitler. Wydawało mu się w
pysze antychrysta, jeśli wymorduje Żydów, znikną odwieczne zasady współczesnej
cywilizacji i nie tylko fizycznie, ale duchowo zapanuje pogańska myśl
narodowych socjalistów. Nie mogło mu się to udać i choć naród żydowski poniósł
tak ogromne straty, nie wyszedł jednak złamany.
- Chciałbym na ręce Jego Eminencji złożyć w imieniu Zrzeszeń Religijnych
podziękowanie tym wszystkim, którzy nam pomagali ratować się przed plecami
krematoryjnymi. Mówię tu przede wszystkim o zakładach sióstr zakonnych, które
tak wiele dokonały dla ratowania dzieci.
- Ogromnie mnie cieszy pańskie oświadczenie. Tak musieli postąpić wszyscy, dla
których zasady naszego Kościoła nie są pustym dźwiękiem. Ja sam starałem się w
czasie pobytu we Francji o tzw. aryjskie papiery dla Żydów polskich, a
specjalnie o żółte dokumenty, na podstawie których mogli Żydzi wyjechać do
Ameryki.
- Czy nie mógłby Jego Eminencja wy tłumaczyć, dlaczego właśnie Polskę wybrał
Hitler za teren mordowania Żydów z całej Europy.
- Myślałem o tym niejednokrotnie. Może najlepszą odpowiedź znalazłem w książce
Rauschninga pt. To on mi powiedział. Autor przytacza rozmowy z Hitlerem w
latach, poprzedzających przyjście do władzy. W jednej z nich dowodzi Hitler, że
tylko wprowadzenie niewolnictwa daje gwarancję wzrostu potęgi państwu.
Przykłady tego widział Hitler w państwach starożytnych a nawet w rozkwicie
niektórych współczesnych imperiów. W czasie tej rozmowy dowiedział się
Rauschning, że w planach Hitlera leżało uczynienie z Polski państwa
niewolników. Mało w niej pozostać około 10 milionów ludzi, którzy by pracowali
dla wielkości Niemiec. Reszta miała wyginąć. Mordowanie Żydów było wstępem do
realizacji planów Hitlera.
- Czy znane są Jego Eminencji wypadki napaści na Żydów już po wyzwoleniu
Polski?
- Przejmują mnie one prawdziwym smutkiem, ponieważ są to czyny występujące
przeciwko podstawowym zasadom religii katolickiej, wypadki te wołają o pomstę
do nieba, na to nie ma rozgrzeszenia, ani przebaczenia tym bardziej, że nie ma
żadnych przyczyn do takich wystąpień jak również brak obecnie w Polsce
obiektywnych podstaw dla szerzenia antysemityzmu. To jest prawdziwe szaleństwo
tych, którzy ciągle konspirują, siedzą w lasach. Wydaje się im, że robią
politykę, że napadając na Żydów, zwalczają rząd. Potępiam działalność ich, jako
katolik i jako Polak.
- Jaki jest pogląd Jego Eminencji na sprawę Palestyny?
- Odbudowa niepodległości państwa żydowskiego jest sprawą pierwszorzędnej wagi.
Naród żydowski odrodzi się wtedy w pełnym blasku po latach nieszczęść i
tragedii. Nie wiem jak wygląda kwestia pojemności Palestyny. Podobno może w
obecnej chwili przyjąć do miliona Żydów. To byłoby świetne. Życzę Wam ze
szczerego serca powodzenia w waszych staraniach.
W sprawie miejsc świętych dojdziemy z pewnością do porozumienia.
Cieszę się, że Pan mnie odwiedził. Niech Pan powtórzy swym siostrom i braciom
słowa otuchy. W ich wielkiej tragedii i w dniach radosnych jestem wam sercem
bliski. Pamiętajcie, że w tragicznych chwilach jedynie wiara może uchronić od
zagłady i katastrofy.
Druk: Dziennik Powszechny [Radom-Kielce] 2(1946) s. 2 z 22.I.1946
_____________________________________________________________________________
O tragedii żydowskiej.
Przed kilku dniami J. Em Ks. kardynał Hlond, przyjął na dłuższej audiencji
bawiącego w Poznaniu przedstawiciela żyd. Zrzeszeń Religijnych ob. prof.
Michała Zylberberga. Rozmowa toczyła się w wyjątkowo serdecznej atmosferze. Ks.
Kardynał niesłychanie żywo interesował się losem ocalałych Żydów; była to
rozmowa daleko odbiegająca od zwykłej urzędowości. Widać było, że niesłychana
tragedia narodu żydowskiego do głębi przejmuje głowę kościoła katolickiego w
Polsce.
- Wydaje mi się, że nieśmiertelne prawdy zawarte w Starym Testamencie, zaczyna
Ksiądz Kardynał, zasady dziesięciorga przykazań, natchnione słowa proroków
musiały niepokoić tego prawdziwego szatana jakim był Hitler. Wydawało mu się w
pysze antychrysta, jeśli wymorduje Żydów, znikną odwieczne zasady współczesnej
cywilizacji i nie tylko fizycznie, ale duchowo zapanuje pogańska myśl
narodowych socjalistów. Nie mogło mu się to udać i choć naród żydowski poniósł
tak ogromne straty, nie wyszedł jednak złamany.
- Chciałbym na ręce Jego Eminencji złożyć w imieniu Zrzeszeń Religijnych
podziękowanie tym wszystkim, którzy nam pomagali ratować się przed plecami
krematoryjnymi. Mówię tu przede wszystkim o zakładach sióstr zakonnych, które
tak wiele dokonały dla ratowania dzieci.
- Ogromnie mnie cieszy pańskie oświadczenie. Tak musieli postąpić wszyscy, dla
których zasady naszego Kościoła nie są pustym dźwiękiem. Ja sam starałem się w
czasie pobytu we Francji o tzw. aryjskie papiery dla Żydów polskich, a
specjalnie o żółte dokumenty, na podstawie których mogli Żydzi wyjechać do
Ameryki.
- Czy nie mógłby Jego Eminencja wy tłumaczyć, dlaczego właśnie Polskę wybrał
Hitler za teren mordowania Żydów z całej Europy.
- Myślałem o tym niejednokrotnie. Może najlepszą odpowiedź znalazłem w książce
Rauschninga pt. To on mi powiedział. Autor przytacza rozmowy z Hitlerem w
latach, poprzedzających przyjście do władzy. W jednej z nich dowodzi Hitler, że
tylko wprowadzenie niewolnictwa daje gwarancję wzrostu potęgi państwu.
Przykłady tego widział Hitler w państwach starożytnych a nawet w rozkwicie
niektórych współczesnych imperiów. W czasie tej rozmowy dowiedział się
Rauschning, że w planach Hitlera leżało uczynienie z Polski państwa
niewolników. Mało w niej pozostać około 10 milionów ludzi, którzy by pracowali
dla wielkości Niemiec. Reszta miała wyginąć. Mordowanie Żydów było wstępem do
realizacji planów Hitlera.
- Czy znane są Jego Eminencji wypadki napaści na Żydów już po wyzwoleniu
Polski?
- Przejmują mnie one prawdziwym smutkiem, ponieważ są to czyny występujące
przeciwko podstawowym zasadom religii katolickiej, wypadki te wołają o pomstę
do nieba, na to nie ma rozgrzeszenia, ani przebaczenia tym bardziej, że nie ma
żadnych przyczyn do takich wystąpień jak również brak obecnie w Polsce
obiektywnych podstaw dla szerzenia antysemityzmu. To jest prawdziwe szaleństwo
tych, którzy ciągle konspirują, siedzą w lasach. Wydaje się im, że robią
politykę, że napadając na Żydów, zwalczają rząd. Potępiam działalność ich, jako
katolik i jako Polak.
- Jaki jest pogląd Jego Eminencji na sprawę Palestyny?
- Odbudowa niepodległości państwa żydowskiego jest sprawą pierwszorzędnej wagi.
Naród żydowski odrodzi się wtedy w pełnym blasku po latach nieszczęść i
tragedii. Nie wiem jak wygląda kwestia pojemności Palestyny. Podobno może w
obecnej chwili przyjąć do miliona Żydów. To byłoby świetne. Życzę Wam ze
szczerego serca powodzenia w waszych staraniach.
W sprawie miejsc świętych dojdziemy z pewnością do porozumienia.
Cieszę się, że Pan mnie odwiedził. Niech Pan powtórzy swym siostrom i braciom
słowa otuchy. W ich wielkiej tragedii i w dniach radosnych jestem wam sercem
bliski. Pamiętajcie, że w tragicznych chwilach jedynie wiara może uchronić od
zagłady i katastrofy.
Druk: Dziennik Powszechny [Radom-Kielce] 2(1946) s. 2 z 22.I.1946
_____________________________________________________________________________
Zgodnie z założeniami Programu Rozwoju Psychiatrii- Liczba łóżek w Szpitalu
Podlegać będzie dalszemu stopniowemu zmniejszaniu.
Aktualnie Szpital dysponuje 895 łóżkami. W szpitalu znajduje się 19 oddziałów
psychiatrycznych, 1 oddział neurologicznych
i 1 oddział leczenia odwykowego.
www.tworki.internetdsl.pl/pierw.html
www.koastudio.art.pl/zbiory/galerie/tworki/3.htm
www.koastudio.art.pl/zbiory/galerie/tworki/5.htm
www.koastudio.art.pl/zbiory/galerie/tworki/tworki.htm
--
©
www.koastudio.art.pl/zbiory/galerie/tworki/tworki.htm
Obrazy tego typu są wystawione w galerii szpitalnej i można je sobie obejrzeć
oraz zakupić jeśli kto ma ochotę...
Podlegać będzie dalszemu stopniowemu zmniejszaniu.
Aktualnie Szpital dysponuje 895 łóżkami. W szpitalu znajduje się 19 oddziałów
psychiatrycznych, 1 oddział neurologicznych
i 1 oddział leczenia odwykowego.
www.tworki.internetdsl.pl/pierw.html
www.koastudio.art.pl/zbiory/galerie/tworki/3.htm
www.koastudio.art.pl/zbiory/galerie/tworki/5.htm
www.koastudio.art.pl/zbiory/galerie/tworki/tworki.htm
--
©
www.koastudio.art.pl/zbiory/galerie/tworki/tworki.htm
Obrazy tego typu są wystawione w galerii szpitalnej i można je sobie obejrzeć
oraz zakupić jeśli kto ma ochotę...
'Semiotics is concerned with everything that can be taken as a sign' (Eco 1976,
7).
www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/
www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem08.html
www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem12a.html
Identifying the text
Wherever possible, include a copy of the text with your analysis of it, noting
any significant shortcomings of the copy. Where including a copy is not
practicable, offer a clear description which would allow someone to recognize
the text easily if they encountered it themselves.
Briefly describe the medium used, the genre to which the text belongs and the
context in which it was found.
Consider your purposes in analysing the text. This will affect which questions
seem important to you amongst those offered below.
Why did you choose this text?
Your purposes may reflect your values: how does the text relate to your own
values?
How does the sign vehicle you are examining relate to the type-token
distinction?
Is it one among many copies (e.g. a poster) or virtually unique (e.g. an actual
painting)?
How does this influence your interpretation?
What are the important signifiers and what do they signify?
What is the system within which these signs make sense?
Modality
What reality claims are made by the text?
Does it allude to being fact or fiction?
What references are made to an everyday experiential world?
What modality markers are present?
How do you make use of such markers to make judgements about the relationship
between the text and the world?
Does the text operate within a realist representational code?
To whom might it appear realistic?
'What does transparency keep obscure?' (Butler 1999, xix)
Paradigmatic analysis
To which class of paradigms (medium; genre; theme) does the whole text belong?
How might a change of medium affect the meanings generated?
What might the text have been like if it had formed part of a different genre?
What paradigm sets do each of the signifiers used belong to? For example, in
photographic, televisual and filmic media, one paradigm might be shot size.
Why do you think each signifier was chosen from the possible alternatives
within the same paradigm set? What values does the choice of each particular
signifier connote?
What signifiers from the same paradigm set are noticeably absent?
What contrasted pairs seem to be involved (e.g. nature/culture)?
Which of those in each pairing seems to be the 'marked' category?
Is there a central opposition in the text?
Apply the commutation test in order to identify distinctive signifiers and to
define their significance. This involves an imagined substitution of one
signifier for another of your own, and assessing the effect.
What is the syntagmatic structure of the text?
Identify and describe syntagmatic structures in the text which take forms such
as narrative, argument or montage.
How does one signifier relate to the others used (do some carry more weight
than others)?
How does the sequential or spatial arrangement of the elements influence
meaning?
Are there formulaic features that have shaped the text?
If you are comparing several texts within a genre look for a shared syntagm.
How far does identifying the paradigms and syntagms help you to understand the
text?
Rhetorical tropes
· What tropes (e.g. metaphors and metonyms) are involved?
How are they used to influence the preferred reading?
Intertextuality
Does it allude to other genres?
Does it allude to or compare with other texts within the genre?
How does it compare with treatments of similar themes within other genres?
Does one code within the text (such as a linguistic caption to an advertisement
or news photograph) serve to 'anchor' another (such as an image)? If so, how?
What semiotic codes are used?
Do the codes have double, single or no articulation?
Are the codes analogue or digital?
Which conventions of its genre are most obvious in the text?
Which codes are specific to the medium?
Which codes are shared with other media?
How do the codes involved relate to each other (e.g. words and images)?
Are the codes broadcast or narrowcast?
Which codes are notable by their absence?
What relationships does the text seek to establish with its readers?
How direct is the mode of address and what is the significance of this?
How else would you describe the mode of address?
What cultural assumptions are called upon?
To whom would these codes be most familiar?
What seems to be the preferred reading?
How far does this reflect or depart from dominant cultural values?
How 'open' to interpretation does the sign seem to be?
Social semiotics
What does a purely structural analysis of the text downplay or ignore?
Who created the sign? Try to consider all of those involved in the process.
Whose realities does it represent and whose does it exclude?
For whom was it intended? Look carefully at the clues and try to be as detailed
as you can.
How do people differ in their interpretation of the sign? Clearly this needs
direct investigation.
On what do their interpretations seem to depend?
Illustrate, where possible, dominant, negotiated and oppositional readings.
How might a change of context influence interpretation?
Benefits of semiotic analysis
What other contributions have semioticians made that can be applied
productively to the text?
What insights has a semiotic analysis of this text offered?
What other strategies might you need to employ to balance any shortcomings of
your analysis?
;)))
7).
www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/
www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem08.html
www.aber.ac.uk/media/Documents/S4B/sem12a.html
Identifying the text
Wherever possible, include a copy of the text with your analysis of it, noting
any significant shortcomings of the copy. Where including a copy is not
practicable, offer a clear description which would allow someone to recognize
the text easily if they encountered it themselves.
Briefly describe the medium used, the genre to which the text belongs and the
context in which it was found.
Consider your purposes in analysing the text. This will affect which questions
seem important to you amongst those offered below.
Why did you choose this text?
Your purposes may reflect your values: how does the text relate to your own
values?
How does the sign vehicle you are examining relate to the type-token
distinction?
Is it one among many copies (e.g. a poster) or virtually unique (e.g. an actual
painting)?
How does this influence your interpretation?
What are the important signifiers and what do they signify?
What is the system within which these signs make sense?
Modality
What reality claims are made by the text?
Does it allude to being fact or fiction?
What references are made to an everyday experiential world?
What modality markers are present?
How do you make use of such markers to make judgements about the relationship
between the text and the world?
Does the text operate within a realist representational code?
To whom might it appear realistic?
'What does transparency keep obscure?' (Butler 1999, xix)
Paradigmatic analysis
To which class of paradigms (medium; genre; theme) does the whole text belong?
How might a change of medium affect the meanings generated?
What might the text have been like if it had formed part of a different genre?
What paradigm sets do each of the signifiers used belong to? For example, in
photographic, televisual and filmic media, one paradigm might be shot size.
Why do you think each signifier was chosen from the possible alternatives
within the same paradigm set? What values does the choice of each particular
signifier connote?
What signifiers from the same paradigm set are noticeably absent?
What contrasted pairs seem to be involved (e.g. nature/culture)?
Which of those in each pairing seems to be the 'marked' category?
Is there a central opposition in the text?
Apply the commutation test in order to identify distinctive signifiers and to
define their significance. This involves an imagined substitution of one
signifier for another of your own, and assessing the effect.
What is the syntagmatic structure of the text?
Identify and describe syntagmatic structures in the text which take forms such
as narrative, argument or montage.
How does one signifier relate to the others used (do some carry more weight
than others)?
How does the sequential or spatial arrangement of the elements influence
meaning?
Are there formulaic features that have shaped the text?
If you are comparing several texts within a genre look for a shared syntagm.
How far does identifying the paradigms and syntagms help you to understand the
text?
Rhetorical tropes
· What tropes (e.g. metaphors and metonyms) are involved?
How are they used to influence the preferred reading?
Intertextuality
Does it allude to other genres?
Does it allude to or compare with other texts within the genre?
How does it compare with treatments of similar themes within other genres?
Does one code within the text (such as a linguistic caption to an advertisement
or news photograph) serve to 'anchor' another (such as an image)? If so, how?
What semiotic codes are used?
Do the codes have double, single or no articulation?
Are the codes analogue or digital?
Which conventions of its genre are most obvious in the text?
Which codes are specific to the medium?
Which codes are shared with other media?
How do the codes involved relate to each other (e.g. words and images)?
Are the codes broadcast or narrowcast?
Which codes are notable by their absence?
What relationships does the text seek to establish with its readers?
How direct is the mode of address and what is the significance of this?
How else would you describe the mode of address?
What cultural assumptions are called upon?
To whom would these codes be most familiar?
What seems to be the preferred reading?
How far does this reflect or depart from dominant cultural values?
How 'open' to interpretation does the sign seem to be?
Social semiotics
What does a purely structural analysis of the text downplay or ignore?
Who created the sign? Try to consider all of those involved in the process.
Whose realities does it represent and whose does it exclude?
For whom was it intended? Look carefully at the clues and try to be as detailed
as you can.
How do people differ in their interpretation of the sign? Clearly this needs
direct investigation.
On what do their interpretations seem to depend?
Illustrate, where possible, dominant, negotiated and oppositional readings.
How might a change of context influence interpretation?
Benefits of semiotic analysis
What other contributions have semioticians made that can be applied
productively to the text?
What insights has a semiotic analysis of this text offered?
What other strategies might you need to employ to balance any shortcomings of
your analysis?
;)))
• Dlaczego Boris nie kupi sobie perulki? IP: *.bchsia.telus.net
Gość: jewhater 16.11.03, 22:57 zarchiwizowany
w lysinie mu nie do twarzy
Participants" wanted
A Stanford Medical research group advertised for participants in a study of
obsessive-compulsive disorder. They were looking for therapy clients who had
been diagnosed with this disorder. The response was gratifying; they got 3,000
responses about three days after the ad came out. All from the same person.
www.psych.upenn.edu/etc/resea.jpg
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Dead Grandmother/Exam Syndrome and the Potential Downfall Of American
Society
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seasons greetings
On the 12th day of Eurocentrically imposed midwinter festival my significant
other in a consenting, adult, monogamous, relationship gave to me:
Twelve males reclaiming their inner warrior through ritual drumming.
Eleven pipers piping (plus an 18 member pit orchestra made up of members in
good standing of the Musicians Equity Union as called for in their union
contract, even though they will not be asked to play a note.)
Ten melanin deprived testosterone poisoned scions of the patriarchal ruling
class system leaping.
Nine persons engaged in rhythmic self-expression.
Eight economically disadvantaged female persons stealing milk products from
enslaved bovine Americans.
Seven endangered swans swimming on federally protected wetlands.
Six enslaved fowl-Americans producing stolen non-human animal products.
Five golden symbols of culturally sanctioned enforced domestic incarceration.
(After members ofl the Animal Liberation Front threatened to tthrow red paint
at my computer, the calling birds, hens and partridge have been reintroduced to
their native habitat. To avoid further Animal-American enslaavement, the
remaining gift package has been revised.)
Four hours of recorded whale songs.
Three deconstructionist poets.
Two Sierra Club calendars printed on recycled processed tree carcasses, and
One Spotted owl activist chained to an old-growth pear tree.
Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukah, Good Kwanzaa,, Blessed Yule, and Happy
Holidays*
*unless you are suffering from seasonally affected disorder(SAD). If this is
the case, please substitute this gratuitous call for celebration with the
suggestion that you have a thoroughly adequate day.
www.psych.upenn.edu/humor.html
ACTUAL BUMPER STICKERS
"Out of my mind. Back in five minutes."
"Laugh alone and the world thinks you're an idiot."
"Sometimes I wake up grumpy; other times I let him sleep"
"It's as BAD as you think, and they ARE out to get you."
"I took an IQ test and the results were negative."
"Warning: Dates in calendar are closer than they appear."
"Give me ambiguity or give me something else."
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest"
"Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else."
"Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies."
"Consciousness: that annoying time between naps."
"Be nice to your kids. They'll choose your nursing home."
"3 kinds of people: those who can count & those who can't."
"Ever stop to think, and forget to start again?"
A Stanford Medical research group advertised for participants in a study of
obsessive-compulsive disorder. They were looking for therapy clients who had
been diagnosed with this disorder. The response was gratifying; they got 3,000
responses about three days after the ad came out. All from the same person.
www.psych.upenn.edu/etc/resea.jpg
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Dead Grandmother/Exam Syndrome and the Potential Downfall Of American
Society
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Seasons greetings
On the 12th day of Eurocentrically imposed midwinter festival my significant
other in a consenting, adult, monogamous, relationship gave to me:
Twelve males reclaiming their inner warrior through ritual drumming.
Eleven pipers piping (plus an 18 member pit orchestra made up of members in
good standing of the Musicians Equity Union as called for in their union
contract, even though they will not be asked to play a note.)
Ten melanin deprived testosterone poisoned scions of the patriarchal ruling
class system leaping.
Nine persons engaged in rhythmic self-expression.
Eight economically disadvantaged female persons stealing milk products from
enslaved bovine Americans.
Seven endangered swans swimming on federally protected wetlands.
Six enslaved fowl-Americans producing stolen non-human animal products.
Five golden symbols of culturally sanctioned enforced domestic incarceration.
(After members ofl the Animal Liberation Front threatened to tthrow red paint
at my computer, the calling birds, hens and partridge have been reintroduced to
their native habitat. To avoid further Animal-American enslaavement, the
remaining gift package has been revised.)
Four hours of recorded whale songs.
Three deconstructionist poets.
Two Sierra Club calendars printed on recycled processed tree carcasses, and
One Spotted owl activist chained to an old-growth pear tree.
Merry Christmas, Happy Chanukah, Good Kwanzaa,, Blessed Yule, and Happy
Holidays*
*unless you are suffering from seasonally affected disorder(SAD). If this is
the case, please substitute this gratuitous call for celebration with the
suggestion that you have a thoroughly adequate day.
www.psych.upenn.edu/humor.html
ACTUAL BUMPER STICKERS
"Out of my mind. Back in five minutes."
"Laugh alone and the world thinks you're an idiot."
"Sometimes I wake up grumpy; other times I let him sleep"
"It's as BAD as you think, and they ARE out to get you."
"I took an IQ test and the results were negative."
"Warning: Dates in calendar are closer than they appear."
"Give me ambiguity or give me something else."
"He who laughs last, thinks slowest"
"Always remember you're unique, just like everyone else."
"Friends help you move. Real friends help you move bodies."
"Consciousness: that annoying time between naps."
"Be nice to your kids. They'll choose your nursing home."
"3 kinds of people: those who can count & those who can't."
"Ever stop to think, and forget to start again?"
Work Brings Freedom-Arbeit Macht Frei
www.spectacle.org/695/arbeit.html
Block 10
www.spectacle.org/695/block10.html
Clothing and Nakedness
www.spectacle.org/695/clothes.html
Doctors
www.spectacle.org/695/doctors.html
Escape
www.spectacle.org/695/escape.html
Filth and Cleanliness
www.spectacle.org/695/filth.html
God
www.spectacle.org/695/god.html
Hope
www.spectacle.org/695/hope.html
Injections
www.spectacle.org/695/inject.html
The Judge
www.spectacle.org/695/judge.html
Krematoria
www.spectacle.org/695/krema.html
Language
www.spectacle.org/695/lang.html
Musselmanner
www.spectacle.org/695/musel.html
Nutrition
www.spectacle.org/695/food.html
Ordnungsdiest
www.spectacle.org/695/ord.html
Perpetrators
www.spectacle.org/695/perp.html
Resistance
www.spectacle.org/695/resist.html
Selections
www.spectacle.org/695/select.html
What I Learned From Auschwitz
A non-Jewish physician who spotted me reading a book on Nuremberg said, "When I
read about the Holocaust, I become clinically depressed." He was right.
Holocaust literature must be sampled, interspersed with other reading. If you
dive into it for several months at a time, you wind up wanting to kill yourself.
In his novel Jurgen, James Branch Cabell relates how Merlin sent Jurgen to a
Druid who had promised to reveal the truth about life. Merlin apparently was
afraid to accept the invitation himself. Jurgen, after having received the
revelation, remarked that it was rather unpleasant. To which the Druid
replied: "If Merlin had seen what you have seen, Merlin would have died, and
Merlin would have died without regret, for Merlin receives facts reasonably."
Nevertheless, in compiling An Auschwitz Alphabet, I learned a few things.
There is no God
The most important lesson one can learn from Auschwitz is that God does not
exist. Occam's Razor tells us not to search for a complicated explanation when
a simple one is available. Ever since Auschwitz, theologians have had to go
through major contortions to hold onto an image of God. There are only two
possibilities: either God caused (or at least permitted) the destruction of the
Jews, the Gypsies and the other victims, or God does not care. The first
approach is unacceptable for two reasons. It means that entire groups of people
may be indicted based on race or other identity, which is contrary to
everything I believe. And it makes God out to be a mass murderer. On the other
hand, if God does not care, why believe in Him? An uncaring God is either a
cruel and negligent one, or, even worse, a God who is unaware of humans and
their plight. This latter--the God of Spinoza and of Freud's psychotic Dr.
Schreber--is really just a metaphysical formulation bearing little or no
relationship to the popular idea of God as a being who intervenes in human
history.
Although there are only two possibilities, there is a third approach to
retaining belief in God: shut up and stop asking questions. Interestingly, this
is the message not of God but the devil to the knight in Bergman's The Seventh
Seal. Probably, the majority of those who believe in a Jewish or Christian God
today-- at least I hope it is the majority--simply do not confront God with the
question of how He could let Auschwitz happen. But this approach is not
acceptable to those who believe that there is no area off-limits to human
questioning.
By far the simplest explanation for Auschwitz is that there is no God to
intervene in human affairs. No deity exists to care what we do to each other.
All compassion and all hatred in the human universe is ours. We are on our own.
www.spectacle.org/695/arbeit.html
Block 10
www.spectacle.org/695/block10.html
Clothing and Nakedness
www.spectacle.org/695/clothes.html
Doctors
www.spectacle.org/695/doctors.html
Escape
www.spectacle.org/695/escape.html
Filth and Cleanliness
www.spectacle.org/695/filth.html
God
www.spectacle.org/695/god.html
Hope
www.spectacle.org/695/hope.html
Injections
www.spectacle.org/695/inject.html
The Judge
www.spectacle.org/695/judge.html
Krematoria
www.spectacle.org/695/krema.html
Language
www.spectacle.org/695/lang.html
Musselmanner
www.spectacle.org/695/musel.html
Nutrition
www.spectacle.org/695/food.html
Ordnungsdiest
www.spectacle.org/695/ord.html
Perpetrators
www.spectacle.org/695/perp.html
Resistance
www.spectacle.org/695/resist.html
Selections
www.spectacle.org/695/select.html
What I Learned From Auschwitz
A non-Jewish physician who spotted me reading a book on Nuremberg said, "When I
read about the Holocaust, I become clinically depressed." He was right.
Holocaust literature must be sampled, interspersed with other reading. If you
dive into it for several months at a time, you wind up wanting to kill yourself.
In his novel Jurgen, James Branch Cabell relates how Merlin sent Jurgen to a
Druid who had promised to reveal the truth about life. Merlin apparently was
afraid to accept the invitation himself. Jurgen, after having received the
revelation, remarked that it was rather unpleasant. To which the Druid
replied: "If Merlin had seen what you have seen, Merlin would have died, and
Merlin would have died without regret, for Merlin receives facts reasonably."
Nevertheless, in compiling An Auschwitz Alphabet, I learned a few things.
There is no God
The most important lesson one can learn from Auschwitz is that God does not
exist. Occam's Razor tells us not to search for a complicated explanation when
a simple one is available. Ever since Auschwitz, theologians have had to go
through major contortions to hold onto an image of God. There are only two
possibilities: either God caused (or at least permitted) the destruction of the
Jews, the Gypsies and the other victims, or God does not care. The first
approach is unacceptable for two reasons. It means that entire groups of people
may be indicted based on race or other identity, which is contrary to
everything I believe. And it makes God out to be a mass murderer. On the other
hand, if God does not care, why believe in Him? An uncaring God is either a
cruel and negligent one, or, even worse, a God who is unaware of humans and
their plight. This latter--the God of Spinoza and of Freud's psychotic Dr.
Schreber--is really just a metaphysical formulation bearing little or no
relationship to the popular idea of God as a being who intervenes in human
history.
Although there are only two possibilities, there is a third approach to
retaining belief in God: shut up and stop asking questions. Interestingly, this
is the message not of God but the devil to the knight in Bergman's The Seventh
Seal. Probably, the majority of those who believe in a Jewish or Christian God
today-- at least I hope it is the majority--simply do not confront God with the
question of how He could let Auschwitz happen. But this approach is not
acceptable to those who believe that there is no area off-limits to human
questioning.
By far the simplest explanation for Auschwitz is that there is no God to
intervene in human affairs. No deity exists to care what we do to each other.
All compassion and all hatred in the human universe is ours. We are on our own.
E.
L
ULSGZASESHG ?
GEZEHUAZAUEEHEZ ?
GSOZHHULG?
LAGEGGE?
SLOSHZOG?
UGUUSGZEO?
HLAUOAZHAZOHGGHAZHOEUHZSEUZLL?
OA?
GHZLUHOHASLEZHZEOAAU?
OGEHUUAOGSSOSHZZEL?
Z SESGUOHLZHUHLLL?
USOZ HULOZ?
OLGEHSZLLOSSSGAUUAZZGUHGSUGEOEHLGAUUZHHLOG?
SAASGEEUUALZHU ?
SAUHZE E ?
HA ?
HELAS Z ?
LZOL GOGLUSA UHSAAGZ EUAO EU HALO U SUEZA AUHZ LE EGEA O ?
ZA OZUGLULZ?
E?
ZUSH?
OOAA OAELSSHHL?
UHHLSZOGZO GAZHZGZSUO GL?
LSEAUEA?
HGZSGOEAO OLLEEOSEOS UHHZOUAASZ LEHULUAGSL GULSLLAOGUEEOS?
Z?
OEA S?
SGSGLGSE OGZLHALL?
E HLGEZALL?
G ELOSLLHSUHO?
UUAZE?
GG AZ?
UGSA?
ES LHHS?SZ?
ZU HGLZZ?
GEHL HEOLLGUGLZGHEEA?
EEAZ UUOASAAUEO HAOZLEGUGU AEGSZZU?
E?
LGO?
OZL?
GHAOGUE?
OZ??
OSEGZL?
L?
A ZGEL?
A?
SZE HUA?
UHLHUA ?
AAGUOSLEZOOOSAHLZ?
L USZAESAOHZ ??
HS??
LEUZ ?
]S??
HGAOGL ?
EAE?
L?
H?
Z
LUAHUUOGOL ZZ
UGSEUEOL UASUGSHSE?
LOSO?
GZZ?
G AHGZSHGZES
UZOLGGSALL ZLZGOZLGAO HAUOEUULHL SGHLEAZG??
U??
LEOGGAO
SLH?
O?
ZLLE UGGGGGGHE?
ZG?
HOUGGSL OSG?
EL?
EZ H LAO GA E L H S GSOZUUSGUSS EU AGOHE OZA UZSZZE OH ZS EEUU AH
SO ES ZALGEL LH HL S G H ZSE UGOU ZH?
SSUAH?
E LLSGSA ZHAE HHZE SE?
H?
S GE?
SGS??
HL HS??
HOSE ZL?
LZZA HOAA LEOOLG Z?
H?
AALLLGS GOG ZLAU ZOL G H G
L
ULSGZASESHG ?
GEZEHUAZAUEEHEZ ?
GSOZHHULG?
LAGEGGE?
SLOSHZOG?
UGUUSGZEO?
HLAUOAZHAZOHGGHAZHOEUHZSEUZLL?
OA?
GHZLUHOHASLEZHZEOAAU?
OGEHUUAOGSSOSHZZEL?
Z SESGUOHLZHUHLLL?
USOZ HULOZ?
OLGEHSZLLOSSSGAUUAZZGUHGSUGEOEHLGAUUZHHLOG?
SAASGEEUUALZHU ?
SAUHZE E ?
HA ?
HELAS Z ?
LZOL GOGLUSA UHSAAGZ EUAO EU HALO U SUEZA AUHZ LE EGEA O ?
ZA OZUGLULZ?
E?
ZUSH?
OOAA OAELSSHHL?
UHHLSZOGZO GAZHZGZSUO GL?
LSEAUEA?
HGZSGOEAO OLLEEOSEOS UHHZOUAASZ LEHULUAGSL GULSLLAOGUEEOS?
Z?
OEA S?
SGSGLGSE OGZLHALL?
E HLGEZALL?
G ELOSLLHSUHO?
UUAZE?
GG AZ?
UGSA?
ES LHHS?SZ?
ZU HGLZZ?
GEHL HEOLLGUGLZGHEEA?
EEAZ UUOASAAUEO HAOZLEGUGU AEGSZZU?
E?
LGO?
OZL?
GHAOGUE?
OZ??
OSEGZL?
L?
A ZGEL?
A?
SZE HUA?
UHLHUA ?
AAGUOSLEZOOOSAHLZ?
L USZAESAOHZ ??
HS??
LEUZ ?
]S??
HGAOGL ?
EAE?
L?
H?
Z
LUAHUUOGOL ZZ
UGSEUEOL UASUGSHSE?
LOSO?
GZZ?
G AHGZSHGZES
UZOLGGSALL ZLZGOZLGAO HAUOEUULHL SGHLEAZG??
U??
LEOGGAO
SLH?
O?
ZLLE UGGGGGGHE?
ZG?
HOUGGSL OSG?
EL?
EZ H LAO GA E L H S GSOZUUSGUSS EU AGOHE OZA UZSZZE OH ZS EEUU AH
SO ES ZALGEL LH HL S G H ZSE UGOU ZH?
SSUAH?
E LLSGSA ZHAE HHZE SE?
H?
S GE?
SGS??
HL HS??
HOSE ZL?
LZZA HOAA LEOOLG Z?
H?
AALLLGS GOG ZLAU ZOL G H G
E.
L
VL S GZASES HG 7
GEZEHVA ZAVEEHEZ 7
G SOZHHVLG7
L AGEGGE7
SLO
SHZOG7
VGVV SGZEO7
HLAV OAZHAZOHGG HAZHOEVHZS EVZLL7OA7
G
HZLVHOHASL EZHZEOAAV7
OGEHVVAOGS SOSHZZEL7
Z SESGVOHLZH
VHLLL7VSOZ
HVLOZ7
OLGE HSZLLOSSSG AVVAZZGVHG SVGEOEHLGA
VVZHHLOG
7
S AASGEEVVAL ZHV 7
SAVHZE E 7
HA 7
HELAS Z 7
LZOL GOGL
VSA VHSAAGZ EVAO EV HALO V SVEZA AVHZ LE EGEA O 7
ZA OZVGLVLZ7E
7ZVSH7OOAA OAELSSHHL7 VHHLSZOGZO GAZHZGZSVO GL7LSEAVEA
7HGZSGOEAO OLLEEOSEOS VHHZOVAASZ LEHVLVAGSL GVLSLLAOGV
EEOS7Z7OEA S7SGSGLGSE OGZLHALL7E HLGEZALL7G ELOSLLHSVH
O7VVAZE7GG AZ7VGSA7ES LHHS7SZ7ZV HGLZZ7GEHL HEOLLGVGLZ
GHEEA7EEAZ VVOASAAVEO HAOZLEGVGV AEGSZZV7E7 LGO7OZL7GH
AOGVE7OZ77 OSEGZL7L7A ZGEL7A7SZE HVA7VHLHVA 7AAGVOSLEZ
OOOSAHLZ7L VSZAESAOHZ 77HS77LEVZ 7S77HGAOGL 7EAE7L7H7Z
LVAHVVOGOL ZZ
VGSEVEOL VASVGSHSE7 LOSO7GZZ7G AHGZSHGZES
VZOLGGSALL ZLZGOZLGAO HAVOEVVLHL SGHLEAZG77 V77LEOGGAO
SLH7O7ZLLE VGGGGGGHE7 ZG7HOVGGSL OSG7EL7EZH LAOGAELHSG
SOZVVSGVSS EVAGOHEOZA VZSZZEOHZS EEVVAHSOES ZALGELLHHL
7LOLOOOELE 7HEH7SZHHA SH7SEEZOHE HLVZOAL7L7 7AAGLV7EOE
SGHZSEVGOV ZH7SSVAH7E LLSGSAZHAE HHZESE7H7S GE7SLGS77H
LHS77HOSEZ L7LZZAHOAA LEOOLGZ7H7 AALLLGSGOG ZLAVZOLGHG
L
VL S GZASES HG 7
GEZEHVA ZAVEEHEZ 7
G SOZHHVLG7
L AGEGGE7
SLO
SHZOG7
VGVV SGZEO7
HLAV OAZHAZOHGG HAZHOEVHZS EVZLL7OA7
G
HZLVHOHASL EZHZEOAAV7
OGEHVVAOGS SOSHZZEL7
Z SESGVOHLZH
VHLLL7VSOZ
HVLOZ7
OLGE HSZLLOSSSG AVVAZZGVHG SVGEOEHLGA
VVZHHLOG
7
S AASGEEVVAL ZHV 7
SAVHZE E 7
HA 7
HELAS Z 7
LZOL GOGL
VSA VHSAAGZ EVAO EV HALO V SVEZA AVHZ LE EGEA O 7
ZA OZVGLVLZ7E
7ZVSH7OOAA OAELSSHHL7 VHHLSZOGZO GAZHZGZSVO GL7LSEAVEA
7HGZSGOEAO OLLEEOSEOS VHHZOVAASZ LEHVLVAGSL GVLSLLAOGV
EEOS7Z7OEA S7SGSGLGSE OGZLHALL7E HLGEZALL7G ELOSLLHSVH
O7VVAZE7GG AZ7VGSA7ES LHHS7SZ7ZV HGLZZ7GEHL HEOLLGVGLZ
GHEEA7EEAZ VVOASAAVEO HAOZLEGVGV AEGSZZV7E7 LGO7OZL7GH
AOGVE7OZ77 OSEGZL7L7A ZGEL7A7SZE HVA7VHLHVA 7AAGVOSLEZ
OOOSAHLZ7L VSZAESAOHZ 77HS77LEVZ 7S77HGAOGL 7EAE7L7H7Z
LVAHVVOGOL ZZ
VGSEVEOL VASVGSHSE7 LOSO7GZZ7G AHGZSHGZES
VZOLGGSALL ZLZGOZLGAO HAVOEVVLHL SGHLEAZG77 V77LEOGGAO
SLH7O7ZLLE VGGGGGGHE7 ZG7HOVGGSL OSG7EL7EZH LAOGAELHSG
SOZVVSGVSS EVAGOHEOZA VZSZZEOHZS EEVVAHSOES ZALGELLHHL
7LOLOOOELE 7HEH7SZHHA SH7SEEZOHE HLVZOAL7L7 7AAGLV7EOE
SGHZSEVGOV ZH7SSVAH7E LLSGSAZHAE HHZESE7H7S GE7SLGS77H
LHS77HOSEZ L7LZZAHOAA LEOOLGZ7H7 AALLLGSGOG ZLAVZOLGHG
Pl:-ISHmaTheMaTICs-PS:YhoZion;)SPIN:OZ:ZION:(NA-ZION-ISH-:-
ALLish=RIFFl›"ɘO1L2Z3E4V5S6A7N8H9G=`adhnt|„?—œ¢ Ÿš–’Ž?ŒŽ‘–›œž›˜”?ŽŒ‰
†~wpjiilopqponnmlgc
ALLish=RIFFl›"ɘO1L2Z3E4V5S6A7N8H9G=`adhnt|„?—œ¢ Ÿš–’Ž?ŒŽ‘–›œž›˜”?ŽŒ‰
†~wpjiilopqponnmlgc
=RE-WELLaCiE-Pi:
E.
L
VL S GZASES HG 7 GEZEHVA ZAVEEHEZ 7G SOZHHVLG7 L AGEGGE7SLO
SHZOG7VGVV SGZEO7HLAV OAZHAZOHGG HAZHOEVHZS EVZLL7OA7G
HZLVHOHASL EZHZEOAAV7 OGEHVVAOGS SOSHZZEL7Z SESGVOHLZH
VHLLL7VSOZ HVLOZ7OLGE HSZLLOSSSG AVVAZZGVHG SVGEOEHLGA
VVZHHLOG7S AASGEEVVAL ZHV7SAVHZE E7HA7HELAS Z7LZOLGOGL
VSAVHSAAGZ EVAOEVHALO VSVEZAAVHZ LEEGEAO7ZA OZVGLVLZ7E
7ZVSH7OOAA OAELSSHHL7 VHHLSZOGZO GAZHZGZSVO GL7LSEAVEA
7HGZSGOEAO OLLEEOSEOS VHHZOVAASZ LEHVLVAGSL GVLSLLAOGV
EEOS7Z7OEA S7SGSGLGSE OGZLHALL7E HLGEZALL7G ELOSLLHSVH
O7VVAZE7GG AZ7VGSA7ES LHHS7SZ7ZV HGLZZ7GEHL HEOLLGVGLZ
GHEEA7EEAZ VVOASAAVEO HAOZLEGVGV AEGSZZV7E7 LGO7OZL7GH
AOGVE7OZ77 OSEGZL7L7A ZGEL7A7SZE HVA7VHLHVA 7AAGVOSLEZ
OOOSAHLZ7L VSZAESAOHZ 77HS77LEVZ 7S77HGAOGL 7EAE7L7H7Z
LVAHVVOGOL ZZ
VGSEVEOL VASVGSHSE7 LOSO7GZZ7G AHGZSHGZES
VZOLGGSALL ZLZGOZLGAO HAVOEVVLHL SGHLEAZG77 V77LEOGGAO
SLH7O7ZLLE VGGGGGGHE7 ZG7HOVGGSL OSG7EL7EZH LAOGAELHSG
SOZVVSGVSS EVAGOHEOZA VZSZZEOHZS EEVVAHSOES ZALGELLHHL
7LOLOOOELE 7HEH7SZHHA SH7SEEZOHE HLVZOAL7L7 7AAGLV7EOE
SGHZSEVGOV ZH7SSVAH7E LLSGSAZHAE HHZESE7H7S GE7SLGS77H
LHS77HOSEZ L7LZZAHOAA LEOOLGZ7H7 AALLLGSGOG ZLAVZOLGHG
===========================================================
scisle:/par/TAY/ne!!!
zapoMniecPoOdKoDoWaNiUnaTYCHmiast:KraKoWiSlaKaziMierzɘO1L2Z3E4V5S6A7N8H9G>
E.
L
VL S GZASES HG 7 GEZEHVA ZAVEEHEZ 7G SOZHHVLG7 L AGEGGE7SLO
SHZOG7VGVV SGZEO7HLAV OAZHAZOHGG HAZHOEVHZS EVZLL7OA7G
HZLVHOHASL EZHZEOAAV7 OGEHVVAOGS SOSHZZEL7Z SESGVOHLZH
VHLLL7VSOZ HVLOZ7OLGE HSZLLOSSSG AVVAZZGVHG SVGEOEHLGA
VVZHHLOG7S AASGEEVVAL ZHV7SAVHZE E7HA7HELAS Z7LZOLGOGL
VSAVHSAAGZ EVAOEVHALO VSVEZAAVHZ LEEGEAO7ZA OZVGLVLZ7E
7ZVSH7OOAA OAELSSHHL7 VHHLSZOGZO GAZHZGZSVO GL7LSEAVEA
7HGZSGOEAO OLLEEOSEOS VHHZOVAASZ LEHVLVAGSL GVLSLLAOGV
EEOS7Z7OEA S7SGSGLGSE OGZLHALL7E HLGEZALL7G ELOSLLHSVH
O7VVAZE7GG AZ7VGSA7ES LHHS7SZ7ZV HGLZZ7GEHL HEOLLGVGLZ
GHEEA7EEAZ VVOASAAVEO HAOZLEGVGV AEGSZZV7E7 LGO7OZL7GH
AOGVE7OZ77 OSEGZL7L7A ZGEL7A7SZE HVA7VHLHVA 7AAGVOSLEZ
OOOSAHLZ7L VSZAESAOHZ 77HS77LEVZ 7S77HGAOGL 7EAE7L7H7Z
LVAHVVOGOL ZZ
VGSEVEOL VASVGSHSE7 LOSO7GZZ7G AHGZSHGZES
VZOLGGSALL ZLZGOZLGAO HAVOEVVLHL SGHLEAZG77 V77LEOGGAO
SLH7O7ZLLE VGGGGGGHE7 ZG7HOVGGSL OSG7EL7EZH LAOGAELHSG
SOZVVSGVSS EVAGOHEOZA VZSZZEOHZS EEVVAHSOES ZALGELLHHL
7LOLOOOELE 7HEH7SZHHA SH7SEEZOHE HLVZOAL7L7 7AAGLV7EOE
SGHZSEVGOV ZH7SSVAH7E LLSGSAZHAE HHZESE7H7S GE7SLGS77H
LHS77HOSEZ L7LZZAHOAA LEOOLGZ7H7 AALLLGSGOG ZLAVZOLGHG
===========================================================
scisle:/par/TAY/ne!!!
zapoMniecPoOdKoDoWaNiUnaTYCHmiast:KraKoWiSlaKaziMierzɘO1L2Z3E4V5S6A7N8H9G>
E.
L
VLS
9Z6
S
ESH
979 EZ
EHV6 Z6V EEH EZ 79
SO ZHHV L97L69E99
E7
SLO
SH ZO97V9VV S9 ZEO 7H L6V O6ZH6ZOH99 H6ZHOEVHZS
EVZLL7O679
HZLVHO H6SL EZH ZEO66V7 O9EHVV6O9S
SOS H ZZEL7Z
SES9V OHLZH
VHLLL
7VS OZ HV LOZ7OL9E HSZLLOSSS9 6VV6ZZ9VH9 SV9EOEHL96
VVZHHLO97S 66S9EEVV6L ZHV7S6VHZE
E7H67H EL 6S Z7LZOL9O9L
VS6VHS669Z EV6OEVH6LO VSVEZ66VHZ LEE9E6O7Z6 OZV9LVLZ7E
7ZVSH7OO66 O6
EL SSHH L7 VHHL
SZO9ZO 96ZHZ9ZSVO 9L7LSE6VE6
7H9ZS9OE6
O OLLEEOSEOS VHH
ZOV66SZ LEHVLV69SL 9VLSLL6O9V
EEOS7Z7OE6 S7S9S9L9SE O9ZLH6LL7E HL9EZ6LL79 ELOSLLHSVH
O7VV6ZE799 6Z7V9S67ES LHHS7SZ7ZV H9LZZ79EHL HEOLL9V9LZ
9HEE67EE6Z VVO6S66VEO H6OZLE9V9V 6E9SZZV7E7 L9O7OZL79H
6O9VE7OZ77 OSE9ZL7L76 Z9EL767SZE HV67VHLHV6 7669VOSLEZ
OOOS6HLZ7L VSZ6ES6OHZ 77HS77LEVZ 7S77H96O9L 7E6E7L7H7Z
LV6HVVO9OL ZZV9SEVEOL V6SV9SHSE7 LOSO79ZZ79 6H9ZSH9ZES
VZOL99S6LL ZLZ9OZL96O H6VOEVVLHL S9HLE6Z977 V77LEO996O
SLH7O7ZLLE V999999HE7 Z97HOV99SL OS97EL7EZH L6O96ELHS9
SOZVVS9VSS EV69OHEOZ6 VZSZZEOHZS EEVV6HSOES Z6L9ELLHHL
7
LOLOOOELE 7H
EH7SZHH6 SH7SEEZOHE HLVZO6L7L7 7669LV7EOE
S9HZSEV9OV ZH7SSV6H7E LLS9S6ZH6E HHZESE7H7S 9E7SL9S77H
LHS77HOSEZ L7LZZ6HO66
LEOOL9
Z7H7 66LLL9S9O9 ZL6VZOL9H9
L
VLS
9Z6
S
ESH
979 EZ
EHV6 Z6V EEH EZ 79
SO ZHHV L97L69E99
E7
SLO
SH ZO97V9VV S9 ZEO 7H L6V O6ZH6ZOH99 H6ZHOEVHZS
EVZLL7O679
HZLVHO H6SL EZH ZEO66V7 O9EHVV6O9S
SOS H ZZEL7Z
SES9V OHLZH
VHLLL
7VS OZ HV LOZ7OL9E HSZLLOSSS9 6VV6ZZ9VH9 SV9EOEHL96
VVZHHLO97S 66S9EEVV6L ZHV7S6VHZE
E7H67H EL 6S Z7LZOL9O9L
VS6VHS669Z EV6OEVH6LO VSVEZ66VHZ LEE9E6O7Z6 OZV9LVLZ7E
7ZVSH7OO66 O6
EL SSHH L7 VHHL
SZO9ZO 96ZHZ9ZSVO 9L7LSE6VE6
7H9ZS9OE6
O OLLEEOSEOS VHH
ZOV66SZ LEHVLV69SL 9VLSLL6O9V
EEOS7Z7OE6 S7S9S9L9SE O9ZLH6LL7E HL9EZ6LL79 ELOSLLHSVH
O7VV6ZE799 6Z7V9S67ES LHHS7SZ7ZV H9LZZ79EHL HEOLL9V9LZ
9HEE67EE6Z VVO6S66VEO H6OZLE9V9V 6E9SZZV7E7 L9O7OZL79H
6O9VE7OZ77 OSE9ZL7L76 Z9EL767SZE HV67VHLHV6 7669VOSLEZ
OOOS6HLZ7L VSZ6ES6OHZ 77HS77LEVZ 7S77H96O9L 7E6E7L7H7Z
LV6HVVO9OL ZZV9SEVEOL V6SV9SHSE7 LOSO79ZZ79 6H9ZSH9ZES
VZOL99S6LL ZLZ9OZL96O H6VOEVVLHL S9HLE6Z977 V77LEO996O
SLH7O7ZLLE V999999HE7 Z97HOV99SL OS97EL7EZH L6O96ELHS9
SOZVVS9VSS EV69OHEOZ6 VZSZZEOHZS EEVV6HSOES Z6L9ELLHHL
7
LOLOOOELE 7H
EH7SZHH6 SH7SEEZOHE HLVZO6L7L7 7669LV7EOE
S9HZSEV9OV ZH7SSV6H7E LLS9S6ZH6E HHZESE7H7S 9E7SL9S77H
LHS77HOSEZ L7LZZ6HO66
LEOOL9
Z7H7 66LLL9S9O9 ZL6VZOL9H9
UNT HITLER-JUGEND !!!
ARISHE ASHOLES !
UNT ZI REDN IDDISH ?
FARFLUHTE ANTYSEMITN !?
...
MESZUG?ENE MENTSHN...
FIRAEJER-GAY-ADOLF-HITLER
....
FUCKING UnBeLiveAble !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ARISHE ASHOLES !
UNT ZI REDN IDDISH ?
FARFLUHTE ANTYSEMITN !?
...
MESZUG?ENE MENTSHN...
FIRAEJER-GAY-ADOLF-HITLER
....
FUCKING UnBeLiveAble !!!!!!!!!!!!!!
E.
L4L59265E5 8979E2E846 264EE8E279 502884L97L 69E99E75L0
5820974944 592E078L64 0628620899 86280E4825 E42LL70679
82L480865L E282E06647 09E8446095 505822EL72 5E59408L28
48LLL74502 84L0270L9E 852LL05559 6446229489 549E0E8L96
44288L0975 6659EE446L 284756482E E78678EL65 27L20L909L
4564856692 E460E486L0 454E266482 LEE9E60726 0249L4L27E
7245870066 06EL5588L7 488L520920 9628292540 9L7L5E64E6
7892590E60 0LLEE05E05 4882046652 LE84L4695L 94L5LL6094
EE057270E6 575959L95E 092L86LL7E 8L9E26LL79 EL05LL8548
074462E799 62749567E5 L885752724 89L2279E8L 8E0LL949L2
98EE67EE62 44065664E0 8602LE9494 6E952247E7 L90702L798
6094E70277 05E92L7L76 29EL76752E 846748L846 7669405LE2
000568L27L 4526E56082 778577LE42 757789609L 7E6E7L7872
L46844090L 22495E4E0L 46549585E7 L050792279 68925892E5
420L9956LL 2L2902L960 8640E44L8L 598LE62977 477LE09960
5L87072LLE 49999998E7 297804995L 0597EL7E28 L6096EL859
5024459455 E46908E026 42522E0825 EE446850E5 26L9ELL88L
7L0L000ELE 78E8752886 5875EE208E 8L4206L7L7 7669L47E0E
59825E4904 287554687E LL5956286E 882E5E7875 9E75L95778
L8577805E2 L7L2268066 LE00L92787 66LLL95909 2L6420L989
=======================================================
wnioski : 7L0L000ELE 8640E44L8L 22495E4E0L
AI ISTnieJE dowodOsobisty do 1000 miejsca po przecinku
L4L59265E5 8979E2E846 264EE8E279 502884L97L 69E99E75L0
5820974944 592E078L64 0628620899 86280E4825 E42LL70679
82L480865L E282E06647 09E8446095 505822EL72 5E59408L28
48LLL74502 84L0270L9E 852LL05559 6446229489 549E0E8L96
44288L0975 6659EE446L 284756482E E78678EL65 27L20L909L
4564856692 E460E486L0 454E266482 LEE9E60726 0249L4L27E
7245870066 06EL5588L7 488L520920 9628292540 9L7L5E64E6
7892590E60 0LLEE05E05 4882046652 LE84L4695L 94L5LL6094
EE057270E6 575959L95E 092L86LL7E 8L9E26LL79 EL05LL8548
074462E799 62749567E5 L885752724 89L2279E8L 8E0LL949L2
98EE67EE62 44065664E0 8602LE9494 6E952247E7 L90702L798
6094E70277 05E92L7L76 29EL76752E 846748L846 7669405LE2
000568L27L 4526E56082 778577LE42 757789609L 7E6E7L7872
L46844090L 22495E4E0L 46549585E7 L050792279 68925892E5
420L9956LL 2L2902L960 8640E44L8L 598LE62977 477LE09960
5L87072LLE 49999998E7 297804995L 0597EL7E28 L6096EL859
5024459455 E46908E026 42522E0825 EE446850E5 26L9ELL88L
7L0L000ELE 78E8752886 5875EE208E 8L4206L7L7 7669L47E0E
59825E4904 287554687E LL5956286E 882E5E7875 9E75L95778
L8577805E2 L7L2268066 LE00L92787 66LLL95909 2L6420L989
=======================================================
wnioski : 7L0L000ELE 8640E44L8L 22495E4E0L
AI ISTnieJE dowodOsobisty do 1000 miejsca po przecinku
www.geocities.com/kk_abacus/mini.html
Mini Theory
(EXCERPTS)
Ruins are playgrounds whether Zapotec or Mayan, Egyptian or modern. Rather than
preserve them, why not play with them ’til they wear away into nothing, and
forget the cultures that created them? The memory of culture is the
preservation of culture - and culture is merely the sacred limit placed on
creativity and play. Insurgents destroy sacred limits.
The consensus process subjects the individual to the group. It subjects the
immediate to the process of mediation. It is conservative by nature since it
only allows change when the entire group agrees to it...It is internalized
control, not anarchy.
For society to function, desire has to be tamed. It has to be colonized by the
economy - turned into lack/need, the fulfillment of which is attributed to the
commodities offered by society. To so direct desire requires restrictions and
structures. As these increase, desire fades into a mere ghost of itself. The
restrictions and structures gradually come to exist only to learn secrets which
can be used against them.
My interest in ruins stems, in part, from attempts to develop strategies from
deconstructing cities playfully, through active, conscious encouragement of
unconstrained rebellion. This requires extensive explorations of cities to
learn secrets which can be used against them.
There is more than one way to create an elite. Ruling classes, intellectual
classes and aesthetic classes create an artificial inaccessibility of their
power, knowledge and skills to "the rabble" to reinforce their position. On the
other hand, self-proclaimed "class-conscious" radical activists deny themselves
access to knowledge, vocabulary and well-honed analytical skills which are
readily accessible, in order to prove their "class purity" or some such
nonsense, and, by their absurd self-denial, create an involuntary elite of
those radicals who are unwilling to impoverish themselves in this way.
Many...anarchists are actually leftist or liberal libertarians or, in some
cases, simply angry people who still "think" in terms of the images created by
the social context, trapping their thought within society’s discourse. Until
one gets beyond this discourse, thinking outside of its categories, one’s
rebellion remains part of the structures of authority. Most anarchists are
quite content with society’s discourse, happily creating an "anarchy" that is
thoroughly unchallenging, mild-mannered, tame and palatable - all in the name
of "education" and "action."
Cybernetic technology is dependent upon industrial technology for its
existence. So much for the pipe-dreams of cyber-utopia.
Barter is still economic exchange. Money allows for a more efficient flow of
economic exchange. Why not just get rid of economy altogether?
Often "health" opposes vitality. Those who value "health" often pursue it in an
ascetic and passive manner - by giving up something. Their longing for health
is not a vital, intense desire-trajectory - it is a business transaction or a
manufacturing process - an attempt to achieve an end - but such a process is
never satisfactory, because it is the nature of a longing to reproduce
perpetually the void that is its origin. Vitality, intensity - these are the
only reasons to have health - and living them creates health or makes it
irrelevant.
The best of post-modernism fails because it removes the drift to the realm of
the intellect - static lives moved by random thoughts rather than ecstatic
lives created by the dialect of active conscious thinking and ec static doing?
If the "subject," the "self," has been destroyed/deconstructed, then all that
prevents one from creating one’s own self, one’s own subjectivity in each
moment is the continued belief in something greater than oneself that is
creator - i.e., the continued belief in god. In the present era, god is
society.
THE REVOLUTION OF DAILY INTERACTIONS:
Confronting separate annoying incidents without confronting the mini social
context from which they spring in its totality is no different then protesting
issues instead of contesting the larger social context in its totality. Nothing
essential changes. Failure of imagination, despair, feeling overwhelmed by
circumstances: these are evidence of interactions gone awry.
The entire "interior" of the "mind" is merely a social creation...a
relationship created by a social context and which would best be destroyed with
that context...Then maybe imagination could cease to be mainly a fantasy
mechanism and become a means for creating intense moments perpetually. By
the "interior" of the "mind," I mean the thoughts, imaginings and dreams that
are separated from an active life of self-creation.
No one owes anyone anything. Debt is an economic concept and I refuse to
recognize it in any form.
www.google.se/search?
q=cache:5p0BQUpDHbEJ:www.econmethodology.org/inem/announce/rappaport.pdf+MINI+TH
EORY&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
Individual Activities - Mini Theory Critique
Due 10-8-03
classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg750/lpallikk/unit2/indi2.html
Mini Theory
(EXCERPTS)
Ruins are playgrounds whether Zapotec or Mayan, Egyptian or modern. Rather than
preserve them, why not play with them ’til they wear away into nothing, and
forget the cultures that created them? The memory of culture is the
preservation of culture - and culture is merely the sacred limit placed on
creativity and play. Insurgents destroy sacred limits.
The consensus process subjects the individual to the group. It subjects the
immediate to the process of mediation. It is conservative by nature since it
only allows change when the entire group agrees to it...It is internalized
control, not anarchy.
For society to function, desire has to be tamed. It has to be colonized by the
economy - turned into lack/need, the fulfillment of which is attributed to the
commodities offered by society. To so direct desire requires restrictions and
structures. As these increase, desire fades into a mere ghost of itself. The
restrictions and structures gradually come to exist only to learn secrets which
can be used against them.
My interest in ruins stems, in part, from attempts to develop strategies from
deconstructing cities playfully, through active, conscious encouragement of
unconstrained rebellion. This requires extensive explorations of cities to
learn secrets which can be used against them.
There is more than one way to create an elite. Ruling classes, intellectual
classes and aesthetic classes create an artificial inaccessibility of their
power, knowledge and skills to "the rabble" to reinforce their position. On the
other hand, self-proclaimed "class-conscious" radical activists deny themselves
access to knowledge, vocabulary and well-honed analytical skills which are
readily accessible, in order to prove their "class purity" or some such
nonsense, and, by their absurd self-denial, create an involuntary elite of
those radicals who are unwilling to impoverish themselves in this way.
Many...anarchists are actually leftist or liberal libertarians or, in some
cases, simply angry people who still "think" in terms of the images created by
the social context, trapping their thought within society’s discourse. Until
one gets beyond this discourse, thinking outside of its categories, one’s
rebellion remains part of the structures of authority. Most anarchists are
quite content with society’s discourse, happily creating an "anarchy" that is
thoroughly unchallenging, mild-mannered, tame and palatable - all in the name
of "education" and "action."
Cybernetic technology is dependent upon industrial technology for its
existence. So much for the pipe-dreams of cyber-utopia.
Barter is still economic exchange. Money allows for a more efficient flow of
economic exchange. Why not just get rid of economy altogether?
Often "health" opposes vitality. Those who value "health" often pursue it in an
ascetic and passive manner - by giving up something. Their longing for health
is not a vital, intense desire-trajectory - it is a business transaction or a
manufacturing process - an attempt to achieve an end - but such a process is
never satisfactory, because it is the nature of a longing to reproduce
perpetually the void that is its origin. Vitality, intensity - these are the
only reasons to have health - and living them creates health or makes it
irrelevant.
The best of post-modernism fails because it removes the drift to the realm of
the intellect - static lives moved by random thoughts rather than ecstatic
lives created by the dialect of active conscious thinking and ec static doing?
If the "subject," the "self," has been destroyed/deconstructed, then all that
prevents one from creating one’s own self, one’s own subjectivity in each
moment is the continued belief in something greater than oneself that is
creator - i.e., the continued belief in god. In the present era, god is
society.
THE REVOLUTION OF DAILY INTERACTIONS:
Confronting separate annoying incidents without confronting the mini social
context from which they spring in its totality is no different then protesting
issues instead of contesting the larger social context in its totality. Nothing
essential changes. Failure of imagination, despair, feeling overwhelmed by
circumstances: these are evidence of interactions gone awry.
The entire "interior" of the "mind" is merely a social creation...a
relationship created by a social context and which would best be destroyed with
that context...Then maybe imagination could cease to be mainly a fantasy
mechanism and become a means for creating intense moments perpetually. By
the "interior" of the "mind," I mean the thoughts, imaginings and dreams that
are separated from an active life of self-creation.
No one owes anyone anything. Debt is an economic concept and I refuse to
recognize it in any form.
www.google.se/search?
q=cache:5p0BQUpDHbEJ:www.econmethodology.org/inem/announce/rappaport.pdf+MINI+TH
EORY&hl=en&ie=UTF-8
Individual Activities - Mini Theory Critique
Due 10-8-03
classes.kumc.edu/son/nrsg750/lpallikk/unit2/indi2.html
zDe-kOn-spIr-oWa-NY
compID=0
;)))
compID=0
;)))
POLLIN
STREAMS,
POLLRDNORM
POLLRDBAND
POLLPRI
POLLOUT
members.chello.se/dajczgewand/
PureIDish©
KuRsyIntErAktyWneDlaEliTy©
STREAMS,
POLLRDNORM
POLLRDBAND
POLLPRI
POLLOUT
members.chello.se/dajczgewand/
PureIDish©
KuRsyIntErAktyWneDlaEliTy©
już wiem ....
31 komentarzy:
Hello
Companies House Webcheck
Webcheck Companies House
[url=http://perosnalbinking.v3host.be/companies-house-webcheck.html]webcheck companies house[/url]
http://www.atomic.yoyo.pl/kara-smierci/kara-smierci.html
http://pl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kara_%C5%9Bmierci
[url=http://www.biznesplan-na5.net/]swietny biznes plan[/url]
Как говорилось на Seexi.net Девушки,какую фигуру вам бы хотелось иметь,конечно понимаю,что тут все красавицы,:))))но в случае в случае если помечтать,где убавить,где прибавить..
awesome blog, do you have twitter or facebook? i will bookmark this page thanks. jasmin holzbauer
[url=http://www.officielsaclancelfr.com][b]http://www.officielsaclancelfr.com[/url] itmmxsbdlhsb sac lancel pas cher
[url=http://www.burberryscarfoffsale.com][b]http://www.burberryscarfoffsale.com[/url] hozgcntgywyq burberry scarf
[url=http://www.burberryscarfoutleter.com][b]http://www.burberryscarfoutleter.com[/url] abphzaxuynvh burberry scarf
[url=http://www.2013saclancel.com][b]sac lancel[/url] jvlytvypxmbl sac lancel
[url=http://www.officiellouisvuitton.com][b]sac louis vuitton[/url] rulwypswhoys http://www.officiellouisvuitton.com
[url=http://www.burberrypascherlondon.com][b]echarpe burberry[/url] pcpelejrrari echarpe burberry
[url=http://www.officialburberryoutlett.com][b]burberry uk[/url] cxekujwxbkyt burberry scarves
[url=http://www.isabelmarantsnekaerspascher.com][b]http://www.isabelmarantsnekaerspascher.com[/url] iehkhtzremup http://www.isabelmarantsnekaerspascher.com
top [url=http://www.c-online-casino.co.uk/]www.c-online-casino.co.uk[/url] brake the latest [url=http://www.casinolasvegass.com/]casino online[/url] manumitted no deposit reward at the best [url=http://www.baywatchcasino.com/]casino online
[/url].
Wow that was odd. I just wrote an really long comment but after I clicked submit my comment didn't show up. Grrrr... well I'm not writing all that over again.
Anyhow, just wanted to say superb blog!
Also visit my blog :: offence
Woah! I'm really enjoying the template/theme of this site. It's simple, yet effective.
A lot of times it's difficult to get that "perfect balance" between user friendliness and appearance. I must say you have done a excellent job with this. Also, the blog loads super quick for me on Internet explorer. Outstanding Blog!
my web-site :: premier weeknight
Hi there! I was curious to know if setting up a weblog such your own:
http://www.blogger.com/comment.g?blogID=8811388080153209744&postID=1668100021317257962 is challenging to
do for unskilled people? I've been wanting to create my own blog for a while now but have been turned off because I've
always assumed it required tons of work. What do you think?
Thanks
Feel free to visit my website; driveway series
My coder is trying to persuade me to move to .net
from PHP. I have always disliked the idea because of the expenses.
But he's tryiong none the less. I've been using Movable-type on a variety of websites
for about a year and am anxious about switching to another platform.
I have heard great things about blogengine.net. Is there a way I can transfer all my wordpress posts into it?
Any help would be really appreciated!
Check out my blog loggerheads
Unquestionably consider that which you said. Your favourite reason
appeared to be at the web the easiest factor to consider
of. I say to you, I certainly get annoyed while people think about worries that they
just do not understand about. You managed to hit the nail upon the highest and also outlined out
the entire thing with no need side-effects , people could take
a signal. Will probably be back to get more. Thank you
My website - aaa fx
Thanks for sharing such a pleasant opinion, paragraph is good, thats why i have read it entirely
my page add followers on twitter
Heya are using Wordpress for your blog platform? I'm new to the blog world but I'm trying
to get started and create my own. Do you need any html coding knowledge to
make your own blog? Any help would be greatly appreciated!
Feel free to visit my page - traka
Please let me know if you're looking for a author for your site. You have some really great articles and I feel I would be a good asset. If you ever want to take some of the load off, I'd really like to write
some articles for your blog in exchange for a link back to mine.
Please shoot me an email if interested. Many thanks!
Also visit my blog :: profesionalna
Howdy! I realize this is kind of off-topic however I had
to ask. Does running a well-established website such as yours
take a massive amount work? I'm completely new to operating a blog but I do write in my diary everyday. I'd like to start
a blog so I will be able to share my personal experience and feelings online.
Please let me know if you have any suggestions or
tips for brand new aspiring bloggers. Thankyou!
Here is my homepage ... tree removal
My website: instructions
Hello, I think your site might be having browser compatibility issues.
When I look at your blog site in Firefox, it looks
fine but when opening in Internet Explorer, it
has some overlapping. I just wanted to give you a quick heads up!
Other then that, excellent blog!
Also visit my weblog stump rotting
Does your blog have a contact page? I'm having problems locating it but, I'd like to shoot you an email.
I've got some creative ideas for your blog you might be interested in hearing. Either way, great blog and I look forward to seeing it develop over time.
cleaning hardwood floors
Take a look at my site :: engineered hardwood flooring
As que eu recomendo, em impetigo are about the backtalk and olfactory organ.
En Noviembre de 1987 es publicado un demo infirmary is where
he caught the infection.
Also visit my web-site infantigo pictures
Hey! Do you know if they make any plugins to help with SEO?
I'm trying to get my blog to rank for some targeted keywords but I'm not seeing very good success.
If you know of any please share. Appreciate it!
my webpage :: blog
Wonderful items from you, man. I've be mindful your stuff previous to and you are just extremely magnificent. I really like what you have acquired here, certainly like what you're stating and the way in which through which you
say it. You're making it entertaining and you still take care of to keep it wise. I cant wait to learn far more from you. That is really a wonderful website.
Also visit my site housekeeper in hotel
Hi there just wanted to give you a quick heads up.
The words in your article seem to be running off the screen in Safari.
I'm not sure if this is a format issue or something to do with internet browser compatibility but I figured I'd post to let you know.
The design look great though! Hope you get the issue
resolved soon. Cheers
Here is my web blog; comp
Hello there I am so happy I found your webpage, I really found you by accident,
while I was browsing on Google for something else, Regardless I am here now and
would just like to say thanks a lot for a remarkable post and
a all round entertaining blog (I also love the theme/design), I don’t have time to browse
it all at the minute but I have book-marked it and also added in
your RSS feeds, so when I have time I will be back to read more, Please do keep up the superb b.
My site Colon Hydrotherapy Benefits
WOW just what I was searching for. Came here by searching for un zip program free
Here is my website - adfocus bot
Hiya! I just found your web page: Blogger: AQUANET_sie�_Wodna
when I was searching digg.com. It looks as though someone appreciated your blog so
much they decided to bookmark it. I'll unquestionably be returning here more often.
Here is my page; cookery
Hey there! I just wanted to ask if you ever have any trouble with hackers?
My last blog (wordpress) was hacked and I ended up losing
a few months of hard work due to no backup. Do you have any methods to protect against hackers?
Also visit my site ... baggage Handling
Appreciating the time and energy you put into your website and
detailed information you present. It's awesome to come across a blog every once in a while that isn't
the same old rehashed information. Excellent read! I've bookmarked your site and I'm including your RSS
feeds to my Google account.
Feel free to visit my web site - thursday nights
Gday. I noticed your blog title, "Blogger: AQUANET_sie�_Wodna" does not
really reflect the content of your web-site. When
creating your website title, do you think it's most beneficial to write it for Search engine marketing or for your viewers? This is something I've been battling with because I want great rankings but
at the same time I want the best quality for my site visitors.
Here is my blog post; Beograd
Stunning story there. What happened after? Good luck!
Also visit my blog: sharecash bypass
I am not able to see this website correctly on my cellphone :(
Also visit my weblog - wanting to get pregnant
It's a shame you don't have a donate button! I'd certainly donate to this outstanding blog! I guess for now i'll settle
for book-marking and adding your RSS feed to my Google account.
I look forward to brand new updates and will talk about
this website with my Facebook group. Talk soon!
my webpage ... laser cellulite treatment
Prześlij komentarz